How the NKJV demotes Jesus Christ Part 1

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

cronjecj

Banned [Reason: ongoing "extreme error/heresy" Den
Sep 25, 2011
1,934
13
0
#21
Just out of interest has anyone heard of the Ferrar Fenton Translation? I hear it's really good! You should look it up :)
Hi Matthew, here is a copy of the gospel of John (Ferrar Fenton Version)

untitled.JPG

In John 3:16 they have changed His begotten Son to the begotten Son.

in Christ :)
 
C

ChristianTalk

Guest
#22
Dear Scott,

Do you believe that Jesus Christ is the first only begotten Son of God?

Or do you believe that Jesus Christ is the one and only Son of God?

Can you see the difference?
I will answer this question.

The Greek word is monogenes means unique and only, one of a kind. The passage in question is John 1:18 where the oldest manuscripts say "monogenes theos", "the unique and only God". It is affirming the deity of Jesus the Messiah. The RSV reads perfectly here when it says:

"it is God, the only Son..."

If this is not he verse you are referencing then let me know the correct one. Thanks, Dr.G ;)
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#23
Instead of trying to compare other versions to the KJV, one should examine both in light of the original languages.

It is a false approach to first claim the KJV as THE only true version and then try to prove it by comparing the differences others have with it.
right that is a circular argument...
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#24
I don't think we should call the version the KJV: history clearly defines that he only authorized the traslation. The King didn't even have enough respect to finance or help defer the cost for the work.
actually king james didn't authorize it...he never signed the decree of authorization...so it is really more like the 'almost authorized version'
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#25
Isaiah 53:11 (KJV)
He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.

Isaiah 53:11 (NIV)
After he has suffered, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities.
uh oh the king james version omits things! lol
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#26
I will answer this question.

The Greek word is monogenes means unique and only, one of a kind. The passage in question is John 1:18 where the oldest manuscripts say "monogenes theos", "the unique and only God". It is affirming the deity of Jesus the Messiah. The RSV reads perfectly here when it says:

"it is God, the only Son..."

If this is not he verse you are referencing then let me know the correct one. Thanks, Dr.G ;)
well 'mono' means 'one'...and 'genes' must have a meaning related to 'generation'...so 'only begotten' would be the best way of translating that word...
 
C

ChristianTalk

Guest
#27
well 'mono' means 'one'...and 'genes' must have a meaning related to 'generation'...so 'only begotten' would be the best way of translating that word...
No "genes" does not mean generation. Here is the Greek rendering below.

monogenḗs; gen. monogenoús, masc.-fem., neut. monogenón, from mónos (G3441), only, and génos (G1085), stock. Unique, one of a kind, one and only.

The best old Greek manuscripts (Aleph B C L) read monogenēs theos (God only and unique) which is undoubtedly the true text.

This is agreed by every major Greek scholar, A.T. Robertson, Bruce Metzger, Daniel Wallace to name a few.

I hope this helps you understand better.

Dr.G
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#28
No "genes" does not mean generation. Here is the Greek rendering below.

monogenḗs; gen. monogenoús, masc.-fem., neut. monogenón, from mónos (G3441), only, and génos (G1085), stock. Unique, one of a kind, one and only.

The best old Greek manuscripts (Aleph B C L) read monogenēs theos (God only and unique) which is undoubtedly the true text.

This is agreed by every major Greek scholar, A.T. Robertson, Bruce Metzger, Daniel Wallace to name a few.

I hope this helps you understand better.

Dr.G
oh ok so 'genes' is related to 'genus' meaning 'kind'...
 

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#30
God's word is pure in the Bible. Only the original documents are the undisputable Holy Bible. The original documents do not say men cannot mistranslate and misinterpret the Holy Bible. It nowhere is promised that the Bible will be perfectly preserved in every language. Or in English (only). But it is nearly perfectly preserved in many languages. These are approximations of the infallible Word of God, but they aren't as good as the original. Peter Ruckman believes the KJV is superior to the original Greek New Testament.
Okay but where in Scripture does it say that? It seems as though you are saying only the "original autographs" were perfect?

