What really were the gift of tongues? Acts.. and Corinthians...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#61
Mark 11:3

Truly I tell you, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in their heart but believes that what they say will happen, it will be done for them.

Matthew 12:21

Jesus replied, "Truly I tell you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and it will be done.

You are not going to move mountains with your faith.
Roger
And that, my friend, tells us all we need to know about your understanding of Gods Word and Spiritual things.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,090
1,751
113
#62
Given the many times this has been explained and still you do not get it indicates it's not a matter of intellect but will.

I think it has more to do with the fact that you are an eisegete. Of course, other people aren't going to be able to guess what things that are not actually in a Bible passage that aren't really there unless they can read your mind or have some supernatural help.

Pretty bold to place yourself on the same level as Elijah. First problem to over come will be that you are not an Israelite.
When I read this, I think is Roger really that dense? Or is he so intent on getting a rhetorical jab in that he doesn't care about what other posters say or what the Bible teaches? I didn't say anything about being on the same 'level' as Elijah.

The Bible tells us that Elijah was a man subject to like passions as we are. Maybe the audience of the book of James was Jewish, but the book is also written for our learning. Gentiles experience emotions just like Jews do.

The point of all my examples that God used frail human beings with all kinds of weaknesses in power. It had nothing to do with who was at what 'level.' Do you think God gave spiritual gifts to people because they reached a certain 'level' or out of grace and to accomplish his own purposes? If you think it is about reaching some level of worthiness or spirituality, I really suggest you read the Bible on this issue. I also mentioned believers in the church at Corinth. Don't you believe some believers today are at the same level as some of the believers in Corinth who were operating in spiritual gifts?

The paragraph you responded to was to correct this error in your thinking, this unbiblical error, that gifts and power are only for people who reach a certain 'level.' The examples I gave from the Bible didn't immediately change your thinking. I'd encourage you to study and meditate on this issue. Charisma (gift) and 'charismata' (gifts) are related to the word 'grace.' I've heard 'charisma' loosely translated as 'gracelet.' Do you think grace is earned? Do you think you have to get at a certain 'level' before you can have grace? Why would Paul call them charismata if a believer had to arrive at a certain 'level' to operate in a gift?

Charismata are not earned.

Different from Paul or different from you?
Different from Paul. Paul's application of the Isaiah passage is this.

[SUP]22 [/SUP]Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.

Jewish unbelievers are included in 'them that believe not.' But so are Gentile unbelievers.

Tongues throughout the bible are a sign of impending judgment toward Israel. The church is not judged but Israel is yet to be judged. Christians are passed from judgment unto eternal life. Just how is this profitable for Christ? You need to seek a better more biblical understanding.
The same would go for you. Without the proper foundation you cannot build any profitable thing.
If you think tongues and interpretation are not profitable for the church, then you have a problem with the Bible. Maybe you need to actually sit down and read I Corinthians 12-14. If you don't get it, we can pray that your blinders be taken off. It would be good for you to pray that. If you just read chapter 14, you can see that if tongues are interpreted, they edify the assembly. Without interpretation, tongues only edifies the speaker. Is that bad? No, but it doesn't build up the assembly. The one who speaks in tongues is to keep silent in the church if there is no interpreter. But does that mean he is totally forbidden from speaking in tongues without an interpreter? No, he is allowed to 'speak to himself and to God' (I Cor. 14:28.)
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#63
eisegesis


noun eis·ege·sis \ˌī-sə-ˈjē-səs, ˈī-sə-ˌ\

plural eis·ege·ses\-ˌsēz\

Definition of EISEGESIS

: the interpretation of a text (as of the Bible) by reading into it one's own ideas



(From Websters dictionary)

Sound like he's got your number Rog
 

wattie

Senior Member
Feb 24, 2009
3,044
1,028
113
New Zealand
#64
Okay well.. aside from the pie throwing back and forward :)

In 1 Corinthians 12-14

There is obviously tongues being encouraged to be used in order and decency for edifying the local church.

So there mostly likely is more to tongues that what was going in Acts..

It is curious though why it would be any different from Acts. Acts 2 is without any pagan or gnosticism influence.. its the clearest example..

So why would it be different to the church at Corinth?

Maybe it did have a purpose for edifying believers in a church also as prophecy does. As long as it is interpreted for the congregation to understand.

So why is said to be not for them that believe.. but them that believe not?

Hmmmm... further thoughts me thinks..
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,090
1,751
113
#65
It is curious though why it would be any different from Acts. Acts 2 is without any pagan or gnosticism influence.. its the clearest example..
There is no reason from the context to think that Paul was addressing or hinting at pagan influence in the Corinthian exercise of tongues or prophecy. He exhorts them not to be childish in their thinking, but to be men. They were childish in how they viewed the role of gifts, perhaps. But Paul does not blame their lack of order on paganism.

Maybe it did have a purpose for edifying believers in a church also as prophecy does. As long as it is interpreted for the congregation to understand.
This is very clearly and explicitly taught in I Corinthians 14.

So why is said to be not for them that believe.. but them that believe not?
The passage teaches that tongues is A SIGN not for them that believe, but for them that believe not. He doesn't say that tongues is only for them that believe not. He said that tongues is A SIGN for them that believe not. The sign is 'and yet for all that ye will not hear Me' being fulfilled when unbelievers hear speaking in tongues.


Tongues are among the gifts given FOR believers in I Corinthians 12, given to members of the body of Christ 'to profit withal.' Tongues are for believers, but they are a sign for unbelievers.