Eastern Orthodoxy is not Talmud Pharisaism (Mishnaism).

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Are you saying we need to have some bias in order to read the scriptures?

I'm going to repeat this... Jesus did not call Peter the Rock in Matthew 16:18, in Acts chapter 4 Peter himself says that it is Jesus that is the corner stone that the church is built on, and if you know anything about construction, the corner stone is the rock that you build something on... So yes, Peter himself was saying the rock the church is built on is not himself, but it is Jesus. Any claim of apostolic succession through Peter, be it by the Roman Catholic Church or the Eastern Orthodox Church or anyone else is fraudulent according to Peter's own words.
AGREE!
........
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Well it's written in every known language on earth, so everyone who reads the bible should get a really good idea of what it's ultimately about.



Ultimately you have no idea what Peter understood or what is revealed to believers by the Holy Spirit. I say no one knows everything except Jesus Christ. Only Jesus is infallible.



You probably don't mean this as an apology but I forgive you anyway, just in case.



The Protestant, as you call him, does not transfer authority to the private individual. He wrests it from the pope and gives it back to Jesus where it belongs.

Hence a pope cannot be a protestant reformer or he would fire himself as pope and place Jesus in his stead.
LOL!
you go gramps!
love it.
 
N

NitzWalsh

Guest
Excuse me! What Scripture proves apostolic succession is false? Have you ever heard of the Apostolic Fathers? Some of them were written by the disciple of Saint John the Apostle!
Did the apostles found churches? Yes. Is that apostolic succession? Yes. Were their five ancient churches founded by the apostles? Yes. And a few more.
Rome (St. Paul and St. Peter)
Alexandria (St. Mark)
Antioch (St. Paul, St. Peter)
Constantinople (St. Andrew, St. Stachys was his successor)
Jerusalem (St. James)
Apostolic succession in the EOC! And Rome was until 1054 AD part of the WOC (Western Orthodox Church)? Yes it's so!
Since I already said what scripture Peter calls Jesus the corner stone... which is the rock the church is built on... I'm going to let you figure that out for yourself.

None of the Apostles, Peter included, are the rock that the church is built on... the only one that can claim that is Jesus Christ... It doesn't matter how old a church is, or what connections to the Apostles it claims to have, none of them are the church that Jesus Christ established.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Truly, EG, who else would have written history, dolphins?
Truly rose. Those who control history and they are going to write history to go their way. Meaning it will be biased to make them look good. Can you imagine what history would read if Hitler won world war two? Do you think we would be reading how evil that man was? Of course not. Because he would have wrote history.

You want to base your eternity on men and not God? I am saddened by that
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You just quoted a Scripture out of context. Which anyone can do.


No Scott. I have translated it for what it says. People used the same excuses your church does back then. And paul condemned it. The jews used this same excuse to reject Christ and have him crucified. Just because you can't see it does not make it so.

Can you read Scripture without any man guiding you? (Acts 8:30-31).
Scott. I have been a Christian for 38 Years. I am not a newbie. If I need someone to teach me now. I have wasted many years of my life. I am not saying I am perfect. Nor that you should listen to me. You should test what I say. As we should do for ALL PEOPLE. Men have the ability to distort Gods word. Paul warned people in the NT that people in their OWN church. Leaders of their church would distort Gods word. and turn it to a different gospel Can you prove it did nto happen with your church? Well yeah you can. Read the word. Study it. Stop listening to men, and you will see your doctrines do not line up with the word. Without tradiditon and your many excuses, your church falls on its face. it has no where to stand. why do you think they demand you listen to them. they scare you to believe only they can translate. This is not of God. this is fear based phariseeism.

Have you not read corinthians where Paul tells them THEY SHOULD BE TEACHING OTHERS. But they have to be taught because they are still babes.

It is one thing to have a guide to help you start. It is another to rely on men, and not learn scripture so YOU CAN TEACH OTHERS. How do you do this?> You study to show yourself approved, a workman who needeth not be ashames, rightly deviding the word of truth. How can we rightly devide the word if we have to be taught and only certain men have that ability?


Do you serve as your own pope (Protestant) over the word of God,[/quote]

God is my leader. Christ is my rock and cornerstone, and the HS is my teacher. Men help guide me. But I test what they say. because men have led me wrong before.

the Scriptures? Or do you listen to the Church Christ founded (Matth. 16:18, 1 Tim. 3:15) to show what the Scriptures mean?
How can I know what church is the church? Listen to men or listen to God. You assume your church is right. yet scripture does not support it. Sorry I put my faith in no man. Eternity is forever. If I listen to a man just because they say what you say and they are wrong. I am doomed for eternity. That to dangerous.. God will hold me responsible for what I believe. nor what orthodox, catholic or protestant tells me what to believe!


What is the true church according to you? The pope of Rome was the first Protestant, and Protestants all follow in the papist pretensions of private interpretation of the prophecy of the Holy Scriptures. Against Scripture!
Read Scripture, written by God: with no bias in your interpretation of Scripture? How do you KNOW you are UNDERSTANDING and rightly INTERPRETING the Scriptures?
How do I know? My Gospel does not cause scripture to contradict itself. Your churches gospel does. I need no more proof.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You just quoted a Scripture out of context. Which anyone can do.


No Scott. I have translated it for what it says. People used the same excuses your church does back then. And paul condemned it. The jews used this same excuse to reject Christ and have him crucified. Just because you can't see it does not make it so.

Can you read Scripture without any man guiding you? (Acts 8:30-31).
Scott. I have been a Christian for 38 Years. That guy was new and needed shown the way.

I am not a newbie. If I need someone to teach me now. I have wasted many years of my life. I am not saying I am perfect. Nor that you should listen to me. You should test what I say. As we should do for ALL PEOPLE. Men have the ability to distort Gods word. Paul warned people in the NT that people in their OWN church. Leaders of their church would distort Gods word. and turn it to a different gospel Can you prove it did nto happen with your church? Well yeah you can. Read the word. Study it. Stop listening to men, and you will see your doctrines do not line up with the word. Without tradiditon and your many excuses, your church falls on its face. it has no where to stand. why do you think they demand you listen to them. they scare you to believe only they can translate. This is not of God. this is fear based phariseeism.

Have you not read corinthians where Paul tells them THEY SHOULD BE TEACHING OTHERS. But they have to be taught because they are still babes.

It is one thing to have a guide to help you start. It is another to rely on men, and not learn scripture so YOU CAN TEACH OTHERS. How do you do this?> You study to show yourself approved, a workman who needeth not be ashames, rightly deviding the word of truth. How can we rightly devide the word if we have to be taught and only certain men have that ability?


Do you serve as your own pope (Protestant) over the word of God,[/quote]

God is my leader. Christ is my rock and cornerstone, and the HS is my teacher. Men help guide me. But I test what they say. because men have led me wrong before.

the Scriptures? Or do you listen to the Church Christ founded (Matth. 16:18, 1 Tim. 3:15) to show what the Scriptures mean?
How can I know what church is the church? Listen to men or listen to God. You assume your church is right. yet scripture does not support it. Sorry I put my faith in no man. Eternity is forever. If I listen to a man just because they say what you say and they are wrong. I am doomed for eternity. That to dangerous.. God will hold me responsible for what I believe. nor what orthodox, catholic or protestant tells me what to believe!


What is the true church according to you? The pope of Rome was the first Protestant, and Protestants all follow in the papist pretensions of private interpretation of the prophecy of the Holy Scriptures. Against Scripture!
Read Scripture, written by God: with no bias in your interpretation of Scripture? How do you KNOW you are UNDERSTANDING and rightly INTERPRETING the Scriptures?
How do I know? My Gospel does not cause scripture to contradict itself. Your churches gospel does. I need no more proof.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Excuse me! What Scripture proves apostolic succession is false? Have you ever heard of the Apostolic Fathers? Some of them were written by the disciple of Saint John the Apostle!
Did the apostles found churches? Yes. Is that apostolic succession? Yes. Were their five ancient churches founded by the apostles? Yes. And a few more.
Rome (St. Paul and St. Peter)
Alexandria (St. Mark)
Antioch (St. Paul, St. Peter)
Constantinople (St. Andrew, St. Stachys was his successor)
Jerusalem (St. James)
Apostolic succession in the EOC! And Rome was until 1054 AD part of the WOC (Western Orthodox Church)? Yes it's so!
You were there? You saw these men walk with John?

There you go using geniologies again. Take pauls warning scott!!

You say you do not do it. but everytime you speak you do it!
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest

Since I already said what scripture Peter calls Jesus the corner

stone... which is the rock the church is built on... I'm going to let you figure that out for

yourself.

