Killing and the Christian

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

ABMF

Guest
#1
[FONT=verdana, geneva, lucida, lucida grande, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]This is an online post that all could review and [/FONT][FONT=verdana, geneva, lucida, lucida grande, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]benefit[/FONT][FONT=verdana, geneva, lucida, lucida grande, arial, helvetica, sans-serif] from. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana, geneva, lucida, lucida grande, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]"Killing and the Christian[/FONT]
The principle of Mat. 5:38-48 is nonresistance toward all. No killing or wounding or returning evil by a Christian. This is what father God had always intended in the old and new testaments.
There is no evidence in the Bible to indicate that the disciples followed any course but nonresistance even when Paul and the Roman emperors broke into their homes to kill whole families.
Matthew 5:38-48
New King James Version (NKJV)
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. 40 If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also. 41 And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two. 42 Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to borrow from you do not turn away.

43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you,[c] 45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet your brethren[d] only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors[e] do so? 48 Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.

Gen. 4:7-8: Cain made the wrong sacrifice which opened the door to sin of hatred, jealousy and finally killing. The sacrifice Christians are to make is in Romans 12:1-2. When they do not do this and yield to the Holy Spirit training as to what this means they will do what is right in their own sight. This often results in operating in expediency (armed guards in churches, killing in 'just' wars) which is operating on the knowledge of good and evil not the Holy Spirit of Life. Note what Jesus says in Mat. 26:52. The disciples surely had a reason to wound and kill to defend each other and Jesus. Also Rev 13:7-10 The antichrist is killing saints and they are to follow nonresistance.

Genesis 4: 23-24 tells of a killing for a wounding possibly to save his own life. He indicates he realizes this was wrong with the statement he makes about Cain in vs 24.

Genesis 9:6-7 is a clear statement on killing. The exception being capital punishment (Old and New testaments) and the OT wars of God's judgments on nations whose cup of iniquity was full. Acts 17:25-27 speaks of all being one blood. God's heart at this time is that men be saved not killed or injured, especially not by carnal Christians defending themselves or others.

King David is a type of Christ and was called by God a man after His own heart. However, Father God told him he could not build the temple because he had shed much blood on the earth in His sight, even though these were nations under judgment in wars God had directed. See I Chronicles 22:7-8 and I Chronicles 28:3 and 1 Kings 5:3.

What is Jesus' view of "just" wars and physical violence? Luke 9:51-56. The disciples did not know what spirit they were of! They thought they had a "good" and Biblical response (see Elisha).
Luke 9:51-56
New King James Version (NKJV)
51 Now it came to pass, when the time had come for Him to be received up, that He steadfastly set His face to go to Jerusalem, 52 and sent messengers before His face. And as they went, they entered a village of the Samaritans, to prepare for Him. 53 But they did not receive Him, because His face was set for the journey to Jerusalem. 54 And when His disciples James and John saw this, they said, “Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them, just as Elijah did?”[a]
55 But He turned and rebuked them, and said, “You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. 56 For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives but to save them.”[c] And they went to another village.
Christians who either do not have the Holy Spirit or do not submit to His training in this area end up using 'expediency' or OT justifications for their violence which there is none there either.

Every non believer that a Christian kills ends up in the pit which was the point of what Jesus said in Luke 9:55-56. Then after you wound them, or talk to the ones who are left that are not killed, it makes it hard to tell them about the love of the Lord.

Some justify war by saying the US is a Christian nation. There is no such thing. There are nations with the King's citizens in them being salt and light, not acting like the world and serving its Godless systems, or relying on the expediency of armed guards in churches. see Ezra 8:21-23.

At this point some anecdotal evidence is in order. Nate Saint and those with him who died rather than defend themselves or each other is an example. I will say they were told by leadership not to go and may be the reason for no Divine protection.

On Killing by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman has some good points. After the battle of Gettysburg (the South lost) 100's of rifles were gathered up from the battlefield. Many were double and triple loaded. The reluctance to kill with an individual weapon seemed to be the reason. To cover their reluctance they did not fire but "reloaded". He goes on with more evidence throughout history to support the point, and the ways the military and our society has overcome this.

