Hello all from Chestertonrules

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 28, 2013
183
3
0
#1
I was born again as a Baptist but have converted to Catholicism. I believe that Catholic Church is the Church Jesus started.

I had many misconceptions about the Catholic Church before joining the Church and I hope that I can help clear up some of these misconceptions for others.

For those who are interested in sincere Christian dialogue I'm sure we can have a great time discussing and debating doctrinal differences.

Feel free to ask me anything!
 
Z

zaoman32

Guest
#3
I'm not catholic, but regardless, I saw chestertonfan and got excited :D Welcome to the boards.
 
Aug 28, 2013
183
3
0
#4
I'm not catholic, but regardless, I saw chestertonfan and got excited :D Welcome to the boards.

I keep getting logged out so forgive me if this post is a repeat.

Thanks for the kind words.

It's good to know there is at least one other Chesterton fan here!
 
Dec 19, 2009
27,513
128
0
71
#5
Welcome to Christian Chat, Chestertonrules. I have no doubt Jesus started the Catholic Church. I also have no doubt he started my church.
 
B

bluebirdchaser

Guest
#7
Welcome to CC!
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#8
Does the Catholic Church still teach that every other church is wrong and they are right?
 
Aug 28, 2013
183
3
0
#9
Does the Catholic Church still teach that every other church is wrong and they are right?

Of course. Jesus only started one Church and he promised that the Holy Spirit would lead them into all truth. Paul said that the Church is the pillar and foundation of truth.

Of course, that doesn't mean only Catholics will go to heaven, it just means that the fullness of truth is found in the Church, as Jesus said.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#10
Of course. Jesus only started one Church and he promised that the Holy Spirit would lead them into all truth. Paul said that the Church is the pillar and foundation of truth.

Of course, that doesn't mean only Catholics will go to heaven, it just means that the fullness of truth is found in the Church, as Jesus said.
That's not the answer to the whole question. It only covers the part that they say they are right. You did not answer the part about if they still say everyone else is wrong. And if they do not say everyone else is wrong, then what meaning does "one true church" have? "One" certainly makes it sound like every other one is false.

It's another question, but I do not recall Jesus ever using the word "Catholic". So how do you know that when He used the word "church", he meant the Catholic church?
 
Aug 28, 2013
183
3
0
#11
That's not the answer to the whole question. It only covers the part that they say they are right. You did not answer the part about if they still say everyone else is wrong. And if they do not say everyone else is wrong, then what meaning does "one true church" have? "One" certainly makes it sound like every other one is false.

It's another question, but I do not recall Jesus ever using the word "Catholic". So how do you know that when He used the word "church", he meant the Catholic church?

If one Church is guided in the fullness of truth, then other Churches are wrong by definition when they disagree with this Church. Jesus only started one Church. That's not to say that other Christian churches don't get many things right because they do.

Catholic simply means on the whole. The early Church was united with single leadership. The word Catholic is just a modifier to describe the Church. It wasn't used in writing until about 100 AD. It isn't really relevant, though. We know who the leaders are because they were appointed by the apostles. We can read their writings. What the Church came to be called isn't a central issue.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#12
If one Church is guided in the fullness of truth, then other Churches are wrong by definition when they disagree with this Church. Jesus only started one Church. That's not to say that other Christian churches don't get many things right because they do.

Catholic simply means on the whole. The early Church was united with single leadership. The word Catholic is just a modifier to describe the Church. It wasn't used in writing until about 100 AD. It isn't really relevant, though. We know who the leaders are because they were appointed by the apostles. We can read their writings. What the Church came to be called isn't a central issue.
1. Jesus did not start the church. Acts 7:38 states it existed at Sinai.
2. you are using church in two different ways. Jesus "built" the one church which is all of us. By calling some churches (denominations, a different use of the word), it just creates confusion.
3. It is not true at all that the early church was all under one headship. If that were true, there would be no Eastern churches, and no heretical sects to have been banned. There would have been no false apostles for Paul to have gone against.

My question relates not to the catholic church (small c - adjective meaning "on the whole"), but to the Catholic Church, the worldwide entity headquartered in the Vatican and claiming headship of the Pope. That is like a corporate name, and no more means "on the whole", than "Suregood" foods means something that is surely good to eat.
 
Aug 28, 2013
183
3
0
#13
1. Jesus did not start the church. Acts 7:38 states it existed at Sinai.
2. you are using church in two different ways. Jesus "built" the one church which is all of us. By calling some churches (denominations, a different use of the word), it just creates confusion.
3. It is not true at all that the early church was all under one headship. If that were true, there would be no Eastern churches, and no heretical sects to have been banned. There would have been no false apostles for Paul to have gone against.

My question relates not to the catholic church (small c - adjective meaning "on the whole"), but to the Catholic Church, the worldwide entity headquartered in the Vatican and claiming headship of the Pope. That is like a corporate name, and no more means "on the whole", than "Suregood" foods means something that is surely good to eat.

1) Jesus built the Church and he explicitly stated this in Matt 16.

2) Jesus started a single Church built upon the apostles. This is the Catholic Church. Churches composed of those who left the Church or their followers are denominations.

3) You are mistaken. This point is clearly made in Acts 15, when the Christians at Antioch had a doctrinal dispute. They didn't lean on their own understanding, they consulted Church leadership in Jerusalem.

The Catholic Church is the Church. All Christians subsist within the Catholic Church, but many are not in full communion with the Church.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#14
1. Please check the Greek. The word that is used applies to expansion of an existing structure, not to building a new one. Also explain my reference to the quote in Acts, which says the church existed at Sinai.
2. Jesus did not start the church, as I said in #1. The Eastern churches were started by the same 13 apostles, and are not under Rome. Many other churches were started by other apostles who left only limited written records (since the Catholic church burned whatever they could.)
3. Acts 15 was a meeting between Paul and the Church in Jerusalem. The other churches were not part of this meeting.

You have not justified your conclusion. Please answer my objections. At best, they are one denomination among many. All Chirstians subsist in Jesus Christ, some Catholics included.
 
Aug 28, 2013
183
3
0
#15
1. Please check the Greek. The word that is used applies to expansion of an existing structure, not to building a new one. Also explain my reference to the quote in Acts, which says the church existed at Sinai.
2. Jesus did not start the church, as I said in #1. The Eastern churches were started by the same 13 apostles, and are not under Rome. Many other churches were started by other apostles who left only limited written records (since the Catholic church burned whatever they could.)
3. Acts 15 was a meeting between Paul and the Church in Jerusalem. The other churches were not part of this meeting.

You have not justified your conclusion. Please answer my objections. At best, they are one denomination among many. All Chirstians subsist in Jesus Christ, some Catholics included.
1) You are mistaken. This is a declaration of the New Covenant. Do you believe in the New Covenant?

2) Jesus started a Church and appointed the apostles as leaders of his Church. The Eastern Churches were part of this Church for hundreds of years but eventually some of them left. We have thousands of records of the Eastern Churches. You need to do more research.

For example:

[FONT=arial, helvetica, verdana, sans-serif]John VI, Patriarch of Constantinople (715)[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica, verdana, sans-serif]The Pope of Rome, the head of the Christian priesthood, whom in Peter, the Lord commanded to confirm his brethren. (John VI, Epist. ad Constantin. Pap. ad. Combefis, Auctuar. Bibl. P.P. Graec.tom. ii. p. 211, seq.)

and:

[/FONT][FONT=arial, helvetica, verdana, sans-serif]Sergius, Metropolitain of Cyprus (649)[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica, verdana, sans-serif]Writing to Pope Theodore:
O Holy Head, Christ our God hath destined thy Apostolic See to be an immovable foundation and a pillar of the Faith. For thou art, as the Divine Word truly saith, Peter, and on thee as a foundation-stone have the pillars of the Church been fixed. (Sergius Ep. ad Theod. lecta in Sess. ii. Concil. Lat. anno 649)

3) You are wrong. Paul and others were sent by the Christians in Antioch to Jerusalem to consult Church leaders about a doctrinal dispute. Do you just make this stuff up?
[/FONT]​
 
F

Footie03

Guest
#16
Hi, I am living in Eastern Europe with my wife, we have come here for study and worship. Your discussion of the Catholicism issue is interesting. Perhaps I may be able to help a small amount. After Christ, the Apostles and the others in Christ set out. They were to Ecclesiastic or Assemble and Preach the Word as prescribed by the Christ. Needless to say, persecution was sever and extreme. This can be read about in a book called the Synaxcerion. Christians were persecuted without mercy until 321CE when Constantine came to power. The original first century church was later divided, Catholic one direction, Orthodox in the other. Their belief in the Christ was and is the same. The most obvious difference is the Catholics celebrate the Passion of the Christ, or Salvation thru the Blood poured out at the Cross for us of Faith. The Orthodox celebrates the Resurrection of the Christ which shows us we can be born again into eternal life thru Faith. They both are off shoots of first century Christianity. It was at this time other involvements started to occur such as the Sabbath being moved from Saturday to Sunday. The Greek name for Saturday is still "Sabbato". Biker Dave
 
Aug 28, 2013
183
3
0
#17
Hi, I am living in Eastern Europe with my wife, we have come here for study and worship. Your discussion of the Catholicism issue is interesting. Perhaps I may be able to help a small amount. After Christ, the Apostles and the others in Christ set out. They were to Ecclesiastic or Assemble and Preach the Word as prescribed by the Christ. Needless to say, persecution was sever and extreme. This can be read about in a book called the Synaxcerion. Christians were persecuted without mercy until 321CE when Constantine came to power. The original first century church was later divided, Catholic one direction, Orthodox in the other. Their belief in the Christ was and is the same. The most obvious difference is the Catholics celebrate the Passion of the Christ, or Salvation thru the Blood poured out at the Cross for us of Faith. The Orthodox celebrates the Resurrection of the Christ which shows us we can be born again into eternal life thru Faith. They both are off shoots of first century Christianity. It was at this time other involvements started to occur such as the Sabbath being moved from Saturday to Sunday. The Greek name for Saturday is still "Sabbato". Biker Dave

Catholics celebrate both the passion and the resurrection of Christ, as do the Orthodox. I don't think that is a legitimate difference.

The problem with the Orthodox is that their eastern Churches were once united under the Bishop of Rome. They proclaimed and acknowledged the Jesus wanted Peter and his successors to lead and assure the unity of the Church. Those that left did so primarily for political reasons.

There can be no unity outside the Church established by Jesus.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#18
I believe in the new covenant. The new covenant fulfills the hope of the old, and is therefore built onto it. Abraham is a blessing to all nations. Therefore, the church is founded from Jerusalem outward. Not from Rome rewriting history

If the Eastern churches left, then are they true churches or not? If the Catholic Church is the only true church, they are not. But if they were founded by the apostles they are. So which is it?
 
Apr 14, 2011
1,515
66
48
33
#19
Welcome to Christian Chat, Chesteronrules. While I am not a Catholic, I would recommend that you look at the Vatican City homepage of the Catholic church then you will understand why a lot of people are leery about it. God bless.
 
Aug 28, 2013
183
3
0
#20
I believe in the new covenant. The new covenant fulfills the hope of the old, and is therefore built onto it. Abraham is a blessing to all nations. Therefore, the church is founded from Jerusalem outward. Not from Rome rewriting history

If the Eastern churches left, then are they true churches or not? If the Catholic Church is the only true church, they are not. But if they were founded by the apostles they are. So which is it?

The Church is a people of Christ, not a place. The eastern Churches left the fold. They are still part of the Church but not in full communion. The fullness of truth, the Church that the gates of hell will not prevail against, is led by the successors of Peter and the apostles.

Why do you think it would be acceptable to leave the Church started by Jesus?