DId constentine the roman emperer order the first full new testement bible

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Q

quickfire

Guest
#41
So were do many protestants get this idea that the books from the septuagint are made up books by the Roman Catholic church?

not completely sure but the catholics use the RSV-CE. others use NAB, or Douay-Rheims. they still have all the original books that the protestant took out.



cathlics also claim that The Catholic Bible contains more books than the Protestant. If your looking at a bible with 66 books, its Protestant.

catholic bibles have extra 6 books plus chapters of daniel and esther the 6 are tobit judith maccabees 1&2
wisdom ecclesiasticus or sirach baruch it is thes books that contain Apocrypha and are still in the catholic bibles today.
these were rejected by martin luther, who also was going to throw out jude , james , revelation until the german princes protested, hence where the name protestant originated
 

Photoss

Senior Member
Sep 15, 2012
213
10
0
#42
Just to add on to what quickfire wrote:

1384 AD: Wycliffe Bible - The Bible translated into Middle English from the Latin Vulgate,

1516 AD: Erasmus Greek/Latin New Testament - The first 'critical edition' Greek NT, collated and constructed by Erasmus using manuscripts from the 12th and 15th centuries.

1522 AD: Martin Luther's German NT - Translated from Erasmus's 2nd edition.

1526 AD: William Tyndale's first printed NT - First NT in early modern English, and first English NT translated from the Greek (from Erasmus's 3rd edition).

1535 AD: Myles Coverdale's Bible - First complete Bible, but only the NT was translated from the Greek, the OT/Apoc was translated by Coverdale from German and Latin texts (he couldn't read Hebrew or Greek).

1537 AD: Tyndale-Matthews Bible - Constructed by John Rogers, using Tyndale's Pentateuch (from the Hebrew) and NT, with portions of the OT being from Coverdale.
 
Last edited:
Q

quickfire

Guest
#43
all i can say is those germans have a got a lot to answer for
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#44
So were do many protestants get this idea that the books from the septuagint are made up books by the Roman Catholic church?
I've never heard anyone say the Catholics wrote the books. I have heard that the Catholics made up that the books are inspired.

Historically, the Jewish scholars rejected the canonicity of these books in about 195. The Catholics stated these books are canonical in about 365. Martin Luther denied the canonicity around 1500, quoting the history, and expressing some theological doubts. Protestants are largely "sola scriptura" and thus equate canonicity with inspiration. Remixing the words of these facts logically concludes that the Catholics "made up" the inspiration of these books.

There are certain books that the Catholics use to base their "traditions" on, that are not in the Bible, like the Protoevangelion. Many of these books may have been made up by Catholics, or those whose churches eventually took the name Catholic. These books are not in the Septuagint.
 
N

nathan3

Guest
#45
.

I understand that which is Why i am looking into it.
But the fact is we do have so called uninspired books missing.

Its taking me ages to write this because my phone is stuck on predictive text sø i can not explain it very Well at the moment .
We have all we need...

Other then that, if you want more. I believe there are legit books. 1st and 2nd Esdras are pretty good. Esdras is Greek for Ezra in the Hebrew. The story about Susanna is also good. Those are found in the Apocrypha.... There is a 29th chapter of Acts that has been around for a long time. I think that may be legit; or at least should be considered . Because it has markings of Paul's writings.
Also if you read the last chapter of Acts , that would be chapter 28, it kinda ends abruptly . Acts 29 seems like it was suppose to be the last chapter at the end of Acts. I had a PDF Copy of it, then I accidentally deleted it. : / I'm sure I'll find it again.
 
Last edited:
Q

quickfire

Guest
#46
So were do many protestants get this idea that the books from the septuagint are made up books by the Roman Catholic church?
This may of be some interest to you rock also explains about catholics too.
From 1,400 BC to 1,400 AD

The story of how we got the English language Bible is, for the most part, the story of the Protestant Reformation which began in the late 14th Century AD with John Wycliffe. Indeed, if we go back more than just one thousand years, there is no language recognizable as “English” that even existed anywhere. The story of the Bible is much older than that, however.

The first recorded instance of God’s Word being written down, was when the Lord Himself wrote it down in the form of ten commandments on the stone tablets delivered to Moses at the top of Mount Sinai. Biblical scholars believe this occurred between 1,400 BC and 1,500 BC… almost 3,500 years ago. The language used was almost certainly an ancient form of Hebrew, the language of Old Covenant

The earliest scripture is generally considered to be the “Pentateuch”, the first five books of the Moses: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, & Deuteronomy… though there is some scholarly evidence to indicate that the Old Testament Book of Job may actually be the oldest book in the Bible. The Old Testament scriptures were written in ancient Hebrew, a language substantially different than the Hebrew of today. These writings were passed down from generation to generation for thousands of years on scrolls made of animal skin, usually sheep, but sometimes deer or cow. Animals considered “unclean” by the Jews, such as pigs, were of course, never used to make scrolls.

When the entire Pentateuch is present on a scroll, it is called a “Torah”. An entire Torah Scroll, if completely unraveled, is over 150 feet long! As most sheep are only about two to three feet long, it took an entire flock of sheep to make just one Torah scroll. The Jewish scribes who painstakingly produced each scroll were perfectionists. If they made even the slightest mistake in copying, such as allowing two letters of a word to touch, they destroyed that entire panel (the last three or four columns of text), and the panel before it, because it had touched the panel with a mistake! While most Christians today would consider this behavior fanatical and even idolatrous (worshiping the scripture, rather than the One who gave it to us), it nevertheless demonstrates the level of faithfulness to accuracy applied to the preservation of God’s Word throughout the first couple of thousand years of Biblical transmission.

Hebrew has one thing in common with English: they are both “picture languages”. Their words form a clear picture in your mind. As evidence of this; the first man to ever print the scriptures in English, William Tyndale, once commented that Hebrew was ten times easier to translate into English than any other language. Tyndale would certainly be qualified to make such a statement, as he was so fluent in eight languages, that it was said you would have thought any one of them to be

By approximately 500 BC, the 39 Books that make up the Old Testament were completed, and continued to be preserved in Hebrew on scrolls. As we approach the last few centuries before Christ, the Jewish historical books known as the “Apocrypha” were completed, yet they were recorded in Greek rather than Hebrew. By the end of the First Century AD, the New Testament had been completed. It was preserved in Greek on Papyrus, a thin paper-like material made from crushed and flattened stalks of a reed-like plant. The word “Bible” comes from the same Greek root word as “papyrus”. The papyrus sheets were bound, or tied together in a configuration much more similar to modern books than to an

These groupings of papyrus were called a “codex” (plural: “codices”). The oldest copies of the New Testament known to exist today are: The Codex Alexandrius and the Codex Sinaiticus in the British Museum Library in London, and the Codex Vaticanus in the Vatican. They date back to approximately the 300’s AD. In 315 AD, Athenasius, the Bishop of Alexandria, identified the 27 Books which we recognize today as the canon of New Testament

In 382 AD, the early church father Jerome translated the New Testament from its original Greek into Latin. This translation became known as the “Latin Vulgate”, (“Vulgate” meaning “vulgar” or “common”). He put a note next to the Apocrypha Books, stating that he did not know whether or not they were inspired scripture, or just Jewish historical writings which accompanied the

The Apocrypha was kept as part of virtually every Bible scribed or printed from these early days until just 120 years ago, in the mid-1880’s, when it was removed from Protestant Bibles. Up until the 1880’s, however, every Christian… Protestant or otherwise… embraced the Apocrypha as part of the Bible, though debate continued as to whether or not the Apocrypha was inspired. There is no truth to the popular myth that there is something “Roman Catholic” about the Apocrypha, which stemmed from the fact that the Roman Catholics kept 12 of the 14 Apocrypha Books in their Bible, as the Protestants removed all of them. No real justification was ever given for the removal of these ancient Jewish writings from before the time of Christ, which had remained untouched and part of every Bible for nearly two thousand years.

By 500 AD the Bible had been translated into over 500 languages. Just one century later, by 600 AD, it has been restricted to only one language: the Latin Vulgate! The only organized and recognized church at that time in history was the Catholic Church of Rome, and they refused to allow the scripture to be available in any language other than Latin. Those in possession of non-Latin scriptures would be executed! This was because only the priests were educated to understand Latin, and this gave the church ultimate power… a power to rule without question… a power to deceive… a power to extort money from the masses. Nobody could question their “Biblical” teachings, because few people other than priests could read Latin. The church capitalized on this forced-ignorance through the 1,000 year period from 400 AD to 1,400 AD knows as the “Dark and Middle

Pope Leo the Tenth established a practice called the “selling of indulgences” as a way to extort money from the people. He offered forgiveness of sins for a fairly small amount of money. For a little bit more money, you would be allowed to indulge in a continuous lifestyle of sin, such as keeping a mistress. Also, through the invention of “Purgatory”, you could purchase the salvation of your loved-one’s souls. The church taught the ignorant masses, “As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the troubled soul from Purgatory springs!” Pope Leo the Tenth showed his true feelings when he said, “The fable of Christ has been quite profitable to us!”

Editorial Note: Let us state at this point, that it is not our intent to offend or “bash” Roman Catholics. It is unavoidable that every historical account has its “good guys” and its “bad guys”. Just as it is impossible to accurately tell the story of World War Two without offending the Germans and the Italians who were undeniably the enemies of world peace at that time… it is equally impossible to accurately tell the story of the English Bible without unintentionally offending those who continue to revere the Roman Catholic and Anglican Churches.

Where was the true church of God during

On the Scottish Island of Iona, in 563 AD, a man named Columba started a Bible College. For the next 700 years, this was the source of much of the non-Catholic, evangelical Bible teaching through those centuries of the Dark and Middle Ages. The students of this college were called “Culdees”, which means “certain stranger”. The Culdees were a secret society, and the remnant of the true Christian faith was kept alive by these men during the many centuries that led up to the Protestant

In fact, the first man to be called a “Culdee” was Joseph of Aremethia. The Bible tells us that Joseph of Aremethia gave up his tomb for Jesus. Tradition tells us that he was actually the Uncle of the Virgin Mary, and therefore the Great-Uncle (or “half-Uncle” at least) of Jesus. It is also believed that Joseph of Aremethia traveled to the British Isles shortly after the resurrection of Christ, and built the first Christian Church above ground there. Tradition also tells us that Jesus may have spent much of his young adult life (between 13 and 30) traveling the world with his Great Uncle Joseph… though the Bible is silent on these years in the life

In the late 1300’s, the secret society of Culdees chose John Wycliffe to lead the world out of the Dark Ages. Wycliffe has been called the “Morning Star of the Reformation”. That Protestant Reformation was about one thing: getting the Word of God back into the hands of the masses in their own native language, so that the corrupt church would be exposed and the message of salvation in Christ alone, by scripture alone, through faith alone would be proclaimed again.
 
Q

quickfire

Guest
#47
NOTE for my last post was not intended to offend Catholics in anyway, as the bad news there also affects my faith church of England as we are Anglo Catholics.
we where once under the rule of the pope until 1500 ad .
We then became a reformed church and we are now known officially as a christian church (half protestant half catholic) but we still as an Anglican Church Celebrate the sacraments, and most importantly the Holy Eucharist.
 
Dec 5, 2012
885
5
0
#48
As I began to do my research on your post I found something not quite right at all.

This history claims that a "secret society" that started by the real half uncle of Jesus Christ himself who quietly moved to the British Isles and built a church who 563 years later became a bible school and for 700 years they were teaching against the catholic church and in the 1300's the secret society chose John Wycliffe to go against a corrupt church.

That is when I just stop searching. I am sorry but this has false witness written all over it for me, and if it were true, does this sound like the work of Jesus.

Who would have created a secret society who's only purpose was to destroy the church? Not Jesus.
 
Q

quickfire

Guest
#49
As I began to do my research on your post I found something not quite right at all.

This history claims that a "secret society" that started by the real half uncle of Jesus Christ himself who quietly moved to the British Isles and built a church who 563 years later became a bible school and for 700 years they were teaching against the catholic church and in the 1300's the secret society chose John Wycliffe to go against a corrupt church.

That is when I just stop searching. I am sorry but this has false witness written all over it for me, and if it were true, does this sound like the work of Jesus.

Who would have created a secret society who's only purpose was to destroy the church? Not Jesus.
not moved rock just traveled and i posted on a study studied by professers of scotish tradition
like you rc catholic tradition .

dont forget rock the christian faith did travel far and wide...


dont forget rock the christian faith did travel far and wide and it was not to destroy only to start the faith ... in scotland..

but you seee the faith was not corrupted by romans so it survived and thought back hundreds of years later in the dark ages.. __________________
 
Last edited:
K

kenisyes

Guest
#50
As I began to do my research on your post I found something not quite right at all.

This history claims that a "secret society" that started by the real half uncle of Jesus Christ himself who quietly moved to the British Isles and built a church who 563 years later became a bible school and for 700 years they were teaching against the catholic church and in the 1300's the secret society chose John Wycliffe to go against a corrupt church.

That is when I just stop searching. I am sorry but this has false witness written all over it for me, and if it were true, does this sound like the work of Jesus.

Who would have created a secret society who's only purpose was to destroy the church? Not Jesus.
You must admit, the story is "apocryphal". I'm not sure it's any stranger than the three daughters of Job and the charismatic sashes (Testament of Job), or Enoch's journey to the metal mountains, or Jeremiah visiting the Rachabites on a world floating above the clouds. The way I learned it, Joseph of Arimethea brought the cup from the Last Supper to England (the "holy grail"). It points up very well, the issue of where do we draw the line.
 
Q

Quickfire

Guest
#51
hmm that is a very good point ken (where do we draw the line i think its high time there was another council and high time all this mess got soughted out once and for all .