James and Paul do not contradict

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#61
My comments....How about forsaking rebellion and obediently yielding to God before being born again? Do you consider that such a thing is possible?
Outward adherence to law does not make one righteous and I have never claimed that it does.
I teach that a sinner must forsake their rebellion to God through a broken repentance BEFORE forgiveness is granted.
you.... accuse me of teaching that we are made righteous by the law? You cannot quote me teaching what you accuse me of
You claim that one cannot forsake rebellion or choose to do what is right unless one gets saved first. Thus you have just contradicted yourself again.
God is calling men to choose to do good and yield to the light of the world which is Jesus Christ. Yielding to good is not of ourselves because God is the source of light. Thus we can do nothing except we abide in Jesus Christ who is the way, the truth and the life.
Absolutely we cannot love unconditionally until God raises us up to newness of life. I have never taught otherwise.
What you do is you connect the "forsaking of sin" with the actual result of "being born again" and thus teach that the former is impossible without the latter. Thus you reverse the Gospel and have the forsaking of rebellion occurring after forgiveness is granted. The Bible clearly teaches the opposite of what you believe.
we can do nothing except we abide in Jesus Christ who is the way, the truth and the life.
My comments....How about forsaking rebellion and obediently yielding to God before being born again? Do you consider that such a thing is possible?
you.... accuse me of teaching that we are made righteous by the law? You cannot quote me teaching what you accuse me of
Absolutely we cannot love unconditionally until God raises us up to newness of life. I have never taught otherwise.
My comments....How about forsaking rebellion and obediently yielding to God before being born again? Do you consider that such a thing is possible?
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
#62
AS ETERNALLY GRATEFUL has raised the subject of BORN AGAIN Let us use Scripture and see what is Born Again.... This must be the most misunderstanding concept in the Bible. I will use ONE VERSE to show you just how powerful BORN AGAIN is.

Let us read 1 John 3:9... Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Born again, means a person is BORN OF GOD! That means God is your Father that gave you life, existance, and HIS SEED! Not one single person that is born again is born to be the OLD person he was. You are not born again to be you AGAIN! If God gives you life, HE gives you HIS LIFE... Jesus Christ!
Let us break up 1 John 3:9...
1. God says ANY PERSON that is born of GOD, doth not commit sin. I wonder how many here want to change this simple straight foreward statement God makes here. ANY REBORN DOTH NOT COMMIT SIN.... Just accept it, or you will always be in a twirl of confusion!
2. The reason why this person cannot sin God gives as...FOR HIS SEED REMAINETH IN HIM.... This seed is the SAME SEED Jesus was born of... The Holy Spirit! The Holy Spirit of God has to commit sin before this person can sin. The Holy Spirit is the ONLY SEED in this person. And this Holy Spirit CANNOT SIN...
3. HE CANNOT SIN, BECAUSE HE IS BORN OF GOD..... LOOK!!!! He did not grow in God and sin less and less, the moment HE WAS BORN OF GOD, he became SINLESS and PERFECT. How many people teach we should GROW in God? Plenty! But God says clearly here that the BORN OF GOD, cannot sin. He did not say those that matured in ME cannot sin, He says those BORN of me CANNOT sin.
Well that makes it very easy to understand.... REBIRTH happens at THE END OF SANCTIFICATION.

I have one huge request from all that reads this.... If a person reads John 17, and 1 John 3, with an open heart, then we can clearly see what God does to make a person BORN OF GOD. To read these two chapters, gives a person the best vision and revelation on BORN AGAIN.

Shortly put BEN IS BORN AGAIN OF GOD THEN.... JESUS IS BORN AGAIN IN BEN=BEN IS BAPTIZED IN/OF HOLY SPIRIT=BEN IS FILLED WITH HOLY SPIRT=BEN IS BORN OF GOD=JESUS IS PLANTED INSIDE BEN=ONLY JESUS LIVES IN BEN=FATHER AND SON MADE ABODE IN BEN=GOD IS IN BEN=BEN IS IN GOD=NO SATAN CLOSE AND VERY SCARED OF BEN/JESUS IN BEN=NO SIN IN GOD NO SIN IN BEN = BEN IS MADE BY GOD IN PERFECTION. BEN = JESUS CHRIST IN IMAGE, HOLINESS AND SONSHIP OF GOD. BEN IS AS MUCH A SON OF GOD AS JESUS IS! THIS IS WHAT BORN OF GOD/REBIRTH IS. NOTHING LESS!

So many people confuse the calling with rebirth. Calling of God is the first step God performs to save you. Rebirth is the last. There is NO HOLY SPIRIT IN YOU BEFORE GOD GIVES YOU REBIRTH AT THE END OF SANCTIFICATION!

Cobus,

Have your sins been forgiven?

The reason I ask is that you are teaching that actual rebirth (being born again) comes with being perfected. I reference this passage...

Eph 4:11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;
Eph 4:12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:
Eph 4:13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:
Eph 4:14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
Eph 4:15 But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:

I am aware of others who teach this doctrine (namely Truecore08 on Youtube TrueCore08's channel - YouTube ). The problem I have with this doctrine though is that the scriptures clearly teach that the remission of sins is tied to rebirth. If you carefully examine what Peter writes in 2 Peter chapter 1 he speaks of "adding to our faith" which is no doubt the equivalent of the "growing in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ" through the application of what we learn yet Peter makes a reference to the man who does not do this in verse 2Pet 1:9 as forgetting that his sins have already been purged. Thus the purging of sin comes BEFORE one adds to their faith and is thus perfected.

If you compare this to Hebrews 9:13-15 where it speaks of how the blood purges our consciences of dead works and how that relates to the remission of transgressions under the first covenant. In other words it is dealing with past misconduct ala Rom 3:25.

The blotting out of sins is connected in scripture with the refreshing which in the Greek is...

anapsuxis
From G404; properly a recovery of breath, that is, (figuratively) revival: - revival.

Act 3:19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord;

You can also see that the forgiveness of sins is connected with "being quickened together with Him."

suzōopoieō
From G4862 and G2227; to reanimate conjointly with (figuratively): - quicken together with.

Col 2:11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ:
Col 2:12 Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.
Col 2:13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;

Here are some more relevant scriptures which are good to compare.

Act 26:18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.

Heb 9:14 How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?

1Jn 1:7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

Mat_26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

Rom 3:24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
Rom 3:25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

I have read many of your posts and it appears that you believe that the Old Man is crucified over a long period of time and that this period of time is sanctification. Then at the end of this sanctification process or the perfecting of the saints is when one actually becomes born again.

I think that is a very dangerous error because it undermines the purpose of repentance (which is to purge the heart of rebellion and prepare an individual to receive the implanted word) and thus puts an individual into a state of waiting on God to change them and conform them into His image.

I have communicated these issues with those who teach this doctrine but have yet to receive a response directly addressing my queries.

Romans 6:6 teaches that the body of sin is destroyed via the old man being crucified with Christ. It is something that happens at a moment in time once and for all. The Bible does not teach it is a gradual thing. Those that are Christ's HAVE crucified the flesh with its passions and desires and this is directly related to the death of the old man. This is where the yielding to sin stops and the yielding to God begins. It is where the enslavement to sin ceases and we become a slave to righteousness.

2Co 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.
2Co 5:18 And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;
2Co 5:19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
2Co 5:20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.

Read the next passage carefully as Peter refers to the "trial of faith" and he is speaking in context with those who are "born again." I think you have confused "being born again" with "being granted entrance into the kingdom."

Being being born again is not a guarantee that one will enter the kingdom simply because we have to remain steadfast and endure to the end. Eternal life is a hope and promise if we do this. We are kept by the power of God through faith which means as long as we are doers of the word and remain steadfast in faith we will receive the promise. God will deliver us from all temptation and preserve us to the end so long as we do not turn away from Him.

1Pe 1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,
1Pe 1:4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
1Pe 1:5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
1Pe 1:6 Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations:
1Pe 1:7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:
1Pe 1:8 Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory:
1Pe 1:9 Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.
1Pe 1:10 Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:
1Pe 1:11 Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.
1Pe 1:12 Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.
1Pe 1:13 Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
1Pe 1:14 As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance:
1Pe 1:15 But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation;
1Pe 1:16 Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.
1Pe 1:17 And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear:
1Pe 1:18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed [the reconciliation has already taken place]with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
1Pe 1:19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
1Pe 1:20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,
1Pe 1:21 Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God.
1Pe 1:22 Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently:
1Pe 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
1Pe 1:24 For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away:
1Pe 1:25 But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.


Look at this...

1Pe 2:1 Wherefore laying aside all malice, and all guile, and hypocrisies, and envies, and all evil speakings,
1Pe 2:2 As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby:

The perfecting of the saints and coming into the unity of the faith is this growth. Yet rebirth comes first. Rebirth is simply being raised up by God from darkness to light by His power and it follows a genuine repentance experience whereby one forsakes their rebellion through a broken godly sorrow. This is where the axe is laid to the root cause of sin in one's life.

When one is born again they are not perfect. They need to be perfected. What they are though is no longer rebellious to God. The rebellion has ceased and in its place is a willingness to yield to the instruction of God whereby one may grow.

Please consider these things and I look forward to your response.

God bless.
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
#63
Zone.... My words come across as Chinese to you due to the strongholds in your mind.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#64
Zone.... My words come across as Chinese to you due to the strongholds in your mind.
no dear, it's because you are a heretic.

Originally Posted by Skinski7
Absolutely we cannot love unconditionally until God raises us up to newness of life. I have never taught otherwise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinski7

What you do is you connect the "forsaking of sin" with the actual result of "being born again" and thus teach that the former is impossible without the latter. Thus you reverse the Gospel and have the forsaking of rebellion occurring after forgiveness is granted. The Bible clearly teaches the opposite of what you believe.

you neither loved God unconditionally before He saved you (debatable), or AFTER.
claiming you do makes you a liar.
which you are.
 
Last edited:
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
#65
no dear, it's because you are a heretic.

Originally Posted by Skinski7
Absolutely we cannot love unconditionally until God raises us up to newness of life. I have never taught otherwise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinski7

What you do is you connect the "forsaking of sin" with the actual result of "being born again" and thus teach that the former is impossible without the latter. Thus you reverse the Gospel and have the forsaking of rebellion occurring after forgiveness is granted. The Bible clearly teaches the opposite of what you believe.

you neither loved God unconditionally before He saved you (debatable), or AFTER.
claiming you do makes you a liar.
which you are.
Heart purity is the purpose of the Gospel and those who are Christ's have been made pure by their faith. We are to love God with ALL our heart, ALL our mind, and ALL our soul. We are to walk with God with OUR WHOLE being and nothing else will suffice. This is what being born again is all about.

1Ti 1:5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:

Pure - katharos
Of uncertain affinity; clean (literally or figuratively): - clean, clear, pure.

Tit 2:14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.

Heb 12:14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:

Mat 5:8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
 

loveme1

Senior Member
Oct 30, 2011
8,090
191
63
#66
Scripture:

Romans 8

There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. 2For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. 3For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: 4That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. 5For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. 6For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace. 7Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. 8So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
9But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. 10And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness. 11But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

12Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh. 13For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live. 14For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. 15For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. 16The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: 17And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.

18For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. 19For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. 20For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, 21Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. 22For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now. 23And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body. 24For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for? 25But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it.

26Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. 27And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God.

28And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. 29For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

31What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us? 32He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things? 33Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. 34Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us. 35Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?

36As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.

37Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. 38For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, 39Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#67
Heart purity is the purpose of the Gospel and those who are Christ's have been made pure by their faith. We are to love God with ALL our heart, ALL our mind, and ALL our soul. We are to walk with God with OUR WHOLE being and nothing else will suffice. This is what being born again is all about.

1Ti 1:5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:

Pure - katharos
Of uncertain affinity; clean (literally or figuratively): - clean, clear, pure.

Tit 2:14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.

Heb 12:14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:

Mat 5:8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
blah blah blah.
so you can post the scriptures?

you said people must purify THEMSELVES under the law before God will even consider them.

which means Christ died for no purpose.

which makes you an heretic. which you are.

did you know this is the COMMANDMENT #1 and without it you're already a dead man?

We are to love God with ALL our heart, ALL our mind, and ALL our soul.
tell me Mr. Righteous - do you claim to fulfill the First Great Command according to Father's requirement?



now if you have had a Gospel adjustment, just admit it before the church - that you were wrong. you'll be welcomed...even after all that fire-breathing and threatenings against her you've been doing, Saul.

or, you can do what all heretics do: when discovered, slither away and come back with a new variation.

*shrug*

mean nothing to me.
i know lots of guys like you. some of the most defiled hearts out there - thinking you are on par with MY LORD.

*yawn*
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#68

Therefore I believe that James completes Paul's message by saying that a saved individual is to bear fruit. One can’t be saved by works because no human being can save themselves, that's why Jesus became the sinless Lamb to save mankind, however after you have been saved by faith you are to live in active obedience, practical fruits of righteousness (Phil 1:11) which is the manifestation of grace in the regenerated heart.
James is not saying an induvidual MUST bear fruit. He is saying HE WILL. As Paul said, We are saved by grace through faith, and not of ourselves. But those who are saved, will do the work God created them to do. he also tells us in titus, we were not saved by any good deeds (works of righteousness) we have done, but by the washing and renewal (new birth) of the Holy Spirit.

Pauls letter was to an audience who were being bombarded by those trying to add works, and also who came from a pagan society which preaches works is a means to appease an angry God. James on the other hand was speaking against people who claimed to have faith, but only had mere belief. he told them that hearers of the word only, but not doers, who have no works, their faith is dead.

Since they did not have the works Paul said they would have, they would not be saved. One can not be saved by mere belief.
 
Nov 29, 2012
86
0
0
#69
This is a heretical statement. Gods works in us are not works of the flesh they are a work of Gods spirit changing us into the image of His son. THAT IS GOOD WORKS.
Heretic? Thanks, yes I would definitely be excommunicated by the Catholics and I would be proud of it.

The question here is, Does the Faith come first or the Works? Is this just Good Works or Works thorugh Faith? I don't know that you can tell from the outside. Remember though, Faith without Works is Dead.

Christians are all about things that don't make worldly sense:

We Live by Dieing
We Get by Giving
We are Richest when we are Poor
We Fight the Good Fight by Turning the other cheek
We become Free by Submitting

Works ARE REQUIRED. Faith by itself is not enough. We must Labor to enter into the Rest.

When Jesus comes for us, He will have Rewards in His Hand. I want nothing more than to hear Him say to me "Well Done thou good and faithful Servant." I think most Christians agree, or they are not really Christians.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#70
My comments....How about forsaking rebellion and obediently yielding to God before being born again? Do you consider that such a thing is possible? Or do you believe that one must get saved before one can obey?

Your reply.


Ok here you reference a section from Romans 3.

Rom 3:9 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;
Rom 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
Rom 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.
Rom 3:12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

Then you add "how can we forsake something that we do not have the power to do it?"

Where exactly does the Bible teach that?

The Prodigal Son forsook the pig pen. The Ninevites forsook their rebellion. They certainly had the power. How do you explain what they did?


1. The prodigal son never stopped being the son, He already had the power. Your refusal to see this, and look at how he became the son in the first place amazes me and shows your true heart.
2. The ninivites repented at the teaching of jonah, and believed what he said. Thus they too were given the ability to do good.

Your saying one must do good first. The ninivites did not do this. All they did was repent, and admit they were guilty and came to God. they were saved before they did their first good deed. Another fact you can not understand!


You are teaching that sin is not a choice but rather an involuntary activity. If sin is rooted in the choice then one can choose not to do it. Is a man forced to commit adultery on his wife? If a man is committing adultery on his wife does he have the power to forsake that adultery? Of course he does.
No. I am teaching that all sin comes from pride. and we do not have the capacity to do good because the thing which God gave mankind to do good (his love) was taken away when sin entered the world. Since we do not have access to gods love, we can not love others in the way we were intended to love, for this reason, everything we do comes from a selfish attitude. In order to recieve gain. As john said, we love because God first loved us. Until we are born again, and have recieved and experienced Gods love, we can do nothing good. For even the moral good we do is filthy rags, because it is not for the reason God commanded us to do it, but for selfish gain. Another fact you can not comprehend!


Yet you deny this basic principle and speak against those who teach one must forsake known sin before forgiveness is granted.


Rom 3:9-12 is in the context of teaching that both the Jewish and Gentile nations have all been concluded under sin. Paul is quoting from Psalm 14, Isa 53:6 and Jer 50:6. If you read those passages you will clearly see the context there is in regards to those who have rejected God.

If there never has been or never will be anyone righteous except Jesus Christ then why does the Bible teach the opposite? Job, Danial and Abel are all called righteous in the Bible. Explain that inconsistency?

How about John the Baptist parents?

Luk 1:5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.
Luk 1:6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.

Did they lack ability? These verses clearly contradict what you are espousing. Can you explain them?


So what your saying is we have to promise to be sinless, and show an act of doing this very thing before God will save us. And he may save us when we come to him, but only if we show we are able to become sinless? Do you not see the conundrum you have? What your saying does not make sense. Your no better than the pharisees, and you can;t even see it!



Sin is rebellion to God. It is doing wrong when you know to do right (Jam 4:17), it is transgression (1Joh 3:4).


Yes, and why is it transgression? Because it is self motivated, and not motivated out of love, Anything you do with self motivation is sin. You should know, you do it all the time. we all do.


Was Nineveh prideful for forsaking their sin and seeking the mercy of God? You are clearly implying that they were.

Was the Prodigal Son prideful in forsaking the pig pen and returning to the Father and confessing his sin? You must conclude that he was if you are to be consistent with what you are saying.

Does a husband who forsakes his adulterous relationship with another women that he may possibly be reconciled with his wife do it because he is proud?

Why do you think it is pride to forsake sin and to turn to God BEFORE one is raised up to newness of life? You speak in clear opposition to the plain words of Scripture.
1. Ninivah could not be proud. For they acknowledged their sin separated them from God. How could they be proud for changing when it was Gods power that changed them.

2. Again with the prodigal son? He was already the son, Unlike th eninivites where were not children of God. they repented and asked God to forgive them, then they became children, it was Gods work. not theres.

3. Again with adultry? How about all the other sins? you like to stick to the big three, but you refuse to see the many other sins people commit.

4. It is not pride to forsake sin. Because we do not have the power to forsake it. Only God, by giving us love, can give us the power to forsake self and give to others.




Yes the law paints an outward picture of righteousness that leads us to Jesus Christ. Outward adherence to law does not make one righteous and I have never claimed that it does. I clearly state that true righteousness is through walking in the Spirit of life of Jesus Christ whereby we walk by a faith which works by love. Love fulfills the law.
Your issue is saying we must do it BEFORE we are saved. when it is impossible to do it, because we have not yet felt Gods love to give us a capacity to love others.

If one truly loves then they do not need outward rules telling them how to behave because by nature they will do right. That is true righteousness. Yet you keep twisting what I say and present it as if I am teaching that the law saves you because I teach that a sinner must forsake their rebellion to God through a broken repentance BEFORE forgiveness is granted.
You are correct here. Love does allow us to do what is right, Your issue is you are saying we must do this of our own power first. then we might be saved. When scripture makes it clear. Once we are saved, we WILL do these things. How can one who is filled with th elove of God not love others? you don;t understand, most likely because you do not have God slove, your still trying to earn it.


How about you address why you never make mention of "faith works by love and love fulfills the law" and accuse me of teaching that we are made righteous by the law? You cannot quote me teaching what you accuse me of, you just pretend that I teach that.


I adressed it. I have been showing it all along.

You can sit there and claim you do not teach we ar emade righteous by the law all you want. But saying we are not saved if we do not obay the law or lose it when we fail, you are doing just this.





How can one CHOOSE to REBEL if they don't have the power to do otherwise? You claim that one cannot forsake rebellion or choose to do what is right unless one gets saved first. Thus you have just contradicted yourself again.


you don;t make any sense. Try again. Have to power to rebell? we all have that power, even when saved, god did nt remove our sinful nature. he kept it in us, until we are risen with a new body free of sin. Until then, we can always chose to do anything with self in mind, Anything we do with self in mind is sin.


 
P

psychomom

Guest
#71
This thread has served to make me so grateful for our pastor/teacher. :)

He's a former Catholic, and fully appreciates grace.♥
We're going through the book of Romans currently, and every time he preaches,
I find myself rejoicing more! (even when I thought I couldn't possibly...I do! :) )

So, thanks to each of you...the ones who speak the Truth,
and the ones who need to learn.

There's not one thing we can do to earn it,
and not one thing we can do to deserve it,
but God grants not only eternal life through Christ,
but life now, and abundant life, too!

Jesus is The Way, The Truth, and The Life. (John 14:6) ♥
I am just so thankful, and thank all of you for allowing me to praise our Abba
and our Savior for His wonderful gift to us! :)

-ellie
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#72
It is important to be very specific in defining faith. "Faith Alone" is a protestant term that implies that men are saved via a "passive trust" in what Jesus did on the cross.


who told you dat?:rolleyes:

oh ya. this guy who can't even get his blog name right >> Standing the Gap

(send him an email and give him the little word IN < an important preposition)

............................

a-a-a-a-anyways:

Romans 10:17
So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.

&#960;&#953;&#963;&#964;&#953;&#962; noun - nominative singular feminine
pistis pis'-tis: persuasion, i.e. credence; moral conviction; by extension, the system of religious (Gospel) truth itself -- assurance, belief, believe, faith, fidelity.

oh lookie.
only one guy (who doesn't know what a preposition is for) ever looked up faith.
the reformers, who actually read greek, just kinda missed it.
not to mention they were never saved, so didn't have an active faith.

skinski i feel sorry for you (kinda)
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#73
Heretic? Thanks, yes I would definitely be excommunicated by the Catholics and I would be proud of it.

The question here is, Does the Faith come first or the Works? Is this just Good Works or Works thorugh Faith? I don't know that you can tell from the outside. Remember though, Faith without Works is Dead.

Christians are all about things that don't make worldly sense:

We Live by Dieing
We Get by Giving
We are Richest when we are Poor
We Fight the Good Fight by Turning the other cheek
We become Free by Submitting

Works ARE REQUIRED. Faith by itself is not enough. We must Labor to enter into the Rest.

When Jesus comes for us, He will have Rewards in His Hand. I want nothing more than to hear Him say to me "Well Done thou good and faithful Servant." I think most Christians agree, or they are not really Christians.

yes you would get excommunicated from an organisation. But you would still not have found Christ.

Faith without works is dead. because it is no faith whatsoever. true faith will produce true works. The issue is not works, the issue is does one have salvic faith or not.

works are not required, if they are, jesus died in veign, because we could save ourselves.

works are a given to those who have faith. to those who have mere belief, they will have no works, thus their lack of faith will be proven.
 

starfield

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2009
3,393
58
48
#74
It is through the action of yielding to God that salvation is wrought in the soul. There is nothing passive about it. The grace of God BRINGS salvation by teaching men to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts, to live soberly and uprightly in the present age (Tit 2:11-12). That is what the Bible teaches. This grace BRINGS the salvation and this grace TEACHES.
...And this yielding is as a result of the quickening from the Spirit. Consequently, the sinner turns from their wickedness to Christ for salvation.

This grace is EFFECTUAL when we WORK TOGETHER with God (2Cor 6:1). Thus if we refuse to work together with God the grace is received in vain or to no effect. Hence DOING is key. Faith is the DOING aspect of our salvation.

