If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Why

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 9, 2017
223
2
0
#1
If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Why

did He wait 1400 years before showing somebody how to build a printing press?
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
#2
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

did He wait 1400 years before showing somebody how to build a printing press?
He didnt, contrary to popular belief, God didnt send us a bible, God sent us the Holy Ghost.
Most people couldnt even read back when the new testament was being written so why give a scroll to a bunch of folks who cant read, makes no sense.
Instead they had apostles lay hands on em and get the gift of the Holy Ghost and baptism in water.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#3
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

The Israelites/Jews didn't have their own copies of the "old testament", they were taught the scriptures though.

So technically Jesus "religion" is based on the "religion of the book" and so are the writings of the new testament.
[h=2][/h]
 
Mar 9, 2017
223
2
0
#4
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

The Israelites/Jews didn't have their own copies of the "old testament", they were taught the scriptures though. So technically Jesus "religion" is based on the "religion of the book" and so are the writings of the new testament. [h=2][/h]
You are advocating "Oral Tradition."
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#5
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

No - Jesus read from the scriptures:

Luke 4:16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read.

Luke 4:17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written,

Others read the scriptures:


Acts 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

2 Tim 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
 
Mar 9, 2017
223
2
0
#6
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

No - Jesus read from the scriptures: Luke 4:16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read. Luke 4:17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, Others read the scriptures: Acts 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. 2 Tim 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
Whether you know now or not, what you described in your earlier post is what the early Church describes as "Oral Tradition".
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#7
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Whether you know now or not, what you described in your earlier post is what the early Church describes as "Oral Tradition".
How is reading from scriptures "oral tradition" - which "early church" - a quote from a reputable source would be nice.
 
Mar 9, 2017
223
2
0
#8
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

How is reading from scriptures "oral tradition" - which "early church" - a quote from a reputable source would be nice.
People were taught the scriptures from generation to generation, this is what the early church describes as "Oral Tradition".
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#9
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Joh 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Gods word is much more than a book although a book provides a written record of it.

The printing press made the word of God available to many more souls and spurred civilizations development.

Mt 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

God places great value on His word.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#10
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

did He wait 1400 years before showing somebody how to build a printing press?
If Christianity was the "religion of the book" then Jesus Christ would have urged His disciples to write about Him and about His teaching. But He didn't. He asked them to love one another and to love God. He didn't even intend to form a new religion. Christianity is not supposed to be a new religion, but a new way of existence: one based on love and freedom.
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
#11
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

If Christianity was the "religion of the book" then Jesus Christ would have urged His disciples to write about Him and about His teaching. But He didn't. He asked them to love one another and to love God. He didn't even intend to form a new religion. Christianity is not supposed to be a new religion, but a new way of existence: one based on love and freedom.
Sounds good and partly i agree, however, Jesus did say GO TO ALL NATIONS and TEACH all that I have COMMANDED YOU, baptizing them in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#12
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

People were taught the scriptures from generation to generation, this is what the early church describes as "Oral Tradition".
Still no back up from reputable sources - All we have is your unverified statement.
 

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#13
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Sounds good and partly i agree, however, Jesus did say GO TO ALL NATIONS and TEACH all that I have COMMANDED YOU, baptizing them in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost
Yes. He told His disciples to go and tell all nations the good news: that He obtained freedom (for us, humans) from decay and death through His sacrificial love and resurrection. The baptism in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost meant that you united with the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ and that you became part of His Body/Church.
 
Mar 9, 2017
223
2
0
#14
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Still no back up from reputable sources - All we have is your unverified statement.
Go to Google.com, type in "Oral Tradition, hit enter on the keyboard; you will see it is all there.
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
#15
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Yes. He told His disciples to go and tell all nations the good news: that He obtained freedom (for us, humans) from decay and death through His sacrificial love and resurrection. The baptism in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost meant that you united with the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ and that you became part of His Body/Church.
So you're universalist then? why bother tellign anyone if they are already saved.
This is classified "H" for Hogwash.
 
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
251
0
#16
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

These threads get dumber by the hour.
 
Mar 21, 2017
329
7
0
#17
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

did He wait 1400 years before showing somebody how to build a printing press?
If God intended for Israel to be His exclusive people, why didn't He just beam them out of Egypt and into Canaan and then at the snap of His fingers give them a temple in Jerusalem?

What is the meaning of OP question? What is the underlying message? I don't understand.
 
Aug 16, 2016
143
4
0
#18
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

did He wait 1400 years before showing somebody how to build a printing press?
Who cares.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#19
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

did He wait 1400 years before showing somebody how to build a printing press?

Last time I checked people came equipped with something called the tongue,and usually two ears to go with it. The Gospel was spread many,many years before the printing press came along. God can make a donkey share the Gospel,He doesn't need a printing press.
 

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#20
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

What is the meaning of OP question? What is the underlying message? I don't understand.
That Sola Scriptura approach is wrong...?

That the existence of the Christian Church comes before the writing of the New Testament?

To explain the discrepancies found in the narratives of the New Testament? These discrepancies clearly show that there was more than one version of the accounts circulating orally.