Institutionalizion of the Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
8,312
3,618
113
#81
Baptist has a rich, long running tradition and their are distinctive baptistic teachings, so I am happy to align myself to the name. The main thing it really means is baptism of believers only, by full immersion.

In saying this I could easily ditch the baptist name if it didn't mean adherance to the bible's teachings. Strickly speaking, I really am non-denominational in the sense that there is no 'mother church' ...no denominational church over the church I go to. It is completely independent of any other church.
I see, thanks.
 
Nov 26, 2021
1,125
545
113
India
#82
You have been shown the factual historical evidence before. Why do you keep denying it?

Oh, wait. That is obviously a rhetorical question. I know why: you must defend the RCC.

However, for those who are honestly interested in the truth of
the matter, here is an extremely detailed and informative page.


Number of Protestants Killed By Catholic Pope (alphanewsdaily.com) <= link :)
Dear Magenta, I have to disagree. Yes, I know that article is precisely the source of the false 50 Million claim, by the ame David A Plaisted, who is not an academic historian at all, but a professor of computed science. Those claims have been totally debunked. It also relies on "research" that is 300+ years old and cites no modern historians. Mainstream historians totally disagree with its figures.

Please read what I cited earlier on: "
He said that he knew of an internet article that he couldn't locate, by one David A. Plaisted: who turned out to be a professor of computer science, not an academic historian at all. But when pressed, my fiend offered no actual historian to back up his assertion and quickly descended (as so often in these sorts of “discussions”) to mere insults and evasive tactics. Before I was banned from his site, I produced for him – upon being challenged to do so – two (non-Catholic) professors of history with vastly different opinions.

Edward Peters, from the University of Pennsylvania, is the author of Inquisition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989). Henry Kamen, a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society and professor at the University of Wisconsin – Madison, wrote The Spanish Inquisition: A Historical Revision (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998).

These two books are in the forefront of an emerging, very different perspective on the Inquisitions: an understanding that they were exponentially less inclined to issue death penalties than had previously been commonly assumed, and also quite different in character and even essence than the longstanding anti-Catholic stereotypes would have us believe.

On page 87 of his book, Dr. Peters states: “The best estimate is that around 3000 death sentences were carried out in Spain by Inquisitorial verdict between 1550 and 1800, a far smaller number than that in comparable secular courts.”

Likewise, Dr. Kamen states in his book: Taking into account all the tribunals of Spain up to about 1530, it is unlikely that more than two thousand people were executed for heresy by the Inquisition. (p. 60)
. . . it is clear that for most of its existence that Inquisition was far from being a juggernaut of death either in intention or in capability. . . . it would seem that during the 16th and 17th centuries fewer than three people a year were executed in the whole of the Spanish monarchy from Sicily to Peru, certainly a lower rate than in any provincial court of justice in Spain or anywhere else in Europe. (p. 203)"

https://www.ncregister.com/blog/were-50-million-people-really-killed-in-the-inquisition

If you still want to believe 50 MN people died in the Inquisition, you can. But it isn't so. Will get back to the rest later. God Bless.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,135
29,451
113
#83
He said that he knew of an internet article that he couldn't locate, by one David A. Plaisted: who turned out to be a professor of computer science, not an academic historian at all. But when pressed, my fiend offered no actual historian to back up his assertion and quickly descended (as so often in these sorts of “discussions”) to mere insults and evasive tactics. Before I was banned from his site, I produced for him – upon being challenged to do so – two (non-Catholic) professors of history with vastly different opinions.
I am aware that Catholic historians differ in their opinions. They follow the lead
of the Catholic church! I.E.: they make it up as they go along. Your post gives the
impression that anyone not an academic historian is incapable of determining
the truth of the matter from a multitude of other available factual historical
resources. In doing so, you disqualify yourself from offering an opinion.
 
Nov 26, 2021
1,125
545
113
India
#84
... two (non-Catholic) professors of history with vastly different opinions.

I am aware that Catholic historians differ in their opinions.
I think there is a miscommunication, misunderstanding. To be clear, Dr. Edward Peters and Dr. Henry Kamen are NON-CATHOLIC historians.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,135
29,451
113
#85
If you still want to believe 50 MN people died in the Inquisition, you can.
Don't be ridiculous. The 50 million figure crosses many years of
persecution not limited to one onslaught by your beloved institution.


The fact that you make such ridiculous statements speaks badly of your character.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
2,945
863
113
#86
I am aware that Catholic historians differ in their opinions. They follow the lead
of the Catholic church! I.E.: they make it up as they go along. Your post gives the
impression that anyone not an academic historian is incapable of determining
the truth of the matter from a multitude of other available factual historical
resources. In doing so, you disqualify yourself from offering an opinion.
The population of Europe in the sixteenth century would have been somewhere between 50 and 80 million. The Inquisition could not have killed 50 million people because the Inquisition. Did not operate within many countries in Europe. Eastern Europe was Eastern Orthodox and not under the control of the Catholic Church.

Western Europe was under the control of the Catholic Church, but not all countries in Western Europe were subjected to an Inquisition.
As I said before, the Inquisition operated in a similar way to our modern courts. It would take weeks, if not months, to find a person guilty and to execute them. The Inquisition handed over the folk sentenced to death to the civil authorities for execution. This is a time consuming process. Not everyone who appeared before an Inquisition was sentenced to death. Most folk were told to repent and perform penance. That is what the historical sources in the !6th and 17th centuries prove to us.

The Inquisition itself was not as devastating to Europe's population as what some people would think.

You need to examine the court records yourself. I trust no one on this subject.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,135
29,451
113
#87
The Inquisition could not have killed 50 million people because the Inquisition.
You need to examine the court records yourself. I trust no one on this subject.
You need to stop pretending I said 50 million were killed in the inquisition. Jeepers :oops::censored:
 

wattie

Senior Member
Feb 24, 2009
3,236
1,130
113
New Zealand
#90
Perhaps more like you listened to the wrong person :rolleyes:
I think we are both saying a similar thing that there is over 1200 years of persecution of christian churches outside of the RCC and the Reformers.

That has the inquisitions, but also many other mass killings of christians going into antiquity.
 
May 22, 2020
2,382
358
83
#91
=========================================================

Wow...check scripture re.... baptism;


Baptism is Required.

Peter 3: 21.... whereunto even baptism doth also now save us...

John 3:5 .......Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.


Acts 2;38-....Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Acts 22;16... And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.


Galations 3:26...... For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

KJV Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

KJV Matthew 3:14... But John forbad him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me? 15. Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer it to be so now, for thus it becometh us to fulfil all rightesousness. Then He suffered Him.

KJV Matthew 28:19..... Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:.

Matthew 3:11
I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:


John 3:5
Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Acts 8
:12-18:
But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, both men and women were baptized.

Acts 19:4 And Paul said, “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus.”

John 3; 22 After these things came Jesus and his disciples into the land of Judaea; and there he tarried with them, and baptized.
23 And John also was baptizing in Aenon near to Salim, because there was much water there: and they came, and were baptized.

Quote from Billy Graham that is note worthy;
....Also, to clarify I did not say remission of sin takes place at repentance. Scripture makes it clear that it occurs upon obedience to water baptism in the name of the Lord Jesus. Each is a step of faith, along with receiving the Holy Ghost, in the process of one's spiritual rebirth

.."Paul explains the doctrinal significance of what occurs when one is baptized.His explanation is found in his letter to those who had already been obedient to the command.

Paul tells the Roman Christians what actually occurred when they were/are baptized; they were baptized into His death. Being buried with Jesus into His death resulted in their sin being destroyed.

Even though Paul explains this concept, the NEW AGE RELIGION TEACHING is......... that water baptism is nothing other than a mere public display.......... And that is so far removed from the truth.

.......If you were baptized for some reason other than for forgiveness of sins in order to be saved then you do not have salvation and you are still lost. Who are you going to follow: God or man? As our Lord warns us in Matthew 15:14, "And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a ditch." Don't allow someone, who has added to and taken away from God's word, to lead you. Open your eyes and read God's word for yourself. Those who have added to and taken away from God's word will be lost. If you continue to follow them, then you too will be lost.

Keep in mind that Satan knows if he can continue to perpetuate that lie ...... he can keep people from entering the kingdom of God. Thus He has proven scripture which says ...in the end times there will be ...great delusions.....they are here.

Conclusion....teaching that baptism is not necessary is violation of Rev. 22;19.... And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. 20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus. (Also two other books of the Bible).
Weeeell.. I am not gonna argue over this. There has been enough threads that refute water baptism for salvation.[/QUOTE]


Really?...........none show scriptures to such ending. We must stick with the Bible...not human conclusions.
 
Nov 26, 2021
1,125
545
113
India
#93
Resident Alien said this:

:Yes, I hate the Catholicism; I never said otherwise. I love the people who are caught in its clutches and have been led down the wrong road. But I hate everything that institution stands for: The way it has corrupted the truth; its lust for power; its open mockery of Yahweh and Christ Jesus; its arrogance; its lies; its greed; its murders; its sexual crimes.

I think it was sometime in the early 2000s the pope apologized for all the ills perpetrated by Catholicism in the past; but this was nothing more than a transparent bid to gain credibility so it could continue to push its false unity plan. They think a simple apology will make people forget.

The Holocaust can't hold a candle to the Inquisition. The Holocaust: Some 6,000,000, give or take, over a few years. The Inquisition: 50,000,000 over 500 years.
: