Did Jesus ever tell us that we no longer need to keep the law of Moses?
- Thread starter Marcelo
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I think I understand what people say here pretty good. But your attack again is unfounded. I always have time to talk to people about Jesus and face to face people are usually pretty comfortable talking to me. Much is lost communicationg this way 
I`m here because I have a knee injury and am stuck at the house. I needed an outlet because I was getting depressed.
I`m here because I have a knee injury and am stuck at the house. I needed an outlet because I was getting depressed.
-
2
- Show all
E
I missed this post earlier. I love it Paul was Jewish as Jew can be. He was a high ranking Pharisee, a scholar, a torah observant expert who often taught and quoted from the torah. He always preached to Jews first and his churches were mixtures of Gentiles and Jews with a very Jewish church culture. This is what he said about himself.
4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:
5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;
6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.
That is Paul`s own summation of himself.
Paul was Jewish as Jew can be. He was a high ranking Pharisee, a scholar, a torah observant expert who often taught and quoted from the torah. He always preached to Jews first and his churches were mixtures of Gentiles and Jews with a very Jewish church culture. This is what he said about himself.4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:
5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;
6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.
That is Paul`s own summation of himself.
Yet most of pauls letters was in condemnation of jews who tried to add works of the oaw to grace, even going as far to call them fools
E
I think I understand what people say here pretty good. But your attack again is unfounded. I always have time to talk to people about Jesus and face to face people are usually pretty comfortable talking to me. Much is lost communicationg this way
I`m here because I have a knee injury and am stuck at the house. I needed an outlet because I was getting depressed.
I`m here because I have a knee injury and am stuck at the house. I needed an outlet because I was getting depressed.
Not from my point of view,
I am not even here to fight you, yet you keep saying i am attacking you when i am not, i am just showing you a different view, thats what people do when they “discuss” the word in a bible “discussion” forum
You remind me of another poster who has been here for along time
I am sorry about your situation, will pray for healing.
E
I am not hostile to the law
I am hostile to misinterpretation and missaplication to the law
But you have no desire to discuss that, its already set in stone i am attacking the law.
When in my view. It in in reality is you who attack the law, but that does not matter, what matters is the truth right?
But lets be honest, if i say you attack the law. Does that tend to lead to honest discussion, does it prove my point? No , any more than your what we call stawman, saying i am attacking the law does.
I am hostile to misinterpretation and missaplication to the law
But you have no desire to discuss that, its already set in stone i am attacking the law.
When in my view. It in in reality is you who attack the law, but that does not matter, what matters is the truth right?
But lets be honest, if i say you attack the law. Does that tend to lead to honest discussion, does it prove my point? No , any more than your what we call stawman, saying i am attacking the law does.
E
1 Timothy 1:7
desiring to be teachers of the law, understanding neither what they say nor the things which they affirm.
This is the problem here
We both desire to teach the law. But one of us do not understand the law.
desiring to be teachers of the law, understanding neither what they say nor the things which they affirm.
This is the problem here
We both desire to teach the law. But one of us do not understand the law.
discuss a different view is always good. it`s frustrating for me because I know I am misunderstood here. I have same goal, to show a different view. The posters here seem to be modern Christians with modern American religeous views. I don`t think you can show me anything new. I started out as a Baptist about 36 years ago.
I think I understand what people say here pretty good. But your attack again is unfounded. I always have time to talk to people about Jesus and face to face people are usually pretty comfortable talking to me. Much is lost communicationg this way
I`m here because I have a knee injury and am stuck at the house. I needed an outlet because I was getting depressed.
I`m here because I have a knee injury and am stuck at the house. I needed an outlet because I was getting depressed.