That is what James was talking about. The believer's faith must be accompanied with obedience.
But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves (James 1:22).

It is the implanted word that saves the soul. It has to be RECEIVED (Jam 1:21) in order that the soul be saved. All filthiness and overflowing of wickedness has to be LAID ASIDE first in order for the implanted word to be received. This is because the works of wickedness is the rejection of the word. One cannot reject Jesus and receive Him at the same time. This is why REPENTANCE is crucial for it prepares the heart for salvation.
I agree with the necessity of repentance for salvation.

"Faith Alone" completely removes this dynamic from salvation. If the dynamic of "working together with God" is absent then there will be no salvation. Salvation is not some abstract pie in the sky book keeping entry. Salvation is a literal present state of walking in the Spirit of God by faith overcoming the works of the devil. Salvation is pure holy living where we walk in accordance with the Creator. We are in fellowship with God.
Skinski, Paul was talking about how a sinner can become saved. This is through faith alone in the Lord Jesus apart from works to win God's favor. Jesus died for our righteousness so a sinner can only be declared righteous through faith in Him.
Repentance is needed but that is not the "works" Paul was referring to. Faith alone is faith without deeds of the law which Paul mentioned in Romans 3:28 (Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law)
and Ephesians 2:8-9 (For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast).

What the Reformers have done is displace the ritualistic errors and sacraments of the Catholic Church with the error of forensic salvation. They forsook one false set of teachings and replaced them with another.

It is a masterful work of Satan who has been able to convince untold millions of people that they are saved whilst they are still in rebellion. He has been able to totally disconnect the deeds done in the body from the state of the soul.

This was the error John was speaking against in his first Epistle. If you read the Epistle in its entirety you will see that John was teaching that deeds matter. He taught that what we do is a manifestation of who we are. Jesus taught the exact same thing but spoke of bearing fruit.
Some theologians of old corrupted the gospel nonetheless the word of God stands forever. There is consequence for adding and taking away from the word.
That's what Jude said about people perverting the gospel... Jude 1:4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. However, we as believers are to uphold the truth.
If someone adulterates the biblical doctrine of repentance tomorrow, are you going to deny it too because of this? Why do you deny certain essential messages of the Christian faith simply because some have perverted it? I would suggest that you search the scriptures for yourself and pray for the leading of the Holy Spirit instead of looking into these religious men.

The doctrinal error of Original Sin lies at the root of all this heresy. By redefining the nature of man and by putting sin as a substance of the flesh as the root of actual rebellion it completely undermines the ability of man to forsake rebellion in repentance. Thus on this basis salvation is necessitated to be forensic in application because actual deeds are not a result of choice but rather of nature.

This is why the Gospel is presented in such a way that men are saved whilst they are still in rebellion. Thus Justification (forensic salvation) is separated from Sanctification (actual salvation). Sanctification under this lie is related to Manifest Righteousness whilst Justification is related to the Forensic Righteousness. This is why they misapply Romans 7 to teach that a Christian is still in bondage to sin.

It is a very powerful deception rooted in multiple layers of error. People today totally underestimate the deceptive nature of Satan.

The reason that the church system is so full of sin today is because they are not preaching the true Gospel. They are preaching this forensic salvation message based upon the doctrine of being born a sinner.

Starfield I urge you to dig into these things. I know you reject what I say about Original Sin being error but I urge you to dig into the early church writings as well as the conflict between Pelagius and Augustine. Augustine would have to be the greatest heretic of all time in introducing Gnostic Philosophy into Christian orthodoxy.

One cannot be "born a sinner" and have a"free independent will" at the same time.
Original sin does not annul repentance and free will or hold man captive in sin. It only shows our need for the Savior. Your teaching lacks a solid foundation because it denies the truth of the state of man before the new birth. Your denial of the taint of sin brought to humanity implies that we do not need Jesus as our Savior but can attain righteousness on our own. In addition, according your argument there is a possibility for one to be born into this world with good upbringing and not be exposed to anything that will elicit temptation to sin thus they will not sin and will be automatically saved. However the bible says all have sinned. Justification is through Christ alone. I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me (John 14:6). Man cannot be righteous in the sight of God without Christ.
No one is born in a neutral state; it must be spiritually alive or spiritually dead so since spiritual life comes after salvation through repentance and faith in Christ then man, in fact, is born spiritually dead because of Adam's sin. By one man sin entered into the world and death by sin (not merely physical death, but spiritual death).
Psalm 51:5- Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me. Why do you deny this Skinski?
 
Last edited:
S

soldierofchrist4ever24

Guest
#75
DO JAMES AND PAUL CONTRADICT?
[If so which one is right or is both of them right?]

Do James and Paul in their basic theology contradict each other? Have you ever heard that controversy? Two thousand years they have been debating this. Most of them siding with Paul and putting James in the category as heretic.

Remember we are talking James the brother of Christ. James who in Acts 15 at the Jerusalem conference, when Paul and Barnabas and those came to meet with everyone. I mean everybody was there, all the believing Pharisees that was converted and all of the elders, the Apostles and the chief people and the whole congregation. They were all there and James was there. Who gave the final summation of what was to be done with what was discussed at that conference? Who gave the final summation? James.

Yet, Martin Luther who started ‘the’ Reformation, he is attributed to others too, but this was the primary one, what they called The Protestant Reformation. He calls James "an Epistle of straw" and the main reason being that James emphasizes ‘works,’ good works. Dr. Martin Luther, of course was by "faith ALONE."


WHO TEACHES ‘FAITH ALONE’

This faith alone… the word alone, this is something that has been interjected at the time of Martin Luther and I’m going to show you that it was him that did it. I just looked up a few, but I mean there are hundreds. So I just looked up this few.

James Dobson says, "we are justified by faith ALONE." Where did he get that word alone.

Billy Graham, "faith ALONE." Now I believe it was Billy Graham, I don’t know how many years ago when he had one of his really big or first rallies in Berlin, he was sure to emphasize that we are justified by faith ALONE. Why did he do that? Well he wanted to get in good with the Germany, because it was their great reformer Martin Luther who introduced this word alone.

Listen to this, I’m going to read this now about the same way that theologians would try to. How Billy Graham and Dobson and others would try to show you how they are right on this ‘faith ALONE.’ They might quote Paul in Galatians 2.

Gal 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law…

Well there you go.

Paul says:
Gal 2:16 …but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. (also 17-21!!)

Now that is pretty clear, isn’t it. I mean it sounds pretty clear, doesn’t it. Will anybody be justified in the eyes of God by doing works of the law? Paul say no.

James says:
James 2:21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works...

v. 24 Ye see then how that BY WORKS A MAN IS JUSTIFED...

Is that a contradiction? It sure sounds like one if you read it like that, doesn’t it. One place says, not by works but by faith in Christ and then not by works of the law. Then James comes along and says was not Abraham justified by works, you see then that a man if justified by works.

Okay, it’s not a contradiction. Now follow me closely. I so help me God think the worse offenders of Christian hermeneutics are the Christian theologians. They are the worst. They say that difficult Scriptures must be interpreted by simpler, more to the point Scriptures. They’ve got all these principles and context context context. Yet when they try to ensconce their heretical teaching, they break every rule in the book and they do it with impunity.

We started off with this word ‘alone.’ We are justified, saved by faith alone. Justification is by faith alone. Faith alone.

I read you two verses, one by Paul and one by James. Did you see the word ‘alone’? It’s not there. Well where in the world did it come from? I’ll show you.


MARTIN LUTHER INSERTED THE WORD ‘ALONE’

This I have is a very old translation of the Bible by Martin Luther, from back in the 1500’s. Now I’ll take you to Romans 3:28. In says in there;

Roemer 3:28 German: Luther (1545)
So halten wir es nun, daß der Mensch gerecht werde ohne des Gesetzes Werke, allein durch den Glauben.

"Allein" means alone. "Glauden" means belief or faith. That’s Martin Luther’s from the 1500’s.

Now let’s read that from the King James.

Rom 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds (or works) of the law.

Do you see the word ‘alone.’ No. No you don’t. It’s interesting that Martin Luther puts little margin notes. He puts them actually not in the margin, but he puts them right next to the verses. He has Galatians 2:16. Maybe it is just to help people see another reference.

Gal 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ…

Now it doesn’t say ‘alone’ does it. But he uses that as a reference. But in Romans 3:28 he puts the word ‘alone.’

Biased Bible Translation

Martin Luther translated the New Testament into German. He translated Romans 3:28 as follows:
We hold that the human will be justified without the works of the law but only by faith.

[Comment: They give the King James text and show that it is not there]

Luther admits to adding the word "only" in the text but insists that his reasons for doing so are good ones. [comment: Isn’t this incredible.] Notice that he is using his doctrine of Sola Fide (faith only) to guide his translation rather than being faithful to the text. Here are his words:

I was not depending upon or following the nature of language when I inserted the word "solum" (alone) in Rom. 3 as the text itself, and St. Paul's meaning, urgently necessitated and demanded it. He is dealing with the main point of Christian doctrine in this passage - namely that we are justified by faith in Christ without any works of the Law.

I also know that in Rom. 3, the word "solum" is not present in either Greek or Latin text - the papists did not have to teach me that - it is fact! The letters s-o-l-a are not there. And these knotheads stare at them like cows at a new gate, while at the same time they do not recognize that it conveys the sense of the text[/u] - if the translation is to be clear and accurate, it belongs there.
North Forest - Jesus Christ, the light of the world
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

So why did he put ‘alone’ there?… "It belongs there." Why anybody can tell that, right, because it belongs there. Now he didn’t put it in Galatians 2:16, but guess who did? Now I will extol the virtues of the Concordance’s translation when that is deemed fair, but let me show you something. This is the reference that Martin Luther gives in his Scripture Romans 3:28, when he says ‘alone.’

Concordant Literal Version
Gal 2:16 having perceived that a man is not being justified by works of law, except alone through the faith of Christ Jesus,

That is just sheer spurious nonsense. They do show you, they always put the words from the Scripture in bold face and if they add words… and sometimes you need to add words to make it idiomatically correct, you know in reading it. They do put the word ‘alone’ in light face. But the point is, why did they put it there at all? It is not suggested and it is not in the original, so why did they put it there? Well A. E. Knoch… is that not a good German name. I think he’s got a heritage back to Martin Luther if you ask me. Where else did he come up with that? It’s not there, he just stuck it in there. Martin Luther just stuck it in there. Where did this ‘alone’ come from? It didn’t come from the Scriptures.

So although what I read you, and I didn’t read you the whole verse, I just read an excerpt from a verse from Paul and in James. I did that on purpose, so you could see how you could make it sound like it’s a absolute contradiction. You see?

So there is no Scripture that uses the phrase ‘faith alone’ or ‘only by faith’ or ‘faith only.’ Or ‘works alone’ or ‘only works.’ Neither one of those is used, you don’t find the word alone. Now you will find ‘faith alone’ one place in the Bible and it is in James. But guess what you find with that "faith alone"? You find the word "not."

James 2:17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.


THE FAITH ‘OF’ CHRIST

Now why would Dobson and Billy Graham and Martin Luther and all, why would they insert this word ‘alone’? What is there point? Why is it so important to them to pervert the Scriptures, to pervert the Word of God, to add to the Word of God, when God says, woe be to those that add to it? Why is it so important to them to do that?

[Comment from someone: Well I’ve heard you talk about, that they are trying to make it sound like it’s our faith and not Jesus Christ’s faith.] That’s one thing and you do find that some translations talk about faith ‘in’ Christ, even Rotherham. It’s plainly the faith ‘of’ Jesus Christ and he inserts the word ‘in’ (Gal. 2:16, 3:26; Php. 3:9; Col. 1:4). I know that Rotherham’s translation is pretty consistent, just like Concordant. But sometimes the human element gets in there and they just think, ‘it’s our faith in Christ.’ No it’s not, it’s the faith ‘of’ Christ. Big difference. That’s one point.
Killing sin is not a prescription of how to be forgiven but is a description of the christian who is forgiven :D
in
Christ
brother travis
 
P

psychomom

Guest
#76
Killing sin is not a prescription of how to be forgiven but is a description of the christian who is forgiven :D
in
Christ
brother travis
That...is so concisely beautiful!
Thanks, Travis. :)
-ellie
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
#77
Original sin does not annul repentance and free will or hold man captive in sin.


Yes it does because Original Sin teaches that human beings sin because of their nature instead of by choice. Thus actual sin is the result of a malady and not in choosing to willfully rebel.

Sin is not natural and that is why people feel guilt. Indeed sinning can become natural through repeated habit in the same way that Cocaine or Video Games illicit the development of neuron pathways in the brain. Sin is addictive in this sense. Yet this addiction to sin is not something we are born with, rather it is something that grows. The word nature in the Greek is Phusis and it literally means "Growth." The same word is used in both Romans 2 and Ephesians 2 in reference to conduct resulting from nature. In Romans 2 there are people who "do by nature the things in the law" and in Ephesians 2 there are those "who do by nature" wickedness.

We are not born wicked. If we are born wicked and sin is simply a natural offshoot of this wickedness then ultimately we are not responsible for our wickedness. Thus if someone approaches God in this manner it is simply impossible to be truly sorry for sin because in the mind they will be blaming their flesh and not the choices they made in regards how they chose to yield their flesh.

Sin is a result of yielding to the passions and desires of the flesh exactly as James describes. Sinners freely choose to do this, they are not compelled by some inner wickedness that they were born with. Original Sin actually puts the blame of sin on God.

If sin is some sort of substance that indwells the flesh then it cannot be repented of anymore than a black or white person can repent of their race. Thus the sinner just "admits their sinfulness" as opposed to confessing their CHOICE to be sinful.

Sin is a moral choice. Sin is not a disease.

False Christianity treats sin as a disease and presents the Gospel as the cure. The Bible treats sin as a crime and it present the Gospel as the method one can be reconciled to God through the blood of Jesus Christ despite their PAST criminal actions. It is a very big difference.


It only shows our need for the Savior.
We would need a saviour whether Original Sin was true or not. Once a sin is committed condemnation is wrought and there is nothing a sinner can do to undo what has already been done. That is why mankind needs a saviour. Men are criminals who have committed a crimes and returning to obedience does not expunge the previous criminal record.

Jesus is needed by all people for two major reasons. Jesus is the source of all light and thus without Him we would be stumbling around in the dark. Secondly, without the shedding of blood there would be no remission of sin. Without the death of Jesus on the cross men could not have their past rebellion washed away through the forbearance of God.

Your teaching lacks a solid foundation because it denies the truth of the state of man before the new birth.
No it doesn't. Sinners have been defiled by sin and are held in bondage to sin. Thus they need redemption. They need to be set free from bondage and they also need to be released from the condemnation that hangs over their heads.

Yet the condemnation of sinners is wrought through the sinners having CHOSEN to sin. They were not born condemned and in bondage. That is the error. Original Sin puts the blame on birth instead of choice. Thus again, sin is redefined to be a sickness instead of a criminal act.

The Bible clearly teaches that we sold ourselves for nought and that we are redeemed without money.

Isa 52:3 For thus saith the LORD, Ye have sold yourselves for nought; and ye shall be redeemed without money.

One cannot sell themselves for nought if they are "born already sold."

Likewise Paul teaches in Romans 7 that he was alive before the law came. Sin revived only when he had the knowledge of right and wrong and when he chose to do wrong he died.

Rom 7:8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.
Rom 7:9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.
Rom 7:10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.
Rom 7:11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.

Likewise with Adam, the sinning of eating the forbidden fruit slew him because it was a direct violation of a command of God. He did it willingly. Choice is always involved.

We are not born dead or in bondage to sin. This is because sin is involved choice. Babies are born subject to the passions and desires of the flesh IN IGNORANCE. They cannot sin for sin is not doing right when you KNOW right (Jam 4:17) and sin is transgression (1Joh 3:4).

A little baby is neither righteous nor unrighteous. They are neutral and ignorant. They are subject to the natural passions of the flesh which are not evil in and of themselves. It is only evil when we choose to gratify the passions and desires of the flesh in a selfish manner when we know it is selfish. A baby crying or having a tantrum when they are hungry or don't get what they want is done in pure ignorance. They have no concept whatsoever of good or evil and thus they cannot sin. They are still alive for they have not rejected the light yet.

Original Sin teaches we are born dead. Original Sin teaches we are born condemned already. Original Sin teaches that actual sin is necessitated by the nature one is born with. Original Sin teaches that man cannot forsake that which his birth nature forces him to do. Thus there repentance is completely neutralised.

Satan knows how important repentance is and he has been able to completely pervert it through Augustine introducing the doctrine of Original Sin.

Why did not the church teach Original Sin before Augustine?

Why did the church NEVER use Romans 7 as an example of the present Christian walk before Augustine?

Why did the church NEVER teach that "being crucified with Christ" was positional in application?

These things were never taught in the early church yet if you oppose them today you are deemed a heretic by the religious establishment.

Your denial of the taint of sin brought to humanity implies that we do not need Jesus as our Savior but can attain righteousness on our own.
That is a very fallacious statement and yet I have to keep addressing it. The denial of Original Sin seems to imply to people that they would not need Jesus and that they could be righteous on their own.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Such are the strongholds of the mind that keep people in bondage to error.

God is the source of righteousness in an individual in the same way that a light globe needs a source of electricity. True righteousness is through abiding/walking in the light of God. This is why Jesus taught that without Him we can do nothing. Jesus is the light that lights every man that comes into the world. We have to abide in that light in order to manifest the righteousness of God. We cannot do it on our own.

Also the denial of Original Sin in no way implies men do not need the Saviour. If you have sinned then you need to be both set free from the condemnation wrought by that sin as well as set free from the bondage that sin brings. We cannot set ourselves free from either. Only through the shed blood of Jesus Christ and through abiding in His word can it happen.


In addition, according your argument there is a possibility for one to be born into this world with good upbringing and not be exposed to anything that will elicit temptation to sin thus they will not sin and will be automatically saved.
Wrong. The flesh itself brings temptation to sin due to the natural passions and desires. So whether one has a good upbringing or not is irrelevant. Adam and Eve walked with God in the garden and "it was good." Yet Eve succumbed to the passions and desires of her flesh (Gen 3:6) due to having her ears tickled by Satan.

Being "saved has to do with being "saved from something." One is not born needing to be "saved from sin" because they have not sold themselves into bondage or fallen under condemnation yet. They still need Jesus to be righteous though. Yet, there is no real doubt in my mind that all do choose to sin mainly due to a lack of an understanding of the full consequences of such an action. Remember we are not born righteous possessing a pure heart of unconditional love, we are a blank slate. Thus the choice to sin is not really seen as a big deal the first time we do it. No wonder all have sinned.

However the bible says all have sinned. Justification is through Christ alone.
I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me (John 14:6). Man cannot be righteous in the sight of God without Christ. [/quote}

Indeed, Jesus is the light of the world. Jesus is how God has chosen to manifest Himself to His creation. If we reject this manifestation then that leaves no other way to the Father.

No one is born in a neutral state; it must be spiritually alive or spiritually dead so since spiritual life comes after salvation through repentance and faith in Christ then man, in fact, is born spiritually dead because of Adam's sin. By one man sin entered into the world and death by sin (not merely physical death, but spiritual death).
Psalm 51:5- Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me. Why do you deny this Skinski?
What you state there completely contradicts the Bible. Paul stated plainly...

Rom 7:8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.
Rom 7:9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.
Rom 7:10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.
Rom 7:11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.

Paul was alive once and then he died. Why did he die? because he sinned.

What does Romans 5:12 state?

Rom 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

Death passed upon all men BECAUSE ALL HAVE SINNED.

In the same manner that Adam died because he chose sin is the exact same manner everyone else dies spiritually.

The Prodigal Son was not born dead in the pig pen. He took his inheritance and left the Father, that was when he willfully chose to reject his Father and go his own way. He was not born that way.

If the Prodigal Son was born dead in the pig pen then he would not have been responsible for blowing his inheritance on the lusts of his flesh. he may have been sorry for his state but there is no way he could have felt ultimately responsible for it.

There is a big difference in being born a rebel and choosing to rebel.

This is the problem with Original Sin. It completely redefines the nature of man and puts the blame for sinning on a mysterious substance in the flesh.

Why do you believe it when the early church did not teach it?

The Gnostics taught it and Augustine was a student of Manichaen Gnosticism for nine years. Thus when he converted to Christianity on a whim (no broken godly sorrow in repentance if you read his Confessions) he read his philosophy into the Bible by misapplying Hebrews 7:9-10 and Romans 5:12 to support his inbred sin doctrine.

I am not making this up. Look it up and read Augustine's own words for yourself. Augustine was challenged on this doctrine by Pelagius and others who pointed out that this was what the Gnostics taught and that Christian orthodoxy up until then had never taught any such thing.

Augustine was very angry with these challenges and sought to have Pelagius condemned as a heretic. It took 3 synods to finally condemn Pelagius, the first two found Pelagius innocent of the charge of denying grace. Pelagius was not able to defend himself personally ath the thrid one and they found him guilty. Thus Augustine won the day and perverted the Gospel to this very day with this evil teaching.

Pelagius is deemed as a arch-heretic to this very day for he is accused of denying grace. Yet if anyone reads his commentary on the book of Romans this charge is shown to be an absurd lie.

It's no different today. Contend for the faith once delivered to the saints and it is the religious people who hate it the most. They hate the message of "go and sin no more" and "cease from sin" and the "crucifixion of the flesh with its passions and desires." "Do nothing and accept Jesus" is much more palatable to the sinner. There is no strait gate and narrow way, pick up your cross, deny self and follow Jesus in this watered down substitution message preached today.

The religious system today is just as apostate as it was in the day of Jesus or Jeremiah. There is no real difference. If Jesus went into one of these "confess, trust and receive" churches today He would be thrown out onto the curb for denying grace.

It truly is mind boggling.
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
#78
Psa 51:5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.


Psalm 51:5 does not say that sin was born in David. It says he was shapen in inqiuity, that in sin did his mother conceive him. Either David is saying that he was born into a sinful world (most likely I think) or that his conception was the result of fornication. Nonetheless he most definitely is not teaching that sin was born in him.

I was born in a hospital, a hospital was not born in me. Big difference.

How come Judaism does not use Psalm 51:5 to teach Original Sin? Judaism denies such an absurd doctrine because they know sin is a choice.

It is only professing Christianity since Augustine which teaches such a thing.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#79
When one is born again they are not perfect. They need to be perfected. What they are though is no longer rebellious to God. The rebellion has ceased and in its place is a willingness to yield to the instruction of God whereby one may grow.
get your stories straight skinski.....you're slick:cool:

i'm watching you tweak your doctrine....you're dangerous. but not invisible.

well, i have to go shopping. but when i get back, KIDS! it's......

StoryTime with Skinski.

Chapter 1:

perfection, purity and sinlessness before salvation.

(dontcha just hate that the internet is forever?):rolleyes:
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#80
How come Judaism does not use Psalm 51:5 to teach Original Sin? Judaism denies such an absurd doctrine because they know sin is a choice.
how come jews in judaism aren't saved?
LOL.

well, this prolly goes somewhere into StoryTime with Skinski Chapter 1:

in the beginning. maybe the preamble?

(it's a nasty job wading through your junk. but somebody has to do it).