Grace and Law are married....

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,709
3,650
113
#61
The question had nothing to do with the matter at hand, therefore, her question indicates an ulterior motive. He doesn't need to succumb to her request and furthermore discuss something personal since it had nothing to do with the topic. He is in his full right not to answer her question and let alone discuss it in private. The question was totally irrelevant and out of place, indication of an ulterior motive.
You have three different parties in question. I was only defending the use of a question to answer a question, and then a third party came in (who I guess was also involved) and objected to my tactic. I don't care to be dragged in any further to a personal issue between other parties. That's why I suggested for the one to PM the other.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#62
You have three different parties in question. I was only defending the use of a question to answer a question, and then a third party came in (who I guess was also involved) and objected to my tactic. I don't care to be dragged in any further to a personal issue between other parties. That's why I suggested for the one to PM the other.
It's like rolling around with Brer Rabbit in the briar patch. . .
 

LEPIDUS

Senior Member
May 15, 2012
457
10
18
#63
You have three different parties in question. I was only defending the use of a question to answer a question, and then a third party came in (who I guess was also involved) and objected to my tactic. I don't care to be dragged in any further to a personal issue between other parties. That's why I suggested for the one to PM the other.
No one is dragging anyone anywhere, If you didn't want to be involved then you shouldn't have implied for him to discuss anything further as the question was irrelevant. He was only apologizing to you for stooping to someone else's level. There is nothing to discuss in private, with that said let this be the end.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#64
Do you believe there is a NEW covenant compared to an OLD covenant? Did God change or did He covenant one way with a certain group of people and covenant another way with the world?
This is pin pointing the split in the church that is coming to be more and more serious! Is there one God with one voice, or different God's at different times, with different voices for different people? The old school people are pinning there entire lives on there being different Gods. The new is to make everything new. With every finding that is dug up of information about what the old was really like, the more it is saying that the new is built on the old. For instance, of the 812 scrolls found at Qumran, scrolls originally written between the third century BC and about 62 AD, most were in Hebrew, even classical Hebrew. Before, most scholars thought Hebrew was a dead language by that time.

The idea that Christ got rid of so much when Christ made new is being debunked with facts more and more. Paul's scripture has been read as advocating getting rid of the old as the new is learned is being looked at carefully, and I really think the idea of Paul saying we must throw out Moses is being proven to be a wrong idea.
 
Aug 19, 2014
117
3
0
#66
This is pin pointing the split in the church that is coming to be more and more serious! Is there one God with one voice, or different God's at different times, with different voices for different people? The old school people are pinning there entire lives on there being different Gods. The new is to make everything new. With every finding that is dug up of information about what the old was really like, the more it is saying that the new is built on the old. For instance, of the 812 scrolls found at Qumran, scrolls originally written between the third century BC and about 62 AD, most were in Hebrew, even classical Hebrew. Before, most scholars thought Hebrew was a dead language by that time.

The idea that Christ got rid of so much when Christ made new is being debunked with facts more and more. Paul's scripture has been read as advocating getting rid of the old as the new is learned is being looked at carefully, and I really think the idea of Paul saying we must throw out Moses is being proven to be a wrong idea.
Paul is very misunderstood and still is to this day. Just read (2 Peter 3) To see that.

2Peter 3:14-18
14So then, dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with him. 15Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.

