A republic, such as the USA, is founded on the principal that our rulers are answerable to the will of the people. We do have a "King" who can act independently, but within boundaries. His actions are counterbalanced.
Even during the times when Kings had absolute power. God did not allow his people to evade corporate responsibility. The ancient kingdoms of Ephraim and Judah stand as proof.
How much more will we, who do have control of our "King", be held responsible for our corporate actions.
Yea a kingdom operates by the wiol and command of the king alone , the people are all subject to the king.
america rejected this principle it’s the reason America exists now , rejection of the rule of the British kingdom and rejection of that entire system of a king who rules soveriegnly over the entire kingdom
the subjects who reject the Will of the king then became a democracy where the will of the people makes the laws , makes the rules , govern tbier own selves by thier own collective morality and rule over themselves
Gods kingdom operates and exists by the Will of the king which is irrevocable either the subjects operate within this system of his Will that rules over them , or they reject this system and choose thier own Will
think of American laws friend we argue ,we the people , for instance a question “
should it be legal for a woman to kill her unborn baby ?”
this argument breeds and grows among the people and then our system puts it into the hands of elected representatives of the collective people arguing over these matters.
everything is settled by a vote but eventually these eleceted people are
lawmakers , and they appoint judges and make laws and change moralities and legalities of what is morally acceptable in this society and what isn’t ect ect
you have this constant divide over most every issue because there is no foundational point no actual law tbat stays the same it changes like sands shift
is it legal and right for two men to marry each other or two women ?
is it legal and right to kill unborn babies ?
is it legal and right for a man to decide he is a woman and mutilate his flesh and pretend to be a woman ?
those things never come up in a kingdom because you have the kings decree over it all to start with that’s immutable and unchanging
you don’t need to argue and form factions and have votes in a kingdom the kind speaks and everyone accepts it and that’s just the law of his kingdom ect ect
They are two different systems entirely one is a kingdom the other is the people without a king choosing particular leaders every few years by thier own Will they choose the leaders it’s entirely ruled by the Will of the people ……only the people give it to the rich and corrupt among us who raise the most money and recite the right speeches every few years lol
this isn’t possible in a kingdom it’s sure and constant always stable and true never changing and was wrong with the peoples whims but solid and strong and immovable as tbe Will of the great king
