Quassar said: Mt.28:19 and 1 Jn.5:7 is an alteration and an additive, respectively as the Scripture prove in the following:…
…Jesus would never have made a statement like the present day translation, because He knew very well His Father was/is the Holy Spirit, according to Mt.1:20 and Lk,1:35. Jesus stated that His Father lived in Him doing His work, in Jn.14:10, clearly revealing His Father to be the Holy Spirit.
Fredoheaven: Exactly here is “conjectural emendation” – an educated guesswork…nothing has been proven in regards to the issue. BTW, how can the Holy Spirit be the God the Father when the Holy Spirit comes from the Father and by which the Father will send just like Jesus? In John 14:26 Jesus said,” But the Comforter , which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things and bring you all things to your remembrance whatsoever I have said unto you.
Quassar said: In addition, the practice of baptism by the Apostles, was always in the name of Jesus Christ, confirming the prophecy of John the Baptist, in Mt.3:11; Mk.1:8; Lk.3:16 and Jn.1:33, as found in Acts 2:38. Never in the triune theology Godhead of Father, Son and Holy Spirit - for the above Scriptural reasons.
Fredoheaven: This is construed that “baptism in name of Jesus Christ” by the apostles never contradicts what Jesus said in Matthew 28:19. It should be noted that somehow the Apostles have done terrible things why they did not obey what Jesus said. However, not a slightest chance has ever affected what the Apostles did in their obedience to the Great Commission. The formula of baptism is still true in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. What the Apostles did as it was recorded in Acts 2:38 were done in the authority (name) of Jesus Christ that any believers were said to be baptized of what Jesus Christ really said. And what Jesus really said? Believers were to be baptized “…in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”, moreover, Jesus said “All power is given unto me…” and said to his disciples “…if you love me keep my commandments” John 14:15 and Christ commandments about baptism is to baptize believers as it is said coming from the lips of our Saviour-that’s what the record says. SOLA SRIPTURA!
Quassar said: In regards to 1 Jn.5:7, it is a late Latin insert of about the 12th century. It does not appear in any of the early Greek mss.
Fredoheaven: What you are insinuating is about “early” Gk. Mss. Antiquity is not all the basis to appear it’s the correct reading or concrete evidence, for a 4[SUP]th[/SUP] ce. extant Gk. Mss could be a representative of a mutilated, corrupt or depraved text but a later Greek mss may be said to be an exact representative of the pure text or the original autographs. To be straight, you are just referring to the corrupt Vaticanus (B) or the Sinaticus (Aleph) and few more. The external evidence and internal evidence, theological considerations and by the universal consent however, I believe it is to be retained. (Review the site I just provided) or believe what the Scriptures says. SOLA SCRIPTURA!
Quassar said: That the above views come from only a"few critics/agnostics is nothing but opinion as the two verses are actively debated by many who do not hokld to the doctrine of the Trinity. The Scriptures prove them both to be false.
Fredoheaven: Yes, the point is all about your opinion, is not really the Word of God! SOLA SCRIPTURA!
Quassar said: As to the annotation I quoted from the Scofield version of the KJV, Yes, I left out the final statement,“Create” might fit the word in Genesis 14:14, 22, in other instances such a meaning would be absurd," because that is their opinion, and it is not absurd, and I can fully support it. Review the NIV translation of Gen.14:14 and 22, where it is ranslated possessir in the KJV, it is CREATED, in the NIV. Same as the pre-incarnated Jesus was possessed in the KJV, Pr.8:22. He was brought forth and given birth in Pr.8:22-25, in the NIV.
Fredoheaven: Now you are trying to explain unnecessarily. But the fact remains, you have quoted them with your “alteration”. This must be the standard operation of many cults I know, when being pinned downed. The Bible says in Proverbs 24:21 My son, fear thou the LORD and the king: and meddle not with them that are given to change:
Who did the alteration? Think twice or thrice…The Holy writ or you? SOLA SCRIPTURA!
Quassar said: Get this straight! I have written where Jesus became the od/God the Son in Mt.1:20 and in Lk.1:35 mjany times over on this thread. I have NEVERdenied the deity of Jesus Christ.
Fredoheaven: A careful analysis of your opinion seems everything is right but is not! If God is eternal God, and Jesus is God therefore He is eternal. John 1:1 says Jesus did not became into something God. He is God forevermore! The Word (Jesus) was made flesh! God manifested in the flesh! John 1:14; 1 Timothy 3:16. SOLA SCRIPTURA!
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God.
John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us (and we beheld the glory, the glory of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
Quassar said: I have studied this issue for 35 years and I herewith challenged to prove the Trinity from the Bible! And when you have finished your best effort, I will refute you from the Scriptures and show you who and what God is together with the origin of Jesus Christ, that can be taught from the Bible, the Trinity cannot be!
Fredoheaven: Of course your 35 years studying the issue has no bearing on what’s the issue. How can you refute someone from the Scriptures when the Scriptures refute you? What you are saying actually is to give your opinion to refute someone, but it is all “the scriptures” that will refute you as already demonstrated in your “firstborn”, “possessed” “wisdom” in my and others earlier posts.
Further, it may be a good thing that you have said your “refutation” will come from the Scriptures and that’s good, fair enough! We goanna shout and praise the Lord for that! And I say Amen! Hallelujah! But from my own observation in # 660 post of yours, in that I didn’t even see or find one single full quotation of scripture by you! SO, Scriptures only please…
SOLA SCRIPTURA!
“Remove not the ancient landmarks which thy father hath set…”