Ok to be lesbian?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 18, 2014
193
2
0
#81
Defending homosexual is a rationalization process by which people attempt to normalize deviant choices that cannot be justified through any psychological exercise. It is simply an attempt to placate a conscience that cannot harmonize the thing one desires and the moral limitations that prohibit the behavior. Homosexuals are NOT born gay. This is nothing more than an attempt to appeal to the scientific community and call them as a witness against the defense of scripture. Homosexuality is not a biological issue, it is a sin issue. It is not socially acceptable behavior, it is a social and moral disgrace. Homosexuality is not an illness nor is it some type of genetic abnormality. It is certainly not engineered biologically at birth. Homosexuality is a learned behavior and a matter of choice, not a predilection. There is no "pride" in it, nor should it be afforded any measure of dignity. IT IS SIN and in the end it will destroy all who engage in it or stand in its defense. Attempting to explain it away scientifically is simply an attempt to excuse the behavior and marginalize it's shame.
Ah so what you are saying is that Homosexuality is a choice made by us as God's intelligent creatures. The only creatures on earth which are given this status of intelligence if I remember from my early bible studies. So, with that in mind, with it being a sinful choice, how do you explain the wealth of homosexuality which occurs in the animal kingdom.

Summarised Source:
10 Animals That Practice Homosexuality - Listverse

If this is not accurate enough I can provide papers by university press' which show demonstrated behaviours. Did they make a choice? Is there in that case an animal heaven and hell to which they are sorted.

I have known wonderful, kind and genuine people who were pressured by their 'community' to be something they couldn't be for so long that they either spent their lives in misery or ended giving up and taking their own lives. There is nothing right or just when the situation gets to this point.

dP
 

Radius

Senior Member
Feb 11, 2013
1,138
180
63
#82
Ah so what you are saying is that Homosexuality is a choice made by us as God's intelligent creatures. The only creatures on earth which are given this status of intelligence if I remember from my early bible studies. So, with that in mind, with it being a sinful choice, how do you explain the wealth of homosexuality which occurs in the animal kingdom.

Summarised Source:
10 Animals That Practice Homosexuality - Listverse

If this is not accurate enough I can provide papers by university press' which show demonstrated behaviours. Did they make a choice? Is there in that case an animal heaven and hell to which they are sorted.

I have known wonderful, kind and genuine people who were pressured by their 'community' to be something they couldn't be for so long that they either spent their lives in misery or ended giving up and taking their own lives. There is nothing right or just when the situation gets to this point.

dP
Not sure if this needs to be said....but God made man different than animals. Comparing human sexuality to that of animals truly is comparing apples to oranges.
 

Radius

Senior Member
Feb 11, 2013
1,138
180
63
#83
Defending homosexual is a rationalization process by which people attempt to normalize deviant choices that cannot be justified through any psychological exercise. It is simply an attempt to placate a conscience that cannot harmonize the thing one desires and the moral limitations that prohibit the behavior. Homosexuals are NOT born gay. This is nothing more than an attempt to appeal to the scientific community and call them as a witness against the defense of scripture. Homosexuality is not a biological issue, it is a sin issue. It is not socially acceptable behavior, it is a social and moral disgrace. Homosexuality is not an illness nor is it some type of genetic abnormality. It is certainly not engineered biologically at birth. Homosexuality is a learned behavior and a matter of choice, not a predilection. There is no "pride" in it, nor should it be afforded any measure of dignity. IT IS SIN and in the end it will destroy all who engage in it or stand in its defense. Attempting to explain it away scientifically is simply an attempt to excuse the behavior and marginalize it's shame.
Excellently put.
 
P

paulsfam4

Guest
#84
It is a sin and don't let the devil lead you otherwise...Mark 7:20 “And then he added, ‘It is what comes from inside that defiles you. For from within, out of a person’s heart, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, wickedness, deceit, lustful desires, envy, slander, pride, and foolishness. All these vile things come from within; they are what defile you.”
 
F

Fishbait

Guest
#85
I have reason to believe that being lesbian is not a sin.

The idea that being lesbian is a sin, particularly an act of sexual immorality, appears to be referring to two things found in the Bible.

The first, is this:

Leviticus 18:22

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." (KJV)
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination." (ESV & NSRV)
"You are not to sleep with a man as with a woman; it is detestable." (HCSB)

which is a line in a list of sexual immoralities addressed directly by GOD.

However, this is a line that specifically states a man may not sleep with a man in the same way as they would with a woman.
This does not say that a woman can not sleep with a woman as they would with a man.

In other words, this is a rule for men, not women.

Argument 1:
It's implied that same sex relations are wrong.
Counterargument 1:
The very next line states
"Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto". This addresses a rule specifically for women in a separate section of the same line. It comes off as strange that it would be so specific here, yet not specific in the rule made immediately before it. If it was a rule against women doing it with women, then it would likely say something along the lines of "You are not to sleep with a man as with a woman; Neither shall any woman sleep with a woman as with a man: it is detestable". However, it did not do so, which comes off as strange considering the formatting of the rule that comes immediately after it.

Argument 2:
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.". The bolded part is saying that women may not do so either.
Counterargument 2:
If that were the case, then "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." the bolded part here would be separate. Even if they are not separate, then no matter how you twist this, the closest thing you are going to get to a rule about lesbians would be "You may not sleep with a man as you would with a woman, neither shall any woman sleep with a man as they would with a woman."

Argument 3:
If it is not okay for two men to have a sexual relationship, then why would it be okay for two women to have a sexual relationship?! Just because the bible does not explicitly say it is unacceptable for two women to have a sexual relationship does not mean that it is okay!
Counterargument 3:
See Counterargument 1:. We can't assume that it is a sin if it does not explicitly say so. There is actually nothing here suggesting it is wrong to have a lesbian relationship, so there is no reason to act like it is.

Argument 4:
Are you a lesbian? If so, then this whole topic is you twisting the Bible and manipulating to have your way! You are just making it mean something else to your own benefit! That is not good in the eyes of GOD.
Counterargument 4:
I am not lesbian. In fact, the thought of doing something like that personally grosses and creeps me out a bit (Although the thought of doing it with a man also grosses me out. I'm a virgin btw. I plan on staying that way for life.). That much is irrelevant regardless. As for what my motive is behind this topic, a few things. You are making lesbians feel like they will go to hell for what they are and how they feel. Moreover, it is possible that it is not even a sin in the first place! More importantly, you are turning them away from GOD by saying so. You may think that because they would turn from GOD to indulge in being lesbian, that they were already too sinful in the first place. This is incorrect. It turns them away because they believe that if GOD is the kind of person that would send people to hell over something like love, that GOD is a cruel being. Even so, many lesbians try to be Christian regardless, and are put down by daring to call themselves Christian while being so sexually perverse and immoral. This makes Christians, some who are likely the home of much more sin in general, look bad, and turns them away from the religion. This also makes them feel like a minority doomed to hell for how they are. In other words, you are making Christianity a thing that makes them miserable and ruins their life. And for what? Because we think a verse may imply that it is wrong without even explicitly saying so? Aren't we contradicting ourselves, to think we will be fine for our sins that we choose to do in our lives as well as the sinful tendencies that we call a part of who we are and what we are? Unforgivable, by most but not GOD who is understanding and has forgiven you for all of your sins that are much more vast than the one potential sin you pointed out.

Additionally, there is nothing logically incorrect about anything that I pointed out. It does not say it is a sin for women to sleep with women as they would with a man. That means there is nothing suggesting that it is a sin in the first place. Why would this
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." be worded this way, but the line "Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto" that comes immediately afterwards be so specific and address women separately?

Argument 5:
So according to you, it's perfectly fine to be lesbian! Great! Now society is one step closer to incest and pedophilia!
Counterargument 5:
No more so than heterosexual relationships. In fact, GOD specified against incest and pedophilia in the section regarding sexual immoralities. Do not forget, however, that we are not to judge, and that we need to focus on ourselves as much as possible. We are sinful ourselves, and have no time to focus on the immorality of society or the acts of others. It is not your place to judge, and I believe, judging is the one of very few ways to get GOD to judge you now that Jesus has died for your sins. Another, is sinning purposefully as though you have a get out of jail free card and do true evil feeling you will meet no consequence. Do not judge, or you too will be judged, and with your unit of measure, it will be measured to you.

In other words, focus on yourself. Focus on yourself as much as you can. You need to do all you can to be good yourself. Teach others, but do not force the word down their throats. Do not abhore a sinful Christian, as they are in need of Christianity the most. Do not say "How dare you call yourself Christian when X" because the same should be said to you.


The other part:

Romans 1:18
That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.
Note here, that it is not GOD speaking, but the apostle Paul.

This appears to be written from the perspective of Paul who was watching what became of the people who worshiped an idol instead of GOD.

The verse does have this line "
Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other.". The way this is worded, seems more like a declaration of geniune surprise in response to the observation that even women were doing it with women.

The lines "
And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.", also said by Paul, all seems to be referring specifically to men.

Although Paul was an apostle and therefore technically able to declare lesbian relationships as a sin, he was certainly not doing so at this time.

This combined with the list of sexual immoralities stated directly by GOD that specified for women in the line
"Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto" but not in the line "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." convinced me that perhaps it is not actually a sin. It doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere else in the Bible as far as I know, unless i'm wrong? It appears as though it isn't explicitely or clearly stated anywhere in the Bible that lesbian relationships are wrong.

What do you think?


Don't let Satin fool you.

Homosexuality (from Ancient Greek ὁμός, meaning "same", and Latin sexus, meaning "sex") is romantic attraction, sexual attraction or sexual behavior between members of the same sex or gender.

Is it possible to be a gay Christian? If the phrase “gay Christian” refers to a person who struggles against homosexual desires and temptations – yes, a “gay Christian” is possible.

However, the description “gay Christian” is not accurate for such a person, since he/she does not desire to be gay, and is struggling against the temptations. Such a person is not a “gay Christian,” but rather is simply a struggling Christian, just as there are Christians who struggle with fornication, lying, and stealing. If the phrase “gay Christian” refers to a person who actively, perpetually, and unrepentantly lives a homosexual lifestyle – no, it is not possible for such a person to truly be a Christian.

What differentiates a Christian’s life from a non-Christian’s life is the struggle against sin. The Christian life is a progressive journey of overcoming the “acts of the flesh” (Galatians 5:19-21) and allowing God’s Spirit to produce the “fruit of the Spirit” (Galatians 5:22-23). Yes, Christians sin, sometimes horribly. Sadly, sometimes Christians are indistinguishable from non-Christians. However, a true Christian will always repent, will always eventually return to God, and will always resume the struggle against sin. But the Bible gives no support for the idea that a person who perpetually and unrepentantly engages in sin can indeed be a Christian. Notice 1 Corinthians 6:11, "And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God."
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#86
answering OP. NO

Romans 1:21-32 (KJV)
[SUP]21 [/SUP]Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
[SUP]22 [/SUP]Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
[SUP]23 [/SUP]And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
[SUP]24 [/SUP]Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
[SUP]25 [/SUP]Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
[SUP]26 [/SUP]For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
[SUP]27 [/SUP]And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
[SUP]28 [/SUP]And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
[SUP]29 [/SUP]Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
[SUP]30 [/SUP]Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
[SUP]31 [/SUP]Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
[SUP]32 [/SUP]Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
 
A

AgnusDei

Guest
#87
Ok to be lesbian?

No.com
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,782
2,951
113
#88
I am wondering where someone of "uncertain" spiritual status would find such a deep (although perverse) study of the Bilbe?

The reason I ask is because there was a hippie "Jesus" cult in the 1970's called the Children of God, and this sounds like something out of their doctrinal statement. CoG started legitimately, and gradually deteriorated into a non-biblical cult, with one man, David Berg, enforcing his own doctrine, including forcing women to sleep with each other. People literally had to be kidnapped and de-programmed by family members.

I thought CoG kind of died out, but reading this post makes me wonder. It is just too close for comfort!

Well, I see from Wikipedia, this group has changed its name several times, and is now The Family International. David Berg, the founder is now dead and considered a prophet!

Here is the link:

Family International - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

if you are in this cult, please PM me, and we can talk about it, and what the Bible really has to say about needing a relationship with Jesus Christ, flirty fishing, and this sort of deceptive post!
 

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#89
What about general romantic feelings or even kissing, though? Or the desire to be with one another and the desire to be married, etc? That is, is romantic love between two girls really so wrong? So perverse? It gives off a different vibe from penetrative and sexual relationships. To me, it seems less perverse than most heterosexual relationships these days.

I don't really know either way. I can't say.


For two women to desire to be together and to be married is a perverse desire, just as it is a perverse desire for two men to want to be together and to get married. And as AgeofKnowledge has already pointed out; Paul does indeed condemn both Sodomy and Lesbianism all in Romans 1:24-32.


God clearly defines marriage in His holy word:



Genesis 2:24

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

[SUP]24 [/SUP]Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.



Matthew 19:5

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

[SUP]5 [/SUP]and said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?



Mark 10:7-9

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

[SUP]7 [/SUP]For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; [SUP]8 [/SUP]and they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh. [SUP]9 [/SUP]What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.



Ephesians 5:31-32

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)


[SUP]31 [/SUP]For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. [SUP]32 [/SUP]This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.


[HR][/HR]
Sex is only to be enjoyed in the Biblical parameter of Marriage.

And Marriage is to be between one man and one woman. Just as the Holy Bbible says it is.
 
Last edited:
N

Nick1939

Guest
#90
In fact, it seems the same Wiki article also states "Originally, the term sodomy was commonly restricted to anal sex,[SUP][4][/SUP][SUP][5][/SUP] and is derived from the story of Sodom and Gomorrah in chapters 18 and 19 of the Book of Genesis in the Bible.[SUP][6][/SUP] " immediately after your quote.
Please read carefully Rom 1:19-32, Very carefully, and then you can see the truth , any sexual act other than marriage is SIN
heb13:4.. Marriage is honorable among all, and the bed undefiled; but fornicators and adulterers God Will judge..
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#91
The final straw that breaks the proverbial camel's back when it comes to impending judgment (wrath) is sexual immorality and sexual perversion! The acts of men with men, women with women and humans with animals are the direct result of a reprobate mind and the inability to retain God in ones knowledge. God will give every human over to a reprobate mind if they choose to remove God from their knowledge and or way of life.
 

Apostol2013

Senior Member
Jan 27, 2013
2,105
39
48
#92
So many posting up leviticus but there isn't any found to separate the clean and unclean. This chapter was originally written in and had a sole purpose to edify, the Hebrew language.Abomination, defile, etc are added to the translation. It's not there to judge. It's sad that all the pain, hate, and rejection actually comes by people making a whore out of God and the intended purpose. I'm sure these are the same people that think (by faith) they hold some special truth in God. Same people that think Noah built a great boat called an ark. You, just as in leviticus, are lost in translation.
God sets the standards God alone judges but its the creation that condems themselves and you acuse me of something purely speculative of your own thought
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
#93
Ah so what you are saying is that Homosexuality is a choice made by us as God's intelligent creatures. The only creatures on earth which are given this status of intelligence if I remember from my early bible studies. So, with that in mind, with it being a sinful choice, how do you explain the wealth of homosexuality which occurs in the animal kingdom. Summarised Source: 10 Animals That Practice Homosexuality - Listverse

If this is not accurate enough I can provide papers by university press' which show demonstrated behaviours. Did they make a choice? Is there in that case an animal heaven and hell to which they are sorted.
There is no animal group or species that practices homosexuality. Practicing homosexuality and imitating the act are two entirely different behaviors in the animal world. In none of these instances is there penetration. Even if it were proven that this practice does show up in the animal world does this suggest that man, who is in the image of God, take his ques of behavior from the animals? Man is not an animal and is not permitted to behave as one. He is bound to the moral laws that God has imposed upon him.

I have known wonderful, kind and genuine people who were pressured by their 'community' to be something they couldn't be for so long that they either spent their lives in misery or ended giving up and taking their own lives. There is nothing right or just when the situation gets to this point.
You cannot excuse the behavior simply because some feel they cannot accept the fact that it is wrong. Only God has the right to determine what is right and wrong, not man. God says this is sin. He has condemned it on every level and has promised that these will "receive in their own persons the due penalty of their error," in other words, there are fleshly consequences for this behavior, but he has also promised to punish it in the proper time. Do you feel God is unjust in how he regards this matter? How you and I "feel" about it is quite irrelevant. God has said it is wrong. Why do feel comfortable defending that which God has so strongly condemned?
 
U

Ugly

Guest
#94
Animals are subject to the sin around us. Even nature is affected by sin. Once sin is removed from the planet even the behavior of animals will change. This goes for animals... plants... humans. Granted we, as humans, are made in Gods imagine Originally, we have Since that time fallen and subject to sin.
Whether or not homosexuality is a choice or not is irrelevant. We all have tendencies towards some sin or another. Giving in to that sin is wrong. Just because we're geared towards that sin doesn't make it ok. The only choice we are held to is the choice to act, or not, on the sin we're geared towards.
 
J

Jda016

Guest
#95
If a person struggles with same sex attraction, they can still live a full and Godly life just like the person who is tempted to become an alcoholic and yet abstains from it.

we are all prone to sin in one way or another. Admittedly the desire for a same sex partner is a particularly heavy burden to bear. However, this life is all a test in righteousness and choosing God above our selfish desires.

let everyone who struggles with same sex attraction pray for deliverance, but at the same time, love Jesus enough that you are willing to remain celibate if need be. This is the calling of Christ, "if you love me, obey my commandments" (John 14:15).
 
Nov 2, 2013
1,380
6
0
#96
God sets the standards God alone judges but its the creation that condems themselves and you acuse me of something purely speculative of your own thought
Oh...who is a creator? Who is speculative? Who is accusing?
 
Jan 18, 2014
193
2
0
#97
Not sure if this needs to be said....but God made man different than animals. Comparing human sexuality to that of animals truly is comparing apples to oranges.
Apples and oranges are both citrus fruits with soft seeds protected by edible flesh inside an oil rich skin. Very different :p

Homosexuality is a choice for man but not for animals is that what you are saying?

Because if homsexuality is not a choice then it is part of gods design therefore natural. If however it is a choice then that makes us no different from the animals as we share the same free will for sin as they do.

Which would you like to choose?

Excellently put.
It is a sin and don't let the devil lead you otherwise...Mark 7:20 “And then he added, ‘It is what comes from inside that defiles you. For from within, out of a person’s heart, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, wickedness, deceit, lustful desires, envy, slander, pride, and foolishness. All these vile things come from within; they are what defile you.”
Bigoted statement. You fail to understand it is not a temptation any more than a mans instinct to breathe.
 

CWJ

Banned
Jan 16, 2014
555
10
0
#98
'All have sinned and come short of the glory of God'

Hello there,

To discover that the desires one experiences do not reflect the gender one is born with is a tragedy. However, what we are is between ourselves and God, and should remain that way. We have a choice regarding what we do with what we are. It is the act of sexual relation between members of the same gender which is abhorrent to God, not the person.

God saves to the uttermost those who have sought refuge in the person of His Beloved Son.

With love in Christ Jesus
Chris
 
Last edited:
Jan 18, 2014
193
2
0
#99
There is no animal group or species that practices homosexuality. Practicing homosexuality and imitating the act are two entirely different behaviours in the animal world. In none of these instances is there penetration. Even if it were proven that this practice does show up in the animal world does this suggest that man, who is in the image of God, take his cues of behaviour from the animals? Man is not an animal and is not permitted to behave as one. He is bound to the moral laws that God has imposed upon him.

You cannot excuse the behavior simply because some feel they cannot accept the fact that it is wrong. Only God has the right to determine what is right and wrong, not man. God says this is sin. He has condemned it on every level and has promised that these will "receive in their own persons the due penalty of their error," in other words, there are fleshly consequences for this behavior, but he has also promised to punish it in the proper time. Do you feel God is unjust in how he regards this matter? How you and I "feel" about it is quite irrelevant. God has said it is wrong. Why do feel comfortable defending that which God has so strongly condemned?
Really? Where? Show me the the words which could only be written by a god that say this is wrong. As all I see are the writings of men of a bygone era in morally ambiguous collection of stories and myths which object to it. Yes, homosexuality is nonsensical from an evolutionary standpoint in the sense that it can not produce offspring through its practice but that is something you may not care about when you are in the arms of the woman you love.

One thing I have come to realise, if I and millions of others are wrong, and there is a judo-christian god and a heaven, you can keep it! If it is filled with people likeminded to yourself then I would consider an eternity there to be my own personal hell. If I remember, to speak ill of God / the holy ghost means I will never be forgiven.....that should already be more than covered.

OP. Disregard what any Bigot on here thinks and follow your faith as feels right to you. The kingdom of God exists within you and not on the pages of propagandist bias literature.

Good day to you sir.
 
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
It never ceases to amaze me to what lengths people will go in twisting scripture in order justify behavior which the text clearly condemns.
The problem is that the text doesn't ​clearly condemn it, though.