OSAS true or false?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,370
113
Jesus said if a man not abide in him, he is as a branch cast forth which the Father taketh away. Not that Jesus would chase him down.
Not right away brother. I remember one of the story in the bible, Jesus wait for the tree that no bear the fruit for 2 year before He cut it and throw it in to fire. Be honest. Yes it talk about salvation.

Throw in to fire mean hell or lost his salvation.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
So you teach that a baby who dies in the first year of life is condemned? Does not the God of grace and mercy have pity on such a one who is incapable of volition to sin?

All men are born with a sin nature but at what point does that nature assert itself and sin achieve Spiritual death?

For the cause of Christ
Roger
I remember God sending Saul to kill all the Amalakites...including babies and livestock...and Saul disobeyed ...we all know the history
Romans 3:9
What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;

Galatians 3:22
But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

I have no idea what you think all means.....but I think it means all......ask David about his first son with Uriah's wife Bathsheba

[SUP]9 [/SUP]Wherefore hast thou despised the commandment of the Lord, to do evil in his sight? thou hast killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword, and hast taken his wife to be thy wife, and hast slain him with the sword of the children of Ammon.
[SUP]10 [/SUP]Now therefore the sword shall never depart from thine house; because thou hast despised me, and hast taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be thy wife.
[SUP]11 [/SUP]Thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house, and I will take thy wives before thine eyes, and give them unto thy neighbour, and he shall lie with thy wives in the sight of this sun.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]For thou didst it secretly: but I will do this thing before all Israel, and before the sun.
[SUP]13 [/SUP]And David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against the Lord. And Nathan said unto David, The Lord also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die.

[SUP]14 [/SUP]Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die.

[SUP]15 [/SUP]And Nathan departed unto his house. And the Lord struck the child that Uriah's wife bare unto David, and it was very sick.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
When a person is Saved, is their name written in the Book of Life? Yes or No? YES is the correct answer.
Does the Bible teach a person can be blotted out of the Book of Life? Yes or No? YES it does teach that.

So simple children can understand it. Click HERE to see Scriptural proof.

^i^
Sorry but there are two books one is the book of life the other the Lambs book of life. All are written into the book of life and all ones deeds are recorded there. Only those who are saved are in the Lambs book of life. In this book none are blotted out ever. Those who are judged at the GWT judgment are all condemned. The Lambs book of life is there to prove that the condemned are not written therein.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
I remember God sending Saul to kill all the Amalakites...including babies and livestock...and Saul disobeyed ...we all know the history
Romans 3:9
What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;

Galatians 3:22
But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

I have no idea what you think all means.....but I think it means all......ask David about his first son with Uriah's wife Bathsheba

[SUP]9 [/SUP]Wherefore hast thou despised the commandment of the Lord, to do evil in his sight? thou hast killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword, and hast taken his wife to be thy wife, and hast slain him with the sword of the children of Ammon.
[SUP]10 [/SUP]Now therefore the sword shall never depart from thine house; because thou hast despised me, and hast taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be thy wife.
[SUP]11 [/SUP]Thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house, and I will take thy wives before thine eyes, and give them unto thy neighbour, and he shall lie with thy wives in the sight of this sun.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]For thou didst it secretly: but I will do this thing before all Israel, and before the sun.
[SUP]13 [/SUP]And David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against the Lord. And Nathan said unto David, The Lord also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die.

[SUP]14 [/SUP]Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die.

[SUP]15 [/SUP]And Nathan departed unto his house. And the Lord struck the child that Uriah's wife bare unto David, and it was very sick.
The child died but David who had a heart after Gods heart said that he would surely see the child in the presence of God. 2 Sam 12:23

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

ISeeYou

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2015
794
11
0
Not right away brother. I remember one of the story in the bible, Jesus wait for the tree that no bear the fruit for 2 year before He cut it and throw it in to fire. Be honest. Yes it talk about salvation.

Throw in to fire mean hell or lost his salvation.
Im your sister bro Jackson :D

I agree, even as they were sometime disobedient (as Noah preached, as the ark was preparing) and his longsuffering toward us is shown us there. Which is the same longsuffering toward us that we should account as our salvation (being patience with us) not willing that any should perish, and that we might all come to repentance (as his gifts and callings are without it). But the Lord is good and upright (receives sinners) and will teach us in the way so that we might.

Also, that scenario of his longsuffering in the days of Noah (among the disobedient) was used to show just how few were saved, eight souls in all. Which is not encouraging, but sobering, and good cause for diligence, in making their own calling and election sure (if only to ones self).

Also, its neither the hot nor the cold that are spued out of his mouth, its the indifferent, lukewarm. I have something on that too, on my website, but it is down at the moment, cant retreive it.

God bless you
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
Cycel said:
So newborns go to Hell if they die because they haven't yet had time to be born again?
That is up to the Lord, He shows mercy to whom He will.
This is what you believe, though maybe you haven't thought it through? If a baby is born during the morning of any given day and dies an houlater, it clearly has not accepted Jesus. It will be some years before a babe would be old enough to understand any of the religious implications. That God would send such an infant to Hell is an unspeakable horror. If God is perfectly good this can't happen.

You quoted Paul in Romans 5:12 "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." Note that Paul did not say, "and so death passed upon all infants." Had Paul wanted to make it clear that all infants too would suffer he would have said "all infants." Instead he said "all men," and as we know men have reached the age of majority. Infants have not. Obviously a newborn has not committed any sin, whatsoever. Making an infant suffer might be in the handbook of ISIS extremists, but one would hope it is not in the repertoire of a god that we identify as being perfectly good.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
The child died but David who had a heart after Gods heart said that he would surely see the child in the presence of God. 2 Sam 12:23

For the cause of Christ
Roger
that simply means the child died and he will die someday also....
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
that simply means the child died and he will die someday also....
Why is your way of thinking always contrary to the ideals of scripture?

David was comforted in the thought that the child had done no evil and that he, David, would see the child in heaven.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Jan 7, 2015
6,057
78
0
This is what you believe, though maybe you haven't thought it through? If a baby is born during the morning of any given day and dies an houlater, it clearly has not accepted Jesus. It will be some years before a babe would be old enough to understand any of the religious implications. That God would send such an infant to Hell is an unspeakable horror. If God is perfectly good this can't happen.

You quoted Paul in Romans 5:12 "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." Note that Paul did not say, "and so death passed upon all infants." Had Paul wanted to make it clear that all infants too would suffer he would have said "all infants." Instead he said "all men," and as we know men have reached the age of majority. Infants have not. Obviously a newborn has not committed any sin, whatsoever. Making an infant suffer might be in the handbook of ISIS extremists, but one would hope it is not in the repertoire of a god that we identify as being perfectly good.
Think about this, the wage of sin=death. So if the baby did not have a sin nature already working in them, then how could the baby die (not having any sin) But all have sin, thus all are determined to die. Thus physical death (even with infants) proves this point to be true.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
This is what you believe, though maybe you haven't thought it through? If a baby is born during the morning of any given day and dies an houlater, it clearly has not accepted Jesus. It will be some years before a babe would be old enough to understand any of the religious implications. That God would send such an infant to Hell is an unspeakable horror. If God is perfectly good this can't happen.

You quoted Paul in Romans 5:12 "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." Note that Paul did not say, "and so death passed upon all infants." Had Paul wanted to make it clear that all infants too would suffer he would have said "all infants." Instead he said "all men," and as we know men have reached the age of majority. Infants have not. Obviously a newborn has not committed any sin, whatsoever. Making an infant suffer might be in the handbook of ISIS extremists, but one would hope it is not in the repertoire of a god that we identify as being perfectly good.
sin entered the world by one man Adam....by reason of disobedience...this affected his whole nature and by extension his seed after him...which would include all men....by reason of birth not age....one is born with the Adamic nature...he does not grow into it...
Romans 5:13-15King James Version (KJV)
[SUP]13 [/SUP](For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
[SUP]14 [/SUP]Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

[SUP]15 [/SUP]But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
Why is your way of thinking always contrary to the ideals of scripture?

David was comforted in the thought that the child had done no evil and that he, David, would see the child in heaven.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
that is your comfort....David prayed for the child's life .....and when his prayers were not answered and the child died he went about hid business as usual....He was comforted in the thought that God was merciful to him......
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
that is your comfort....David prayed for the child's life .....and when his prayers were not answered and the child died he went about hid business as usual....He was comforted in the thought that God was merciful to him......
Pretty much yep. David knew the important things are the eternal things. The child belonged to God and not to David.

Perhaps you need to catch a glimpse of eternity and heavenly things.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,370
113
Im your sister bro Jackson :D

I agree, even as they were sometime disobedient (as Noah preached, as the ark was preparing) and his longsuffering toward us is shown us there. Which is the same longsuffering toward us that we should account as our salvation (being patience with us) not willing that any should perish, and that we might all come to repentance (as his gifts and callings are without it). But the Lord is good and upright (receives sinners) and will teach us in the way so that we might.

Also, that scenario of his longsuffering in the days of Noah (among the disobedient) was used to show just how few were saved, eight souls in all. Which is not encouraging, but sobering, and good cause for diligence, in making their own calling and election sure (if only to ones self).

Also, its neither the hot nor the cold that are spued out of his mouth, its the indifferent, lukewarm. I have something on that too, on my website, but it is down at the moment, cant retreive it.

God bless you

Thank sister, it is scary that the Lord said narrow is the way and only few will be save. Scary but it is fact that we have to face.

Only push us to one choice, do not lukewarm. be hot all the time, I remember parable of the housekeeper. If they not ready when the house owner come, they will be in trouble.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
Pretty much yep. David knew the important things are the eternal things. The child belonged to God and not to David.

Perhaps you need to catch a glimpse of eternity and heavenly things.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
yea and I suppose you had angels pulling out babies from Sodom and Gomorrah .....you know so much about heaven and eternity...but you don't know how much God hates sin.....
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
yea and I suppose you had angels pulling out babies from Sodom and Gomorrah .....you know so much about heaven and eternity...but you don't know how much God hates sin.....
Well it seems to me that there are some difficulties with Sodomites producing children. Since the angels that were there did not pull any other souls out it seems reasonable to conclude that there were none.

Going a step farther I would say that if there were any innocent children there then their souls went to be with the Lord having been saved from a life of sin and misery.

You are very cold hearted if you think that the innocence of children does not touch Gods heart.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
Well it seems to me that there are some difficulties with Sodomites producing children. Since the angels that were there did not pull any other souls out it seems reasonable to conclude that there were none.
small mind ....

Going a step farther I would say that if there were any innocent children there then their souls went to be with the Lord having been saved from a life of sin and misery.
smaller mind

You are very cold hearted if you think that the innocence of children does not touch Gods heart.
smallest mind......
you don't know God....

15 Samuel also said unto Saul, The Lord sent me to anoint thee to be king over his people, over Israel: now therefore hearken thou unto the voice of the words of the Lord.
[SUP]2 [/SUP]Thus saith the Lord of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.
[SUP]3 [/SUP]Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.


 
Dec 9, 2011
13,761
1,731
113
When a person is Saved, is their name written in the Book of Life? Yes or No? YES is the correct answer.
Does the Bible teach a person can be blotted out of the Book of Life? Yes or No? YES it does teach that.

So simple children can understand it. Click HERE to see Scriptural proof.

^i^
How come no one is replying to to this post.....i wonder
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
Think about this, the wage of sin=death. So if the baby did not have a sin nature already working in them, then how could the baby die (not having any sin) But all have sin, thus all are determined to die. Thus physical death (even with infants) proves this point to be true.
Infants are sinless. To claim otherwise is absurd. That something dies is only proof that it once lived. Name something that doesn't die. All things that live must die. Including grass. Has grass sinned? Oh, but then I forgot, you think grass is not a living thing because it does not have red blood. Seahorses then. Have they committed sin?

The very notion that in your mind an infant can be sent to Hell is, I think, inexcusable. There is a problem with this kind of theology. I’ll be straightforward, it is the sort of thinking that drives many people to atheism. The latest is a United Church of Canada minister, Bob Ripley. See his book, published in 2014, Life Beyond Belief: A Preacher's Deconversion.


InSpiritInTruth said:
But all have sin, thus all are determined to die.
Note: Adam did not die because of sin. He died because he did not get the chance to eat fruit from the Tree of Life.

“The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.” So the Lord God banished him from the Garden of Eden.... (Genesis 3:22-23)

The fruit of this tree would have conferred immortality on Adam. It was not sin that killed him, it was God stopping him from eating of this magical tree.