Is that the best you have stan? Your accusing me of being dishonest not only with the word of God but with God Himself? Who the heck are you? You do not know the operation of one's mind to know their motives. How can you prove I'm dishonest when you don't even engage me with any sort of an argument to prove what your saying is true?
And to make the following asinine statement proves your completely Biblicaly ignorant. " It's pretty clear what the Bible says to most people that read it but there will always be some like you that have no idea what the word is telling you. You've accepted the lie and will not repent of it.
I suggest you actually properly exegete the Bible and not just give us your opinion or post links to articles that are erroneous or false." Like I told you before, anybody can give an opinion or state a position, your in the big leagues now so you have to prove or position with evidence and not just a bunch of hot air like you've been doing all along.
Have you ever heard of Greek Scholar A.T.Robertson?
Do you know who Greek scholar A.T. Robertson is? The following is what he said that backs up what I said. And btw, if you want I can provide other Greek Scholars that are in agreement. How about you providing Greek Scholars that agree with you and that "DO NOT BELIEVE" Jesus Christ had two natures?
Verse 6
Being (
υπαρχων — huparchōn). Rather, “existing,” present active participle of
υπαρχω — huparchō In the form of God (
εν μορπηι τεου — en morphēi theou).
Μορπη — Morphē means the essential attributes as shown in the form. In his preincarnate state Christ possessed the attributes of God and so appeared to those in heaven who saw him. Here is a clear statement by Paul of the deity of Christ.
A prize (
αρπαγμον — harpagmon). Predicate accusative with
ηγησατο — hēgēsato Originally words in
μος — ̇mos signified the act, not the result (
μα — ̇ma). The few examples of
αρπαγμος — harpagmos (Plutarch, etc.) allow it to be understood as equivalent to
αρπαγμα — harpagma like
βαπτισμος — baptismos and
βαπτισμα — baptisma That is to say Paul means a prize to be held on to rather than something to be won (“robbery”). To be on an equality with God (
το ειναι ισα τεοι — to einai isa theoi). Accusative articular infinitive object of
ηγησατο — hēgēsato “the being equal with God” (associative instrumental case
τεωι — theōi after
ισα — isa).
Ισα — Isa is adverbial use of neuter plural with
ειναι — einai as in
Revelation 21:16. Emptied himself (
εαυτον εκενωσε — heauton ekenōse). First aorist active indicative of
κενοω — kenoō old verb from
κενος — kenos empty. Of what did Christ empty himself? Not of his divine nature. That was impossible. He continued to be the Son of God. There has arisen a great controversy on this word, a
Κενοσις — Kenosis doctrine. Undoubtedly Christ gave up his environment of glory. He took upon himself limitations of place (space) and of knowledge and of power, though still on earth retaining more of these than any mere man. It is here that men should show restraint and modesty, though it is hard to believe that Jesus limited himself by error of knowledge and certainly not by error of conduct. He was without sin, though tempted as we are. “He stripped himself of the insignia of majesty” (Lightfoot).[HR][/HR]Verse 7
The form of a servant (
μορπην δουλου — morphēn doulou). He took the characteristic attributes (
μορπην — morphēn as in Phlippians 2:6) of a slave. His humanity was as real as his deity.
In the likeness of men (
εν ομοιωματι αντρωπων — en homoiōmati anthrōpōn). It was a likeness, but a real likeness (Kennedy), no mere phantom humanity as the Docetic Gnostics held. Note the difference in tense between
υπαρχων — huparchōn (eternal existence in the
μορπη — morphē of God) and
γενομενος — genomenos (second aorist middle participle of
γινομαι — ginomai becoming, definite entrance in time upon his humanity).
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto