Hi Zac
Let me firstly say that I do not profess to have all the answers on this subject. I have discussed this at great length on two websites and never found anyone from either point of view who could answer every scripture put to them or every question.
And I think sometimes it is good to remember that Paul said
'Now I know in part'
I am positive the part I know is not as great as the part Paul knew. And I also believe there is much we will never fully know until by the grace of God we reach Heaven
I am not much of a theologian I am afraid. But I do see Jesus as divine, the divine son of God.
If we believe(as we do) that Jesus existed before he came to earth to die for our sins then he cannot just be a man can he. Humans did not exist until Adam according to the Bible. But he came in an earthly body.
I see Father and son as two distinct people if you like, BUT and this is a very big but the fulness of the Godhead bodily rests in Christ as I previoiusly mentioned.
We all have the Holy Spirit inside of us, we could not be Christians otherwise Rom 8:9
Charasmatics,Evangelicals believe in the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, an immersion if you like of the Spirit
But imagine the Holy Spirit fully exhibiting in someone. As the spirit was on Christ in bodily form when he walked this earth, and in whom the fulness of the Godhead bodily dwells. Do we ever really stop to think of what that entails?
And how much would we like those verses of scripture which seem difficult to understand according to our belief on this subject come together?
Jesus said to Philip
If you have seen me you have seen the Father
But once Jesus had returned to Heaven he called God 'My God' four times in Rev 3:12
Now I will just concentrate ion these two vesrses. If you have followed such debates as this you already know the different scriptures used in these discussions
Now someone may give you a theological answer to make those two verses tally, but it is whether you in your heart are convinced of what they say, or you just will to believe it because it may fit in with your belief. Does that make sense?
You see with my belief they fit perfectly. But I am not saying every verse of scripture on this subject I can perfectly align. I do not know anyone who can.
On the one hand Jesus is saying that if you have seen him you have seen the Father
On the other her is refering to God as 'My God'
Are you comfortable lets say with God Himself refering to someone as my God?
But to me, if the Father is fully exhibited in Christ via the Spirit because the Father has poured out the spirit without limit on his son, both those verses fit.
With the Spirt fully exhibiting in Christ I would say that anyone who has seen Jesus has seen the very person of who the Father is.
But at the same time, the Father poured out the Spirit on Christ, and He is the one true God
Therefore Christ would still refer to the Father as
'My God
Sporry if this makes little sense to you, but I am trying to avoid us just placing endless scriptures before each other. And I do not want to do that. If you are troubled at all by this subject I honestly believe the best thing is for you to take it in prayer to God, or to discuss it with a minister, and I am not a minister
Therefore I may well confuse more than help
God Bless
Thank you for replying:
Yes, none of us has the full answers about God, and who He fully is. We can look at the Scriptures and come up with doctrines, but they may be right or wrong in the end.
I am not much of a theologian I am afraid. But I do see Jesus as divine, the divine son of God.
I'm just trying to figure out exactly what divine means...but you believe that the full godhead resides in Jesus, so I guess that's what you mean by it.
If we believe(as we do) that Jesus existed before he came to earth to die for our sins then he cannot just be a man can he. Humans did not exist until Adam according to the Bible. But he came in an earthly body.
Well, and if you look at his prayer in John 17 he says that he had glory with his Father, God, before the world was, before the world that we stand on existed. So, yes, there is something more than human about him (though I believe he is fully human due to the incarnation). Exactly right.
What you said between this and the next section I agree with. The Holy Spirit dwells in us.
And how much would we like those verses of scripture which seem difficult to understand according to our belief on this subject come together?
Jesus said to Philip
If you have seen me you have seen the Father
But once Jesus had returned to Heaven he called God 'My God' four times in Rev 3:12
Now, we know that Jesus is not the Father, so Jesus couldn't have been, literally,
the Father.
But, Jesus and his Father do share one being of God. This is what Jesus was saying, and can be the
only thing he was saying.
In light of that, we can look at Jesus calling God "My God" and find the answer. What is it?
Well, at the moment of the incarnation, Jesus became fully human, yet retained his full deity, yet laid aside his former, glorious position with the Father in order to die on the cross and save us, voluntarily.
Jesus can call Him "God" because he truly is His God. His Father is his God, in that he is subordinate to Him.
At the beginning of every letter of Paul's, he says "Blessed be the
God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ."
He's his God because He's human, and He's his Father because He is His Son, or divine Son.
These are the two natures of Jesus; the only way He could be the one mediator between God and man is if he was God and man. He's better than any other high priest before Him because He's perfectly human and God, two natures, one person.
What interesting about Revelation is this. In 3:12, he calls God His God...
...yet in 3:11, He says,
"I am coming soon."
Now, how's that interesting?
Look at Revelation 22:12-13
"Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense with me, to repay everyone for what he has done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end."
So, he can be deity, yet at the same time have deity and a human nature.
Now someone may give you a theological answer to make those two verses tally, but it is whether you in your heart are convinced of what they say, or you just will to believe it because it may fit in with your belief. Does that make sense?
I'm convinced because of what Scripture has shown me, reading it by itself, and comparing verses, all with the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
You see with my belief they fit perfectly. But I am not saying every verse of scripture on this subject I can perfectly align. I do not know anyone who can.
And I probably haven't perfectly aligned it either. But I've done the best I can at it above.
On the one hand Jesus is saying that if you have seen him you have seen the Father
On the other her is refering to God as 'My God'
Are you comfortable lets say with God Himself refering to someone as my God?
Yes, if Jesus is in fact God and man, the God-man. Then it makes sense.
If there were a Scripture of Jesus calling God His God before he became incarnate, however, that would pose trouble for the deity of Christ.
Yet, there are none.
But to me, if the Father is fully exhibited in Christ via the Spirit because the Father has poured out the spirit without limit on his son, both those verses fit.
I don't believe that the Father is the Spirit, but that since the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are all one being, one God, that they all reside in us in some way (Jesus said that He and the Father would come and make their home with anyone who would believe)
With the Spirt fully exhibiting in Christ I would say that anyone who has seen Jesus has seen the very person of who the Father is.
And I would say that they have seen the very "being" of the Father, but not literally the Father Himself.
But at the same time, the Father poured out the Spirit on Christ, and He is the one true God
Therefore Christ would still refer to the Father as
'My God
Sporry if this makes little sense to you, but I am trying to avoid us just placing endless scriptures before each other. And I do not want to do that. If you are troubled at all by this subject I honestly believe the best thing is for you to take it in prayer to God, or to discuss it with a minister, and I am not a minister
Therefore I may well confuse more than help
No, I'm fine with this sort of discussion: it only strengthens my belief, from brother to brother in Christ.
Grace and Love