17Therefore, dear friends, since you have been forewarned, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of the lawless and fall from your secure position. 18But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever! Amen.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,709
3,650
113
#67
Refusing to answer what is asked often means deception.
Jesus answered questions with questions all the time.
yes you are right Jesus did,


i was asked a question, a personal question i did not even see,

and because i did not answer her she degraded me by saying,


"Refusing to answer what is asked often means deception."


and went on about me being decieving, even after i answered.


so i was wrong when i but her words back on her.


i do apolagize about stooping to others level, it should not be this way.


and i feel no uplifting about arguing about law and covents ,

that our God gave to us.
He was belly aching to me about his problem with someone else. I always refer them to PM that person. It had nothing to do with my comment that ''Jesus often answered a question with a question''. He could have objected to my statement instead. And maybe you should jump on his case instead also...pleeease.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,709
3,650
113
#68
Do you believe there is a NEW covenant compared to an OLD covenant? Did God change or did He covenant one way with a certain group of people and covenant another way with the world?
This is pin pointing the split in the church that is coming to be more and more serious! Is there one God with one voice, or different God's at different times, with different voices for different people? The old school people are pinning there entire lives on there being different Gods. The new is to make everything new. With every finding that is dug up of information about what the old was really like, the more it is saying that the new is built on the old. For instance, of the 812 scrolls found at Qumran, scrolls originally written between the third century BC and about 62 AD, most were in Hebrew, even classical Hebrew. Before, most scholars thought Hebrew was a dead language by that time.

The idea that Christ got rid of so much when Christ made new is being debunked with facts more and more. Paul's scripture has been read as advocating getting rid of the old as the new is learned is being looked at carefully, and I really think the idea of Paul saying we must throw out Moses is being proven to be a wrong idea.
Ok, now would you mind answering the question you quoted of mine?

Do you believe there is a NEW covenant compared to an OLD covenant? Did God change or did He covenant one way with a certain group of people and covenant another way with the world?
 
W

wgeurts

Guest
#69
If Jesus died and the law still applies to us, them why did Jesus die for us? Why do we need to put are hope on him if he is a mere example that it is possible to live without sin?
We are made spotless and pure through Christ our Lord and therefore I am at peace with the Lord, I believe what Paul is saying in those passages achduke that those who are living by the law are not at peace with him as we sin. Let me ask you and everyone who says the law still applies to us, do you live without sin?
We are righteous through our saviour, why else would he be Lord and "Saviour"?

as a side note, what do you define the Law as?
 
Aug 19, 2014
117
3
0
#70
If Jesus died and the law still applies to us, them why did Jesus die for us? Why do we need to put are hope on him if he is a mere example that it is possible to live without sin?
We are made spotless and pure through Christ our Lord and therefore I am at peace with the Lord, I believe what Paul is saying in those passages achduke that those who are living by the law are not at peace with him as we sin. Let me ask you and everyone who says the law still applies to us, do you live without sin?
We are righteous through our saviour, why else would he be Lord and "Saviour"?

as a side note, what do you define the Law as?
I believe the Law still applies in that through Grace and Faith the Holy Spirit guides us through not sinning. By the blood of Christ our sins are forgiven. Without that forgiveness I am not sure the Holy Spirit would even come for without Christ we would still be in our sin. We are saved by Faith but those that are saved have good Fruit (Obeying God and not Sinning). Will we still sin? Yes. As in Paul we fight with the flesh but our mind and heart want to do away with sin if we have the Holy Spirit guiding us. I myself want to keep all God's Laws and Feasts. Not because I am saved by doing so but because I Love and want to obey God.
 
Feb 7, 2013
1,276
21
0
#71
I really can't understand, very often we start a tread and when I get to the last answer it has totally nothing to the point of the tread.
Yes, truly beloved, but this depends on which level of Spiritual knowledge you are on. Okay, let us start with what you want to know about the sound doctrine knowledge, to add/supplement to your faith, by the Help of the HOLY SPIRIT?

There is a battle going on with itching ears, but we are to stick to what has been written and established and taught to move forward with CHRIST and fight a Good fight, for CHRIST's Kingdom of GOD, through the HOLY SPIRIT's Help.

Please go ahead then and how may i as 'one' serve you.
 
Feb 7, 2013
1,276
21
0
#72
The law was not abolished. It was fulfilled at the cross.
That's not the New Covenant, the law was in the Old Covenant package. It is obselete. Hebrews says that we live by faith with our new high priest who has forever perfected us rather than living under an obsolete law that was part of an old legislation.
The law still exists in a sense that it is a demonstration of perfection, but it is no longer what we strive for, it is no longer relevant to our lives other than in a sense that it is Christ in us who writes these things in our hearts so that we reflect God in our person.
Yes, we are the promised future born again and resurrected with CHRIST's practitioners, according to the New Covenant Spiritual contents, which the Living GOD established through CHRIST and the HOLY SPIRIT and made with us all and that is why we partake them all as the Holy Communion in remembrance to them all, checking our own given life, in faith whether we ourselves are 'abiding' and be conformed for our witnessing, to a multitude of witnesses, as the church is walking the walk of their MESSIAH, in 'abiding' in all of them that is HIS words in JESUS of spirit and life.

And so through 'abiding' in all of them, the righteousness of the Old Law and the Prophets, shall be fulfilled in them. They only look back and quote to witnesses, that they are fulfilling them according to the New Covenant sound doctrine Spiritual knowledge has conformed in bodily spirit in them and they are willing to lay down their flesh/carnal life for them.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
#73
Grace and Law are married or Divorced? or Dead to the First Husband (Law)?

:1 Or are ye ignorant, brethren (for I speak to men who know the law), that the law hath dominion over a man for so long time as he liveth? 2 For the woman that hath a husband is bound by law to the husband while he liveth; but if the husband die, she is discharged from the law of the husband. 3 So then if, while the husband liveth, she be joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if the husband die, she is free from the law, so that she is no adulteress, though she be joined to another man.

4
Wherefore, my brethren, ye also were made dead to the law through the body of Christ; that ye should be joined to another, even to him who was raised from the dead, that we might bring forth fruit unto God. 5 For when we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were through the law, wrought in our members to bring forth fruit unto death. 6 But now we have been discharged from the law, having died to that wherein we were held; so that we serve in newness of the spirit, and not in oldness of the letter.



7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Let it not be so. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet: 8 but sin, finding occasion, wrought in me through the commandment all manner of coveting: for apart from the law sin is dead. 9 And I was alive apart from the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died; 10 and the commandment, which was unto life, this I found to be unto death: 11 for sin, finding occasion, through the commandment beguiled me, and through it slew me.

< Rom 7
 
Jun 26, 2014
1,011
17
0
#74
Re: Grace and Law are married or Divorced? or Dead to the First Husband (Law)?

:1 Or are ye ignorant, brethren (for I speak to men who know the law), that the law hath dominion over a man for so long time as he liveth? 2 For the woman that hath a husband is bound by law to the husband while he liveth; but if the husband die, she is discharged from the law of the husband. 3 So then if, while the husband liveth, she be joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if the husband die, she is free from the law, so that she is no adulteress, though she be joined to another man.

4
Wherefore, my brethren, ye also were made dead to the law through the body of Christ; that ye should be joined to another, even to him who was raised from the dead, that we might bring forth fruit unto God. 5 For when we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were through the law, wrought in our members to bring forth fruit unto death. 6 But now we have been discharged from the law, having died to that wherein we were held; so that we serve in newness of the spirit, and not in oldness of the letter.



7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Let it not be so. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet: 8 but sin, finding occasion, wrought in me through the commandment all manner of coveting: for apart from the law sin is dead. 9 And I was alive apart from the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died; 10 and the commandment, which was unto life, this I found to be unto death: 11 for sin, finding occasion, through the commandment beguiled me, and through it slew me.

< Rom 7
You must read the whole chapter, in light of the whole Bible, in order to get the flavor of what Paul is saying. Without using the whole Bible to interpret the Bible you could use the Bible to prove there is no God.

Psalm 53:1 “There is no God.”
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#75
prove-all said:
i do apolagize about stooping to others level, it should not be this way.

and i feel no uplifting about arguing about law and covents ,

that our God gave to us.
He was belly aching to me about his problem with someone else. I always refer them to PM that person. It had nothing to do with my comment that ''Jesus often answered a question with a question''. He could have objected to my statement instead. And
maybe you should jump on his case instead also...pleeease.
I know. . .the belly aching gives away the cultural heritage.

No one makes anyone do this, they choose to do it.

They can end their misery, if they really want to do so.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,709
3,650
113
#76
Re: Grace and Law are married or Divorced? or Dead to the First Husband (Law)?

You must read the whole chapter, in light of the whole Bible, in order to get the flavor of what Paul is saying. Without using the whole Bible to interpret the Bible you could use the Bible to prove there is no God.

Psalm 53:1 “There is no God.”
So how would the whole context of chap 7 'flavor' what Atwood quoted from v.4 viz. 'we are dead to the law and alive to Christ'?
Obviously we can't quote the whole bible every time we post a verse.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#77
Ok, now would you mind answering the question you quoted of mine?

Do you believe there is a NEW covenant compared to an OLD covenant? Did God change or did He covenant one way with a certain group of people and covenant another way with the world?
I believe there is a new covenant. I believe there is an old covenant. I believe that God is eternal, God is one, and scripture says so. You cannot believe both that God is one way at one time, for one people God created and another way for another time for a people God sees as completely separately created and still be able to say that God is one and that God is eternal.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,709
3,650
113
#78
Ok, now would you mind answering the question you quoted of mine?

Do you believe there is a NEW covenant compared to an OLD covenant? Did God change or did He covenant one way with a certain group of people and covenant another way with the world?
I believe there is a new covenant. I believe there is an old covenant. I believe that God is eternal, God is one, and scripture says so. You cannot believe both that God is one way at one time, for one people God created and another way for another time for a people God sees as completely separately created and still be able to say that God is one and that God is eternal.
Ok, so that explains why you believe the Christian is still obligated to the Mosaic law...a covenant given to Israel, (not the Church,) because we are actually under both...Old and New?
 

LEPIDUS

Senior Member
May 15, 2012
457
10
18
#79
Re: Grace and Law are married or Divorced? or Dead to the First Husband (Law)?

You must read the whole chapter, in light of the whole Bible, in order to get the flavor of what Paul is saying. Without using the whole Bible to interpret the Bible you could use the Bible to prove there is no God.

Psalm 53:1 “There is no God.”
I keep saying that. sigh :/
 
Jun 26, 2014
1,011
17
0
#80
Re: Grace and Law are married or Divorced? or Dead to the First Husband (Law)?

So how would the whole context of chap 7 'flavor' what Atwood quoted from v.4 viz. 'we are dead to the law and alive to Christ'?
Obviously we can't quote the whole bible every time we post a verse.
The Law makes sin exceedingly sinful (Romans 7:13). It doesn't say the Law makes sin sin, it says it makes sin exceedingly sinful and sin brings guilt and condemnation upon sinners. Are you a sinner? Yes! Will you ever cease to struggle with sin in this life? No! (Romans 7:24) Unless you reckon yourself dead the Law (Romans 6:11) you will never experience new life to serve God through Christ. This is not saying the Law is sin nor is it saying the Law is done away with (Romans 7:22). As a matter of fact, it says the Law is good (Romans 7:12-13). Those in Christ love the Law because it reveals the character of God but with the same heart of love for the Law we understand we are not perfect and are always in the struggle with the flesh. The outward man will always be at odds with the Law while the inward man delights in the Law. It surely is a battle but that battle has been won by Christ so, though the outward man struggles with the Law, we know the victory at the end of the story for those who are in Christ.

So what does the whole Bible say regarding the Law? Does it say God is going to do away with it or does it say God is going to write it on our hearts and minds? The Bible says God will write His Law on our hearts and minds so that means He is not doing away with it so you should never interpret the verses to say He is doing away with it.
 
Last edited: