The False Science of the Evolution Theory
- Thread starter Enow
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
If anyone would like I wrote a blog on this (I'm not active on there at the time but I will share past writings here and there) it's not the shortest thing but I reaaaally felt I made some points that can't be refuted. I studied it on a cellular level, myself, once I was a believer and began reading the Good Book. What I discovered amazed me.
link:: transformed, not [con]formed: Correct me if I'm wrong..?
I do not know what species some here may be claiming came from another species but it doesn't happen. Animals change. I don't even like using the term micro evolution. But there it is. Animals change size shape color attributes but not species.
link:: transformed, not [con]formed: Correct me if I'm wrong..?
I do not know what species some here may be claiming came from another species but it doesn't happen. Animals change. I don't even like using the term micro evolution. But there it is. Animals change size shape color attributes but not species.
Chickenkiller I would be honored if you read my blog post above and got back with me.
And really. Chickenkiller? Didn't enjoy typing that. I don't want to be rude... so I won't say anything else at you directly
<3
I mean my great grandmother used to enjoy killing not just chickens... but chicks. BABY CHICKENS. She got in trouble one day as a kid for somehow...popping their heads off. Yeah lovely family story there (sorry everyone) So your name is extra "ugh" to me XD
And really. Chickenkiller? Didn't enjoy typing that. I don't want to be rude... so I won't say anything else at you directly
<3 I mean my great grandmother used to enjoy killing not just chickens... but chicks. BABY CHICKENS. She got in trouble one day as a kid for somehow...popping their heads off. Yeah lovely family story there (sorry everyone) So your name is extra "ugh" to me XD
The Fraud of Evolution
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/3665.2.0.0/science/evolution/the-fraud-of-evolution
The Improbability of Evolution
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/595.24.41.0/science/evolution/the-improbability-of-evolution
Natural Selection: An Answer to Everything
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/14231.2.0.0/science/natural-selection-an-answer-to-everything
A Multimillion-Dollar Monkey Fraud
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/6223.3.0.0/society/media/a-multimillion-dollar-monkey-fraud
The Dodo’s Lesson in Evolution Theory
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/...volution/the-dodos-lesson-in-evolution-theory
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/3665.2.0.0/science/evolution/the-fraud-of-evolution
The Improbability of Evolution
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/595.24.41.0/science/evolution/the-improbability-of-evolution
Natural Selection: An Answer to Everything
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/14231.2.0.0/science/natural-selection-an-answer-to-everything
A Multimillion-Dollar Monkey Fraud
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/6223.3.0.0/society/media/a-multimillion-dollar-monkey-fraud
The Dodo’s Lesson in Evolution Theory
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/...volution/the-dodos-lesson-in-evolution-theory
Last edited:
“After the microscope was invented in 1683, the masterly work of Tyndall and Louis Pasteur
proved conclusively that the ‘law of biogenesis’ [that life can come only from life] held true
for microscopic forms of life as well!
“Evolutionists, geneticists, biologists, scientists in any field whatsoever,
have never been able to demonstrate, nor to offer the slightest evidence
that the living can come into existence from the not-living!
proved conclusively that the ‘law of biogenesis’ [that life can come only from life] held true
for microscopic forms of life as well!
“Evolutionists, geneticists, biologists, scientists in any field whatsoever,
have never been able to demonstrate, nor to offer the slightest evidence
that the living can come into existence from the not-living!
View attachment 167109
O ye of little faith....
Please don't say a seed is living matter without citing what your doctrine constitutes as living matter, if you really are prove-all.
You are correct in recognizing that science is defines certain terms differently than the definition generally associated with the the meaning of the term.
* My hypothesis noted in red
Isn't the name for standard science now called scientism?
Same reason it is not called the 'fact of creationism"
Please don't say a seed is living matter without citing what your doctrine constitutes as living matter, if you really are prove-all.
You are correct in recognizing that science is defines certain terms differently than the definition generally associated with the the meaning of the term.
- Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” Truth in science, however, is never final and what is accepted as a fact today may be modified or even discarded tomorrow. (Aka: Belief)
- Theory: In science, a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses. (Aka: Doctrine)
SOURCE: National Center for Science Education
* My hypothesis noted in red
Isn't the name for standard science now called scientism?
Same reason it is not called the 'fact of creationism"
The term "theory" in science differs from the use of the term in a common language.
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
Last edited:
I looked at your page and first saw big picture with suggestive question that evolution teaches we are from apes, then I started to read until I got to "So we came from monkeys…no big deal…", which proved you do not know even basic teachings of the evolution theory.
If you want to write on some topic from the Christian perspective, get the facts first, because you are representing Christianity in such a moment, take it seriously, not just only as an agenda.
If you want to write on some topic from the Christian perspective, get the facts first, because you are representing Christianity in such a moment, take it seriously, not just only as an agenda.
View attachment 167109
O ye of little faith....
Please don't say a seed is living matter without citing what your doctrine constitutes as living matter,
if you really are prove-all.
Please don't say a seed is living matter without citing what your doctrine constitutes as living matter,
if you really are prove-all.
The word theory, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is “a hypothesis that has been confirmed
or established by observation or experiment, and is propounded or accepted as accounting for the known facts.”
To be considered a theory, something must be “confirmed” and account for the “known facts.”
Evolution has been neither
In contrast, a “hypothesis” as defined by Oxford is “a proposition or principle put forth or stated
(without any reference to its correspondence with fact) merely as a basis for reasoning or argument .…
[A] provisional supposition from which to draw conclusions that shall be in accordance with known facts,
and which serves as a starting-point for further investigation by which it may be proved or disproved
and the true theory arrived at.”
More simply stated, a hypothesis is an idea or a guess at something without facts to support it.
If the evidence proves the hypothesis, it then becomes a theory
The idea of evolution has never reached that step. At best, evolution is a hypothesis.
Unproven and without “correspondence with fact,” it stands as an idea scientists seem
desperate to substantiate, though they remain unable to do so. An examination of the
facts easily proves there is no theory of evolution.
or established by observation or experiment, and is propounded or accepted as accounting for the known facts.”
To be considered a theory, something must be “confirmed” and account for the “known facts.”
Evolution has been neither
In contrast, a “hypothesis” as defined by Oxford is “a proposition or principle put forth or stated
(without any reference to its correspondence with fact) merely as a basis for reasoning or argument .…
[A] provisional supposition from which to draw conclusions that shall be in accordance with known facts,
and which serves as a starting-point for further investigation by which it may be proved or disproved
and the true theory arrived at.”
More simply stated, a hypothesis is an idea or a guess at something without facts to support it.
If the evidence proves the hypothesis, it then becomes a theory
The idea of evolution has never reached that step. At best, evolution is a hypothesis.
Unproven and without “correspondence with fact,” it stands as an idea scientists seem
desperate to substantiate, though they remain unable to do so. An examination of the
facts easily proves there is no theory of evolution.
Do not worry, the theory of evolution does not contradict the Christian faith, you dont have to fight it and try to make it unscientific.
The evolution of bodies is not any more antichristian than for example the evolution of plants or solar systems. Nature has its laws and God is the architect of it.
The evolution of bodies is not any more antichristian than for example the evolution of plants or solar systems. Nature has its laws and God is the architect of it.