Allegory of the 2 Covenants Galatians 4:22-30

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#1
What I am going to present is not an analogy that makes a comparison between two things, typically on the basis of their structure and for the purpose of explanation or clarification. Quoting Paul, this is an allegory or a ranting by Paul in order for the hearers to see a picture of events that was ordained before the world was created.Paul was issuing a message to the hearers with a symbolic representation.

Genesis 21:10 Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son:for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac.

Galatians 4:22-30
22 For it is written , that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid , the other by a freewoman.
23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
24 Which things are an allegory : for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
27 For it is written , Rejoice , thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry , thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.
28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.

In relation Ishmael was the first born of Abraham but by Issac the promise was made. Genesis 26:1-3

Isaac's 2 sons were twins and Esau was born before Jacob but Jacob received the birthright. Genesis 27:26-29

Manasseh was born before Ephraim, but Ephraim received the blessing with Jacob's right hand. Genesis 48:14

Levi was born before Judah but Jacob says that “the sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be. Genesis 49:8-12

So the allegory is to be seen as God's plan from the beginning, in that the second is to take precedence over the first even though the first is not annihilated. The first has to be recognized in order for the second to fulfill the promise intended from the beginning. The allegory is then seen as a process of events that are perfect and true. Sinai came first in relation to the flesh and being a foreshadow of the Spiritual second. The first doesn't inherit the promise but the second does, and by these events the second takes precedence because God never intended the first to be complete.

Ishmael and his mother Hagar were not neglected by God as we read genesis 21:17-21. Ishmael took a wife in Egypt and then Egypt becomes a key player in the exodus story when we see God's majesty and power to deliver Israel from slavery. The allegory is the picture of events which were preordained for us to see God's glory, power, majesty, and honor that He is due. Amen
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
#2
[h=1]Comparison of Old and New Covenants[/h] [TABLE]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"] [h=3]Feature[/h] [/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"] [h=3]Old Covenant[/h] [/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"] [h=3]New Covenant[/h] [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]When established[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]at Exodus[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]at crucifixion[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Parties: God and[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]national Israel (Ex. 19-24)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Christians (Luke 22:20; John 3:16-21)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]People redeemed from bondage[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]in Egypt (Ex. 20:2)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]in sin (Heb. 9:15)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Mediator of the covenant[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Moses (Ex. 20:18-19; Heb. 9:19-20)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Jesus Christ (Heb. 8:6; 9:15; 12:24)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Ratified by blood of[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]animals (Ex. 24:8; Heb. 9:19-20)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Jesus Christ (Matt. 26:28; Rom. 3:25)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Promises offered[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]prosperity, national security, become God's treasured nation (Ex. 19:5; Lev. 26)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]eternal life (John 3:16), children of God (Rom. 8:14-17, 29), know God, law in heart, forgiveness (Heb. 8:10-12), with God forever (Rev. 21:3-7) [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Initiation sign of the covenant[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]circumcision (Gen. 17:11; Ex. 12:48-49; John 7:22-23)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]conversion of the heart (Matt. 5:8; Acts 15:8; Rom. 2:28-29)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Continuing sign of the covenant[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]observance of the Sabbaths (Ex. 31:16-17; Ezek. 20:12)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]new life of faith in Christ (Eph. 2:4-10; 4:17; 5:1-2)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Obligations[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]obedience to the law that was given through Moses (Ex. 24:3; Lev. 26; Deut. 28)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]be perfect (Matt. 5:48), believe, obey Christ (Gal. 6:2; 1 John 3:23-24; Rom. 12:1; 2 Cor. 10:5)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Duration of the covenant[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]during time of national Israel, temple and Levites (Heb. 8:13)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]eternity (John 5:24; 6:54-58; Heb. 9:15; 12:22-28; Rev. 21:3-7)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Priesthood[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Aaron and sons (Ex. 29:9; Lev. 8)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Jesus Christ (Heb. 4:14-16; 5:5-6), believers (1 Pet. 2:5, 9)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]High Priest entered presence of God[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]symbolically once a year on the Day of Atonement after offering the required blood sacrifices (Lev. 16; Heb. 9:7)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]sat down at God's right hand forever, after offering his own blood for all (Heb. 7:20-8:2; 9:11-14)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Holy place where God can be worshiped[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]tabernacle in wilderness (Deut. 12), temple in Jerusalem (1 Kings 8:29-30)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]temple of the Spirit (1 Cor. 3:16), wherever believers are (John 4:21-24; Matt. 18:20)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Commemorations[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]weekly Sabbath (Ex. 20:8-11, Deut. 5:12-15) and seasonal festivals (Lev. 23)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Lord's Supper (Luke 22:19-20; Cor. 11:26-28)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Sacrifices[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]continual offering of animals and food offerings (Lev. 1-7; Heb. 10:1) as a reminder of sins (Heb. 10:30)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Christ's one sacrifice (Heb. 9:26-28; 10:12) forgave sins, perfects the worshipper, clears conscience (Heb. 8:12; 10:1-2, 22); Christian's life of service is to be a living sacrifice (Rom. 12:1)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Law[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Ten Commandments (Ex. 20; Deut. 5) and 603 additional laws governing moral, civil and religious affairs, fulfilled by adherence to the letter of numerous rules (Ex., Lev., Deut.)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Sermon on the Mount reveals Christian attitude and way of thinking (Matt. 5-7), law of Christ fulfilled by loving God and humans (John 13:34-35; Rom. 3:8-10; Gal. 5:14; 6:2; 1 John 2:3-6; 3:7-10, 21-24)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Contrast[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]the letter kills (Rom. 4:14-15; 2 Cor. 3:6), slavery (Gal. 4:24-25; 5:1)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]The Spirit gives life (John 6:63; 2 Cor. 3:6), freedom (Gal. 4:26; 5:1)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Main feature[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]the law was a shadow of the good things to come (Heb. 10:1)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]Jesus Christ, God in the flesh (Isa. 42:1-7; 49:5-13; Heb. 1; 9:11-15; 10:5-10)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Contact with God[/TH]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]through priesthood (Lev. 1-7)[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffe1"]individual comes to God's throne (Heb. 4:16)[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]



found this chart online: Our Story | Grace Communion International

I suggest seeing the differences made in the LAW section...
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#3
I suggest seeing the differences made in the LAW section...
I don't see a difference in the way faithful individuals view the Spiritual persuasions thereof. May I remind you of Romans 8:5-7 and Acts 24:14 as Paul understood the Spiritual concepts?
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
#4
You don't understand why Christians are not required to follow the additional 603 laws or sacrifice animals at a nonexistent Temple or be circumcized?

Romans 8 doesn't really help me understand what you getting at because we have not established what you believe God's laws are FOR Christians.

I would say they are NOT the same laws given to Moses establishing the Old Covenant.

There is not argument that the NEW covenant is about spiritual laws and a deeper relationship with God. However, the OLD covenant does NOT have the same laws.



Acts 24
[SUP]14 [/SUP]But this I confess to you, that according to the Way which they call a sect, so I worship the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the Law and in the Prophets.


it states that Paul believes it, but it does NOT state to FOLLOW all the Old covenant laws. Paul has spoken against physical circumcision, told people NOT to judge other on their food or drink or if they keep the feasts or the Sabbath.

[h=1]Colossians 2:15-17New King James Version (NKJV)[/h] [SUP]15 [/SUP]Having disarmed principalities and powers, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them in it.
[SUP]16 [/SUP]So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, [SUP]17 [/SUP]which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#5
How about Galatians chapter 4 and the rest of the story concerning Hagar and Sarah and the two children which represent the two covenants.....?
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#6
You don't understand why Christians are not required to follow the additional 603 laws or sacrifice animals at a nonexistent Temple or be circumcized?
The physical temple is gone and so it the Levitical priesthood. That proves that the spiritual aspects of the law continue.

Romans 8 doesn't really help me understand what you getting at because we have not established what you believe God's laws are FOR Christians.

I would say they are NOT the same laws given to Moses establishing the Old Covenant.

There is not argument that the NEW covenant is about spiritual laws and a deeper relationship with God. However, the OLD covenant does NOT have the same laws.

Acts 24
[SUP]14 [/SUP]But this I confess to you, that according to the Way which they call a sect, so I worship the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the Law and in the Prophets.

it states that Paul believes it, but it does NOT state to FOLLOW all the Old covenant laws. Paul has spoken against physical circumcision, told people NOT to judge other on their food or drink or if they keep the feasts or the Sabbath.
Feasts are to be observed spiritually along with everything else that man shall live by. God never established anything in vain. Further, circumcision means nothing physically so let's get off the physical. That's why I mentioned Romans 8:5-7. If you cannot think beyond the physical you fall into that category Paul is talking about.

[SUP]
Colossians 2:15-17 New King James Version
[/SUP]
15 Having disarmed principalities and powers, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them in it. 16 So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, 17 which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ.
When quoting this chapter related verse 11 with Deuteronomy 10:16 and Deuteronomy 30:6. With that said I do not dispute verse 15 through 17 in the least.
 
Last edited:
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#7
How about Galatians chapter 4 and the rest of the story concerning Hagar and Sarah and the two children which represent the two covenants.....?
Go for it. please. We are here to learn.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
#8
Deut 30 is a prophecy about the NEW covenant after Israel has been punished for breaking the OLD covenant and scattered among the nations.

30 “Now it shall come to pass, when all these things come upon you, the blessing and the curse which I have set before you, and you call them to mind among all the nations where the Lord your God drives you, [SUP]2 [/SUP]and you return to the Lord your God and obey His voice, according to all that I command you today, you and your children, with all your heart and with all your soul,
Which laws do you think Moses meant when he spoke in Deut 10? Just the 10 commandments or all the other laws he outlined in the rest of Deut?
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#9
Deut 30 is a prophecy about the NEW covenant after Israel has been punished for breaking the OLD covenant and scattered among the nations.
You must have overlooked this verse
Deuteronomy 30:6 And the Lord your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your descendants, to love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may live.


Which laws do you think Moses meant when he spoke in Deut 10? Just the 10 commandments or all the other laws he outlined in the rest of Deut?
You evidently overlooked this verse also.
Deuteronomy 10:12 And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God require of you, but to fear the Lord your God, to walk in all His ways and to love Him, to serve the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul,
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#10
Deuteronomy 10:16 as mentioned in Post 6 in relation to post #8
Therefore circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and be stiff-necked no longer.

It's the law. I think this is good for all of us to do who believe in the salvation offered to us through Christ Jesus. Maybe there would be less arguing and controversy. Ya think?
 
Last edited:
1

1still_waters

Guest
#11
Deuteronomy 10:16 as mentioned in Post 6
Therefore circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and be stiff-necked no longer.

It's the law
And like all other commands it points out what we can't do...
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#12
Deuteronomy 10:16 as mentioned in Post 6 in relation to post #8
Therefore circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and be stiff-necked no longer.

It's the law. I think this is good for all of us to do who believe in the salvation offered to us through Christ Jesus. Maybe there would be less arguing and controversy. Ya think?
And like all other commands it points out what we can't do...
Are you unable to have this accomplished in your life? Sure you are.
In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, Colossians 2:11
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#13
Are you unable to have this accomplished in your life? Sure you are.
In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, Colossians 2:11
My reply was to your OT command.
And like all other commands it points out what we can't do...
The point of the OT command is to show we can't do it, thus the tutor points us to Christ.
Once in Christ our heart IS circumcised.

Toss out the bondwoman.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#14
My reply was to your OT command.

The point of the OT command is to show we can't do it, thus the tutor points us to Christ.
Once in Christ our heart IS circumcised.

Toss out the bondwoman.
Circumcising of the heart is the law and I agree with you in part that this was and is intended to be a desire according to God's will even before the New Testament. If there were none who were under the law that were truly circumcised in heart, there would have been no resurrection during the crucifixion of Christ. Hebrews 11 for example. Habakkuk says the just shall live by faith. It's an attitude by faith in all of God's word that makes the difference. As far as the "bond woman" and her son, I explained that in the OP. It has to do with the firstborn for 3 generations. Sorry that you didn't see the difference between allegory and analogy.
 
Last edited:
L

Least

Guest
#15
My reply was to your OT command.

The point of the OT command is to show we can't do it, thus the tutor points us to Christ.
Once in Christ our heart IS circumcised.

Toss out the bondwoman.
Acts 7:35 This Moses whom they refused, saying, Who made thee a ruler and a judge? the same did God send to be a ruler and a deliverer by the hand of the angel which appeared to him in the bush.
Acts 7:36 He brought them out, after that he had shewed wonders and signs in the land of Egypt, and in the Red sea, and in the wilderness forty years.
Acts 7:38 This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:


Cast out the lively oracles? I don't think it means that we cast out anything that God spoke.

Acts 7:39 To whom our fathers would not obey, but thrust him from them, and in their hearts turned back again into Egypt,

They didn't obey and their hearts turned back to Egypt?

That sounds more like the bondwoman to me.

Wasn't Hagar, (Agar) an Egyptian?
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#16
Acts 7:35 This Moses whom they refused, saying, Who made thee a ruler and a judge? the same did God send to be a ruler and a deliverer by the hand of the angel which appeared to him in the bush.
Acts 7:36 He brought them out, after that he had shewed wonders and signs in the land of Egypt, and in the Red sea, and in the wilderness forty years.
Acts 7:38 This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:


Cast out the lively oracles? I don't think it means that we cast out anything that God spoke.

Acts 7:39 To whom our fathers would not obey, but thrust him from them, and in their hearts turned back again into Egypt,

They didn't obey and their hearts turned back to Egypt?

That sounds more like the bondwoman to me.

Wasn't Hagar, (Agar) an Egyptian?
Acts 7:38 that you quoted relate to this in Exodus 23:20-22
20 "Behold, I send an Angel before you to keep you in the way and to bring you into the place which I have prepared.
21 Beware of Him and obey His voice; do not provoke Him, for He will not pardon your transgressions; for My name is in Him.
22 But if you indeed obey His voice and do all that I speak, then I will be an enemy to your enemies and an adversary to your adversaries.

I think the Angel was our Lord Jesus Christ. John 1:1

John 5:43-47
43 I have come in My Father's name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive.
44 How can you believe, who receive honor from one another, and do not seek the honor that comes from the only God?
45 Do not think that I shall accuse you to the Father; there is one who accuses you--Moses, in whom you trust.
46 For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me; for he wrote about Me. 47 But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?"
 
Last edited:
L

Least

Guest
#17
Acts 7:38 that you quoted relate to this in Exodus 23:20-22
20 "Behold, I send an Angel before you to keep you in the way and to bring you into the place which I have prepared.
21 Beware of Him and obey His voice; do not provoke Him, for He will not pardon your transgressions; for My name is in Him.
22 But if you indeed obey His voice and do all that I speak, then I will be an enemy to your enemies and an adversary to your adversaries.

I think the Angel was our Lord Jesus Christ. John 1:1

John 5:43-47
43 I have come in My Father's name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive.
44 How can you believe, who receive honor from one another, and do not seek the honor that comes from the only God?
45 Do not think that I shall accuse you to the Father; there is one who accuses you--Moses, in whom you trust.
46 For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me; for he wrote about Me. 47 But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?"
I agree;

John 1:1 also goes along with 1 Corinthians 2:4,5.

When obedience was present peace and protection followed. That is a pattern throughout the word.

The law was given to the Jews who were set free from Egypt, (The descendants of Isaac,) not to the Ishmaelites.

It was about obedience, direction, order, testing, proving and self-control and most importantly, drawing near to God. (All both OT and NT patterns.)

Ishmael, the son of the bondwoman was the opposite:

Genesis 16:11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
Genesis 16:12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.


2 Corinthians 3:13 And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished:
2 Corinthians 3:14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ.


It's interesting to look at translation comparisons of 2 Cor 3:14.

But the people's minds were hardened, and to this day whenever the old covenant is being read, the same veil covers their minds so they cannot understand the truth. And this veil can be removed only by believing in Christ. (NLT)

But their minds were hardened. For to this day, when they read the old covenant, that same veil remains unlifted, because only through Christ is it taken away.
(ESV)

The vail is taken away in Christ.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#18
I agree;

John 1:1 also goes along with 1 Corinthians 2:4,5.

When obedience was present peace and protection followed. That is a pattern throughout the word.

The law was given to the Jews who were set free from Egypt, (The descendants of Isaac,) not to the Ishmaelites.

It was about obedience, direction, order, testing, proving and self-control and most importantly, drawing near to God. (All both OT and NT patterns.)

Ishmael, the son of the bondwoman was the opposite:

Genesis 16:11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
Genesis 16:12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.


2 Corinthians 3:13 And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished:
2 Corinthians 3:14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ.


It's interesting to look at translation comparisons of 2 Cor 3:14.

But the people's minds were hardened, and to this day whenever the old covenant is being read, the same veil covers their minds so they cannot understand the truth. And this veil can be removed only by believing in Christ. (NLT)

But their minds were hardened. For to this day, when they read the old covenant, that same veil remains unlifted, because only through Christ is it taken away.
(ESV)

The vail is taken away in Christ.
Exactly! Many relate the law to the veil, but it represents the inequity of the human race not being able to endure the fullness of God's glory. So the veil actually hides God's glory from the carnal man. When Moses communicated with God, the veil came off, but when Moses communicated with Israel he put the veil back over his face. The glory on Moses' face was waining which represented that the physical aspects of the law were also going to fade away. At that time in history Israel was not ready to see the future Spiritual reality of the law that God would fulfill in Christ, His only begotten Son.

Finishing the chapter explains the spiritual, having the mind of Christ that changes us away from a carnal mind. This is the reality of the taking away of the veil. In verse 18 we then can expect a process that leads to a greater comprehension of these facts.
2 Corinthians 3:15-18
15 But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart.
16 Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away.
17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
18 But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.

The law is still there, but the veil is gone in order for us to see the spiritual truth of the law because man shall not live by bread alone but by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#19


Ishmael and his mother Hagar were not neglected by God as we read genesis 21:17-21. Ishmael took a wife in Egypt and then Egypt becomes a key player in the exodus story when we see God's majesty and power to deliver Israel from slavery. The allegory is the picture of events which were preordained for us to see God's glory, power, majesty, and honor that He is due. Amen
Ok so you try to show a pattern of first things taking second place to the second thing, as the second thing plays a supporting role.
Then you try to show Ishmael in a supporting role by equating him to Egypt because...

then Egypt becomes a key player in the exodus story
Egypt wasn't really in a supporting role in helping Israel get Exodus.

In Galatians the bondwoman is cast out, and the bondwoman is equated to Sinai covenant.
You can't really put Ishmael into a supporting role because he married an Egyptian and Egypt was a "key player".
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#20
Ok so you try to show a pattern of first things taking second place to the second thing, as the second thing plays a supporting role.
Then you try to show Ishmael in a supporting role by equating him to Egypt because...

Egypt wasn't really in a supporting role in helping Israel get Exodus.

In Galatians the bondwoman is cast out, and the bondwoman is equated to Sinai covenant.
You can't really put Ishmael into a supporting role because he married an Egyptian and Egypt was a "key player".
Obviously the second thing is the New Covenant. Egypt played a vital part in showing God's overwhelming power to bring Israel out of captivity so they could inherit the promise. Unlike Hagar who represents what came first, Ishmael then represents the world, not the law.

In the New Covenant, God's power also shows us in like manner that He (through Christ Jesus) is capable of bringing us out of captivity. It began with Passover then, and in like manner the New Covenant began with the sacrifice of the Lamb of God. This happened many years after the allegory we are speaking of. The second takes precedence over the first but the first is used to explain the reality of the second.

Galatians 4 is preempted by Galatians 3
24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25 But after that faith is come , we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

During Paul's day, the "schoolmaster" was a young man in his upper teens or early 20's that directed children to school, assuring their safety along the way. After the children knew the route to school, there was no longer any need for the schoolmaster after the children matured enough to be safe and know the route.

This is also an allegory of what comes first and how the progression of events change according to the divine perfect plan.

Then Paul makes the comparison in chapter 4 after the definition of the schoolmaster is substantiated.

Galatians 4:1-5
1 Now I say , That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all; 2 But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father.
3 Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:
4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,
5 To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.

Then toward the end of the chapter Paul explains more, using this said allegory to show the perfect process of events conceived by the Father and the Son before creation.

John 12:28 Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.

The above verse also relates to what came first, and God voices a promise from heaven that there would be a second.

John 17:5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.