Dear friend,

True. Jesus is the foundation of the Orthodox Catholic Church. Greek speaking and

Orthodox from the start. Since Pentecost, 30 AD.

In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington


None of the Apostles, Peter included, are the rock that the church is built on... the only one

that can claim that is Jesus Christ... It doesn't matter how old a church is, or what

connections to the Apostles it claims to have, none of them are the church that Jesus

Christ established.


Dear NitzWalsh,


So the only other alternative, then, was that the church, true church, was established

during your own lifetime, and there was no true Christian church on earth before you and I

came on the scene. Or, maybe, perhaps, we can only find our way back to 1517 AD, with

Martin Luther's 95 theses; surely, then, Herr Doctor Martin Luther, Augustinian, had the

whole, gospel truth. Or, if Luther wasn't the founder of "our church", maybe it was John

Wycliffe, or the Waldensians, or some other medieval group. After Catholicism fell away in

1054 AD. Only by reforming the false , papist church can we find the true church! The true

church is found by reforming the Antichrist. The pope of Rome is the Antichrist, and, so, if

you reform the pope's doctrines according to the Bible alone, you get a Reformed

Antichrist "church"! No matter that the true Church existed for 1054 years in the East, in

Antioch, Jerusalem, Alexandria, Constantinople, and even in Western Rome until 1014 AD

(or 1054 AD). Really, Rome was in heresy since 1014 AD!

The only church, then, according to you, is whatever you say that the Bible says that the

church is, that is what the church is. It's church doctrine according to your own personal,

private opinion. You know better than any of the church fathers or saints or any average

Christian of the first 1000 years of Christianity. You are free to accept or to reject any of

their doctrines as you yourself see fit, for, in the end, the final authority for you is your

own personal, private reading of the Bible by yourself, as you read the Bible "for yourself".

Baptist preacher Tim LaHaye even wrote a book titled, "How to Read the Bible For

Yourself". So, you accept the Apostolic writings, but you reject that Apostolic Church that

gave you the writings! The Bible just fell "magically" out of the sky, dictated by God, word

for word, in "perfect", King James English! Minus the Apocrypha, of course! Because

Martin Luther told you so! So, it's up to you and me to go it all alone; we don't need any


bishop or successor of the apostles to gather around; we don't need an Orthodox priest to
confess to.

Well, I have said enough.

I need to get back to church.

Really, unless and until you attend an Orthodox Church, you don't know what you are

missing! I'm glad every time I actually do enter an Orthodox Church. It tells me more

than my finite mind can absorb. I get a feeling for the true worship of the true NT church

every time I attend Divine Liturgy. The place even smells better than the average

Protestant iconoclastic assembly.

God bless you.

Goodbye for now. I'll just ask you to read every post I posted before you make

comments on me personally.

I don't sit here judging any of you. Of course, some of you say I'm a cult member or a

sect member, or say I am immature. You use all kinds of ad hominem language about me

personally, but you never read the Bible and show how the Church Fathers are wrong, or

how what I say about John 15:26 is wrong. And I believe what the Church says about John

15:26. I believe that one verse shows Eastern Orthodoxy to be preaching the true

doctrine about the Holy Trinity, along with the other doctrines of Chalcedonian

Christology, the Christology of the Creed (of 381 AD0, the doctrines of the 7 holy councils

of the One Church. I just need to get back to church in September.

Starting in September.

Before you go off into error, save your soul from false translations of the Bible, and read:

Orthodox New Testament. 2 volumes. Volume 1, The Holy Gospels, Evangelistarion.

Volume 2, Acts, Epistles, Revelation, Praxapostolos. Copyright 2000, by Holy Apostles

Convent, Buena Vista, CO. You can't criticize what you do not understand. You can't say

the Eastern Orthodox Church is false if you have never taken the time to see whether or

not what she says, does, and preaches, and teaches, is the Gospel truth. You need to

show that your Protestant doctrine was taught between 100 AD and 200 AD. Where is

justification by faith alone and scripture alone in any of the Ante-Nicene Apostolic

Fathers? If it's not taught by the early church, it is not true!

God bless and save you. Lord have mercy on us all. Amen and Amen.

In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington

 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
You were there? You saw these men walk with John?

There you go using geniologies again. Take pauls warning scott!!

You say you do not do it. but everytime you speak you do it!


So, you were there, too, and so you know that Saint John did not have any disciples?

You say and claim that we cannot know who the disciples of John were? You can't learn

who the followers of John and the other of Christ's disciples were? The names Polycarp,

Justin Martyr, Linus, Stachys, Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome, these names mean

nothing to you, because you are only interested in what happens in Christianity after

Martin Luther in 1521 AD?


 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
You were there? You saw these men walk with John?

There you go using geniologies again. Take pauls warning scott!!

You say you do not do it. but everytime you speak you do it!

Dear "EG":

There is no genealogy in what I said. A genealogy is the list of natural children of natural fathers and

mothers.

The disciples had spiritual children, converts.

That is not a genealogy. It's apostolic succession! Spiritual conversion (born again) through water

baptism in the Trinity!

The disciple of Saint Andrew was Stachys, and he was the bishop of Byzantium. He is mentioned in the NT

under Stachys as one of the 70 disciples of Christ in the book of Acts, etc. See Strong's Exhaustive

Concordance of the KJV Bible for proof. See also: McBirnie, William Steuart. (1973). The Search for the

Twelve Apostles. Wheaton, IL: LIVING BOOKS/ Tyndale House Publishers, Inc.

God bless and have mercy on you. With love and peace to you in Christ Jesus our Saviour. Amen.

In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest


So, you were there, too, and so you know that Saint John did not have any disciples?

You say and claim that we cannot know who the disciples of John were? You can't learn

who the followers of John and the other of Christ's disciples were? The names Polycarp,

Justin Martyr, Linus, Stachys, Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome, these names mean

nothing to you, because you are only interested in what happens in Christianity after

Martin Luther in 1521 AD?


Why would I need to know what these people said or saw? I have Gods word. a word I can trust, because it was written by God not men.

how can you stand there and say you do not follow men. when every post you make you speak of men..
 
N

NitzWalsh

Guest


Dear NitzWalsh,


So the only other alternative, then, was that the church, true church, was established

during your own lifetime, and there was no true Christian church on earth before you and I

came on the scene.


Did you even read my post that you're replying to? I said Jesus Christ is the one that formed the church. Where you're getting this "only alternative" from I don't know but it wasn't from anything I said.

Or, maybe, perhaps, we can only find our way back to 1517 AD, with

Martin Luther's 95 theses; surely, then, Herr Doctor Martin Luther, Augustinian, had the

whole, gospel truth. Or, if Luther wasn't the founder of "our church", maybe it was John

Wycliffe, or the Waldensians, or some other medieval group.

Quit grasping at straws, I already said that Jesus Christ founded the church.

After Catholicism fell away in

1054 AD. Only by reforming the false , papist church can we find the true church! The true

church is found by reforming the Antichrist. The pope of Rome is the Antichrist, and, so, if

you reform the pope's doctrines according to the Bible alone, you get a Reformed

Antichrist "church"! No matter that the true Church existed for 1054 years in the East, in

Antioch, Jerusalem, Alexandria, Constantinople, and even in Western Rome until 1014 AD

(or 1054 AD). Really, Rome was in heresy since 1014 AD!
I don't know when Rome went into heresy, but replacing one false church with another isn't really fixing any problems. Oh and that other false church I'm referring to is of course the Eastern Orthodox church in case you were unclear on that.

The only church, then, according to you, is whatever you say that the Bible says that the

church is, that is what the church is. It's church doctrine according to your own personal,

private opinion. You know better than any of the church fathers or saints or any average

Christian of the first 1000 years of Christianity.
There's some more straw grasping, like I said, the church is founded by Jesus Christ, and the doctrine comes from the Holy Scriptures which the Eastern Orthodox seems to have put on the back burner in favour of the traditions of men.

You are free to accept or to reject any of

their doctrines as you yourself see fit, for, in the end, the final authority for you is your

own personal, private reading of the Bible by yourself, as you read the Bible "for yourself".

Baptist preacher Tim LaHaye even wrote a book titled, "How to Read the Bible For

Yourself". So, you accept the Apostolic writings, but you reject that Apostolic Church that

gave you the writings! The Bible just fell "magically" out of the sky, dictated by God, word

for word, in "perfect", King James English! Minus the Apocrypha, of course! Because

Martin Luther told you so! So, it's up to you and me to go it all alone; we don't need any


bishop or successor of the apostles to gather around; we don't need an Orthodox priest to
confess to.

Every time you post like this it makes me see the low regard you hold for God's word.

Well, I have said enough.
Usually when people have "said enough" they don't keep going further and further into nonsense.

I need to get back to church.

Really, unless and until you attend an Orthodox Church, you don't know what you are

missing! I'm glad every time I actually do enter an Orthodox Church. It tells me more

than my finite mind can absorb. I get a feeling for the true worship of the true NT church

every time I attend Divine Liturgy. The place even smells better than the average

Protestant iconoclastic assembly.

Why would I want to attend an Orthodox Church after the glowing reviews you've been giving?

God bless you.

Goodbye for now. I'll just ask you to read every post I posted before you make

comments on me personally.

I don't need to read every post by you to see how you skirt around things and focus on things like a persons nickname when you can't find fault in their arguments. Or how you start talking about Luther and Protestant churches when you can't answer questions.

I don't sit here judging any of you. Of course, some of you say I'm a cult member or a

sect member, or say I am immature. You use all kinds of ad hominem language about me

personally, but you never read the Bible and show how the Church Fathers are wrong, or

how what I say about John 15:26 is wrong.

It's Homonym, and I don't think you even know what it means.Plenty of people, including myself have shown from the scriptures that the Eastern Orthodox church has 'wrong' traditions of men, you just refuse to believe what is written in the scriptures.

And I believe what the Church says about John

15:26. I believe that one verse shows Eastern Orthodoxy to be preaching the true

doctrine about the Holy Trinity, along with the other doctrines of Chalcedonian

Christology, the Christology of the Creed (of 381 AD0, the doctrines of the 7 holy councils

of the One Church. I just need to get back to church in September.

Starting in September.

Before you go off into error, save your soul from false translations of the Bible, and read:

Orthodox New Testament. 2 volumes. Volume 1, The Holy Gospels, Evangelistarion.

Volume 2, Acts, Epistles, Revelation, Praxapostolos. Copyright 2000, by Holy Apostles

Convent, Buena Vista, CO. You can't criticize what you do not understand. You can't say

the Eastern Orthodox Church is false if you have never taken the time to see whether or

not what she says, does, and preaches, and teaches, is the Gospel truth. You need to

show that your Protestant doctrine was taught between 100 AD and 200 AD. Where is

justification by faith alone and scripture alone in any of the Ante-Nicene Apostolic

Fathers? If it's not taught by the early church, it is not true!

God bless and save you. Lord have mercy on us all. Amen and Amen.

In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington
Like I said once before, I don't identify as protestant, I get my beliefs from the Bible, not from the false teachings and traditions of men. Your question about justification by faith alone has been answered countless times. As for the rest, if the traditions taught by anyone, Ante-Nicene, or otherwise, are found to be in disagreement with what is written in the scriptures, those traditions are false teachings and should be put aside.

If it's taught by the early church (100 - 200) it doesn't automatically make it true.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0


Dear strangelove, You are abusing the Scripture and using it to say false, unfounded things about the EOC.
The Orthodox Church does not use divination, observe Jewish feasts, or use enchantment of witchcraft, nor does the Church engage in charms, consulting with familiar spirits, wizardry, or necromancy. You are being held accountable for your false witness. You say things in accusation, but give no proof. It's typical of Western rationalism, which states, "Whatever makes sense to me, and my private reading of the Scripture, guided by the Holy Spirit (of course!), I must be right!" Anything that smacks of Church history before 1517 AD must be a sect or a cult. The truth was only discovered after Martin Luther's time, or Luther made it possible for me to learn the truth. I follow Protestant tradition (of one sort or another)."
Scott R. Harrington
PS All those who misquote Deuteronomy (etc.) out of context for their own private agenda will have to account for their misuse and twisting of the Scriptures!

Again Scott...a lot of hot air and personal accusations but failure to address the scripture or doctrines.

You are failing badly here....tell EOC to send someone else.

Yes that is where we differ.

You trust MEN enough to risk NECROMANCY.

Why not just NOT risk it? It is an abomination to the Lord, and theres a good chance that you practice this abomination.

There is no command to pray to saints. Therefore we dont need to.

By doing so, and trying to ensnare others ito yor sect that practices this, is to bring people into danger.

All from a matter of trust of MEN.


(Deuteronomy 18:10) There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,

(Deuteronomy 18:11) Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.

(Deuteronomy 18:12) For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
The Protestant, as you call him, does not transfer authority to the private individual. He wrests it from the pope and gives it back to Jesus where it belongs.

Hence a pope cannot be a protestant reformer or he would fire himself as pope and place Jesus in his stead.
Yes Gramps! Exactly!
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
My Gospel does not cause scripture to contradict itself. Your churches gospel does. I need no more proof.
Well, your Gospel says Jesus is not King but the scripture sayz He is...

...but Hey!

...lets get back to ganging up on Scotty eh?
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
Really, unless and until you attend an Orthodox Church, you don't know what you are

missing! I'm glad every time I actually do enter an Orthodox Church. It tells me more

than my finite mind can absorb
. I get a feeling for the true worship of the true NT church

every time I attend Divine Liturgy.
MYSTICISM/GNOSTICISM.
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
AGREE!
........
Dear zone, Fraudulent attacks on the true Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church.

Bad, false book with poor, fraudulent scholarship:

Dr. Robert A. Morey. (2007). Is Eastern Orthodoxy Christian. Las Vegas, NV: Christian Scholars Press.

Proofs the Robert Albert Morey is a fraud (fake):

Robert Morey's National Mail Fraud: Morey's Fraudulent Mailings YouTube.com

Discredited former radio personality Robetr Morey Bye Bye Morey -- Robert Albert Morey << True Faith Defenders
rzhblog.wordpress.com/.../bye-bye-morey-robert-albert-morey.hr....

The Saint Augustinian: Criminal Fraud and Slander Routinely

saintaugustinian.blogspot.com/.../criminal.fraud-slander-routinely.ht....

Well, for me to be real, I need to get back to church.

I won't write any more threads to any of you until I have been to church again at the

Russian Orthodox Church.

Whenever I do go to church, maybe I'll tell you how I'm feeling.

My plan is for the beginning of September to start the new church year.

God bless you.

If you want to talk to me, just send me a personal email to scotth1960. I believe that I have not to say much more stuff on Eastern Orthodoxy. I wish you God bless all of you and I suggest you don't comment any more on Eastern Orthodoxy until you have read the following book.
Gillquist, Fr. Peter E. (1992). Becoming Orthodox: A Journey to the Ancient Christian Faith. revised and expanded edition. Ben Lomond, CA: Conciliar Press.
If and when you DO read all of that book, and compare every page to the Old and New Testaments in your Bible(s), then you can say what you will. Whatever you believe. If you agree with things, fine. If you disagree, okay. Whatever you do, you will have let me know you care even just a little about Eastern Orthodoxy. I care about Anglicanism and Catholicism and Lutheranism, too. I learned a lot of things from the historic Western denominations, especially Roman Catholicism. I have also learned a lot from Lutheranism and the Book of Concord. And I think the 39 Articles of Faith of the Church of England are interesting. Not everything in non-Orthodox Christians are all and completely heterodox. There is much of Orthodoxy in the non-Orthodox confessions. Whatever is true and right and good in the West must be believed in, lest we also reject the same things which are present in Orthodoxy. The West inherits a lot of good things from the Western and Eastern Church Fathers. And not everything Augustine of Hippo said was wrong.
Well, zone and other friends, etc., if you want to send me questions or comments, just privately email me at Christian Chat at scotth1960. God bless you.
God have mercy on us. Amen.
In Erie PA USA Scott R. Harrington

 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
MYSTICISM/GNOSTICISM.
False. I was merely speaking in a human way. I know many of you want an emotional experience with God. That's not the main reason a person should attend worship services and worship God in a church. But it's okay to feel good and have joy in the Lord. A person like me who suffers a lot (greatly) from bad depression needs more joy in his life.
As for Mysticism, it is Christian. What is "Christ in you, the hope of glory", but Christian mysticism. If we are Christians, Christ is IN us. That's MYSTICISM. As for Gnosticism, the EOC is NOT Gnostic. So again, you criticism is FALSE.
Criticize me if you will, but don't wonder if people feel bad about how you're acting if all you can come up with is ad hominem arguments. I want to know what you believe and why you believe the doctrines that you DO believe. What Scriptures are the basis of your doctrines and how do you know your doctrines were taught by the early Christians? Don't just criticize and attack me when I don't say bad things about you ever. It is not fair. If this forum is Christian, it will be by certain rules. Well, maybe I am taking things a bit personally. Can you blame me? Perhaps you will try to! God bless you.