Who told you the Bible was God's word ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
#41
It's obvious you have never experienced the Bible's power.
As Paul might have said of some, "For now we see through a glass, opaquely."
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#42
As I recall the Apostles and neither did Jesus quote from the Apocrypha in order to establish or illustrate a point they were making, thus it poses a problem of authority.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#43
I never spoke about language... what difference does language make ? Im talking about which books belong in the Bible, not what language they are in. Not sure why you are talking about that...

So I ask again... if the Bible is the final authority, and it wasnt perfected until 1776,
what was the perfect final authority prior to 1776 ?
All that agree with the NT.

The canon is not perfect because men say it is,

men say the canon is perfect because the Holy Spirit gives men to recognize it as God's word

by its evidentiary power and authority,

and the first rule of which it does not contradict itself.

The apocrypha is neither.
 
Last edited:
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#44
if the 1769 translation is accurate from the latin translation and you can measure the accuracies from the Original translation from the Hebrew and Greek into English language what is the point of 1769 or any other year for that matter if the translation if from the original writings?
Because you will never be able to speak or write Hebrew or Greek like those folks who did back in the day. In other words, I have no doubt in my mind that Moses and Paul would correct many so called scholars and believers who are arrogant to think they are experts in a dead language. God preserved His Word for the world today so they can understand. God does not speak gibberish to people. God is not the author of confusion. Each language used for the Bible is for it's own time.
 
P

prodigal

Guest
#45
[h=1]Mark 12:30-31New International Version (NIV)[/h] [SUP]30 [/SUP]Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’[SUP][a][/SUP] [SUP]31 [/SUP]The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[SUP][b][/SUP] There is no commandment greater than these.”


the whole of god's laws rest on these 2 commandments, to do them completes the law whatever translation you may have,,
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
#46
Mark 12:30-31New International Version (NIV)

[SUP]30 [/SUP]Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’[SUP][a][/SUP] [SUP]31 [/SUP]The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[SUP][b][/SUP] There is no commandment greater than these.”


the whole of god's laws rest on these 2 commandments, to do them completes the law whatever translation you may have,,
Further explaining,

Romans 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.

This is actually a better statement of the law than a list of dos and don'ts, as it encompasses an entire way of living that even makes more things sin, such as unrighteous anger, lust, all things not of the Holy Spirit, to say Christianity freewheeling disregard for morality and permissive of fleshly immorality a huge lie,

Galatians 5:16-23 This I say then, walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law. Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD. But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
 

skipp

Senior Member
Mar 6, 2014
654
7
0
#47
As I recall the Apostles and neither did Jesus quote from the Apocrypha in order to establish or illustrate a point they were making, thus it poses a problem of authority.
Interestingly enough the Book of Jude quotes from the Book of Enoch, which is considered canon in the Ethiopian Orthodox Church (but nowhere else).
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#48
Think Acts chapter 2. God is more than capable of communicating to us despite the differences in languages. Why wouldn't He still be that same God who communicates to us clearly?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#49
Interestingly enough the Book of Jude quotes from the Book of Enoch, which is considered canon in the Ethiopian Orthodox Church (but nowhere else).
It's highly unlikely he quoted from it although he through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit quotes Enoch himself..
Did Jude quote from the book of Enoch
The Book of Enoch we have today is pseudo-pigrapha which is the lowest tier of questionable literature.
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
#50
It's highly unlikely he quoted from it although he through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit quotes Enoch himself..
Did Jude quote from the book of Enoch
The Book of Enoch we have today is pseudo-pigrapha which is the lowest tier of questionable literature.
You find in the apocryphal writings much that would pass Bible muster as far as canon harmony, but also much that's garbage, and, if anything, throughout the ages holy men have been aware the devil is a master of partial truth. It's been years, but isn't it Enoch that has giants over 400 feet tall in the pre-flood times? I also remember a lot of Enoch reading like a comic book, with worse than junk science as to claims how nature works.
 
I

IAm3rd

Guest
#51
in answering your Q? languages was not all I wrote about :) and perfected in 1776 please provide your ref's to that statement
I was not talking about your statement... Nor did I say it was perfected in the 1700s. That was Jason's "facts".
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
#52
I actually own the Charles apocrypha, those big hardbound books with grey jackets, both Old and New Testament apocryphal writings I read many years ago, and took away from it all one thing, having been pretty up on the Bible before this, "Yes. I can see why that was thrown out." Reasons varied from dubious supernatural claims to just being some rambling history that fit nowhere with inspired scripture. I don't recall one book I could see as belonging in the Bible, only some passages of Enoch harmonizing with Bible scripture.
 
I

IAm3rd

Guest
#53
And I'm still waiting on Jason to answer the question. If the bible is the final authority, yet wasn't perfected until 1769' what was the authority before 1769 ?
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#54
I actually own the Charles apocrypha, those big hardbound books with grey jackets, both Old and New Testament apocryphal writings I read many years ago, and took away from it all one thing, having been pretty up on the Bible before this,
"Yes. I can see why that was thrown out." Reasons varied from dubious supernatural claims to
just being some rambling history that fit nowhere with inspired scripture.
I don't recall one book I could see as belonging in the Bible, only some passages of Enoch harmonizing with Bible scripture.
My experience also.

I had read the OT before I read them, and the apocrypha did not come up to God-breathed for me.

I thought the book of Wisdom came closest.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#55
And I'm still waiting on Jason to answer the question. If the bible is the final authority, yet wasn't perfected until 1769' what was the authority before 1769 ?
Does it have to come from Jason?

Is this a game of gotcha'?

What was the perfect final authority in the OT when 400 years after the last book of the OT was written,
God did away with the Aaronic priesthood and the sacrifices?
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#56
And I'm still waiting on Jason to answer the question. If the bible is the final authority, yet wasn't perfected until 1769' what was the authority before 1769 ?
My friend the bible was perfected before man was created. He knows the beginning from the end and the end from the beginning. God is not a man that He should be shocked or dismayed.
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
#57
My experience also.

I had read the OT before I read them, and the apocrypha did not come up to God-breathed for me.

I thought the book of Wisdom came closest.
There was a lot of stuff you could take away, but nothing that wasn't already there in the Bible, and the Bible less verbose. I also recall some signs of commentary going on, as if some tribal elder giving a speech, waxing eloquent, again, not the same linguistic precision and absence of human rhetorical styles which mark the Bible. It's like, there are people running off at the mouth, then there's the way God speaks.
 
I

IAm3rd

Guest
#58
My friend the bible was perfected before man was created. He knows the beginning from the end and the end from the beginning. God is not a man that He should be shocked or dismayed.
I agree... again, I didnt say it... Jason did.
( why do I have to keep saying this ? lol )
 
I

IAm3rd

Guest
#59
Does it have to come from Jason?

Is this a game of gotcha'?

What was the perfect final authority in the OT when 400 years after the last book of the OT was written,
God did away with the Aaronic priesthood and the sacrifices?
No, its not a game of "gotcha"... Jason said the Bible wasnt perfected until 1769, so I expect him to answer the question. However, you may answer if you want. But you didn't... you asked another question.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#60
And I'm still waiting on Jason to answer the question. If the bible is the final authority, yet wasn't perfected until 1769' what was the authority before 1769 ?
The 1611 would be the authority. They knew the Apocrypha was not authoritative. But the perfect Word that existed before 1769 would be the Latin manuscripts. In other words, let's say a bible is translated into a new language today. That bible would be their authority. In other words, I believe God can use imperfect translations so as to save people and lead to some basic level of truth, but that doesn't mean He has to give everyone a perfect Word.
 
Last edited: