Well guys., guess what? It's already a fact that not all of us Christians here on CC agree on many things concerning the Bible. But the difference between some and some others is this..... we don't need to tear down other brothers and sisters in Christ in order to justify ourselves or our beliefs. God is more than able to persuade us that He is able to keep what we have committed to Him.
Sooo, I will continue to post what the Lord has shown me despite some opposition and I'll do it with joy in my heart and conviction of the righteousness Jesus has given me. Why? because Jesus is our qualification.
you have a sly way of tearing down others joaniemarie who are being straightforward with you
no one has called you a heretic or accused you of heresy. we point out the many errors of the false teacher Joseph Prince and you defend him by trying to make it seem we are attacking you. no one here is that dumb joaniemaire. stop playing the innocent here who just wants to talk about Jesus because that is not going on
do you remember the last time you actually did talk about Jesus here without doing so via a post from your teachers Ellis and or Prince? do you not start these threads with so called devotions from these people? well we all know that you do. so, the op is actually about what they teach...with Prince in particular appearing more than Ellis in your op's
stop trying to make it seem anything else is going on here other than people being disgusted with the erroneous and egregious errors of the people whose teachings you insist on posting
you talk about discussing...but now you have used the word schism...so it is discussing if you do it, but if we do not agree with Joseph Prince or Ellis, then we are creating a schism
you throw words around that have actual meaning...serious words such as 'we do no credit to Jesus by accusing our brothers and sisters in Christ of heresy just because they don't see verses exactly the same as we do'
you obviously mean those who do not agree with Prince, even though you said 'we', your reference is not to yourself
the Bible is not verses joaniemarie. it is the word of God and should be handled with respect and neither Prince nor Ellis do so
the letters in the New Testament were not written in chapters and verses. they were letters. picking and choosing certain verses, what false teachers excel at doing, is how you are learning to study.
the word schism does not even apply in a chat forum. this is a discussion forum and not a church. this is not a church about to split because of a schism, it is a discussion forum and should you leave tomorrow or should any one of us leave, things will go on the same as they did before, during and after
I don't expect you to see that, or to acknowledge what I said regarding your accusatory posts to those who point out the errors in the false teachings of those you seem to favor
some of your posts to those who respond in your threads are as false as the teachers you appear to choose
using words like schism to describe a refutation of a false teacher in a public Bible discussion forum, on the internet, with people from different countries, seems to indicate you believe that you are somehow contributing to the good of the world here and those who disagree are damaging everyone
joaniemarie...I would suggest to you that if you actually believed such a thing, you would apply this to yourself first and if you actually just wanted to discuss God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit, you would do so without creating the atmosphere for disagreement that you provide when you put Prince on a pulpit and then sit back and wait for the response
you know what the response will be.
we are not discussing God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit. we are discussing the twisting of the word of God by Joseph Prince and you don't like it one bit
that is all that is going on here. we are not discussing you or creating a schism
I won't answer whatever long and tedious response you may care to provide to this post because it is burdensome to try and reason with someone who accuses and falsely so and says things that have no bearing on the actual discussion