Can you point me to Scripture that states that only the Original Autographs are infallible and pure?

If that is true, then about what Jesus said Luke 4:4?

"And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God."

How about Proverbs 30:5

Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.

And what about Psalm 19:7

The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.

Again, if we do not have a perfect written Standard, then how are we even sure that we are saved?

Better yet, how do we even know we are saved, if we have no perfect, written record?
 
C

ChristianTalk

Guest
#31
Okay but where in Scripture does it say that? It seems as though you are saying only the "original autographs" were perfect?

Can you point me to Scripture that states that only the Original Autographs are infallible and pure?

If that is true, then about what Jesus said Luke 4:4?

"And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God."

How about Proverbs 30:5

Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.

And what about Psalm 19:7

The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.

Again, if we do not have a perfect written Standard, then how are we even sure that we are saved?

Better yet, how do we even know we are saved, if we have no perfect, written record?
Let answer the first part in that Jesus was speaking of "word" (Greek, Rhema) of the Old Testament. Jesus was not speaking to the future letters written in the New Testament. The Greek word "rhema" means a literal voice spoken. Keep Jesus' statement in their historical context please.

Second the rest of the passages you cited need to be looked in their historical context too. Look up the Hebrew word's you are using and understand the meaning from when they are being used and spoken.

Also you need to remember that people were being saved without the scriptures during the first 3 to 4 centuries. People were making copies of the letters but nobody had all of them. Its not about having the scriptures in order to be saved. Its about hearing the message and believing in faith the redemptive work of Jesus the Messiah. You don't need the Bible to preach the message and have people be saved. You need Jesus only to be saved.

Dr.G
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#33
Also you need to remember that people were being saved without the scriptures during the first 3 to 4 centuries. People were making copies of the letters but nobody had all of them. Its not about having the scriptures in order to be saved. Its about hearing the message and believing in faith the redemptive work of Jesus the Messiah. You don't need the Bible to preach the message and have people be saved. You need Jesus only to be saved.
it annoys me when people say things like that...the first christians had the old testament!
 

cronjecj

Banned [Reason: ongoing "extreme error/heresy" Den
Sep 25, 2011
1,934
13
0
#34
Let answer the first part in that Jesus was speaking of "word" (Greek, Rhema) of the Old Testament. Jesus was not speaking to the future letters written in the New Testament. The Greek word "rhema" means a literal voice spoken. Keep Jesus' statement in their historical context please.

Second the rest of the passages you cited need to be looked in their historical context too. Look up the Hebrew word's you are using and understand the meaning from when they are being used and spoken.

Also you need to remember that people were being saved without the scriptures during the first 3 to 4 centuries. People were making copies of the letters but nobody had all of them. Its not about having the scriptures in order to be saved. Its about hearing the message and believing in faith the redemptive work of Jesus the Messiah. You don't need the Bible to preach the message and have people be saved. You need Jesus only to be saved.

Dr.G
God has put His laws on their hearts and they believed the gospel even though they did not have all scripture or even no scripture but they had to learn some way or another in order to grow in faith.

i hear what you are saying but also remember Jesus told us that we shall not live by bread alone but by every word that proceedeth out of God's mouth.

Matthew 4:4
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

And we need the word of God (the Sword of the Spirit) to fight the enemy too.

Ephesians 6:17 (KJV)
And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.

Peace.
 
C

ChristianTalk

Guest
#35
God has put His laws on their hearts and they believed the gospel even though they did not have all scripture or even no scripture but they had to learn some way or another in order to grow in faith.

i hear what you are saying but also remember Jesus told us that we shall not live by bread alone but by every word that proceedeth out of God's mouth.

Matthew 4:4
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

And we need the word of God (the Sword of the Spirit) to fight the enemy too.

Ephesians 6:17 (KJV)
And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.

