King James Bible ONLY? Or NOT?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
I would be very careful with "another Jesus, another gospel, another God" and similar sayings.

That we are not able to agree on some aspect of God does not mean we have different God or different Jesus.

It would mean we are not saved equally, because one of us would have some kind of a false God.

And you know what? You can be wrong about His origin.
You surely do not want to explain on the judgement day why you said its a different Jesus, right...?

If we had the same physical father and letter from him we could not agree on how to interpret, it does not mean our fathers are different persons.
I'm not accusing anybody of not being saved at all, I don't know who is saved and who is not. I'm just saying that if a person is reading the newer translations then the Christ that's being formed in their mind is not the same Christ that's in the KJV. I used to read the NIV and I was saved and the false Christ had been formed in my mind but God changed it for me.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
But it is about evolution... learning from step to step and it takes much time.

He means some kind of miracle - you hear it and bam!, there it is, from now on you can hear it. So there is actually no time when you cant.
No I don't mean it's some kind of miracle, it takes time to develop hearing. But I will say that it snowballs at a certain point.
 

slave

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2015
6,307
1,097
113
Gods word has always been hidden in the symbolism of the words written down on paper. Those hidden meanings are the spirit and the written words are the letter.
Thats abstract and confusing to me. His Word is not hidden in symbolisms of words. His Word itself is active and alive, and the Spirit, in which you reference, the third part of the triune God, the Holy Spirit ( a person) whom is witness and guarantees the redeemed thru transformation, is part and parcel to your person in Christ. This is simply life thru righteousness; which is your spirit being led and communicated with the Holy Spirit. The written word is the letter;Yet, it is the Lord, via the H.S., whom gives us understanding to the letter, as does the letter of His Word agree with the Triune God actively and with life.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
I agree that there was no time when Jesus didn't exist, he is eternal and DID NOT get his origin from God. Eternal beings don't have origins, they are eternal.
If the eternal Son "flows" (I do not know how to say it better) out of the eternal Father, there is no problem with His origin or His eternity.

This "Son is from Father (origin)" is talking about the physical body of Christ not the origin of the divine being Jesus.
Can you find any Christian creed saying this? I am quite sure this is not a Christian teaching.
 
Last edited:

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
I'm not accusing anybody of not being saved at all, I don't know who is saved and who is not. I'm just saying that if a person is reading the newer translations then the Christ that's being formed in their mind is not the same Christ that's in the KJV. I used to read the NIV and I was saved and the false Christ had been formed in my mind but God changed it for me.
I am afraid that it is the KJV that puts you in some strange teachings not found in any Christian stream.... like the one about the Son.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Thats abstract and confusing to me. His Word is not hidden in symbolisms of words. His Word itself is active and alive, and the Spirit, in which you reference, the third part of the triune God, the Holy Spirit ( a person) whom is witness and guarantees the redeemed thru transformation, is part and parcel to your person in Christ. This is simply life thru righteousness; which is your spirit being led and communicated with the Holy Spirit. The written word is the letter;Yet, it is the Lord, via the H.S., whom gives us understanding to the letter, as does the letter of His Word agree with the Triune God actively and with life.
Would you consider this verse to be the true word of God hidden in the symbols?

John 6:53 KJV
Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
If the eternal Son "flows" (I do not know how to say it better) out of the eternal Father, there is no problem with His origin or His eternity.



Can you find any Christian creed saying this? I am quite sure this is not a Christian teaching.
We've beat this horse to death lol. I, nor anyone else that I know believe Jesus came out of God, we believe that Jesus and God are one eternal being.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
I am afraid that it is the KJV that puts you in some strange teachings not found in any Christian stream.... like the one about the Son.
When Jesus came did his teachings sound strange to the "mainstream" Jews? I probably don't agree with any "mainstream" Christian denomination on anything.... they don't believe the bible is right. God expects one thing from us, Believe Him... that's it.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
We've beat this horse to death lol. I, nor anyone else that I know believe Jesus came out of God, we believe that Jesus and God are one eternal being.
I do not know why are you still changing "Father" for "God" and so making it confusing for yourself :)

Son comes out of Father. They are one God.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
When Jesus came did his teachings sound strange to the "mainstream" Jews? I probably don't agree with any "mainstream" Christian denomination on anything.... they don't believe the bible is right. God expects one thing from us, Believe Him... that's it.
What Christian denomination does not believe that the Bible is right? Where do you live? You have so strange experiences :)
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,781
13,414
113
Yes I forgot you asked for non KJV. Wow, it's much harder to find it in the NIV. It's like they are trying to conceal it from the reader. But they do mention that Jesus is God here.

Isaiah 9:6 New International Version (NIV)

6 For to us a child is born,
to us a son is given,
and the government will be on his shoulders.
And he will be called
Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

I will look for more places where the NIV is wrong based on other things the NIV says.
So you're comparing NIV to NIV and finding discrepancies, and that allegedly proves that the NIV is faulty? I'm trying to follow your logic.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
What Christian denomination does not believe that the Bible is right? Where do you live? You have so strange experiences :)
None of them believe the bible is 100%... it's close enough that the "major" doctrines are still ok. You believe the same don't you?
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
So you're comparing NIV to NIV and finding discrepancies, and that allegedly proves that the NIV is faulty? I'm trying to follow your logic.
I may have misunderstood you earlier, I thought you had asked to prove Jesus was God without using the KJV, that's why I posted the verse I posted..

When I said I will look for more places where the NIV is wrong, I was talking about in addition to the NIV saying that Jesus had an origin.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
So you're comparing NIV to NIV and finding discrepancies, and that allegedly proves that the NIV is faulty? I'm trying to follow your logic.
I'm reading the NIV today as I travel, I will post errors, real errors that I find. :)

Was Abraham considered righteous by offering Isaac? I'm gonna give my input... no he was not considered righteous by anything HE DID, he was considered righteous because he believed God and it was counted to him as righteousness.

21 [FONT=&quot]Was not our father Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar?[/FONT]
 

slave

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2015
6,307
1,097
113
Would you consider this verse to be the true word of God hidden in the symbols?

John 6:53 KJV
Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
I would consider this and many more translations to be true to the context of it's meaning as His Word. The hidden in symbols part is the problem. To me it is just discerning from the spirit and studying Scripture that is translated in context. Thus, the meaning we need to seek after the direction of the spirit simply thru our intellect then after first letting God discern in our spirit. Thus for example your verse:

(John 6:53):

So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.

Cross references:

(1 John 5:12):

Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life.

(Matthew 26:26-28):

Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.

(John 15:4):

Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me.

(John 6:55):

For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.

(John 6:47):

Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life.

(John 3:3):

Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.”

(John 13:8):

Peter said to him, “You shall never wash my feet.” Jesus answered him, “If I do not wash you, you have no share with me.”

(John 6:26-27):

Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. Do not labor for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set his seal.”

(Matthew 18:3):

and said, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

(Revelation 2:17):

He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who conquers I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, with a new name written on the stone that no one knows except the one who receives it.’

(John 3:36):

Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.

(John 3:5):

Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.

(Luke 13:5):

No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.”

(Luke 13:3):

No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.

(Matthew 5:18):

For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.

Plus: (Revelation 2:7; and Matthew 8:20).

To most of us this is a very difficult passage. It speaks in language and moves in a world of ideas which are quite strange to us and which may seem even fantastic and grotesque. But to those who heard it first, it was moving among familiar ideas which went back to the very childhood of the race.

These ideas would be quite normal to anyone brought up in ancient sacrifice. The animal was very seldom burned entire. Usually only a token part was burned on the altar, although the whole animal was offered to the god. Part of the flesh was given to the priests as their perquisite; and part to the worshipper to make a feast for himself and his friends within the temple precincts. At that feast the god himself was held to be a guest. More, once the flesh had been offered to the god, it was held that he had entered into it; and therefore when the worshipper ate it he was literally eating the god. When people rose from such a feast they went out, as they believed, literally god-filled. We may think of it as idolatrous worship, we may think of it as a vast delusion; yet the fact remains these people went out quite certain that in them there was now the dynamic vitality of their god. To people used to that kind of experience a section like this presented no difficulties at all.

Further, in that ancient world the one live form of religion was to be found in the Mystery Religions. The one thing the Mystery Religions offered was communion and even identity with some god. The way it was done was this. All the Mystery Religions were essentially passion plays. They were stories of a god who had lived and suffered terribly and who died and rose again. The story was turned into a moving play. Before the initiate could see it, he had to undergo a long course of instruction in the inner meaning of the story. He had to undergo all kinds of ceremonial purifications. He had to pass through a long period of fasting and abstention from sexual relationships.

At the actual presentation of a passion play everything was designed to produce a highly emotional atmosphere. There was carefully calculated lighting, sensuous incense, exciting music, a wonderful liturgy; everything was designed to work up the initiate to a height of emotion and expectation that he had never experienced before. Call it hallucination if you like; call it a combination of hypnotism and self hypnotism. But something happened; and that something was identity with the god. As the carefully prepared initiate watched he became one with the god. He shared the sorrows and the griefs; he shared the death, and the resurrection. He and the god became for ever one; and he was safe in life and in death.

Some of the sayings and prayers of the Mystery Religions are very beautiful. In the Mysteries of Mithra the initiate prayed: "Abide with my soul; leave me not, that I may be initiated and that the holy spirit may dwell within me." In the Hermetic Mysteries the initiate said: "I know thee Hermes, and thou knowest me; I am thou and thou art I" In the same Mysteries a prayer runs: "Come to me, Lord Hermes, as babes to mothers' wombs." In the Mysteries of Isis the worshipper said: "As truly as Osiris lives, so shall his followers live. As truly as Osiris is not dead, his followers shall die no more."

We must remember that those ancient people knew all about the striving, the longing, the dreaming for identity with their god and for the bliss of taking him into themselves. They would not read phrases like eating Christ's body and drinking his blood with crude and shocked literalism. They would know something of that ineffable experience of union, closer than any earthly union, of which these words speak. This is language that the ancient world could understand--and so can we.

It may be well that we should remember that here John is doing what he so often does. He is not giving, or trying to give, the actual words of Jesus. He has been thinking for seventy years of what Jesus said; and now, led by the Holy Spirit, he is giving the inner significance of his words. It is not the words that he reports; that would merely have been a feat of memory. It is the essential meaning of the words; that is the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

In addition, I use paraphrased versions of Scriptures, I trust, which broadens my understanding of the original etymologies and translations of Scriptures as my spirit leads me. The point I can't get is why is the KJV so pristine and all others are null and void? I don't agree with this, needless to say, I also believe the KJV is also worthy to read and accept.
 
Last edited:
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
@ Slave. I'm about to board airplane and will read more thoroughly but consider the verse below. Jesus is the bread of life, the bread or his flesh that we eat is word of God. This is what I mean by the true word is hidden in the symbols. :)

Matthew 4:4 KJV
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
 

slave

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2015
6,307
1,097
113
@ Slave. I'm about to board airplane and will read more thoroughly but consider the verse below. Jesus is the bread of life, the bread or his flesh that we eat is word of God. This is what I mean by the true word is hidden in the symbols. :)

Matthew 4:4 KJV
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
Absolutely, so why doesn't the NIV or NASB or NJKV etc bring you there as well?
 

slave

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2015
6,307
1,097
113
Look up the verse I posted in the NIV. I'm reading the NIV today as I travel, I will post errors, real errors that I find. :)
Both I, and God, will listen to (your critique of His Word) in the form of the NIV.
 
Last edited:

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,687
3,545
113
@ Slave. I'm about to board airplane and will read more thoroughly but consider the verse below. Jesus is the bread of life, the bread or his flesh that we eat is word of God. This is what I mean by the true word is hidden in the symbols. :)

Matthew 4:4 KJV
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
If we don't have every word of God, than we can't truly live for Him.