God's sovereignity and man's "freedom"...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 6, 2017
674
12
0
is this the kind of teaching available from tv?

touched by your weaknesses? we got spouses for that.

God is the King. God is not just a buddy u go to the beach with come on now. yes i know if we do His will Jesus calls us friends. no need to bring that up.

God isnt far away, but God isnt a human. sounds like u want to make God a man who feels like we do and is controlled by His emotions.

its like if we do something stupid and get burnt, then God comes in and says "there there, lean on my shoulder, im also hurt by what happened . i share ur pain"
whereas what God really probably is saying is "repent!"

very humanistic i must say. even scary.
Interesting comments, it would seem the God you describe is not the Jesus he manifested into flesh, that is found in the Bible.

I would urge you since you cannot relate to God the right way, to read about Jesus to gain understanding about who Father really is!
 
Nov 6, 2017
674
12
0
What's amazing is the KJV spurred on the greatest revival the world has ever seen. That's called fruit. The new versions have led to the Laodicean Age. That's called corrupt fruit.
Which Book, chapter and verse did Jesus command us to go make a revival with a finished Bible at?
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
Nope, sorry.

You've never believed a person to be only figuratively made alive until it became a convenient out and argument at this present time. Your theory has been concisely shown to be invalid and absurd. You're simply writing in your narrative and theology ad lib as you go along, and it isn't sound theology dear sister.

We are not made alive figuratively, nor were we dead figuratively, both are literal realities.
In your opinion my theology isn't sound . . . and in my opinion your theology isn't sound, dear brother.

Post #226 - Spiritually, i.e. figuratively, metaphorically, we were dead in trespasses and sins - we were not literal corpses. Haven't "ad libbed" (don't know if that is a word or not!) as I go along.

Dead - spiritually dead (figurative, metaphorically) NOT physically dead (literal) We were dead because of our trespasses and sins - without God and without hope but still living and breathing creatures . . . that's why it is not literal. Spiritually we were dead - without the Spirit of God dwelling in us. We are made alive - born again Spirit of God dwelling in us. God uses the figurative to emphasize the deadness of one without Him no need to use

We are sealed with holy Spirit AFTER we hear the word of truth, AFTER we believe the gospel of our salvation according to Ephesians 1:13 - now if my belief is absurd . . . so be it.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Brother,

We agree that You have not chosen me but I have chosen you means precisely what it says.

We recognize unequivocally evidence of our mutual Salvation.

We disagree on the role of freewill in the process.

Since we are unlikely to persuade each other, or those who are likeminded; and the issue will be resolved when Jesus calls us home: could our respective camps stop sniping at each other and spend our time more profitably as brothers and sisters who don't let a point of disagreement destroy the unity of the body?
Well, with all due respect I believe your proposal is an unrealistic goal. Although it may appear unlikely any or too few are persuaded, it still happens. In fact, there are several persons that I know of personally who have come to embrace Reformed doctrine after careful analysis and exegesis of Scripture.

Not to argue, or be disagreeable, but that to me is profitable. The testimonies of those seeing these truths are tremendous, and their understanding being opened, rekindled glorying in God, hunger to know him even more all make it well worth the effort. I see this all as an answer to Paul's prayer for the saints; Ephesians 1:15-23.

Truth is always at stake, and will always be defended from each others perspective.

I cannot embrace decisional regeneration, that we have wills that are free in our lost state, or that God elects based upon seeing through portals of time man's decision &c. Believing against these things enhances our understanding concerning the Biblical state of the lost, and the need for God to grant them faith, repentance &c. God set out to gather all he has chosen from eternity and is doing just that, and there are none other persons who will be saved.

Therefore the views I hold to will reflect this from a Biblical standpoint which I believe to be from careful and contextual exegesis. To me it is defending the faith, the purity of the Word, God's character and nature, and of course the Gospel, something Paul also was set to do, as well as we ourselves; Philippians 1:7, 16.

Standing our ground theologically will be deemed by many as sniping, and then there is the issue with compromise, which in my opinion there would have to be compromise to ensure your proposal. There is no complete unity in compromise and it would be asking for me to set aside what is true in the word, and for you to do the same as per your position.

I hope my position does not offend you or divide us.

God bless.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,420
2,493
113
Standing our ground theologically will be deemed by many as sniping, and then there is the issue with compromise,

God bless.


A. In the post you're referring to by MarcR, he never suggested "compromise" on either side's theological views.

In fact, I've never heard him call for theological compromise, on any issue of which I'm aware.


B. When he suggested we refrain from "sniping", he said nothing about giving up your "theological ground".

This would be to add quite a lot to what he actually said.


C. If you look at what MarcR actually said, without reading anything into it, I don't think you can take it as anything more than a call for civility.


He was clearly just calling for civility among those who disagree.

I think to suggest it was anything more would be to take great liberties with his actual words.


D. If perhaps you consider a "call for civility", among brethren, to be a "compromise", then perhaps we need to have an entirely different discussion - one about politeness and temperament.






 
Last edited:

joaniemarie

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2017
3,198
303
83
A. In the post you're referring to by MarcR, he never suggested "compromise" on either side's theological views.

In fact, I've never heard him call for theological compromise, on any issue of which I'm aware.


B. When he suggested we refrain from "sniping", he said nothing about giving up your "theological ground".

This would be to add quite a lot to what he actually said.


C. If you look at what MarcR actually said, without reading anything into it, I don't think you can take it as anything more than a call for civility.


He was clearly just calling for civility among those who disagree.

I think to suggest it was anything more would be to take great liberties with his actual words.


D. If perhaps you consider a "call for civility", among brethren, to be a "compromise", then perhaps we need to have an entirely different discussion - one about politeness and temperament.









I give you a big amen for your post Maxwell. May your numbers increase.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Well, with all due respect I believe your proposal is an unrealistic goal. Although it may appear unlikely any or too few are persuaded, it still happens. In fact, there are several persons that I know of personally who have come to embrace Reformed doctrine after careful analysis and exegesis of Scripture.

Not to argue, or be disagreeable, but that to me is profitable. The testimonies of those seeing these truths are tremendous, and their understanding being opened, rekindled glorying in God, hunger to know him even more all make it well worth the effort. I see this all as an answer to Paul's prayer for the saints; Ephesians 1:15-23.

Truth is always at stake, and will always be defended from each others perspective.

I cannot embrace decisional regeneration, that we have wills that are free in our lost state, or that God elects based upon seeing through portals of time man's decision &c. Believing against these things enhances our understanding concerning the Biblical state of the lost, and the need for God to grant them faith, repentance &c. God set out to gather all he has chosen from eternity and is doing just that, and there are none other persons who will be saved.

Therefore the views I hold to will reflect this from a Biblical standpoint which I believe to be from careful and contextual exegesis. To me it is defending the faith, the purity of the Word, God's character and nature, and of course the Gospel, something Paul also was set to do, as well as we ourselves; Philippians 1:7, 16.

Standing our ground theologically will be deemed by many as sniping, and then there is the issue with compromise, which in my opinion there would have to be compromise to ensure your proposal. There is no complete unity in compromise and it would be asking for me to set aside what is true in the word, and for you to do the same as per your position.

I hope my position does not offend you or divide us.

God bless.
Decisional regeneration what a convenient way to avoid personal responsibility. Deny that you must make a decision to submit your will to Gods will.

God indeed does all the regenerating or saving but man must submit must ask God to save him. Man is able because of what God says in Genesis 3:22 ¶ And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

Wow man is become as one of the Godhead. Had Adam eaten of the tree of life he would have lived forever in his fallen state. Adam would have become as Lucifer corrupted by his will and having eternal life.

God provided redemption back in verse 15 so the will of God is not subverted by Adams will.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
Just the opposite of what Ephesians 1:13 says: In whom you also trusted, AFTER that you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also AFTER that you believed, you were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of HIS glory.


Again, hearing is the key. Its not just hearing with the ears on the sides of our head, but with the ears of our spirit. Let him who has ears hear. This is not physical ears that is being addressed here. The dead can not hear. But you mitigate that to not literal death, but figurative death. As already been stated, you're trying to rewrite the narrative to fit your theology.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
In your opinion my theology isn't sound . . . and in my opinion your theology isn't sound, dear brother.

Post #226 - Spiritually, i.e. figuratively, metaphorically, we were dead in trespasses and sins - we were not literal corpses. Haven't "ad libbed" (don't know if that is a word or not!) as I go along.

Dead - spiritually dead (figurative, metaphorically) NOT physically dead (literal) We were dead because of our trespasses and sins - without God and without hope but still living and breathing creatures . . . that's why it is not literal. Spiritually we were dead - without the Spirit of God dwelling in us. We are made alive - born again Spirit of God dwelling in us. God uses the figurative to emphasize the deadness of one without Him no need to use

We are sealed with holy Spirit AFTER we hear the word of truth, AFTER we believe the gospel of our salvation according to Ephesians 1:13 - now if my belief is absurd . . . so be it.
Now the lost are metaphorically dead. :rolleyes:

So the saved are metaphorically made alive. :rolleyes:

The wheels just came off your theological wagon my Sister.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
Unless one is metaphorically born again, they can not see the kingdom of heaven.

You must be metaphorically born again.

Marvel not that you must be metaphorically born again.
 

TruthTalk

Senior Member
Jul 17, 2017
2,904
2,262
113
Unless one is metaphorically born again, they can not see the kingdom of heaven.

You must be metaphorically born again.

Marvel not that you must be metaphorically born again.
Yes and you just won the lottery metaphorically, plus I can only give you a metaphoric rep, because the real one still does not exst, in a metaphorical sense.
 
Last edited:

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
Yes and you just won the lottery metaphorically, plus I can only give you a metaphoric rep, because the real one still does not exst, in a metaphorical sense.
Yeah. Let's just make everything a metaphor in the bible. The same power that saves is that same power that rose Jesus from the grave. I guess that's a metaphor, too. :rolleyes:

Ppl reject biblical truth all day long, and claim to hold to biblical truths. :rolleyes: :(
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
Yes and you just won the lottery metaphorically, plus I can only give you a metaphoric rep, because the real one still does not exst, in a metaphorical sense.
And you were metaphorically dead in your trespasses and sins, in which you formerly walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, of the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience. Among them we too all formerly lived in the lusts of our flesh, indulging the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest. But God, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were metaphorically dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved),[Ephesians 2:1-5]
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Yes and you just won the lottery metaphorically, plus I can only give you a metaphoric rep, because the real one still does not exst, in a metaphorical sense.
Yeah. Let's just make everything a metaphor in the bible. The same power that saves is that same power that rose Jesus from the grave. I guess that's a metaphor, too. :rolleyes:

Ppl reject biblical truth all day long, and claim to hold to biblical truths. :rolleyes: :(
Really courageous to attack a poster who is far more Christ-like and sensitive than yourselves. Meekness is not weakness.

Mt 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
Yes and you just won the lottery metaphorically, plus I can only give you a metaphoric rep, because the real one still does not exst, in a metaphorical sense.
Jesus answered and said to him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is metaphorically born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Nicodemus said to Him, “How can a man be born when he is old? He cannot enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born, can he?”Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is metaphorically born of water and the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born metaphorically of the Spirit is spirit. Do not be amazed that I said to you, ‘You must be metaphorically born again.’ The wind metaphorically blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and where it is going; so is everyone who is metaphorically born of the Spirit.”[John 3:3-7]

Its a snowball effect. To hold to heresy, you have to have more heresy to support your heresy. That's a big heresy snowball to relegate being spiritually dead as a metaphor. Heresy knows no bounds.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
A. In the post you're referring to by MarcR, he never suggested "compromise" on either side's theological views.
And I never claimed nor implied he did.

B. When he suggested we refrain from "sniping", he said nothing about giving up your "theological ground".
And I never claimed nor implied he did.

C. If you look at what MarcR actually said, without reading anything into it, I don't think you can take it as anything more than a call for civility.
I read what MarcR actually said without reading anything into it. The funny thing is you're doing exactly what you falsely accuse yourself.

D. If perhaps you consider a "call for civility", among brethren, to be a "compromise", then perhaps we need to have an entirely different discussion - one about politeness and temperament.
And there you go with more assuming and making false conclusions on my intentions. You know what they say when we assume.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Yes and you just won the lottery metaphorically, plus I can only give you a metaphoric rep, because the real one still does not exst, in a metaphorical sense.

And I just love when others metaphorically read what I've said, and literally make false accusations and assumptions! :D
 

TruthTalk

Senior Member
Jul 17, 2017
2,904
2,262
113
Really courageous to attack a poster who is far more Christ-like and sensitive than yourselves. Meekness is not weakness.

Mt 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
What on earth are you talking about, SG and I were just having a little metaphoric fun time, never mind though it does not really matter now. And so you are being Christ like more than anyone.
 
Last edited:

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
What on earth are you talking about, SG and I were just having a little metaphoric fun time, never mind though it does not really matter now.
I was being serious, not attacking anyone. That's why he's been on ignore for a long time. He offers nothing of note.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Yeah. Let's just make everything a metaphor in the bible. The same power that saves is that same power that rose Jesus from the grave. I guess that's a metaphor, too. :rolleyes:

Ppl reject biblical truth all day long, and claim to hold to biblical truths. :rolleyes: :(
Wonder what metaphorical heaven and eternal life look like??? I never knew I was only metaphorically saved! :D