Peace.
First, they learned from the apostles especially Paul who wrote to the Churches with instructions and doctrine so they would understand. That was the whole point. They needed teachers. Read all of Paul's letters and you will see.

Second, the verse you quote is Jesus not speaking to the Church, the Church didn't exist. He was speaking to the devil and not us. The "word of God" is not the N.T because the N.T didn't exist when Jesus said it. He was speaking using the Greek word "rhema" which means the literal voice of God which the prophets heard during their time. Please keep everything in its historical context.

Dr.G
 
C

ChristianTalk

Guest
#36
it annoys me when people say things like that...the first christians had the old testament!
Are you kidding? The Christians did not have the O.T. The scriptures where not in book form but were hand written in scroll form kept by the Jewish priests in synagogues until it was time to read them. Unless you were very wealthy and could afford a copy of a O.T book, you didn't have it. Only the Jews were aloud to touch them or handle them. You really need to study the times of the culture of Jews in the O.T and of the time of Jesus.
 
W

Warrior777

Guest
#37
God has put His laws on their hearts and they believed the gospel even though they did not have all scripture or even no scripture but they had to learn some way or another in order to grow in faith.

i hear what you are saying but also remember Jesus told us that we shall not live by bread alone but by every word that proceedeth out of God's mouth.

Matthew 4:4
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

And we need the word of God (the Sword of the Spirit) to fight the enemy too.

Ephesians 6:17 (KJV)
And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.

Peace.
Well from what you said let's see it this way.Just take the most reliable written word of God that you think you would trust the most and then ask God yourself to correct it and tell you where it needs correction, because mankind might have put some errors in it. You just have to make sure it's really God you are hearing, which requires an intimate relationship with Him. Ask Him, He will reveal it to you! The words still proceed out of His mouth!

Matt 7:7-8
7Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:
8For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened.
 

cronjecj

Banned [Reason: ongoing "extreme error/heresy" Den
Sep 25, 2011
1,934
13
0
#38
Well from what you said let's see it this way.Just take the most reliable written word of God that you think you would trust the most and then ask God yourself to correct it and tell you where it needs correction, because mankind might have put some errors in it. You just have to make sure it's really God you are hearing, which requires an intimate relationship with Him. Ask Him, He will reveal it to you! The words still proceed out of His mouth!

Matt 7:7-8
7Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:
8For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened.
It looks like someone is cross because he can't stand those who believes the KJV is inspired.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#39
Are you kidding? The Christians did not have the O.T. The scriptures where not in book form but were hand written in scroll form kept by the Jewish priests in synagogues until it was time to read them. Unless you were very wealthy and could afford a copy of a O.T book, you didn't have it. Only the Jews were aloud to touch them or handle them. You really need to study the times of the culture of Jews in the O.T and of the time of Jesus.
every synagogue had old testament scrolls...and many early christians went to synagogues... also the law was read in the temple...

it is clear from reading the new testament that early christians were deeply familiar with the old testament
 

cronjecj

Banned [Reason: ongoing "extreme error/heresy" Den
Sep 25, 2011
1,934
13
0
#40
First, they learned from the apostles especially Paul who wrote to the Churches with instructions and doctrine so they would understand. That was the whole point. They needed teachers. Read all of Paul's letters and you will see.

Second, the verse you quote is Jesus not speaking to the Church, the Church didn't exist. He was speaking to the devil and not us. The "word of God" is not the N.T because the N.T didn't exist when Jesus said it. He was speaking using the Greek word "rhema" which means the literal voice of God which the prophets heard during their time. Please keep everything in its historical context.

Dr.G
Yes what you say has truth, the rhema was the written word of God heard and written down by the prophets over a period of a few thousand years from Moses until the birth of Jesus. i think Malachi was the last prophet just before Jesus became flesh.

From the ascension of Jesus the NT was then written by the apostles of Christ..... Luke, Matthew, Mark, Paul, John ect...

But even so the NT is inspired too and part of the word of God.