In yet my 10th or so atempt to take about that one topic, here's what I'm saying. If the claims of evolutionists are true, then the first living cell, which reproduced purely asexually, would have to evolve and become an organism that reproducing purely sexually. So where's the scientific evidence that demonstrates that this transition is possible?
This question you ask is an important one. How did sexual organisms evolve from a-sexual ones? Currently our level of knowledge is not great enough to answer the question. It’s that simple. Just because we don’t know something now, or can’t do something, doesn’t mean those things are impossible to know or do. I think, Megaman, you should agree with me on this point. Then why do you think the answer to this question of yours must be answered this day or else evolution is disproved? I’ll answer for you: you want evolution disproved and so you are willing to ignore the obvious fact that not knowing something is not proof that it can’t happen, or didn’t happen.
What you are presenting is the God of the Gaps Argument: if we don’t understand how something happened then God must be the Cause. It’s a bad argument.