[FONT="]Some personal comments about being "saved" Was Job born saved? No.
Was Job saved? Not at the beginning of the book of Job.
Did Job even hear about the coming Savior and how much did Job know about God's love? I don't know.
Did Job understand more at the end of the book of Job? Yes.
I believe Job was brought into the truth by the end of the book and God revealed Himself to Job. But in the beginning I believe Job didn't have the truth about who God was and how God dealt with people.
Some helpful comments from 2 guys on the article about Job;
I so wish tradition would actually use James 5 to interpret Job. What they do instead is look at the oldest book in the Bible, see a man who had no Word of God to rely upon for true info, he had no revealed covenant with God like Abraham did or Noah, he had no knowledge of who God is, he didn’t know the devil existed.
he didn’t know God isn’t the one who brings tragedy and pain and neither did his friends including the young man, and yet with their limited understanding of God, religious tradition holds Job up as an example of theological truth. They insist upon using Job as an example of how God deals with His Family, post cross.
What the New Covenant admonition is, is to look at the end of the Lord as James states and see that God is full of tender mercies and compassion. We’re not told to look at Job’s suffering, the debate between the five people, but only to see the compassion and goodness of God.
[/FONT]
Was Job saved? Not at the beginning of the book of Job.
Did Job even hear about the coming Savior and how much did Job know about God's love? I don't know.
Did Job understand more at the end of the book of Job? Yes.
I believe Job was brought into the truth by the end of the book and God revealed Himself to Job. But in the beginning I believe Job didn't have the truth about who God was and how God dealt with people.
Some helpful comments from 2 guys on the article about Job;
I so wish tradition would actually use James 5 to interpret Job. What they do instead is look at the oldest book in the Bible, see a man who had no Word of God to rely upon for true info, he had no revealed covenant with God like Abraham did or Noah, he had no knowledge of who God is, he didn’t know the devil existed.
he didn’t know God isn’t the one who brings tragedy and pain and neither did his friends including the young man, and yet with their limited understanding of God, religious tradition holds Job up as an example of theological truth. They insist upon using Job as an example of how God deals with His Family, post cross.
What the New Covenant admonition is, is to look at the end of the Lord as James states and see that God is full of tender mercies and compassion. We’re not told to look at Job’s suffering, the debate between the five people, but only to see the compassion and goodness of God.
[/FONT]
For me, Understanding that Job was an example(for us) of a man without a covenant changed how I saw God’s progressive plan to save us.
If Abraham was the subject of Satan’s attention (accusation)the story would read
“Get out of my face Satan, I curse you. Of coarse he is blessed, he has a covenant and he has Faith in the “One God” to complete the terms of that covenant”. And then, very very shortly after those words, a distinct absence of the accuser.
Tradition loses the point of the story when they mold Job to fit their theology.