Death and Dying, part deux

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
57,032
26,760
113
Yeah my dingbat self quoted her and commented, then added another post but in the interim someone else posted, so it was confusing. The post of mine you quoted was meant to be an add on to my previous post. Pay attention!!! Hahahaha!! :D
My apologies Stunned, as I just explained I was at work, and so really do not have time to closely follow long involved conversations you are having with other members.

Are you intoning that it's my fault you were late for work...??
:D:D:p
Intoning? Do you mean implying? No, I take full responsibility for leaving late to go to work. Thankfully my position is such that being late is not an issue, though I was later than I would have liked.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
Since the Calvinist view embraces and promotes a fatalistic predestination, with nothing happening except it be predetermined and foreordained by God, how could anyone who believed that say then that Adam and Eve had any choice in the matter as to whether to obey God, or not? The narrative of Genesis gives no indication that Adam and Eve’s choices were decided for them before they were created, despite God knowing the choice they would make, and working all things to the good for those who love Him and were called according to His purpose.

God desires that all repent and come to a knowledge of the truth, but some people who call themselves Christians, those of a Calvinistic disposition, scoff at that and call God "weak" if He does not get what He wants. So then what happens? Then some of those same people say things like, God does not mean all people when Scripture says all, and when Scriptures say Jesus died for the sins of the whole world they will say it does not mean the whole world, because that would mean that everyone is forgiven, as if repentance were not a requirement for salvation. You have said those underlined things.

God desires none to perish.

God desires none to perish. That some will, does not make Him weak, nor does it mean He is not sovereign, nor does it mean He is not omnipotent. Certain Calvinists will mock the idea of God not being in complete control of all things, and then wonder why anyone thinks that means He is the author of evil, when they come right out and say such things.
Translation: If I repeat this enough, maybe I'll bamboozle them into believing it. And then Ill promote my fake god. Sure. This works.
 

Katy-follower

Senior Member
Jun 25, 2011
2,719
155
63
Maybe the confusion here is over what is really meant when one says "God is in control".

Do you believe that any created being (which includes satan, the god of this world ~ little g) can thwart God's plans? Since the answer should be no, then you agree that God is in control...
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
Since the Calvinist view embraces and promotes a fatalistic predestination, with nothing happening except it be predetermined and foreordained by God, how could anyone who believed that say then that Adam and Eve had any choice in the matter as to whether to obey God, or not? The narrative of Genesis gives no indication that Adam and Eve’s choices were decided for them before they were created, despite God knowing the choice they would make, and working all things to the good for those who love Him and were called according to His purpose.

God desires that all repent and come to a knowledge of the truth, but some people who call themselves Christians, those of a Calvinistic disposition, scoff at that and call God "weak" if He does not get what He wants. So then what happens? Then some of those same people say things like, God does not mean all people when Scripture says all, and when Scriptures say Jesus died for the sins of the whole world they will say it does not mean the whole world, because that would mean that everyone is forgiven, as if repentance were not a requirement for salvation. You have said those underlined things.

God desires none to perish.

God desires none to perish. That some will, does not make Him weak, nor does it mean He is not sovereign, nor does it mean He is not omnipotent. Certain Calvinists will mock the idea of God not being in complete control of all things, and then wonder why anyone thinks that means He is the author of evil, when they come right out and say such things.
Lies....................................
 

Lancelot

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2015
168
13
18
I think the problem here is in the failure to recognize the role God's divine character plays in the matter. God cannot lie. That doesn't mean that He doesn't have the power to do so. It means He won't do something in opposition to His divine character. When people say that God is not in control, it doesn't mean that He's not omnipotent. It just means that He has delegated out the responsibility of running things on Earth to man.
 

FlSnookman7

Senior Member
Jun 27, 2015
1,125
135
63
I think the problem here is in the failure to recognize the role God's divine character plays in the matter. God cannot lie. That doesn't mean that He doesn't have the power to do so. It means He won't do something in opposition to His divine character. When people say that God is not in control, it doesn't mean that He's not omnipotent. It just means that He has delegated out the responsibility of running things on Earth to man.


Not sure I can agree with that last part. I see and have in fact experienced the Holy Spirit at work many times. The fact that my mind can not grasp how God is in control does not mean He is not in control. Ugh, busy at work and not being very clear. Back later, shalom.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
God cannot lie. That doesn't mean that He doesn't have the power to do so.
Heresies such as this have no place on a CHRISTian forum. God can not lie because He is perfect, holy, impeccable, righteous. He does not possess the ability to lie whatsoever.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
I think the problem here is in the failure to recognize the role God's divine character plays in the matter. God cannot lie. That doesn't mean that He doesn't have the power to do so. It means He won't do something in opposition to His divine character. When people say that God is not in control, it doesn't mean that He's not omnipotent. It just means that He has delegated out the responsibility of running things on Earth to man.
I can't fly. No matter how hard I try, I can't will myself to fly. I can't breathe underwater, either. No matter how hard I try, I can't will myself to breathe under water. It is not in my nature to do either of these things. Same with God. He can not sin because it is not in His divine nature to do so.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
57,032
26,760
113
Maybe the confusion here is over what is really meant when one says "God is in control".

Do you believe that any created being (which includes satan, the god of this world ~ little g) can thwart God's plans? Since the answer should be no, then you agree that God is in control...
A Calvinist identifies and agrees with the doctrines of Calvin. Calvin said:

“The first man fell because the Lord deemed it meet that he should.” ~John Calvin

“I freely acknowledge my doctrine to be this: that Adam fell, not only by the permission of God, but by His very secret, the counsil and decree …” ~John Calvin

“God not only foresaw the fall of the first man, and in him the ruin of his posterity; but also at his own pleasure arranged it.” ~John Calvin

 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
57,032
26,760
113
Nope. I call your warping of them lies. Carry on.
You are the one who warps what Scripture says, claiming all does not mean all and that the whole world does not mean the whole world, but now you lie about it. God hates your lying lips.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
I do talk about God, and so do Calvinists, who say such things as, they would not worship a weak God Who will not or cannot bring to pass that which He desires. Yes, people on this very thread have said such things. They call God weak. On this thread? Maybe not, but elsewhere, certainly. Does God desire everyone to be saved? The Calvinist says no, that He only desires those to be saved Whom He has elected for salvation, that all does not mean all. Where Scripture says Jesus died not just for believers, but for the sins of the whole world, they have said the whole world does not mean the whole world, because if it did, then everyone's sins would be forgiven... as IF repentance were not a requirement for salvation. They have said it enough times and had their omission pointed out to them numerous times, too, but they just get angry when it is pointed out to them, and accuse the other of lying, though at the same time they will agree when pressed that repentance is required of man, BUT they will turn around and say man plays no role in his salvation, again negating the need for repentance.

This dovetails into their "man has no choice" doctrine, coming full circle to God pulling the strings, because in their view, a God Who is in control must be micromanaging or He is not omnipotent or sovereign, and they will not acknowledge such a God as One Who gives man a choice. They say there is no such thing as free will. Is the will free? Of course not. It is tied to physical and spiritual imperatives. Is there such a thing as self will that opposes the will of God? Of course there is. The Bible is all about that, and our need for a Savior, that we may escape the bonds of sinful flesh, being born again of the Holy Spirit of God. However, they will say man has no ability to choose God unless God draws them.

Do they overlook the fact that Jesus said He would draw all men to Himself? It seems they do. Their theology promotes a God Who does not give some men a choice, but will nevertheless eternally punish them for failing to choose Him. Their theology also promotes a God Who will reward them for something they claim they played no role in. To me it is all about the character of God. Is it loving, merciful, and just to punish forever after anyone for something about which they were given no choice?

“The first man fell because the Lord deemed it meet that he should.” ~John Calvin

“I freely acknowledge my doctrine to be this: that Adam fell, not only by the permission of God, but by His very secret, the counsil and decree …” ~John Calvin

“God not only foresaw the fall of the first man, and in him the ruin of his posterity; but also at his own pleasure arranged it.” ~John Calvin

“I again ask how it is that the fall of Adam involves so many nations with their infant children in eternal death without remedy unless that it so seemed meet to God? Here the most loquacious tongues must be dumb. The decree, I admit, is, dreadful; and yet it is impossible to deny that God foreknew what the end of man was to be before he made him, and foreknew, because he had so ordained by his decree.” ~John Calvin

I was a calvinist for lets say 15 years of my life, and I am still very close to them, I am just more about synthesis of contradictions regarding spacetime now (kind of leibnizian). I still think that basics of calvinism are right. So you can address me too, not just "them" :)

Is the will free? Of course not. It is tied to physical and spiritual imperatives
And who controls these physical and spiritual imperatives? Because the one who controls our inner and outer circumstences controls also our will, technically. Not directly like forcing, but indirectly like influencing to the direction he wants.
Or do you think that these imperatives are random or maybe in some state similar to Schrödinger´s cat in quantum physics?


Does God desire everyone to be saved? The Calvinist says no, that He only desires those to be saved Whom He has elected
I say yes. I would say that even as a full blood calvinist. Because God is good and want goodness for all in every detail. Its His nature.
But His desires of kindness and goodness are limited by His other attributes like wisdom, justice, glory and His plan for the best possible creation. That means some necessary compromises in the outcome (like the fall of Adam, death of some, pain, sin...)

Can you give me also book, chapter and place of those Calvin´s quotes? I would look it up in my native language in his Institutes.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
57,032
26,760
113
I was a calvinist for lets say 15 years of my life, and I am still very close to them, I am just more about synthesis of contradictions regarding spacetime now (kind of leibnizian). I still think that basics of calvinism are right. So you can address me too, not just "them" :)
I understand that there is tension between seemingly contradictory texts, and that there is a way to reconcile these seeming contradictions, and Scripture even tells us how: line by line and precept by precept. I agree that synthesis is possible, but disagree with Calvin, and other faulty doctrines of men on certain points.

And who controls these physical and spiritual imperatives? Because the one who controls our inner and outer circumstences controls also our will, technically. Not directly like forcing, but indirectly like influencing to the direction he wants.
Yep.

Or do you think that these imperatives are random or maybe in some state similar to Schrödinger´s cat in quantum physics?
Why would I think that? I don't even know what that means :)

I say yes. I would say that even as a full blood calvinist. Because God is good and want goodness for all in every detail. Its His nature.
Unfortunately, other Calvinists disagree with you! The author of this thread (for example) has told me that all does NOT mean all and that the whole world does NOT mean the whole world in the Scriptures I have quoted (he believes Jesus did not die for the sins of the whole world as Scripture states) and that God does not desire all to repent and be saved. In other words, he denies that God's offer of salvation is available to all.

But His desires of kindness and goodness are limited by His other attributes like wisdom, justice, glory and His plan for the best possible creation. That means some necessary compromises in the outcome (like the fall of Adam, death of some, pain, sin...)
I think we agree on far more than you are aware.

Can you give me also book, chapter and place of those Calvin´s quotes? I would look it up in my native language in his Institutes.
Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book III, Ch. 23, Sect. 8.
Calvin, On the Secret Providence of God, 267.
Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book III, Ch. 23, Sect. 7.
 

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
Maybe the confusion here is over what is really meant when one says "God is in control".

Do you believe that any created being (which includes satan, the god of this world ~ little g) can thwart God's plans? Since the answer should be no, then you agree that God is in control...
This is kind of a back and forth thing, we could say well Abraham/Moses changed God's mind, but then of course we would say, well God already knew He would change His mind. So even if He allowed Abraham/Moses to change His mind it was really what He wanted all along.
 

Lancelot

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2015
168
13
18
What is it with you? You see heresy in everything. All I'm saying is that God has the power to do anything, but He doesn't have the character to do anything, which is essentially what you're saying.

Heresies such as this have no place on a CHRISTian forum. God can not lie because He is perfect, holy, impeccable, righteous. He does not possess the ability to lie whatsoever.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
What is it with you? You see heresy in everything. All I'm saying is that God has the power to do anything, but He doesn't have the character to do anything, which is essentially what you're saying.
What is it with me? When someone says God has the power to do anything, including sinning, which is what lying is, I will call whoever it is to the carpet.

To say God has the power to sin is heresy.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
I understand that there is tension between seemingly contradictory texts, and that there is a way to reconcile these seeming contradictions, and Scripture even tells us how: line by line and precept by precept. I agree that synthesis is possible, but disagree with Calvin, and other faulty doctrines of men on certain points.

Yep.

Why would I think that? I don't even know what that means :)

Unfortunately, other Calvinists disagree with you! The author of this thread (for example) has told me that all does NOT mean all and that the whole world does NOT mean the whole world in the Scriptures I have quoted (he believes Jesus did not die for the sins of the whole world as Scripture states) and that God does not desire all to repent and be saved. In other words, he denies that God's offer of salvation is available to all.

I think we agree on far more than you are aware.

Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book III, Ch. 23, Sect. 8.
Calvin, On the Secret Providence of God, 267.
Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book III, Ch. 23, Sect. 7.
To Calvin:

I was unable to find those quotes in my langauge, I have only shorter version of Institutes, wihout these additions where Calvin responded to counterarguments.

But when reading it in the context (in English, though), I am not sure what you think is wrong there. The use of the word "pleasure"? In context it does not say that God has a pleasure with the fall as such, but that He has a pleasure with the fall as a thing leading to better things.

But anyway, Calvin is not infallible, he can say as many error as he wants, I would still go to creeds or catechisms to define what some theological camp believes. There are hundres of millions of calvinists and of course, you can find some saying various things.


To "all, whole world" etc.:

Yeah, thats a tension between God's goodness and between God's final will. We would need to talk about specific verses.


To Schrodinger's cat:

Its a picture of two opposite states to be true in the same time (the cat is both alive and dead) until the universe is forced to choose just one direction. Very interesting thing, I recommend to watch some youtube video about it :)

To God's sovereignity over circumstances:

When God is the one controlling our inner and outer circumstances, He is controlling our choices we make based on those cicumstances... thats what calvinists say, is it not? That our heart is in His hands and He directs it wherever He wishes.

Thats about His sovereignity. But also, He is a good God. Therefore His wishes for us are best possible. So its not just a fatalism, its a Christian fatalism - that a good God is in control. This produces peace in various circumstances.
 
Last edited:
J

joefizz

Guest
A Calvinist identifies and agrees with the doctrines of Calvin. Calvin said:

“The first man fell because the Lord deemed it meet that he should.” ~John Calvin

“I freely acknowledge my doctrine to be this: that Adam fell, not only by the permission of God, but by His very secret, the counsil and decree …” ~John Calvin

“God not only foresaw the fall of the first man, and in him the ruin of his posterity; but also at his own pleasure arranged it.” ~John Calvin

Sounds like garbage whether true or not concerning this calvin doctrine stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.