Calvinists: The Just Shall Live BEFORE Having Faith

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Iconoclast

Senior Member
May 27, 2017
749
186
43
The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.
(1 Corinthians 2:14)​

how do you have faith in something you consider foolish, cannot understand and cannot possibly discern?
this is the type of conundrum which leads to the conclusion that faith cannot exist apart from a regeneration. "
while we were dead He hat quickened us" -- iirc it goes under the umbrella of "total depravity" but you know, basically everything i know about Calvin i read in these forums, specifically in threads written by people trashing Calvin. possible i'm misrepresenting.

what's the alternative?

a dead, blind, deaf man whose heart is utterly hostile to the Spirit comes to faith in the things his own soul hates, and afterwards comes to life, having only later his ears and eyes opened to see the thing he has faith in?
((yeah, i can probably phrase it to sound even more absurd. proofs are formed at extrema))


are these the only two possible views?
Only slightly dead, eh?

What's that like? I thought dead/alive is binary
It would be like being slightly pregnant....
 

Iconoclast

Senior Member
May 27, 2017
749
186
43
The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.
(1 Corinthians 2:14)​

how do you have faith in something you consider foolish, cannot understand and cannot possibly discern?
this is the type of conundrum which leads to the conclusion that faith cannot exist apart from a regeneration. "
while we were dead He hat quickened us" -- iirc it goes under the umbrella of "total depravity" but you know, basically everything i know about Calvin i read in these forums, specifically in threads written by people trashing Calvin. possible i'm misrepresenting.

what's the alternative?

a dead, blind, deaf man whose heart is utterly hostile to the Spirit comes to faith in the things his own soul hates, and afterwards comes to life, having only later his ears and eyes opened to see the thing he has faith in?
((yeah, i can probably phrase it to sound even more absurd. proofs are formed at extrema))


are these the only two possible views?
I don't fully understand Calvansim and it's tenants.
As a result my response may across as stupid and uneducated. Not unusual for me.

We know who saves and that is Jesus.

The new covenant is A.D. the period from when Jesus walked the earth as a man.
The old covenant is B.C. the period where his did not walk in the earth as a man.

Are God and Jesus not one?


If so even in the OC if they believe in God then defacto they believe in Jesus.

God promised a saviour a redeemer.


In the OC, Those who believed in God and walked in his ways knew that the redeemer would come.

Therefore the just shall live by his faith: True righteousness before God is linked to genuine faith in God.

Surely then those who live by faith do so when they place their faith in Jesus (A.D.) And in God (B.C.)

In the NC this faith is birthed by the Holy Spirit.
No idea how though in the OC.

So faith has a starting point.
If that is the case who started it? Surely the Holy Soirit.
Given that the Father, Son & Holy Spirit were the beginning then would they not know who would come to faith?

Yes I think the do.
Problem is we do not.
That's why we do not judge who is saved, will be saved or is not saved.

If we look at Jonah.
He would not go

Jonah 4:2
2 So he prayed to the Lord, and said, “Ah, Lord, was not this what I said when I was still in my country? Therefore I fled previously to Tarshish; for I know that You are a gracious and merciful God, slow to anger and abundant in lovingkindness, One who relents from doing harm.


Jonah 4:10-11


10 But the Lord said, “You have had pity on the plant for which you have not labored, nor made it grow, which came up in a night and perished in a night. 11 And should I not pity Nineveh, that great city, in which are more than one hundred and twenty thousand persons who cannot discern between their right hand and their left—and much livestock?”

To me God knows who will repent.
As I said I don't.

That's why we should be like Jesus, who said

John 6:39-40
39 This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day. 40 And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.”

John 10:27-30
27 My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me. 28 And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of My Father's hand. 30 I and My Father are one.”


Willing to be corrected, in love of course
Your post was on target....consider this as time permits;
The 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Who said this? Put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh. In other words, don't feed what is dying.

Who said this? Calvin? Whoever that dude is, am going to follow him.
 

Iconoclast

Senior Member
May 27, 2017
749
186
43
Nehemiah6;

As you may have noticed, ad hominem attacks are substituted for Bible exposition in this thread.
yes...you should use scripture...
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,659
3,540
113
Look at Hebrews 11. All those mentioned, their faith was what the writer wrote about. No one is justified w/o having faith. No is is justified w/o being saved. No one is saved w/o being regenerated. Those ppl in Hebrews 11 were OT saints, too.

He seeks to rip God’s word to doll rags.
Let's continue the thought in Hebrews 11...39 And these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise: 40 God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.

Were the OT saints, before the cross, redeemed by the blood of the Lamb?
Were they sealed by the Holy Spirit?
Were they born again?
Were they part of the body of Christ?
Were there sins washed away?
Were they absent from the body and present with the Lord? If they were the previous, then they would have been absent from the body and present with the Lord upon dying, instead they were being kept safe in Abraham's bosom.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,659
3,540
113
You do not get it, if they did nto repent, He would have destroyed them, That part is 100 percent correct.

But he knew they were going to repent, He still had to get them to repent, and he still had to get Jonah (for his own good) to go.


You scare me that you do not understand Gods omniscience.
You're saying that God got them to repent by lying to them. If God knew ahead of time that Nineveh was going to repent and in turn He was not going to destroy them, then the statement, "Yet forty days and Nineveh shall be overthrown" is a lie knowing full well He was not going to overthrown them. That's not God. God is not a liar. Let Scripture define what omniscience means and not man. Where do you get your definitions?
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Just love how alleged believers make up what others believe. LOL!!!!!!! :D
Patience, brother!

Some people don't recognize their own misunderstandings; and give voice to them as if they knew what they were talking about.

We may disagree on limited atonement; but I don't like the idea of distorting other people's positions either.


At least we manage to disagree without disrespecting each other.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Who said this? Put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh. In other words, don't feed what is dying.

Who said this? Calvin? Whoever that dude is, am going to follow him.
I'm aPauled here....

Rom 13:14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Righteousness was imputed in the OT saving those who believed. Righteousness in the NT is imputed saving those who believe. OT believing God would send His Messiah Redeemer Savior Who is Christ. NT believing God sent His Messiah Redeemer Savior Who is Christ Jesus.

The Holy Spirit moved upon men in the OT. The Holy Spirit moves within men in the NT in partial fulfillment of Joel 2.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
You're saying that God got them to repent by lying to them. If God knew ahead of time that Nineveh was going to repent and in turn He was not going to destroy them, then the statement, "Yet forty days and Nineveh shall be overthrown" is a lie knowing full well He was not going to overthrown them. That's not God. God is not a liar. Let Scripture define what omniscience means and not man. Where do you get your definitions?
I do not know why you still cannot understand that.

If I say "your roof will fall down in 3 days" and you will go and repair it, who lied? Nobody.

I said that so that you could repair that.

---

Its a very common way of talking. Its a warning.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,659
3,540
113
I do not know why you still cannot understand that.

If I say "your roof will fall down in 3 days" and you will go and repair it, who lied? Nobody.

I said that so that you could repair that.

---

Its a very common way of talking. Its a warning.
When God speaks, it is the truth. God was going to destroy them in forty days, yet He decided not to destroy them. If you say He knew all along that Nineveh was going to repent and He would not destroy them, you make God out to be a liar.

God is not going to lie to get people to respond to His word.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Yes that typically does happen. And one person gets attacked from all sides :( or one person is attacking everyone else.

Too much emotionalism...but why I do not understand.:confused:

If a person is so convinced they have the absolute truth, an airtight system of theology based on the word of God, it should stand up well to questioning.

In my experience, in my line of work the most assured confident person with a good grasp of the facts is the person who does not need or use ad hominem attacks.



This is true, but no need to belabor the point. Even Spurgeon failed to explain this bizarre phenomenon, but insisted that that is what happens, as though insisting on a fallacy makes it true.

As you may have noticed, ad hominem attacks are substituted for Bible exposition in this thread.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
He really is not saying that. I have not seen anyone on this site say unregenerate people are saved.

Now sometimes people type and do not reread what they have typed so unfortunately the meaning of their words is convoluted and they themselves do not see it because they know what they were trying to say.

No everyone has clarity of written expression and we should have patience to let them clarify. IMHO :)

But if you can find that clear statement by Devo (as you call him) I will eat my words.




Devo is avering unregenerate ppl saved. Let that sink in ppl. Let that sink in.

#Heresyabounds
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Let's continue the thought in Hebrews 11...39 And these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise: 40 God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.

Were the OT saints, before the cross, redeemed by the blood of the Lamb?
Were they sealed by the Holy Spirit?
Were they born again?
Were they part of the body of Christ?
Were there sins washed away?
Were they absent from the body and present with the Lord? If they were the previous, then they would have been absent from the body and present with the Lord upon dying, instead they were being kept safe in Abraham's bosom.

No, they didn't receive the inheritance of Holy Spirit. Their sins were covered, not removed. And their destination was Abraham's bosom. But, they had the promise through baptism of what was to come. Though they didn't understand, they called turning to God and to the law, Mikvah. New birth.

They were still of Adam, but children of faith through Abraham.

The new covenant is a will. We inherit all of Holy Spirit in the members of His body.

I know it's not asking Jesus into our hearts. That's Passover. We are of Pentecost. Goal being fullness. Tabernacle. One with Him, moving, living, having our very being in Him.

Positionally, we all are of the fullness. Experientially? We all answer individually, yet will be corporate.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
I much prefer Haddock attacks...:p
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,783
2,947
113
You aren't reading that right. It doesn't say faith is not of ourselves. That is referring to Salvation in the Greek grammar not to faith. This is how we are to read that passage:

God saved you through faith as an act of kindness. You had nothing to do with it. Being saved is a gift from God.
Ephesians 2:8 GW
https://bible.com/bible/70/eph.2.8.GW
So, I have a life, and I am so far behind on the comments, I'm just going to give up the thought of catching yup. But, this post from the earlier pages just must be addressed!


Well, you just lost all credibilty with this post! Because, you don’t know anything about Greek. Or, if you do, then post what you think it says, feel free to exegete the Greek.

For that matter, there is NO GREEK in your post. Greek is a language that needs to be studied for years. Have you done that? I thought not!

Or, to save you some time, I will do exegete the verse for you. Since you do not have a clue! First, the verse in modern English, so I can read it. Oh, and in context! Very important!

"But God, being rich in mercy, because of his great love with which he loved us, 5 even though we were dead in transgressions, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you are saved!— 6 and he raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, 7 to demonstrate in the coming ages the surpassing wealth of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. 8 For by grace you are saved through faith, and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 it is not from works, so that no one can boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, having been created in Christ Jesus for good works that God prepared beforehand so we may do them." Eph. 2:4-10

“τῇ γὰρ χάριτί ἐστε σεσῳσμένοι διὰ πίστεως· καὶ τοῦτο οὐκ ἐξ ὑμῶν, θεοῦ τὸ δῶρον·9 οὐκ ἐξ ἔργων, ἵνα μή τις καυχήσηται.” Eph. 2:8-9 Greek

χάριτί - dative singular - grace. Instrumental Dative "by grace." The definite article (τῇ) appears with the word because it is the grace already mentioned. vv 5, 7. The work of the article refers to a concrete application of the abstract noun, namely the work of redemption as a concrete historical fact.

σεσῳσμένοι - Perfect Passive Participle (v 5) -to rescue, save. Perfect points to the completed action with a continuing result, thus emphasizing the continual state or condition. Pf Pass Ptcp should really be translated "have been saved" to emphasis it is completed, but it is important to see that the words have continuing results in the present/future. Use of the verb ἐστε (you - second person plural present tense) is a periphrastic construction, emphasizing the continuing results of one's salvation. This salvation delivers people who are dead in transgressions and are eternally separated from God and can only expect God's wrath.

Again, it could be translated "you have been saved" (ASV, RSV, NASB, TEV, JB, NIV, NJB, NRSV) but the translation "you are saved" conveys the continuing results of being saved. (AV, HCSB, NEB, NET) "Grace" is the objective cause or basis of salvation, and "through faith" is the subjective means by which one is saved. Calvin states that a person must receive by faith the salvation offered to him or her by the hand of God.

διὰ πίστεως - through faith. The preposition διὰindicates the channel through which salvation comes. Faith is NOT viewed as a positive work or accomplishment of the individual. (In other words, you do NOT have faith first!) Only on the basis of grace are people delivered from their desperate situation of sinfulness which separates them from God.

θεοῦ - of God (Genitive 3rd person singular) - the genitive emphasized by its position before the noun and stand in emphatic contrast with the personal pronoun ὑμῶν,(you- Genitive second person plural)

The definitions of these words are from "The Linguistic and Exegetical Key to the Greek New Testament" Cleon & Cleon.


So, what does this mean, when we put the sentence together? What is the Greek saying?

First, which is my belief, "by faith" is inseparable companion of "by grace" and together the two expressions stand in stark contrast to any human merit. If God's grace is the ground of salvation, then faith is the means by which it is appropriated. And faith cannot be a meritorious work; it is the response which receives what has already been done for us in Christ.

In order to stress that salvation is by God's grace alone and through faith, Paul adds two balancing negatives: first, "and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God. (8b) and second, "not by works, so that anyone can boast." (v9) The first clause, emphasizes the divine initiative and activity. The point being made is that the response of faith does not come from any human source but it is God's gift. In fact, grammatically speaking, the context demands that "this" be understood of salvation, by grace as a whole, including faith (or faithfulness) through which it is received. No separating faith, grace and salvation at all!

God's magnificent rescue from death, wrath and bondage is all of grace. It neither originates in nor is affected by the readers. The divine intention in providing salvation apart from any human effort or achievement is to exclude all human boasting.

The "gift" is that which is outside ourselves and is to be received. Therefore, the gift of salvation has its origin in God, its basis in faith, and it is received by means of faith.

In conclusion, if salvation is a gift of grace, then human beings can do nothing to achieve it. It is God's work, a gift extended with the cause being purely in God's character, not in the character or conduct of any person. No act or virtue can be presented to God to gain acceptance. Remember, grace is God's giving himself to us. We are valued by grace, but the attention is not on us, but on the God who loves so deeply. Grace moves us to worship and true humility. Grace is not just the beginning of the Christian life, but the whole.

To me, this can be summed up to mean "Salvation is all about God!"

Other sources:

Klyne Snodgrass - Ephesians, The NIV Application Commentary

Peter T. O'Brien - The Letter to the Ephesians Pillar New Testament Commentary

Harold W.
Boehner - Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary