Re: Given Before Times Eternal. Does 2 Timothy 1 Imply Eternal Security?
Your claims are of course unfounded sir.
You have failed to present a legitimate argument, while denying and ignoring scripture that is ever so clear.
If you read where God spoke to anyone, you would know that He speaks to you in your own dialect.
I am seriously questioning your salvation sir, 'cause the bible says that those who are not of God cannot hear the truth.
You might have some knowledge of some scripture, but from what I have observed, you have no revelation.
Who is it who has the truth? I suppose we will have to let God be God. As for me, it is very clear.
I might be wrong on this last thing though, I don't know at this juncture, but I see there being a distinction between righteousness and justification. Where the righteous are not saved but the just are. Romans 10:10 and Jas 2:20-24.
It is also clear that faith and believing are not synonymous. You cannot tell someone to have believe and just faith. If they were synonymous, you would be able interchange them in the sentence.
First know, you should know that Strong is not a high authority, but a simple tool. The authorities are the Hebrew Lexicons, like Keil & Delitzsch, Halot, etc.
K & D: " vb. denom. lay aside, reserve, withdraw, withhold—" "part" is not a meaning listed.
min is the standard Hebrew word meaning from, used in a variety of ways.
I think what you are doing is inferring something that is not there. The Holy Spirit is infinite; you don't really cut Him up into parts. If He is there, He is all there. Of course He is omnipresent, but has special places also.
You speak of "spirit of faith." I already gave you a reasonable explanation. Now the word "of" is generally an English representation of what is a case ending in Greek (like 's is a case Ending in English for the possessive case). In Greek it is called the genitive case. And "of" can cover a host of meanings. "The love of God" can be a humans' love for God, or God's love for the human -- context is required.
Everything produces after its kind? God made donkeys! God does make Gods.
You say you followed the voice of the Spirit. OK, was it masculine or feminine? Did it have a German accent? What kind of English did the voice speak? Southern drawl? Clipped New Yawk? Yorkshire incomprehensible? Scottish brogue? Mushy Indian? Was the voice bass, barotone, tenor, alto, sporano?
I don't know why anyone would believe your claim here.
K & D: " vb. denom. lay aside, reserve, withdraw, withhold—" "part" is not a meaning listed.
min is the standard Hebrew word meaning from, used in a variety of ways.
I think what you are doing is inferring something that is not there. The Holy Spirit is infinite; you don't really cut Him up into parts. If He is there, He is all there. Of course He is omnipresent, but has special places also.
You speak of "spirit of faith." I already gave you a reasonable explanation. Now the word "of" is generally an English representation of what is a case ending in Greek (like 's is a case Ending in English for the possessive case). In Greek it is called the genitive case. And "of" can cover a host of meanings. "The love of God" can be a humans' love for God, or God's love for the human -- context is required.
Everything produces after its kind? God made donkeys! God does make Gods.
You say you followed the voice of the Spirit. OK, was it masculine or feminine? Did it have a German accent? What kind of English did the voice speak? Southern drawl? Clipped New Yawk? Yorkshire incomprehensible? Scottish brogue? Mushy Indian? Was the voice bass, barotone, tenor, alto, sporano?
I don't know why anyone would believe your claim here.
You have failed to present a legitimate argument, while denying and ignoring scripture that is ever so clear.
If you read where God spoke to anyone, you would know that He speaks to you in your own dialect.
I am seriously questioning your salvation sir, 'cause the bible says that those who are not of God cannot hear the truth.
You might have some knowledge of some scripture, but from what I have observed, you have no revelation.
Who is it who has the truth? I suppose we will have to let God be God. As for me, it is very clear.
I might be wrong on this last thing though, I don't know at this juncture, but I see there being a distinction between righteousness and justification. Where the righteous are not saved but the just are. Romans 10:10 and Jas 2:20-24.
It is also clear that faith and believing are not synonymous. You cannot tell someone to have believe and just faith. If they were synonymous, you would be able interchange them in the sentence.