I recommend that you invest in Strongs or Youngs concordance , after you have a trustworthy Bible translation, like New KJV or the New Amer.Standard , Do not use the oldKJV ,it is not good, as redtent said, the schorship of 1600's is not as good as today. Your last resort is a commentary. But Books by John Mac Arthur are very good, but he is fudging on some passages and seems he is trying to please some of his enemies, those who hate the real Gospel of the Lordship of Christ. He is a Pre-Triber, you have to be careful with pre tribbes, they read too much into or delete from texts and they get too nasty. I would recommend you use the internet and find all the library you need there. I have very few books with me here in the philippines and I find I don' need them. Matthew Henry is one of the best read on salvation, to be found, but he knows nothing about eschatology. The Reformers did us good but not so good. Some of the Roman Cath. theologians read better on sal. then the Ref. "faith only" slant at time , like: Justification by faith only ,is not Biblical. ( grace ,faith and works justi.). If you want to hear real Gospel, look up Rev. Albert Martin, sermons, Montville Trinity Baptist Church,He is a Ref. bap., so he is way off on eschatology. Joanathen Edwards is one of the best Ref.theo. His book ,Religious Affections, is super. John Piper is great. Chuck Swindol is bad on sal. and esch.. beware Dallas Theo.Sem..