Ok Looked a bit at he website you quoted. I did a degree in physics so I know a bit about the subject.
The controversial point is quite important. The first is special theory of relativity is wrong. The second is the big bang theory has a big hole in it which dark energy and dark matter are designed to fill.
Now I know about the problem of dark energy etc. but this problem could be solved is if gravity behaves differently at very large scales.
The problem of idea of a geocentric universe is at first insane, because we know the earth going round the sun is observable fact. If there is a problem shown up with GPS and the speed of light, then that is very significant.
I am therefore very interested. Anything that is measurable matters, because you can construct experiments to confirm or deny the proposition. The accusation is scientists are biased, which again is 100% true, especially is they are atheists.
One reason for the multiple universe idea is because science was leading them to the conclusion the universe could only exist because one constant had to exist at a value so precise 10^20+ that it only could happen if it was planned.
But that hypothosis had to be rejected because that would mean religion mattered. I will look into this further, but currently I am a little sceptical, but I am always open to ideas if they make sense.
The controversial point is quite important. The first is special theory of relativity is wrong. The second is the big bang theory has a big hole in it which dark energy and dark matter are designed to fill.
Now I know about the problem of dark energy etc. but this problem could be solved is if gravity behaves differently at very large scales.
The problem of idea of a geocentric universe is at first insane, because we know the earth going round the sun is observable fact. If there is a problem shown up with GPS and the speed of light, then that is very significant.
I am therefore very interested. Anything that is measurable matters, because you can construct experiments to confirm or deny the proposition. The accusation is scientists are biased, which again is 100% true, especially is they are atheists.
One reason for the multiple universe idea is because science was leading them to the conclusion the universe could only exist because one constant had to exist at a value so precise 10^20+ that it only could happen if it was planned.
But that hypothosis had to be rejected because that would mean religion mattered. I will look into this further, but currently I am a little sceptical, but I am always open to ideas if they make sense.
From earth, it looks like everything moves around us and we are stationary.
So why would it be so strange if this were the truth? To me it wouldn't be strange.
But what caught me is I like to shoot rifles. I am interested in shooting them long distances. In ballistics, when shooting at long distances, you have to make a correction for the spin of the earth. I could explain this correction, if you needed me to, but it was this correction that caused me to think that the earth is at least rotating on an axis. I don't know if its also moving through space as well, but it is rotating. Just based on ballistics corrections at long distances.