Evolution???? Questions:
- Thread starter RubyCrystal
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
That is true, but that power to actually perform what God spoke was by the Spirit and not the actual medium of His voice (audible or otherwise). Some have been suggesting that God's literal spoken voice caused things to come into existence, but they have not mentioned the role of the Spirit who actually does the works.
S
Genesis is the only truly scientific approach.
The scientific method requires that a thing be observable. No one today was living when it came into existence and it cannot be repeated. So from our perspective the origin of the universe, etc. is a history question.
Not only do we have the history, we have the Creator/Observer's notes.
The rest of the Bible is consistently in agreement with the Genesis account of the creation, the flood, etc.
The scientific method requires that a thing be observable. No one today was living when it came into existence and it cannot be repeated. So from our perspective the origin of the universe, etc. is a history question.
Not only do we have the history, we have the Creator/Observer's notes.
The rest of the Bible is consistently in agreement with the Genesis account of the creation, the flood, etc.
J
nesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
if the holy word of God says that it is more true that all these scientists liars, then let go because fake scientists who say that we were evolved via a monkey or an explosion, this is a liar false believe in this scientific theology.
Bible also says
the beginning of wisdom is fear of the Lord the Bible says in Proverbs 1:7
marrow is also the principle of fear of the Lord, so we created in the image and semajansa of it, and I am against it because of the changes is antibiblico and we Christians must always be against EEST d, and for the creation
blessings ...
if the holy word of God says that it is more true that all these scientists liars, then let go because fake scientists who say that we were evolved via a monkey or an explosion, this is a liar false believe in this scientific theology.
Bible also says
the beginning of wisdom is fear of the Lord the Bible says in Proverbs 1:7
marrow is also the principle of fear of the Lord, so we created in the image and semajansa of it, and I am against it because of the changes is antibiblico and we Christians must always be against EEST d, and for the creation
blessings ...
P
Slepsog4 can you clarify what you mean by your statement 'Genesis is the only truly scientific approach.'? In your statement what definition are you using for science? As I understand it science and the work of the bible are completely different. Stipulating notions of religious ideas being science is akin to Einstein's notion of God (in which God is the nature of the world rather the theists idea of a supernatural creator).
You've also contradicted yourself by saying 'The scientific method requires that a thing be observable.' - this is true, I have no problem with that. How is it then possible for Genesis to be scientific? As you alluded to, the very start of creation (from both a religious and scientific viewpoint) is unobservable.
You've also contradicted yourself by saying 'The scientific method requires that a thing be observable.' - this is true, I have no problem with that. How is it then possible for Genesis to be scientific? As you alluded to, the very start of creation (from both a religious and scientific viewpoint) is unobservable.
- Status