Huldah was also a prophetess. But we cannot use two exceptional women as basis for how all women should be treated. Furthermore these two women did not lay down basic doctrines. If we apply it only to the Corinthian church then we raise the problem that no Scripture can be seen as generally applicable unless the same teaching is contained in a number of epistles. To my mind this is dangerous.. The same argument is used by homosexuals concerning Rom 1.25 ff.
In my view Paul was forbidding overall authority to women, especially at a time when there was no New Testament due to their tendency to be more easily misled because of the way a woman's brain works. Eve was deceived. Adam was not..[/QUOTE]
You do realize your own argument argues against you right? And, as for how a woman's brain works vs. how a man's brain works...........well, I'll leave that to those who will be offended by such a sexist remark. Hopefully, the Blond will not venture past this thread, I fear she could have some rather interesting thoughts to convey.
In my view Paul was forbidding overall authority to women, especially at a time when there was no New Testament due to their tendency to be more easily misled because of the way a woman's brain works. Eve was deceived. Adam was not..[/QUOTE]
You do realize your own argument argues against you right? And, as for how a woman's brain works vs. how a man's brain works...........well, I'll leave that to those who will be offended by such a sexist remark. Hopefully, the Blond will not venture past this thread, I fear she could have some rather interesting thoughts to convey.