Someone please answer my question .

[Makahiya2028]

a. Here ya go have a cookie and I gave you a special cookie award and as a sincere Blond want to explain a few things to you....

b. As you have stated above we are all aware by now of your 21 years of theology training, which is impressive by the way, but here on this site you would be known as The New Kid On The Block.... In order to learn to play well with others who have been around the block a time or two you need to learn who your audience is as I previously stated in another post on another of your threads....

c. You see, we unlike you have not had 21 years of theology training and will most likely seem like a dumb Blond to you...and I'm sure for you this could be problematic.... There may be several on this site who do have some years in of theology training but I would imagine very few have the 21 years you keep reminding us that you have had....impressive by the way, but then I said that already....

The way you word questions I sure most don't understand I for one don't, but I do believe that you are sincere, however, if you want the answers that you seem to already have in your mind, we will disappoint you as we don't think like you do. So unless there is a Christian site with very well educated theologians I don't know that you would ever be happy here as you probably won't get the answers you are seeking....

Don't get me wrong I love you like a brother in Christ, but I don't understand what you are asking and unless you can dumb down your questions...or just decide to fellowship and talk about Jesus and what He has done for your life I don't know how much interaction you will receive on the block you have tried to join in on....

So could you tell us how you found Jesus and what He has done in your life?

a. lol,

b. oh, ok, thanks

c. someone asked me about my education,
I told them I would tell them one time
and would not consider discussing it

It's ok to be a dumb blond,

but it's not ok to make stuff up

 

[Willie-T]

LOL. Because I exposed him a troll and an internet spammer and Willie called him a braying jackass.

Hey! I already apologized to Balaam's donkey for that.

 

[kodiak]

It is perfectly obvious, oldhermit is a novice

and really insincere and a little creepy .

hey, hypocrite, that sounds like an unkind personal attack,

spammer, troll, mean man, hater

That is, but calling someone insincere and creepy who was trying to answer your question isn't? Please explain this to me.

 

[Bowhunter2394]

well, not really, the central critical issue in academic theology is final authority

Academic theology? that was Purchased with the following and the Final Authority is in Him, the Way the Truth and the Life!

-------------------------------------------------------------------



[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: vDispa"]For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that Commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

 

[Makahiya2028]

Sir, these words aint supposed to be used against your brothers and sisters in Christ...why are you using such words?

I was showing that man how unkind and hypocritical he talks,

by demonstrating it to him .

 

[cmarieh]

Okay, I am really confused on what this is supposed to be about. All I know is that the Bible is true and it was the different religions that ripped it apart so they can get what they want out of it and as a result of this, people lost the joy of simply reading such a wonderful book that continues to lead people to experience the love of the Christ and share that with others.

 

[JesusLives]

I have a true sincere question....Are you telling me you don't have a personal relationship with Jesus? When you said....but it's not o.k. to make stuff up.... Because I asked you if you could tell us How you found Jesus and what He has done for your life? In post #94.....

 

[Makahiya2028]

View attachment 108066

Academic theology? that was Purchased with the following and the Final Authority is in Him, the Way the Truth and the Life!

yes, great thought, but unless Jesus comes to you personally

and teaches you the Book of the Revelation of Jesus

you'll probably need a Holy Bible

 

[valiant]

There are two types of bibles, Holy Bibles and Corrupt Bible.
Holy Bibles are translated from holy manuscripts
and Corrupt Bibles from corrupt manuscripts.
99% of the 5,500+ existing N.T. manuscripts support
the readings of the KJV Holy Bible.

Only because they were copied from each other. Most of them are medieval manuscripts.

The N.T. manuscripts of the KJV Holy Bible

predate the existing 45 Alexandrian corrupt manuscripts

This is simply untrue. Sinaiticus and Vaticanus predate all Byzantine manuscripts by over 100 years, and most by hundreds of years. We also have the Papyri cited in Greek critical texts which tend to support the above..

and the reconstructed Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus.

but we can trace the originals.

Over seven years 47 of history’s greatest scholars prayerfully

translated the Authorized King James Holy Bible

from the majority manuscripts and Wycliffe Bible,

Erasmus N.T., Luther Bible, Colinaeus N.T.,

Stephanus N.T., Tyndale Bible, Coverdale Bible,

Great Bible, Geneva Bible, Bishop Bible and Beza N.T.

True and given the limitations they did a good job. But they had no idea of what would be discovered about older manuscripts. They used what was available including at least one doctored by the RC church so that 1 John 5.7 would be included. Erasmus refused to put it in his Greek text until a Greek txt could be produced that had it in. Conveniently a few months later one was produced, recently copied.

 

[Makahiya2028]

Okay, I am really confused on what this is supposed to be about. All I know is that the Bible is true and it was the different religions that ripped it apart so they can get what they want out of it and as a result of this, people lost the joy of simply reading such a wonderful book that continues to lead people to experience the love of the Christ and share that with others.

