Romans 8:1-2, is conditional
- Thread starter know1
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I find it illuminating, I have expounded my position here, but the reply is
just slander. Is this all they can bring? Is this the best their foundation
has to offer?
It is like when I listed their theology, they did not deny it or correct me.
When I showed the problems with it, they just attacked me on different issues.
These are a blind people who have no real concerns with real spirituality but
compromising the word of the Lord to appease their own dispositions.
This is a very hard thing to say, but there is nothing else to conclude.
The Kingdom stands and falls on the principle of love and righteousness.
It is where God has placed His marker in Christ. If you follow Jesus then
you should also agree with this, it is where the Kingdom is. It has always
been so.
The gifts, grace, redemption, sanctification all lead from and to this place.
It is like a river that flows from eternity to eternity. Yet many are deceived
their hearts weaving a different story with a different agenda of treasures in
this world and recognition not from the Lord. It has always been so, and so
is today.
just slander. Is this all they can bring? Is this the best their foundation
has to offer?
It is like when I listed their theology, they did not deny it or correct me.
When I showed the problems with it, they just attacked me on different issues.
These are a blind people who have no real concerns with real spirituality but
compromising the word of the Lord to appease their own dispositions.
This is a very hard thing to say, but there is nothing else to conclude.
The Kingdom stands and falls on the principle of love and righteousness.
It is where God has placed His marker in Christ. If you follow Jesus then
you should also agree with this, it is where the Kingdom is. It has always
been so.
The gifts, grace, redemption, sanctification all lead from and to this place.
It is like a river that flows from eternity to eternity. Yet many are deceived
their hearts weaving a different story with a different agenda of treasures in
this world and recognition not from the Lord. It has always been so, and so
is today.
Their sin is to condemn those who love Jesus as evil, double minded, liars, hypocrites,
legalists, enemies of the gospel, full of malice and hate and sometimes, with no knowledge
of Christ and the cross.
It is very odd, because they believe 99% of the same things, yet a few issues turn us into
satans spawn. It is like a red mist descends on their souls, and the words of love and
encouragement, fellowship in Christ become hypocracy hiding terrible evil which is just not
there.
And their preachers pour out this condemnation day and night, and they do whenever I appear
or believers like me. I have found it odd coming from the spiritual background I do, to have
such emnity and words thrown, like double minded etc. If I did not understand the bile this
comes from I would be very hurt and upset. But that is what it is. It is not I who have moved
but it is they, and go redefining the faith into something else.
legalists, enemies of the gospel, full of malice and hate and sometimes, with no knowledge
of Christ and the cross.
It is very odd, because they believe 99% of the same things, yet a few issues turn us into
satans spawn. It is like a red mist descends on their souls, and the words of love and
encouragement, fellowship in Christ become hypocracy hiding terrible evil which is just not
there.
And their preachers pour out this condemnation day and night, and they do whenever I appear
or believers like me. I have found it odd coming from the spiritual background I do, to have
such emnity and words thrown, like double minded etc. If I did not understand the bile this
comes from I would be very hurt and upset. But that is what it is. It is not I who have moved
but it is they, and go redefining the faith into something else.
This is where we have to be careful. On issues that are plain and simple in
scripture, they are very much issues from the Lord. But there are many things
I do not know the Lords position on, and would not like to say where I am in this.
But this has always been the dilemma of Gods people. We always know in part.
scripture, they are very much issues from the Lord. But there are many things
I do not know the Lords position on, and would not like to say where I am in this.
But this has always been the dilemma of Gods people. We always know in part.
G
I would be happy to discuss this with you, and have tried many times. And so have many others.
Honestly Peter? You won't carry out one lucid thought and stick to one point. And lots of us have been here long enough to know why you won't. It's a tactic that works very well to try to confuse and overwhelm others with to much information.
Honestly Peter? You won't carry out one lucid thought and stick to one point. And lots of us have been here long enough to know why you won't. It's a tactic that works very well to try to confuse and overwhelm others with to much information.
I am sorry this is simply not true.
I remember JGIG produced a long list of answers to a HG type church.
After going through it in detail I realised it was just a rehash of the basic belief
system. So unless you can actually deal with facts it is just slander again.
Look at my blog, it is all there. There is little point me repeating the issues here.
And we have had threads going through each one in detail, and it normally just gets
worse in the description and consequences.
So as I always want simple open issues drawn to a conclusion, it is absurd to actually
accuse me of the opposite. This is what I call a joke.
And if anyone is interested, read the blog and comment. It is that simple.
What I believe I have also laid out, which is traditional standard evangelical faith.
But maybe this is just all too much, because you cannot win, which is the reality.
I remember JGIG produced a long list of answers to a HG type church.
After going through it in detail I realised it was just a rehash of the basic belief
system. So unless you can actually deal with facts it is just slander again.
Look at my blog, it is all there. There is little point me repeating the issues here.
And we have had threads going through each one in detail, and it normally just gets
worse in the description and consequences.
So as I always want simple open issues drawn to a conclusion, it is absurd to actually
accuse me of the opposite. This is what I call a joke.
And if anyone is interested, read the blog and comment. It is that simple.
What I believe I have also laid out, which is traditional standard evangelical faith.
But maybe this is just all too much, because you cannot win, which is the reality.
There is an issue with all who share Gods word. It is for the listener to
prove to themselves that they are right. Put simply it is not my word, but Gods
word that matters.
Funnily even Christ said the same thing. You need the testimony of more than one.
He did balance this as the Father testified to Him as well.
But this is always the case with anything from the Lord. We are in the end servants
to the King.
prove to themselves that they are right. Put simply it is not my word, but Gods
word that matters.
Funnily even Christ said the same thing. You need the testimony of more than one.
He did balance this as the Father testified to Him as well.
But this is always the case with anything from the Lord. We are in the end servants
to the King.
Here is EG the liar and slanderer.
I come speaking the truth, talking scripture, what the Lord has laid on my
heart, and continually I get a long list of sins I have commited, which I have not.
But then the enemy always attacks the messenger and not the message.
So Jesus tells me, Halleluyah for great is your reward in Heaven.
So rather than tearing down what I have to say, he is pointing to is veracity,
because as his hatred of this message rises so does its impact and reality.
I come speaking the truth, talking scripture, what the Lord has laid on my
heart, and continually I get a long list of sins I have commited, which I have not.
But then the enemy always attacks the messenger and not the message.
So Jesus tells me, Halleluyah for great is your reward in Heaven.
So rather than tearing down what I have to say, he is pointing to is veracity,
because as his hatred of this message rises so does its impact and reality.
I answered her point my friend.
But as I said before the idea of speaking from me or the flesh is an alien
concept not in scripture. Or cannot you read what I write?
I cannot make it simpler.
And my point is about feelings, openness and sharing. Or does this pass
you by as well? As I am your enemy, I suppose it must because how things
impact me is not a concern of many.
It was like when someone first suggested I spoke to satan instead of Christ.
A bit of a shock coming from a "believer", who felt they had the authority to
advise elders and whole fellowships. But there you have the great emotional
fest at work, the authority with responsibility theology. Love was never on
their agenda.
But as I said before the idea of speaking from me or the flesh is an alien
concept not in scripture. Or cannot you read what I write?
I cannot make it simpler.
And my point is about feelings, openness and sharing. Or does this pass
you by as well? As I am your enemy, I suppose it must because how things
impact me is not a concern of many.
It was like when someone first suggested I spoke to satan instead of Christ.
A bit of a shock coming from a "believer", who felt they had the authority to
advise elders and whole fellowships. But there you have the great emotional
fest at work, the authority with responsibility theology. Love was never on
their agenda.