As I see it, that's an odd question. = )
The word "King" (re: Jesus) is used only TWO times in all of the epistles, and both of them are "FUTURE tense"
(agreeing with both Rev19:15b which is also "future tense" to that context [that is, future to His RETURN to the earth], and what Acts 3:21 says, "whom indeed it behooves heaven to receive UNTIL the timeS of restoration OF ALL THINGS OF WHICH GOD SPOKE BY the mouth of His holy prophets from the age." [i.e. OT prophecies spoken by OT prophets];...
...IOW, Acts 3 is not making the point [as the "Amill-teachings" and others suppose] that "David's throne" has now [since the Cross / Resurrection / Ascension] been "relocated UP TO Heaven"... NO.)
Not sure what you meant by your comment, however. = )
The word "King" (re: Jesus) is used only TWO times in all of the epistles, and both of them are "FUTURE tense"
(agreeing with both Rev19:15b which is also "future tense" to that context [that is, future to His RETURN to the earth], and what Acts 3:21 says, "whom indeed it behooves heaven to receive UNTIL the timeS of restoration OF ALL THINGS OF WHICH GOD SPOKE BY the mouth of His holy prophets from the age." [i.e. OT prophecies spoken by OT prophets];...
...IOW, Acts 3 is not making the point [as the "Amill-teachings" and others suppose] that "David's throne" has now [since the Cross / Resurrection / Ascension] been "relocated UP TO Heaven"... NO.)
Not sure what you meant by your comment, however. = )