Chokmahiel,
I wasn't asking for a meaning - don't think there is one; perhaps I was deluding myself in thinking that there was something which would stand as some sort of meaning in spite of the inherent futility in everytihng. I think I was right with my previous postulation then, that you may as well make the most of it while you can sort of thing. Can one truly believe atheism is neither ironic nor interesting. Atheism is the default position, it's not being convinced by theistic arguments and therefore either deferring judgement or rejecting the claims; I actually reject the claims and believe there is no God, I'm an agnostic atheist in that I don't know if there is one or not. I feel very sure that none of the judeo-christian theisms are even remotely reasonable explanations of reality. Does atheism in truth even exist is like asking does not believing in pixies exist.
Sorry for the little delay in responding, had to go watch Wheel of Fortune and Jeopardy.
Well your original question was asking for meaning in life outside of God, destiny, etc. Not a bad question by the way, I enjoyed thinking about it. I thought it was thought-provoking so I just am giving my thoughts.
See there's the problem though again, if I suppose the answer to the question that outside of the God, destiny, higher powers, etc. that life is meaningless and futile, I can't really give an honest answer about the meaning of life without those. If it is meaningless and futile then there is no meaning. If there is no meaning then there is no conclusion to the question. So logically then something in the original assumption has to be incorrect.
As for the ironic question; can atheism truly exist? I mean think about it, if atheism is true, then there can't be a point of view that has a deity or deities, destiny, higher powers, or whatever you want to call such things. So then you can't really be an atheist. For example if you are like most atheists and simply believe in the theory of evolution or the theory of the big bang, then you have become a creationist, just a different type of creationist. You would believe there is a creation, you would believe the creation is ordered in a certain way. In this example you'd believe there was a creation in the form of what the big bang theory postulates. You would believe the order of the creation that things are fated to evolve or perish. You would believe in a higher power be it the cosmos, nature, theoretical physics, natural selection, whatever basically. Since then you would believe in such things you couldn't truly be an atheist.
Heh I find the term agnostic atheist kind of a funny conundrum in itself. You don't know if there is a higher power that you don't believe in? I don't see how atheism can be the default if it does not exist. Even you say in your first post you were at first a Christian.
As for Christianity and Judaism, I think Christianity is pretty reasonable, maybe not so much Judaism. But then those are pretty vast topics in themselves that I suppose would be better saved for a whole other topic.
Also, you may not be convinced of evolution but it is a fact and there is not a scintilla of contravening evidence against it despite what you say. There is no debate on it, at least no serious academic debate on it - there is the odd creationist objection with not basis in science. There is a 'debate' as to whether evolution is true in the same way there is a 'debate' as to whether Elvis Presley is still alive.
Well I don't believe evolution is a fact based upon other facts I have seen. There are too many facts against it. One scintilla would simply be in the way the theory of evolution is both relatively new and also has to continually be revised. So I suppose then it's easy to see why it is one of the more popular debates. You could probably make a popular topic about it, or join in on one elsewhere on the forum though. I'm sure you would get many respondents.