Catholics *PLZ ANSWER*

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#61
BLAH BLAH triplet347 and those of you that like to write novellls. FOR WHAT?! My earthly father is different from the ones that think they should be called "father" as to exalt themselves above the Lord God, they should no better! So you keep my earthly father and Heavenly Father from here on out outta your confused belligerent mouth and mind. NO ONE DOES NOT AND NEVER WILL have Jesus, because they have denied the TRUTH and therefore Jesus as well! Disunity is what ALL religions are. Disunity and falsehood! They will be JUDGED IMMENSELY by the true King of Kings. Not some baywatch ricky martin with blue eyes look a like, but the real ORDEAL! All religions even sesame street cookie monster worshipers will be relinquished and abased by Jesus !! And tell me something else obnoxious! I'll laugh you outta here to the pope of rome toilet so you can carry on your fecal phasia! And so you can smell your own crap on your knees!!!
And thus the true intention of this thread is revealed... Can't say I'm surprised though.

We pray TO God because Jesus said so. He also said to ask in HIS Name. He said that NO MAN comes to the Father but by HIM. Paul says there is ONE Mediator.

Too hard to understand?

WHAT would YOU describe as a "graven image" or an "image" of things that are in Heaven?

No need to investigate anything any further.
I honestly can't blame Triplet. Every time I hear someone proclaim to be a former Catholic, and then promptly see them espouse the things you did, it forces me to think that they were never much of a Catholic to begin with.

Anyway, as you no doubt know (being the bible based protestant that you are) that God commanded images to be put in the Temple (I Kings 6:23-36; 7:27-39; 8:6-67). In other places the plans for the Temple include such things as an altar made of refined gold with golden cherubim (1 Chron. 28:18-19; 3:7-14). Also there is the famous instance where God ordered the Ark to be built with golden Cherubim (Exodus 25:18-22; 26:1,31). Therefore the much more reasonable interpretation of the prohibition of graven images in Deut 5:8 (given the Israelites rather liberal use of them in the Temple and God's lack of condemnation) is that the commandment is a prohibition against the worship of false gods through the images of the aforementioned false deities, and not a prohibition against the use of images in worship in general.
 
K

kujo313

Guest
#62
And thus the true intention of this thread is revealed... Can't say I'm surprised though.



I honestly can't blame Triplet. Every time I hear someone proclaim to be a former Catholic, and then promptly see them espouse the things you did, it forces me to think that they were never much of a Catholic to begin with.

Anyway, as you no doubt know (being the bible based protestant that you are) that God commanded images to be put in the Temple (I Kings 6:23-36; 7:27-39; 8:6-67). In other places the plans for the Temple include such things as an altar made of refined gold with golden cherubim (1 Chron. 28:18-19; 3:7-14). Also there is the famous instance where God ordered the Ark to be built with golden Cherubim (Exodus 25:18-22; 26:1,31). Therefore the much more reasonable interpretation of the prohibition of graven images in Deut 5:8 (given the Israelites rather liberal use of them in the Temple and God's lack of condemnation) is that the commandment is a prohibition against the worship of false gods through the images of the aforementioned false deities, and not a prohibition against the use of images in worship in general.
Then your "Mary" is a deity. Claiming that "she" can be more than one place at a time and can hear all prayers. In the presence of a statue or painting of "her", you pray to her.

As a "bible-based protestant" and not something made up by people, I do not accept the word "venerate" when it comes to the RCC and "Mary". Assuming that "she" has God-like characteristics and asking "her" for anything IS worshipping "her".
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#63
Then your "Mary" is a deity. Claiming that "she" can be more than one place at a time and can hear all prayers. In the presence of a statue or painting of "her", you pray to her.
The Saints in heaven are not limited by the constraints of time (heaven is outside of time) nor are they limited by the constraints of human sensory perception, since they no longer have their earthly bodies. Also the sense in which we use the word pray in relation to the Saints is not the same as the way you use it in relation to God. as you no doubt know the older English meaning of "pray" was both "to ask" and "to pray to God" in the sense you use it. We have simply retained the older meaning of the word. The Saints can do nothing but present our requests before the throne of God.

As a "bible-based protestant" and not something made up by people, I do not accept the word "venerate" when it comes to the RCC and "Mary". Assuming that "she" has God-like characteristics and asking "her" for anything IS worshipping "her".
Then I suggest you take up the meaning of the word venerate with the many generations of Christians that came before you and before the Protestant reformation was even a twinkle in the eye of history. The meaning of the word and the concept of a division between "Latria" and "Dulia" has been around practically as long as the Christian faith itself has been around.
 
R

rodogg

Guest
#64
BLAH BLAH triplet347 and those of you that like to write novellls. FOR WHAT?! My earthly father is different from the ones that think they should be called "father" as to exalt themselves above the Lord God, they should no better! So you keep my earthly father and Heavenly Father from here on out outta your confused belligerent mouth and mind. NO ONE DOES NOT AND NEVER WILL have Jesus, because they have denied the TRUTH and therefore Jesus as well! Disunity is what ALL religions are. Disunity and falsehood! They will be JUDGED IMMENSELY by the true King of Kings. Not some baywatch ricky martin with blue eyes look a like, but the real ORDEAL! All religions even sesame street cookie monster worshipers will be relinquished and abased by Jesus !! And tell me something else obnoxious! I'll laugh you outta here to the pope of rome toilet so you can carry on your fecal phasia! And so you can smell your own crap on your knees!!!
Waow... Speaks for itself...
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#65
Every time I hear someone proclaim to be a former Catholic, and then promptly see them espouse the things you did, it forces me to think that they were never much of a Catholic
Brother, bit judgmental there, maybe they seeked Gods truth thru scripture and scripture alone instead of being led with a ring thru their nose.
Most interesting thing I've found is when people stop listening to man and start seeking Jesus for themselves thru the scripture as the sole foundation religious doctrine fades in comparison.
I'm neither class myself catholic nor Protestant even though Catholics coin that I am a Protestant for being not catholic. Many Protestant denoms I find hard to fathom but one thing I know in my heart with all truth is I'm a child of the most high God thru Jesus and the cross He died on for me.

Former Catholics shouldn't be derided cause they left your pope to follow Jesus.

 
T

triplet347

Guest
#66
And thus the true intention of this thread is revealed... Can't say I'm surprised though.



I honestly can't blame Triplet. Every time I hear someone proclaim to be a former Catholic, and then promptly see them espouse the things you did, it forces me to think that they were never much of a Catholic to begin with.

Anyway, as you no doubt know (being the bible based protestant that you are) that God commanded images to be put in the Temple (I Kings 6:23-36; 7:27-39; 8:6-67). In other places the plans for the Temple include such things as an altar made of refined gold with golden cherubim (1 Chron. 28:18-19; 3:7-14). Also there is the famous instance where God ordered the Ark to be built with golden Cherubim (Exodus 25:18-22; 26:1,31). Therefore the much more reasonable interpretation of the prohibition of graven images in Deut 5:8 (given the Israelites rather liberal use of them in the Temple and God's lack of condemnation) is that the commandment is a prohibition against the worship of false gods through the images of the aforementioned false deities, and not a prohibition against the use of images in worship in general.

Well said!

If Kujo and the like are going to make Exodus 20:4 into a blanket statement as to apply to all images, then he should not have pictures of Jesus anywhere. Jesus is God, right? Then you shouldn't have any pictures of Jesus because that is a graven image.

It is typical of anti-Catholics or non-Catholics to take verses out of context and use them to bolster their position. This is called proof-texting or isogesis instead of exogesis.
 
T

triplet347

Guest
#67
Then your "Mary" is a deity. Claiming that "she" can be more than one place at a time and can hear all prayers. In the presence of a statue or painting of "her", you pray to her.

As a "bible-based protestant" and not something made up by people, I do not accept the word "venerate" when it comes to the RCC and "Mary". Assuming that "she" has God-like characteristics and asking "her" for anything IS worshipping "her".

So says you, the ignorant "bible-based Protestant". Wow, just go right ahead and make up your own interpretation of the RCC's teachings. Go ahead, don't accept the word "venerate". Go ahead and make your own definition of "worship". Anything to make the RCC easier to refute by misrepresenting its teachings and building a strawman.

Yes, the Catholic church was "man-made" because Jesus started His church, the Catholic Church, and He is 100% man and 100% God. See how that works. I have no problem with that, but your denomination was founded by a man and only a man. Go ahead give me the name of your denomination and I'll give you the name of the founder.
 
T

triplet347

Guest
#68
Brother, bit judgmental there, maybe they seeked Gods truth thru scripture and scripture alone instead of being led with a ring thru their nose.
Most interesting thing I've found is when people stop listening to man and start seeking Jesus for themselves thru the scripture as the sole foundation religious doctrine fades in comparison.
I'm neither class myself catholic nor Protestant even though Catholics coin that I am a Protestant for being not catholic. Many Protestant denoms I find hard to fathom but one thing I know in my heart with all truth is I'm a child of the most high God thru Jesus and the cross He died on for me.

Former Catholics shouldn't be derided cause they left your pope to follow Jesus.


No, this is not being judgmental. It is using the fact that he claims to be a former Catholic and then goes ahead and misrepresents the basic teachings of the Catholic Church. As a former Catholic he should no the Catholic Church has never condoned the worship of Mary, the Saints, angels, or any other created thing, for example. The claim that Mary is a deity is another patently false claim the Catholic Church doesn't make. It is comments like these that justify his conclusion. You would say the same thing about someone who claimed to be a former__________ (whatever your denomination is) and then misrepresent what your church teaches. It is being intellectually honest.
 
T

triplet347

Guest
#69
Brother, bit judgmental there, maybe they seeked Gods truth thru scripture and scripture alone instead of being led with a ring thru their nose.
Most interesting thing I've found is when people stop listening to man and start seeking Jesus for themselves thru the scripture as the sole foundation religious doctrine fades in comparison.
I was an anti-Catholic and it was through studying the scriptures that led me to the doors of the Catholic Church. I was not led by a ring through the nose.
 
Aug 14, 2011
68
0
0
#71
Triplet347 you have stated a couple times that some of the verses in the bible are a "blanket statement" towards others real learned stuff concerning WHATEVER. That is typically disrespecting others and the Word of God as well. This chat room isn't about challenging it's about strictly learning from the bible and what the Holy Spirit of Jesus(for those of you that really have the Holy Spirit) reveals to us. Not to bicker and deny. You have denied the verse in Mathew towards the whole calling any man on earth father, and made a comment, that was immature about the one that made me with his sperm shouldn't be called father either. It seems to me, forgive me if wrong, and may God forgive me most of all, but you don't really wanna learn. You just wanna challenge and deny. Both in which I have no time! I sincerely wanna learn. And all I find in here is studies of stuff of google and false books and not enough of the divine TRUTH which is the Word, The BLOOD of Jesus!!! And I don't feel an ounce of love here neither with all the other names callings I've seen. Everyone in here that's suppose to learn and teach about the Lord God is suppose to unite with the others ones on here that feel and think the same way and fight the good fight against the enemy or enemies, not each other. You guys are trying to be smarter then the other and swifter then another, but to me, w out Jesus and the love He demands you to share among each other; your just fools to me. :(
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#72
Brother, bit judgmental there, maybe they seeked Gods truth thru scripture and scripture alone instead of being led with a ring thru their nose.
Most interesting thing I've found is when people stop listening to man and start seeking Jesus for themselves thru the scripture as the sole foundation religious doctrine fades in comparison.
I'm neither class myself catholic nor Protestant even though Catholics coin that I am a Protestant for being not catholic. Many Protestant denoms I find hard to fathom but one thing I know in my heart with all truth is I'm a child of the most high God thru Jesus and the cross He died on for me.

Former Catholics shouldn't be derided cause they left your pope to follow Jesus.

It's more of a statement of fact than anything else. If he actually was a well grounded and catechized Catholic he would not have said we "worship" Mary and the like, when we clearly say we don't, and his arguments would have been a bit more laid out then they were since he would have actually known why we teach what we do and the reasons behind them.

However I will say that he isn't entirely to blame for any bad Catechesis he received, since judging by his age he would have been the product of 70's Catholic Catechesis, which was quit abysmal at the time.
 
T

triplet347

Guest
#73
Triplet347 you have stated a couple times that some of the verses in the bible are a "blanket statement" towards others real learned stuff concerning WHATEVER. That is typically disrespecting others and the Word of God as well. This chat room isn't about challenging it's about strictly learning from the bible and what the Holy Spirit of Jesus(for those of you that really have the Holy Spirit) reveals to us. Not to bicker and deny. You have denied the verse in Mathew towards the whole calling any man on earth father, and made a comment, that was immature about the one that made me with his sperm shouldn't be called father either. It seems to me, forgive me if wrong, and may God forgive me most of all, but you don't really wanna learn. You just wanna challenge and deny. Both in which I have no time! I sincerely wanna learn. And all I find in here is studies of stuff of google and false books and not enough of the divine TRUTH which is the Word, The BLOOD of Jesus!!! And I don't feel an ounce of love here neither with all the other names callings I've seen. Everyone in here that's suppose to learn and teach about the Lord God is suppose to unite with the others ones on here that feel and think the same way and fight the good fight against the enemy or enemies, not each other. You guys are trying to be smarter then the other and swifter then another, but to me, w out Jesus and the love He demands you to share among each other; your just fools to me. :(
I am not going to try to convince of my intentions. I've already stated what my intentions are. You can accept that or not. As for my calling some peoples' use of verses of the Bible as "blanket statement", it is a statement of fact. If someone is going to say as you have reiterated, "calling any man on earth father" then that is a blanket statement. Period. You and the others are using the word "any" to be used to apply to ALL fathers. That, by definition is called a "blanket statement". It is NOT disrespecting others or the Word of God. That is your projection onto my statements. My statements are just that statements. I have not been mean or pejorative in any of my comments. I am simply entering into a dialogue with you and others.

Why is it that people think that just because one challenges their beliefs that they take it as being attacked, being disrespected, or that the person challenging your beliefs is "mean"?

Let me be frank, you don't know me and for you to accuse me of just challenging and denying is just wrong. If I was just interested in that, then I would never have become Catholic. Becoming Catholic was the LAST thing I ever thought I would be. I was and still am a Bible-believing Christian. I have always lived my life committed to learning the truth and in the words of C.S. Lewis, "to follow the evidence where ever it may lead." It was a Catholic who asked me some very tough questions that I had to be honest with myself that I did not have a good answer for. It was my searching out those answers in scripture so I could go back and "show" him that ultimately led me to eventually see the truth in the Catholic Church. The more I studied scriptures the more I saw how certain things/topics aligned perfectly with Catholic teaching. The evidence was leading me straight to where I DID NOT want to go, but the evidence became more and more overwhelming. As I studied for about fours years I prayed for God every step of the way that if the Catholic Church was in error to show me, but the more I read Catholic sources and got deeper into scripture, the topics that had always puzzled me as a non-Catholic/ bible-Christian made perfect sense from a Catholic point of view, from Catholic theology. It got to a point where I would have discussions with my Protestant friends and they would bring up issues with Catholic teachings and I found myself defending those teachings and explaining to them how they misunderstood what the Catholic Church was teaching.

How does one know you have the truth if you are not open to having others scrutinize you belief. If your argument can stand up to scrutiny then that lends credence to your position, but if someone shows you a weakness in your position/argument, then you have to be intellectually honest and consider the objection seriously. to see if you can find an answer. It is through these "challenges" that we get closer to the truth.

Finally, I think you are the one who is being challenging and just wants to deny. You are guilty of the very thing you accuse others of being. You are the one who started this thread under a false pretense. I took you to be sincere in your questions only to find out you were baiting. You were not interested in the answers at all. You were just interested in espousing your anti-Catholic rhetoric.

I am hear to have dialogue with those who want to truly have dialogue: meaning they are open to having a discussion with someone who doesn't believe what they believe in a respectful manner in order to discover what the truth is about God's word and His church. I am not interested in bickering and that is something I have not done. I hope we may continue this dialogue with charitable intentions, but for the purpose of learning the truth.

God bless,
 
T

triplet347

Guest
#75
Triplet, this is the one that I have yet to see resolved.


Do Catholics and Muslims worship the same God?
Did you read Lumen Genitum paragraph 16? I don't see how the answer to the question above has anything to do with what CCC 841 is talking about in light of what Vatican II states in LG 16.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#76
Did you read Lumen Genitum paragraph 16? I don't see how the answer to the question above has anything to do with what CCC 841 is talking about in light of what Vatican II states in LG 16.
The issue you and I were discussing was whether or not Christians and Muslims worship the same God.'


Relevancy: these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day."(
 
T

triplet347

Guest
#78
The issue you and I were discussing was whether or not Christians and Muslims worship the same God.'
As I stated earlier, you are misrepresenting the statement in CCC 841 and this is why I brought your attention to the footnote 300 that is at the end of the statement. The footnote refers you to Lumen Gentium paragraph 16. There it explains what is meant. I also explained that in the previous post.

You are making an issue where one doesn't exist if you properly understand what the CCC is saying in paragraph 841.

Maybe this will help. Would you agree that the Jews of the Old Testament worshiped the true God? If yes, then is that still the same God of the New Testament? If yes, then wouldn't they be worshiping the same God? You keep bringing Jesus into the mix, but the God of Abraham is the God of Jacob, etc. So if the God of the OT is the same God as the NT then it follows that Muslims, Jews, and Christians worship the same God. Now, they may accept (or not accept) certain revelations about who God is (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), but they are worshiping the same God in a certain sense. This is what CCC 841 is saying and that is what LG 16 is explaining.

With this understanding you can see there is no contradiction with CCC 841 and the verses you quote. To say otherwise is a strawman argument. I would encourage you to find another signature because in my mind to continue to do so would be an act of willful ignorance.

I hope this helps.
 
T

triplet347

Guest
#79
im glad im not the only one who sees this. ived done so much research on this subject that i found a lot of things about the catholic church.
The Fox Catholic Nazi NIV Connection - YouTube

Wow, more unsubstantiated claims about the Catholic Church and Hitler. I don't put any credence in videos with nothing more than a narrator making claims. There are many non-Catholic historians who find this line of accusation untenable. I agree. This is intellectually dishonest work.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#80
@triplet

John 5 said:
19 Jesus gave them this answer: “Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does. 20 For the Father loves the Son and shows him all he does. Yes, and he will show him even greater works than these, so that you will be amazed. 21 For just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, even so the Son gives life to whom he is pleased to give it. 22 Moreover, the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son, 23 that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father, who sent him
Muslims and Jews of this day, do not honor the Son, and thus, do not honor the Father. It is that simple.