Biblical Errors - Why Haven't They Been Fixed?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jul 23, 2015
1,950
7
0
#21
Smoke Whistle whatever.

They won't change the manuscripts as they find them but I believe some of the newer translations/versions will make the corrections in the text with a footnote explaining or just make the correction in a footnote.

Smoke happy, whatever.
:smoke:
3 John: 1. 5. Dearly beloved, thou dost faithfully whatever thou dost for the brethren, and that for strangers,
:whistle:

God bless us all always

:ty:
 
G

GaryA

Guest
#22
Just curious, brother. Which 'chariots' thing do you think I'm thinking of? ;)
It just means at one point there may be 4,000 chariots going into battle and then in other part of the same story, there may be 40,000 chariots.
"Yep - that sounds like it..."


1 Kings 4:

[SUP]26[/SUP] And Solomon had forty thousand stalls
of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen.

2 Chronicles 9:

[SUP]25[/SUP] And Solomon had four thousand stalls for
horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem.


10 horses for each chariot

40,000 horses
4,000 chariots

:)
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,143
612
113
70
Alabama
#24
Before you break out the flaming torches and the pitchforks, first I want to clarify something. I believe the God's Word is His ultimate written authority to us. I believe the Bible is perfect. I believe the whole Bible is written FOR us, but that not every part is written TO us. I believe God is absolute truth and His ways don't change with the times. I believe we need to conform to Christ's image and not try and make Him conform to our image (it had to be said!) I believe we need to understand Law to understand Grace and the Old Covenant to understand the New Covenant. I believe we are saved by grace through faith alone. I even believe those wacky first 11 chapters of Genesis are history.

That said, I believe the Bible has errors. I'm not talking about doctrinal issues, I'm talking simple scribal errors. Spelling, grammar, people's names, little inventory details. Like how many chariots went to war or Cainan in the genealogies. Does anyone know why these errors haven't been corrected? The Church has known about them for a long time. Just curious. Thanks. :)
I am sure there are a number of contributing factors but one is that of uncertainty. When the manuscript evidence is split it is not always certain which the best. Sometime it is a simple matter of opinion.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#25
I feel sorry for any Christian who believes that God is either a liar, makes mistakes or only half hazardly preserved his word. I for one am blessed to have a Bible that I believe is 100% free from error and therefore infallible, the KJV. Jealous? :)
Ugh!! Boy have you been fooled!

Jealose? Of what??
 
Jul 23, 2015
1,950
7
0
#26
:dontknow: what kind of understanding do we have to obtain
when it comes to this verses
Mark: 12. 29. And Jesus answered him: The first commandment of all is, Hear, O Israel: the Lord thy God is one God.
30. And thou shalt love the Lord thy God, with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole mind, and with thy whole strength. This is the first commandment.
31. And the second is like to it: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is no other commandment greater than these.

:smoke: thank you very much :happy:

God bless us all always
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,143
612
113
70
Alabama
#27
I feel sorry for any Christian who believes that God is either a liar, makes mistakes or only half hazardly preserved his word. I for one am blessed to have a Bible that I believe is 100% free from error and therefore infallible, the KJV. Jealous? :)
Obviously you understand little or nothing about the issues involved in manuscript evidences.
 
W

wwjd_kilden

Guest
#28
Is this any help with the chariots?

Chariots of David and Solomon
When David set up his kingdom, chariots appeared. We know this because the prophet Samuel warned the people that a king ‘will take your sons, and appoint them for himself, for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and some shall run before his chariots.’(I Samuel 8: 11). These were not battle chariots, of course. The bodyguard of runners was needed when the King drove his chariot through the alleys and narrow winding streets of the city. In fact, we do not know if David used chariots in battle.

The basic structure of a chariot
But if the chariot squadron in David's army was small, there is certainly no doubt that it reached quite formidable proportions in the army of Solomon. What those proportions were we do not know, since the Bible’s figures are not consistent:

  • "Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen." (I Kings 4: 26)
  • "Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horses, which he stationed in the chariot cities and with the king at Jerusalem." (II Chronicles 9: 25)
  • "Solomon gathered together chariots and horses: and he had fourteen hundred chariots and twelve thousand horses which he stationed in the chariot cities and with the king at Jerusalem." (I Kings 10: 26)
It is of course impossible to determine which of the above figures is correct, but the fact remains that Solomon must have had a good many chariot horses. If the number of horses per chariot including the horse in reserve was three, then if we assume that the 4,000 figure was the true number of chariot horses in his possession, this would put the figure of his chariots at about 1,400 which would fit the 'fourteen hundred chariots' of the last Biblical quotation.
If, on the other hand, this 'thousand and four hundred chariots' refers not to chariots but to the total number of chariot horses—and the Bible frequently uses ‘rekheb’ to mean "chariot horse" - then the number of chariots in Solomon's army would be nearer to 500. This would be a sizable figure for the period, but quite realistic.



CHARIOTS OF WAR IN THE BIBLE
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,143
612
113
70
Alabama
#29
I feel sorry for any Christian who believes that God is either a liar, makes mistakes or only half hazardly preserved his word. I for one am blessed to have a Bible that I believe is 100% free from error and therefore infallible, the KJV. Jealous? :)
Yet another case of KJV myopia.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#30
I feel sorry for any Christian who believes that God is either a liar, makes mistakes or only half hazardly preserved his word. I for one am blessed to have a Bible that I believe is 100% free from error and therefore infallible, the KJV. Jealous? :)
Why would I be jealous of someone who's biggest sorrow is that others aren't KJV Only too? I feel sorry that that alone brings you to feel anything for others.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#31
Is this any help with the chariots?

Chariots of David and Solomon
When David set up his kingdom, chariots appeared. We know this because the prophet Samuel warned the people that a king ‘will take your sons, and appoint them for himself, for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and some shall run before his chariots.’(I Samuel 8: 11). These were not battle chariots, of course. The bodyguard of runners was needed when the King drove his chariot through the alleys and narrow winding streets of the city. In fact, we do not know if David used chariots in battle.

The basic structure of a chariot
But if the chariot squadron in David's army was small, there is certainly no doubt that it reached quite formidable proportions in the army of Solomon. What those proportions were we do not know, since the Bible’s figures are not consistent:

  • "Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen." (I Kings 4: 26)
  • "Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horses, which he stationed in the chariot cities and with the king at Jerusalem." (II Chronicles 9: 25)
  • "Solomon gathered together chariots and horses: and he had fourteen hundred chariots and twelve thousand horses which he stationed in the chariot cities and with the king at Jerusalem." (I Kings 10: 26)
It is of course impossible to determine which of the above figures is correct, but the fact remains that Solomon must have had a good many chariot horses. If the number of horses per chariot including the horse in reserve was three, then if we assume that the 4,000 figure was the true number of chariot horses in his possession, this would put the figure of his chariots at about 1,400 which would fit the 'fourteen hundred chariots' of the last Biblical quotation.
If, on the other hand, this 'thousand and four hundred chariots' refers not to chariots but to the total number of chariot horses—and the Bible frequently uses ‘rekheb’ to mean "chariot horse" - then the number of chariots in Solomon's army would be nearer to 500. This would be a sizable figure for the period, but quite realistic.



CHARIOTS OF WAR IN THE BIBLE
All could of course have been correct. Solomon may well have started with 1400 chariots and gradually increased to 4000, each supported by ten horses. The 12000 horsemen was clearly seen as the ideal number of horsemen.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#32
Oh, go away KJV-Onlyist! I don't think God's a liar, or that He makes mistakes or did a half-assed job of preserving His Word, not at all. But some scribes have been known to bugger up their copies spelling-wise, grammar-wise etc. That doesn't change God's truth. It just means at one point there may be 4,000 chariots going into battle and then in other part of the same story, there may be 40,000 chariots. Again, nothing doctrinal. I mentioned that. So you can get off my back. Please. Also, I believe God's Word is infallible/perfect. I mentioned that in my above post.
You know? Now I'm picturing a bunch of scribes in some big marbled room of second century Mediterranean construct in their proper scribely attire peeking at what the guy next to them is writing, and mumbling to him, "Whatever thou doeth, don'teth buggereth it up."
 

Budman

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2014
4,153
1,998
113
#33
I think it's a simple matter of people heeding God's warning not to add or take away from His word. If one is not certain as to a number or description, it's best to leave it in and create a footnote.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#34
Seriously not a Biblical scholar here, but I am wondering, why would a one man chariot need 10 horses? One horse can carry a man, so I'm going with two can easily carry a man on a chariot. Maybe four, if the chariot is extremely heavy, but by the time you're getting up to ten, that's ten horses that have to be controlled as one unified body. They can't go any faster. If ten can go up a mountain with that load, so could four. With ten, go into battle and I'm aiming for a middle horse, just because that mucks up the entire use of the chariot and makes it harder for the driver to unhooked the dead horse, and it would possibly break the leg of the horse right behind it. There is such a thing of overly efficient that makes it less efficient.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#35
I am sure there are a number of contributing factors but one is that of uncertainty. When the manuscript evidence is split it is not always certain which the best. Sometime it is a simple matter of opinion.
We know that God knows which is the best. Do you think God has any sway over the translator to pick one or the other?
 
G

Goodness11

Guest
#36
Before you break out the flaming torches and the pitchforks, first I want to clarify something. I believe the God's Word is His ultimate written authority to us. I believe the Bible is perfect. I believe the whole Bible is written FOR us, but that not every part is written TO us. I believe God is absolute truth and His ways don't change with the times. I believe we need to conform to Christ's image and not try and make Him conform to our image (it had to be said!) I believe we need to understand Law to understand Grace and the Old Covenant to understand the New Covenant. I believe we are saved by grace through faith alone. I even believe those wacky first 11 chapters of Genesis are history.

That said, I believe the Bible has errors. I'm not talking about doctrinal issues, I'm talking simple scribal errors. Spelling, grammar, people's names, little inventory details. Like how many chariots went to war or Cainan in the genealogies. Does anyone know why these errors haven't been corrected? The Church has known about them for a long time. Just curious. Thanks. :)
'I believe we need to conform to Christ's image and not try and make Him conform to our image.'

Personally I won't be joining this thread because I'm not that well versed in historical theology in comparison to some amazing contributors on this site. What I will say though is your line, 'I believe we need to conform to Christ's image and not try and make Him conform to our image.' really spoke to my Holy Spirit!! Love that line! Thank-you, brought me some joy this morning :) Many blessings!! Xoo
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,189
113
#37
Proverbs 26:4-5
[SUP]4 [/SUP]Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
[SUP]5 [/SUP]Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.

Its the only place in the bible where I have ever encountered a 'contradiction' where I didn't think it was because of my own limited understanding.

I wonder if this just requires discernment on when to do what...?
 
W

wwjd_kilden

Guest
#38
Maybe there weren't that many pulling the wagon but several replacements?

I know that post chaises had stations at intervals where the horses were replaced, but these obviously were not war horses but taxis

*shrugs*
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
#39
Proverbs 26:4-5
[SUP]4 [/SUP]Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
[SUP]5 [/SUP]Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.

Its the only place in the bible where I have ever encountered a 'contradiction' where I didn't think it was because of my own limited understanding.

I wonder if this just requires discernment on when to do what...?
Absolutely.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,024
26,150
113
#40
Proverbs 26:4-5
[SUP]4 [/SUP]Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
[SUP]5 [/SUP]Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.

Its the only place in the bible where I have ever encountered a 'contradiction' where I didn't think it was because of my own limited understanding.

I wonder if this just requires discernment on when to do what...?
To everything there is a time and a season. Sometimes it is wise to speak to someone in a way they understand, speaking to them on their level, which is often a method of teaching, and sometimes it is simply not wise to stoop that low. That is one way of reconciling the two. Both can be beneficial, and true, after all, even if they do appear to be contradictory.