Yes, you're right, this is going to take a little while to understand.

There is no such thing as the bible. There never was an original bible .

The subject is bible canonization.

There are over 400 (Christian, Catholic, Cult) Hebrew, Greek, Syrian, Latin,

German, English, etc. bibles which do not match in content, volume or doctrine.

 

[KJV1611]

Not there, but then again you promote a version that was very much about trying to corrupt God's word. (It didn't work.) King James hired a bunch of scholars to translate the Bible into what he wanted it to say. He wanted it to say the King is Law, instead of the law is king. God had other plans, and got the scholars to do a good translation for its time.

Words have changed in meaning since then, and new evidence proves some of the words were mistranslated, but this is what we get -- the best translations by the scholars of the time.

Let's face it, if KJV1611 was the only version that works, that's roughly 1578 years of people stuck with bad translations and countless people who never got any translation, because they can't read English.

That rather proves the point.

As far as I can tell, the KJV is the pure word of God. I've never seen anybody prove an error in it yet. Word meanings may have changed a little bit but that doesn't affect our ability to understand scripture. It's very easy to understand word meanings by looking at their usage throughout scripture. Most words are symbols anyway.

 

[just-me]

Yes, you're right, this is going to take a little while to understand.

There is no such thing as the bible. There never was an original bible .

The subject is bible canonization.

There are over 400 (Christian, Catholic, Cult) Hebrew, Greek, Syrian, Latin,

German, English, etc. bibles which do not match in content, volume or doctrine.

I have 2 questions for you. Do you believe in the "Word of God" being a person in Christ Jesus, and also His statements given in both the Old and New Covenants? Do you understand the allegory in the chronology that was written in what we call the Bible, and what is called scrolls in scripture?

 

[Makahiya2028]

Only because they were copied from each other. Most of them are medieval manuscripts.[/SIZE]


This is simply untrue. Sinaiticus and Vaticanus predate all Byzantine manuscripts by over 100 years, and most by hundreds of years. We also have the Papyri cited in Greek critical texts which tend to support the above..


but we can trace the originals.



True and given the limitations they did a good job. But they had no idea of what would be discovered about older manuscripts. They used what was available including at least one doctored by the RC church so that 1 John 5.7 would be included. Erasmus refused to put it in his Greek text until a Greek txt could be produced that had it in. Conveniently a few months later one was produced, recently copied.

99% of the 5,500+ existing N.T. manuscripts

support the readings of the KJV Holy Bible,

lol, that's why they are call the majority texts.


The N.T. manuscripts of the KJV Holy Bible

predate the existing 45 Alexandrian manuscripts

and the reconstructed Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus.


Have you ever seen Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus ?

 

[AgeofKnowledge]

I've reported you for making a blatant personal attack here.

It is perfectly obvious, oldhermit is a novice

and really insincere and a little creepy .

 

[oldhermit]

99% of the 5,500+ existing N.T. manuscripts

support the readings of the KJV Holy Bible,

lol, that's why they are call the majority texts.


The N.T. manuscripts of the KJV Holy Bible

predate the existing 45 Alexandrian manuscripts

and the reconstructed Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus.


Have you ever seen Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus ?

Really? Perhaps you can provide us with statistical data that supports such an outlandish claim. Which MSS do not?

 

[KJV1611]

I don't get all this original language stuff, can't you guys tell the difference between the KJV and the newer translation when you read them? The KJV always points to Christ and his work while the newer translations put the focus on you and your works.

 

[posthuman]

sorry i'm late!

what's for supper?

If you bite and devour each other,
watch out or you will be destroyed by each other.
(Galatians 5:15)
​

oh.

 

[Makahiya2028]

I have a true sincere question....Are you telling me you don't have a personal relationship with Jesus? When you said....but it's not o.k. to make stuff up.... Because I asked you if you could tell us How you found Jesus and what He has done for your life? In post #94.....

ok, I'm going to answer your sincere questions,

even if I don't understand them.

really, no, I'm not saying I don't have a personal relationship with Jesus.

I do have a personal relationship with Jesus,

but he doesn't come to me at night, sit on my bed

and read the Holy Bible to me.


So far, I've had to read the Holy Bible for myself.


lol, no, you stated that I repeatedly talk about my education,

when actually, I only answered one person, one time .

that's kinda like making stuff up

 

[oldhermit]

sorry i'm late!

what's for supper?

TROLL......

 

[JesusIsAll]

sorry i'm late!

what's for supper?

If you bite and devour each other,
watch out or you will be destroyed by each other.
(Galatians 5:15)
​

oh.

Lord knows, looking at your avatar, you could use some supper! The menu is unclear, though, and maybe all meats are to be received with thanksgiving, but there's been talk of jackass, so I'm thinking to maybe just stick to the taters.