Disputed Passages

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

Enoch987

Senior Member
#161
Jul 13, 2017
317
15
18
#161
First John 5:7 Father, Son and Holy Spirit added because someone may have argued that the following 'water, blood and Spirit" are its or things and Spirit is not a person. First John requires belief in Father and Son, Jesus had a human body, the begotten of God does not sin. I have been told that Spirit is a neuter noun so the only scripture for personhood is Jesus calling the Holy Spirit a "He' in John 16. Using that proof text, all Spirit references are He's. Paul's epistles always open with God the Father and Jesus Christ the Lord. The Spirit is the mind of God given to Jesus. According to 1 Corinthians 2, believers are given the mind of Christ.

Elohim requires three or more. Father, Son and Holy Spirit are 3. This is evidence for Trinity Echad (united one) can be no more than two. Paul and John do not teach the Spirit to be a separate person except in John 16. My opinion is the text for John 16 may have been tampered with since Spirit carries the neuter definite article (The 'the' for 'the Spirit' is for a neuter (a thing not a person) noun.)

Set me straight Old Hermit.
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#163
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
#163
Magenta said:
It probably counts as a negative reaction. I'm pretty sure that even the zzz counts as a negative :(
Click to expand...

I then got worried because I gave the "surprised" reaction earlier and wondered if it registered negative, so I tried it out on joes post. It doesn't give any negativity but it doesn't have any effect either, so not the greatest one to use...
joefizz said:
It can "reach" that many"miles" away??????
Click to expand...

Fear the broom young man, fear it.
 
oldhermit

oldhermit

Senior Member
#164
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
#164
Stunnedbygrace said:
Are you sure you're spelling it right? I thought dyadic referred to something with computers...
Click to expand...
Yes, it is spelled correctly. My colleague, Dr. Strawn, defines this idea in this way, “Dyadic reasoning is a reflexive nominal movement that has only two points of valence (as opposed to tryidic). It begins on the temporal side and comes to bear upon something else on the temporal side.”
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#166
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
#166
okay so its the last three choices that give a negative showing. Some others don't show one way or the other.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#168
Jul 3, 2015
60,131
29,444
113
#168
Stunnedbygrace said:
okay so its the last three choices that give a negative showing. Some others don't show one way or the other.
Click to expand...
I just figured that out, too :) I found out how to find people's posts, also (answered in your New Site thread).
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#170
Jul 3, 2015
60,131
29,444
113
#170
Stunnedbygrace said:
wow...I did two separate posts and they both mushed into one...odd.
Click to expand...
You must have hit "Reply" on each one before answering either? It acts like a multi-quote ;)

With apologies to Old Hermit :giggle: Nice to see you posting again, OH! :):):)
 
J

joefizz

Guest
#171
#171
Magenta said:
Thank you for removing it, Joseph :)
Click to expand...
You're welcome after all you've shared so many helpful bible posts and cute kitten pictures that I just can't call you "boring" in anyway!
 
J

joefizz

Guest
#172
#172
Stunnedbygrace said:
I then got worried because I gave the "surprised" reaction earlier and wondered if it registered negative, so I tried it out on joes post. It doesn't give any negativity but it doesn't have any effect either, so not the greatest one to use...



Fear the broom young man, fear it.
Click to expand...
I didn't know you had a "giant mustache"!?(broom)o_O
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#173
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
#173
Magenta said:
You must have hit "Reply" on each one before answering either? It acts like a multi-quote ;)

With apologies to Old Hermit :giggle: Nice to see you posting again, OH! :):):)
Click to expand...
Well that's nice if that's the way to multiquote now because I never did figure out how to do it the old way, except to do a lot of deleting!
 
HeRoseFromTheDead

HeRoseFromTheDead

Senior Member
#174
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113
#174
Stunnedbygrace said:
Well that's nice if that's the way to multiquote now because I never did figure out how to do it the old way, except to do a lot of deleting!
Click to expand...
You can also do multiquote by selecting text with your mouse. Once it's highlighted you should see a Reply thingy at the end of the text. You can do that over and over.
 
J

joefizz

Guest
#176
#176
joefizz said:
Awesome! I didn't know that!
Click to expand...
Also it can't have any other portions of the post like signatures or part of the page,tried highlighting nearly entire page and "reply" didn't show up....
 
J

Jaybrewer

Guest
#177
#177
oldhermit said:
I think that of all the disputed texts, the longer ending of Mark 16 has better evidence than most. The majority of ancient manuscripts do contain the longer ending.
Click to expand...
My question is....how can you take any verse or chapter of the Bible and check for its existence in ancient manuscripts. Do we have 1st century manuscripts?
 
J

joefizz

Guest
#178
#178
I dispute "my own texts" on here because "sometimes" I say "random" stuff.
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#179
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
#179
joefizz said:
Also it can't have any other portions of the post like signatures or part of the page,tried highlighting nearly entire page and "replt" didn't show up....
Click to expand...
That saves on space and redundancy. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.