I could explain the difference between the natural mans "faith" and the "gift of faith", which is supernatural but what would be the point. You write much but little is of Scripture teachings. You think you know much but most is foolishness before God. You are likened to this person: 2Ti 3:7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. I know this sounds harsh on my part but sooner or later it has to be said.
Even a learned person, should be able to distinguish between the things we obtain in our natural birth and the things needed to equip one as a believer.
Even a learned person, should be able to distinguish between the things we obtain in our natural birth and the things needed to equip one as a believer.
When you're ready to actually discuss what is present within Scripture, I'll be happy to oblige. But so long as you think your cherry-picked theology is the whole of Scripture you will never be able to truly understand the depth of the Bible's richness.
It's rather amusing to me how often rather than engaging in discussion and rebutting the things that I say the response is to elevate yourselves and your view of Scripture as unassailable, to equate your views with the plain text of Scripture, and to shut down conversations by putting yourselves in God's position and saying God is unquestionable. If your views were so strong, why would you need such tactics rather than defending them openly?