I made a statement,
Paul had more of a reason to covet AFTER he was born again, than before. and if this was true, if paul tried to use the law to overcome those temptations he would fail
as I showed in paragraph 6
I backed my statement of belief up with reasons why I believed that way.
You did not even address my statement, you instead, used a basic explanation of what I was saying, to prove I said that is ALL coveting was.
1. Why is it you did not do as you demand others do and answer my points I made
2. Why is it you say I believe coveting is only those things, when I NEVER STATED that those things were the only means of coveting, I used them as examples to prove a point.[/B]
Paul had more of a reason to covet AFTER he was born again, than before. and if this was true, if paul tried to use the law to overcome those temptations he would fail
as I showed in paragraph 6
I backed my statement of belief up with reasons why I believed that way.
You did not even address my statement, you instead, used a basic explanation of what I was saying, to prove I said that is ALL coveting was.
1. Why is it you did not do as you demand others do and answer my points I made
2. Why is it you say I believe coveting is only those things, when I NEVER STATED that those things were the only means of coveting, I used them as examples to prove a point.[/B]