What of the dinosaurs?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 30, 2014
2,329
102
0
why is it that people can believe in god who they cant see and cant believe in something else that they have seen evidence of?
im not athiest i just dont understand god or why someone i never met would die for me that be like saying if u walked into a bank and they was 10 people in there besides the guys robbing the bank and they say 5 people can leave, r u gunna say to the robbers, Hey pick me to stay?
No, I'm going to dial 911 if I can.. And if need be die trying to save everyone. I guess I don't think logically.
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
Evolution is not a state of continuous change. Evolution is adapting to your environment.

There are insects who live in caves and have done so for 400 million years or so and they haven't changed at all. Because they've been in the same environment the whole time. There's nothing to adapt to.
 
Sep 30, 2014
2,329
102
0
Evolution is not a state of continuous change. Evolution is adapting to your environment.

There are insects who live in caves and have done so for 6000 years or so and they haven't changed at all. Because they've been in the same environment the whole time. There's nothing to adapt to.
Fixed it for ya :). No really, the fish didn't have to keep up with these adaptations? Why did he not have to in the million year mark? Why didn't the fish turn in to a whale over the million years, I'm sure the fish wants to be big and strong as a whale ? Are you saying the fish reached it's pinnacle perfection that it already was ? Why did we change from monkeys ? Were the monkeys not happy with who they were? If they had to adapt to the environment, why lose hair, I would've added like a protective layer of fish scales, why would soft flesh, in cold winters be more adaptive?
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
Fixed it for ya :). No really, the fish didn't have to keep up with these adaptations? Why did he not have to in the million year mark? Why didn't the fish turn in to a whale over the million years, I'm sure the fish wants to be big and strong as a whale ? Are you saying the fish reached it's pinnacle perfection that it already was ? Why did we change from monkeys ? Were the monkeys not happy with who they were? If they had to adapt to the environment, why lose hair, I would've added like a protective layer of fish scales, why would soft flesh, in cold winters be more adaptive?
Its not about reaching a pinnacle of perfection or turning into whale.

I'll tell you what, go and read up about what evolution actually is and then we will continue the discussion.
 
Sep 30, 2014
2,329
102
0
Its not about reaching a pinnacle of perfection or turning into whale.

I'll tell you what, go and read up about what evolution actually is and then we will continue the discussion.
Ok, let me put it like this... When did we become man again, how many million years? Since you don't want to give me the run down on " evolving "
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
Ok, let me put it like this... When did we become man again, how many million years? Since you don't want to give me the run down on " evolving "
"When did we become man again, how many million years?"

Brainfreeze, I don't understand your question.
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
Fixed it for ya :). No really, the fish didn't have to keep up with these adaptations? Why did he not have to in the million year mark? Why didn't the fish turn in to a whale over the million years, I'm sure the fish wants to be big and strong as a whale ? Are you saying the fish reached it's pinnacle perfection that it already was ? Why did we change from monkeys ? Were the monkeys not happy with who they were? If they had to adapt to the environment, why lose hair, I would've added like a protective layer of fish scales, why would soft flesh, in cold winters be more adaptive?
You do ask some interesting questions here, a few of which have been posed and answered by evolutionary biologists. Other questions you've posed are phrased the wrong way and show you are not familiar with evolutionary research.

Below is one of the largest fish, the whale shark. So maybe some fish are evolving along a similar path to whales.



I am out of time till this evening. Have a good day.
 
Oct 15, 2014
149
1
0
Look up the dreadnaughtus . Its a new dinosaur . It fits the description in Job ( the behemoth ) really well. ( not evolution; and not jobs time ) as God is going over a list of His creation. There has been a bigger one found, but not as compete as dreadnaughtus .

God's creation,

Dreadnoughtus: A New Dinosaur Discovery - YouTube

[video=youtube_share;jyoTwDfXZ6c]http://youtu.be/jyoTwDfXZ6c[/video]
 
Last edited:
Oct 15, 2014
149
1
0
Job 40:15-24 (KJV)

[SUP]15 [/SUP]Behold now behemoth , which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.

( a behemoth means large quadruped land animal , has a synonym with Dreadnaught )

[SUP]16 [/SUP]Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly.
[SUP]17 [/SUP]He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.

[SUP]18[/SUP]His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron.

[SUP]19 [/SUP]He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him.
[SUP]20 [/SUP]Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.

[SUP]21 [/SUP]He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens.

[SUP]22 [/SUP]The shady trees cover him with their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about.

[SUP]23 [/SUP]Behold, he drinketh up a river, and hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth.
[SUP]
24 [/SUP]He taketh it with his eyes: his nose pierceth through snares.






 
Last edited:
O

oldernotwiser

Guest
LOL! Thank you. I had forgotten. :)
and down here in abners butt alabama we got some trained back to be vegetabletarians and got them running down kudzu
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
Look up the dreadnaughtus . Its a new dinosaur . It fits the description in Job ( the behemoth ) really well. ( not evolution; and not jobs time ) as God is going over a list of His creation. There has been a bigger one found, but not as compete as dreadnaughtus .

God's creation,

Dreadnoughtus: A New Dinosaur Discovery - YouTube

[video=youtube_share;jyoTwDfXZ6c]http://youtu.be/jyoTwDfXZ6c[/video]
I'd hardly call that dinosaur "new" since it lived 77 million years ago, according what the scientist in the video reported in a scientific journal.

Dreadnoughtus weighed 65 tons and was 85 feet long. Bigger than a Boeing 737. In the video the scientist says: "it is equivalent to a dozen giant elephants squished into one body."

You quote Job 40 in your other post. With respect to "The shady trees cover him with their shadow" of verse 22, what sort of trees are this that would provide this massive creature with shade?
 
Oct 15, 2014
149
1
0
I'd hardly call that dinosaur "new" since it lived 77 million years ago, according what the scientist in the video reported in a scientific journal.

Dreadnoughtus weighed 65 tons and was 85 feet long. Bigger than a Boeing 737. In the video the scientist says: "it is equivalent to a dozen giant elephants squished into one body."

You quote Job 40 in your other post. With respect to "The shady trees cover him with their shadow" of verse 22, what sort of trees are this that would provide this massive creature with shade?
A willow would do. Cedars would be more then enough, as they would tower far above it.And If its laying down;; most trees would likely have no problem providing shade .
 
Last edited:
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
I'd hardly call that dinosaur "new" since it lived 77 million years ago, according what the scientist in the video reported in a scientific journal.

Dreadnoughtus weighed 65 tons and was 85 feet long. Bigger than a Boeing 737. In the video the scientist says: "it is equivalent to a dozen giant elephants squished into one body."

You quote Job 40 in your other post. With respect to "The shady trees cover him with their shadow" of verse 22, what sort of trees are this that would provide this massive creature with shade?
The amount of times I've walked through the park and 85 foot long creature attacked me because i couldn't see it due to it hiding behind a tree.

This is a real threat Jack

Run fast... Run far
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
A willow would do. Cedars would be more then enough, as they would tower far above it.And If its laying down;; most trees would likely have no problem providing shade .
Job 40:21 is referring to a lotus, isn't it?
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
The amount of times I've walked through the park and 85 foot long creature attacked me because i couldn't see it due to it hiding behind a tree.

This is a real threat Jack

Run fast... Run far
One individual in this thread said he would much rather deal with a bear than a T. rex.

What sort of weaponry do you hunt T. rex with?

I mean, I have some weapons that could possibly stop a bear, but I dunno about T. rex.

Incidentally, you can not hunt with semi-automatic weapon in the state where I live.
 
May 15, 2013
4,307
27
0
I have difficulty calling it "walking" when body parts other than legs and feet are used for moving about. People with no legs can move about on the ground, but I don't call it walking.

I can see, however, how you could mistake a mudskipper for a mermaid (see pic below), even though mudskippers are usually around six inches long. Just as you got confused about lions and sauropods.
Attached Images
Well, if you were on a deserted Island for a long period of time, and the only thing that's around was a mudskipper, that mudskipper will be evolving into a woman in your mind. So, this is the only evidence that you have that show that a fish evolving into a man (woman)?

 
Oct 15, 2014
149
1
0
Job 40:21 is referring to a lotus, isn't it?
yes it can be lotus . Marsh is also mentioned, so it could have been in swamp lands going from the other words like fens.
 
Last edited:
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
Well, if you were on a deserted Island for a long period of time, and the only thing that's around was a mudskipper, that mudskipper will be evolving into a woman in your mind. So, this is the only evidence that you have that show that a fish evolving into a man (woman)?

Maybe this is the evasive missing link lol
 
Nov 3, 2014
1,045
5
0
Response to the OP

Briefly ....

The dinosaurs existed on the earth between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2

The Lord judged the pre-Adamite earth because of Satan's rebellion against Him which occurred long before humans were created on a reconditioned Earth about 6000 years ago

The Lord's judgment was severe and the earth required changing to be suitable for human habitation

If you look at all the other planets in the earth's solar system your can see the results of the Lord's fierce anger and devastation .... notice that none of them provide environments for any life forms including humans

However, the earth is very different today because the Lord recently changed the planet for human habitation along with new life forms created after their kind

So the earth was without form and void, and darkness prevailed in the universe in the aftermath of the Lord's punishment against Satan and his fallen angels

The theory of Evolution is false and the human way of attempting to deny the existence of God

The biblical account of creation is true and makes perfect sense

There is much more to say about this subject from a biblical perspective

If you have further questions I will help you with your witness to substantiate the truth about the Lord's creation, past, present, and future .... His revelation is very convincing and it does fit perfectly with archaeological discoveries
 
Last edited: