lol
it was not me, it was someone else who brought up the subject.
The son was still his fathers son. He had his fathers blood.
He walked away and was on his own, and could not be BLESSED by the father, but he was still his fathers son. It was his brokenness which caused him to remember his father, and why he returned (I had the same experience)
Now. Please stop. You claim you believe your saved by God. Practice what you preach, or stop saying you believe God saved you, and you are trying to save yourself.
it was not me, it was someone else who brought up the subject.
The son was still his fathers son. He had his fathers blood.
He walked away and was on his own, and could not be BLESSED by the father, but he was still his fathers son. It was his brokenness which caused him to remember his father, and why he returned (I had the same experience)
Now. Please stop. You claim you believe your saved by God. Practice what you preach, or stop saying you believe God saved you, and you are trying to save yourself.
lol
it was not me, it was someone else who brought up the subject.
it was not me, it was someone else who brought up the subject.
The prodigal having his "father's blood line" did not put food in his belly, it was his returning to his father that brought out the fattened calf.
You are simply defending your theology and your own scriptures are against you.