No, I meant what I said, not what you repeatedly try to twist it into meaning according to your agenda. Please show the truth as Scripture reveals:
Evidence of Mary's sinlessness, her immaculate conception, her perpetual virginity, her bodily assumption to heaven, or why I should accept her as the mother of humanity and the queen of heaven, and an intercessor between myself and God? The RCC promotes them as truths, some of them as infallible truths, despite there being no evidence to support them through Scripture, and despite the fact that some of them are plainly directly contradicted by Scripture. Jesus did not elevate Mary at all, and God multiple times says He will not share His glory, while the RCC glorifies not just Mary but Peter, as if the church Christ is building is founded upon a fallible man Jesus called Satan at one point, instead of on a confession of faith in Him, divinely inspired. There are plenty of Scriptures to attest to the fact that God is the sole rock of our salvation. That would be Petra, not Petros... and Jesus told us to call no man Father, but of course Catholics ignore that in favour of their man made traditions as well.
Someone asked, how do I know anything about the Catholic mass. That is another problem with Catholics. They think they are the only ones that know anything about their institution, its practices, man made traditions elevated above the Word of God, and heretical beliefs.