Not really, there are only 57 Mizmors Paul would understand as Psalms. The BOOK of Psalms contains at least 4 types of POETIC material: #150 is a Halal which means "to make yourself vile"
Where do you get that? It doesn't mean that when I look it up. The root shows up in "Hallelujah." Saying that is not to declare the Lord vile.
You seem to be taking a kind of 'etymological conspiracy theory' approach to the Bible. It seems like you ignore what the actual text says, and instead decode what it is really saying by using your strange twist on the etymology of words.
because David was a king and not a priest
You should consider the prophetic implications of the Melchizedek passage. David was king in Jerusalem.
and the Levites as soothsayer-sorcerers were under DAVID
More nonsense. You come up with your theories by ignoring the immediate context about the Levites, using some verse in some other context centuries later, and add in some misuse of the etymologies of Greek words. That stuff might sell on a cable network. Maybe you can take over for the Shepherd's Chapel guy.
The command is to SPEAK that which is written for our LEARNING and Paul compares tongues to lifeless instruments neither of which can TEACH and he therefore silenced the EVERYONE
Clearly false (the silenced part) from reading the passage. The interpretation of tongues does edify. Paul specifically allows speaking in tongues with interpretation. Paul does not silence the 'everyone' but instructs that all things be done unto edifying.
and limited the prophesying to any Apostle-Ordained prophet:
False. There is no indication anywhere in scripture that prophets had to be ordained by apostles. Apostles didn't even have to be ordained by apostles if we look at Paul's example. We do know that Christ ascended and gave gifts, including apostles, to the church.
We also see that Paul said to let the prophets speak two or three and let the other judge. This implies that there were indeed prophets in the church. He also says 'for ye may all prophesy one by one' which allows others to prophesy as well.
there was not one in Corinth and that is why Paul said "Your assemblies do more harm than good."
You make jump up again. Paul wrote that the assemblies did more harm than good because of how they ate together.
Nor does the text imply that there was no prophet in Corinth. Paul wrote that the Corinthians came behind in no spiritual gift waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ (I Corinthians 1:7). Prophecy is listed among the spiritual gifts in that book.
So pity anyone who would use that which Paul condemned as a PATTERN.
Pity the one who would condemn what Paul calls the 'commandments of the Lord'. Such a man should not be regarded as spiritual.
The problem with proof text is that it proves that they do not understand that from the Wilderness onward the Church of Christ (the ROCK) had a two piece pattern never changed even by Jesus:
The pattern, or rather, actually commandments of the Lord in the passage make sense in studying the context. We aren't talking about one-verse profftexts.
But I'd rather see someone use a prooftext than these bizaar insane-sounding ramblings of yours. It reminds me of the movie 'A beautiful mind' where the deluded Nash thought he was decoded messages in letters in magazines. Instead of letters in magazines, you are focuses on a word or two here of a Strong's concordance gloss, a phrase here and there out of pagan literature or commentaries about paganism, and then a verse or two here and there taken out of context. You bring them all together to some sort of argument that makes a lot more sense to you than to others, because you aren't quite connecting the tenuous dots. Please don't be deceived into thinking your reasoning comes from the Holy Spirit. Have you ever had someone from your own movement tell you that your ideas are ramblings or insane musings? It's hard to understand what you are saying, so some people may think you are highly educated and it just goes over their heads, but if someone really tries to read what you are saying, it's a bunch of irrational nonsense. I'm sorry to be the one to tell you that, if a thousand others haven't already. But you should know it and pray about it. Just lay all this stuff down, all these ideas down, give them to the Lord, and ask the Lord to give you peace and a sound mind.
All such religious operatives such as Miriam, the Levites and all religious musicians are called PARASITES.
And you slander the people in the Old Testament. Miriam, David. You seem to think you seem to know better than the actual text of scripture which David and others wrote, rejecting the literal message in favor of the patterns you see in Greek glossaries, pagan writings, commentaries on pagan writings, and scriptures you apply to the wrong contexts.
Moses promised
another "prophet" like him as our last warning:
1Corinthians 10:6 Now these things were our
examples,
..... to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.
1Corinthians 10:7 Neither be ye
idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written,
.....he people sat down to
eat and
drink, and
rose up to play.
Paizō 4. play on a musical instrument, h.Ap.206: c. acc., “Pan ho kalamo [flute]phthogga paizōn” Ar.Ra.230; dance and sing, Pi. O.1.16. 5. play amorously, “pros allēlous”
"The triumphal hymn of Moses had unquestionably a religious character about it; but the employment of music in religious services, though idolatrous, is more distinctly marked in the festivities which attended the erection of the golden calf." (Smith's Bible Dictionary, Music, p. 589).
I notice you ignore the 'amorously' aspect of the glossary. And the fact that the next verse warns against fornication.
But if you will notice, the warning is against being idolaters, not doing what 150 commanded and praising the Lord with instruments.
I have shown where Romans 14 OUTLAWS all of the diversities so that EDIFICATION which means EDUCATION is possible. If you don't know that the purpose of the assembly is ONLY for education, then you probably do not know the meaning of a DISCIPLE and that excludes you from being a CHRISTIIAN.
As a disciple of Christ, I know better than to follow these weird ideas of yours. IN a previous post, you considered exposition to be private interpretation. Is that what you are engaging in, by your own definitions?
Edification involves building up. It can be done without 'education' as in the one who prays in tongues alone. But in the church, others must understand so they can be edified through their understanding. (Hence, the instructions that messages in tongues be interpreted.)
JESUS COMMANDED THAT WE TEACH WHAT HE COMMANDED TO BE TAUGHT: He was musically mocked as prophesied and did not Command, Example or Remotely infer any performance music in HIS Assembly.
Jesus said, "I have piped unto you and ye have not danced" something he wouldn't have said if He thought like you do. And Hebrews applied, "in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto Thee" to Christ.