Also he establishes the killing as a cause of PTSD. His ways to overcome this are junk but his evidence is compelling. This is sowing and reaping for violation of God:s laws. PTSD is overcome by repentance and deliverance. How an airborne ranger and Delta force operator got set free when we had the privilege of ministering deliverance to him is an interesting story.

General S. L. A. Marshall also makes the same point with his unique method of interviewing WW II, Korean War and Vietnam soldiers right after close combat. He interviewed the handful of survivors of Able CO. that hit the Dog Green sector on Omaha Beach. He talked with about 20 men not killed or wounded of over 200. It was the beach that Saving Private Ryan tried to show at the start of the film. He discovered a very high percentage that did not fire their personal weapons in these wars except Vietnam. By then the military had devised training to partially overcome the God given resistance to killing.

In Vietnam one platoon of less than 30 men stood off a force of 200 very determined NVA all night with no artillery and some of the time with no illumination. Near the end, having very little ammo left, knowing they were as good as dead they just all started laughing! Captured NVA later said this really affected their morale. The US troops had the resistance to killing removed and the NVA didn't. This platoon was mostly just a regular bunch of draftees that had not even seen "the elephant" yet.

This training is so effective, along with the conditioning to violence that our society provides, that troops will assault immediately when ambushed by a superior well protected force and win! In training the same men thought to themselves, never will I do this! The other force still had that bothersome inhibition.

The US Marines seem to be most open about telling recruits the truth, and perhaps best at it. They tell all their 'boots' that they will make them into trained killers.
Who would Jesus shoot? Or tell His disciples to shoot?"-Lesjude
 
Mar 15, 2014
325
1
0
#2
Not many on this site will agree with Jesus' teaching of loving your enemies, and praying for those who persecute you; ALL ENEMIES. One guy said this only applies when you are NOT at war; ridiculous.

This is one on the difficult teachings of Jesus. I believe him. What about the rest who give him lip service?

"Why do you call me Lord, Lord and not do what I tell you?" Luke 6:46
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,713
3,651
113
#3
Jesus spoke kindly of Centurions and John the Baptist told the inquiring soldiers...

And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we do? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any falsely; and be content with your wages.
(Luk 3:14)


He never told them not to fight and quit being a soldier.
 
Mar 15, 2014
325
1
0
#4
crossnote, What trsanslation did you use? What you quoted is not match up with KJV or ESV which I have?
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
#5
That was KJV. You must use some other.
 
Mar 15, 2014
325
1
0
#6
Jesus spoke kindly of Centurions and John the Baptist told the inquiring soldiers...

And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we do? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any falsely; and be content with your wages.
(Luk 3:14)

He never told them not to fight and quit being a soldier.
What do you think "do violence to no man" means? Does it mean to kill them?
 
Jan 6, 2014
991
27
0
#7
justifying war and killing is impossible to do, If we are to live as Jesus lived. The apostles never killed anyone. God is a mighty fortress to his children, we do not need weapons of war and armies of men to protect us, We have God as our protection.
It was not until christianity became the religion of the Roman Empire that teachings of 'just war', and christians being soldiers of the state were taught. The early church fathers were opposed to christians being soldiers of the state before the 4th century.
 
N

Nick1939

Guest
#8
Not many on this site will agree with Jesus' teaching of loving your enemies, and praying for those who persecute you; ALL ENEMIES. One guy said this only applies when you are NOT at war; ridiculous.

This is one on the difficult teachings of Jesus. I believe him. What about the rest who give him lip service?

"Why do you call me Lord, Lord and not do what I tell you?" Luke 6:46
I agree, but there are many that don't like Luke 6:46, just as there is many other scriptures that they don't like,Which they
twist to their own destruction 2 Pet 3:16. Like 1st Tim 3:16 GOD was manifested in the flesh,KJV, but the Greek has
" He who was manifested in the flesh," Really which one of the two was manifested in the flesh? JESUS or GOD THE FATHER?
and many such mistranslations they use to create the Christian divisions we have today and it will get worse yet,may the
Lord step in and help us and as Isaiah say 53:1 Lord who have believed our report and to whom the arm of the Lord is
been revealed,? The world is in trouble no wonder why the great tribulation is coming .watch out inhabitants of the earth
repent before is too late.. God bless....
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,713
3,651
113
#9
What do you think "do violence to no man" means? Does it mean to kill them?
it means unauthorized use of force. Here is an example of authorized...

For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
(Rom 13:3-4)

...and that sword is not for spanking.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#10
To understand the principles of God and how it applies to war, first you have to study all the wars of the Old Testament, then relate each to what the New Testament explains about them.

Everything about God principles must be looked at through the principle that is behind all else: love.

In OT times, there were times that God told them to go to war, it was a holy war with God's purposes. There were few of them. Joshua was told to go to war, and then victory was assured if there was faith. We are supposed to protect our family in the Lord from evil, even if we have to go to war to do it, but love has to be the reason for it, and the goal saving life, not of taking it.

After we learn these basic principles, we must go to the New Testament to see how scripture tells us it is to be carried through in our times.
 
Jan 6, 2012
1,233
10
0
#11
ABMF, this is one of those topics that needs to be discussed until [Christianity] reaches some kind of resolution or common agreement. I agree that God never intended for us to kill anything (animals) not to mention fellow humans; however, after the Fall, a major imperfection was added to God's will called God's 'permissive will' (which was what allowed a man to marry more than one wife, a person to divorce their spouse, killing heathens in the OT, etc.). This imperfect addition doesn't even make the Rom. 12:2 list: "Be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God." With the Fall, sometimes imperfect things become 'permissible'... like war.

Having said that, I believe that there's no time (or there has been no time since the days God charged Israel to take Canaan, etc.) when war was needed, inevitable, or the only option. Killing sometimes happens by mistake or self defense; but when you have to plan it before doing it (war), then you're overlooking other options.

ABMF, you're right about PTSD in relation to sowing and reaping. I think that finding out why people kill willingly in the military can shed light on some of these issues. I used to work at a veteran hospital. The guy I worked with told me, when I first started, that I was going to meet a lot of veterans who felt entitled to benefits. The spiritual atmosphere of the hospital was oppressive! One day, ready to QUIT, I asked the Lord what made the atmosphere so oppressive. His response? "Pride." I started to 'get it'. It made sense. There are many things that can drive people to kill or justify wanting to kill; pride (thinking you're actually more valuable as a person than someone else is) is numero uno. It was Jesus who told His disciples to buy swords toward the end of His life; but they (Peter) used it in pride, therefore Jesus disagreed (which confused them as they still didn't know 'what spirit they were of', and, 'not allowed to defend themselves', they took off). God slayed Ananias and Sapphira through the same Peter (who was finally 'of the right spirit' and so no longer thought "we're right and you're wrong") and said through Solomon that there is "a time to kill". The trick is only God has the right to say who goes and when. Meanwhile, Christians shouldn't take a passive stance in any issue and shouldn't shy away from owning guns; however, we should also strive to be of 'the right spirit' which is neither an itchy finger nor is it a bumper sticker that brags of being anti-guns. The truth is usually found in the middle of things (a tightrope walker is a great example of this) where there is balance or 'where the balance [actually] is'.

Just saw your post, RedTent. I agree.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
#12
This is an online post that all could review and benefit from.

"Killing and the Christian
The principle of Mat. 5:38-48 is nonresistance toward all. No killing or wounding or returning evil by a Christian. This is what father God had always intended in the old and new testaments.
There is no evidence in the Bible to indicate that the disciples followed any course but nonresistance even when Paul and the Roman emperors broke into their homes to kill whole families.
Matthew 5:38-48
New King James Version (NKJV)
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. 40 If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also. 41 And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two. 42 Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to borrow from you do not turn away.

43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you,[c] 45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet your brethren[d] only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors[e] do so? 48 Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.

Gen. 4:7-8: Cain made the wrong sacrifice which opened the door to sin of hatred, jealousy and finally killing. The sacrifice Christians are to make is in Romans 12:1-2. When they do not do this and yield to the Holy Spirit training as to what this means they will do what is right in their own sight. This often results in operating in expediency (armed guards in churches, killing in 'just' wars) which is operating on the knowledge of good and evil not the Holy Spirit of Life. Note what Jesus says in Mat. 26:52. The disciples surely had a reason to wound and kill to defend each other and Jesus. Also Rev 13:7-10 The antichrist is killing saints and they are to follow nonresistance.

Genesis 4: 23-24 tells of a killing for a wounding possibly to save his own life. He indicates he realizes this was wrong with the statement he makes about Cain in vs 24.

Genesis 9:6-7 is a clear statement on killing. The exception being capital punishment (Old and New testaments) and the OT wars of God's judgments on nations whose cup of iniquity was full. Acts 17:25-27 speaks of all being one blood. God's heart at this time is that men be saved not killed or injured, especially not by carnal Christians defending themselves or others.

King David is a type of Christ and was called by God a man after His own heart. However, Father God told him he could not build the temple because he had shed much blood on the earth in His sight, even though these were nations under judgment in wars God had directed. See I Chronicles 22:7-8 and I Chronicles 28:3 and 1 Kings 5:3.

What is Jesus' view of "just" wars and physical violence? Luke 9:51-56. The disciples did not know what spirit they were of! They thought they had a "good" and Biblical response (see Elisha).
Luke 9:51-56
New King James Version (NKJV)
51 Now it came to pass, when the time had come for Him to be received up, that He steadfastly set His face to go to Jerusalem, 52 and sent messengers before His face. And as they went, they entered a village of the Samaritans, to prepare for Him. 53 But they did not receive Him, because His face was set for the journey to Jerusalem. 54 And when His disciples James and John saw this, they said, “Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them, just as Elijah did?”[a]
55 But He turned and rebuked them, and said, “You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. 56 For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives but to save them.”[c] And they went to another village.
Christians who either do not have the Holy Spirit or do not submit to His training in this area end up using 'expediency' or OT justifications for their violence which there is none there either.

Every non believer that a Christian kills ends up in the pit which was the point of what Jesus said in Luke 9:55-56. Then after you wound them, or talk to the ones who are left that are not killed, it makes it hard to tell them about the love of the Lord.

Some justify war by saying the US is a Christian nation. There is no such thing. There are nations with the King's citizens in them being salt and light, not acting like the world and serving its Godless systems, or relying on the expediency of armed guards in churches. see Ezra 8:21-23.

At this point some anecdotal evidence is in order. Nate Saint and those with him who died rather than defend themselves or each other is an example. I will say they were told by leadership not to go and may be the reason for no Divine protection.

On Killing by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman has some good points. After the battle of Gettysburg (the South lost) 100's of rifles were gathered up from the battlefield. Many were double and triple loaded. The reluctance to kill with an individual weapon seemed to be the reason. To cover their reluctance they did not fire but "reloaded". He goes on with more evidence throughout history to support the point, and the ways the military and our society has overcome this.

Also he establishes the killing as a cause of PTSD. His ways to overcome this are junk but his evidence is compelling. This is sowing and reaping for violation of God:s laws. PTSD is overcome by repentance and deliverance. How an airborne ranger and Delta force operator got set free when we had the privilege of ministering deliverance to him is an interesting story.

General S. L. A. Marshall also makes the same point with his unique method of interviewing WW II, Korean War and Vietnam soldiers right after close combat. He interviewed the handful of survivors of Able CO. that hit the Dog Green sector on Omaha Beach. He talked with about 20 men not killed or wounded of over 200. It was the beach that Saving Private Ryan tried to show at the start of the film. He discovered a very high percentage that did not fire their personal weapons in these wars except Vietnam. By then the military had devised training to partially overcome the God given resistance to killing.

In Vietnam one platoon of less than 30 men stood off a force of 200 very determined NVA all night with no artillery and some of the time with no illumination. Near the end, having very little ammo left, knowing they were as good as dead they just all started laughing! Captured NVA later said this really affected their morale. The US troops had the resistance to killing removed and the NVA didn't. This platoon was mostly just a regular bunch of draftees that had not even seen "the elephant" yet.

This training is so effective, along with the conditioning to violence that our society provides, that troops will assault immediately when ambushed by a superior well protected force and win! In training the same men thought to themselves, never will I do this! The other force still had that bothersome inhibition.

The US Marines seem to be most open about telling recruits the truth, and perhaps best at it. They tell all their 'boots' that they will make them into trained killers.
Who would Jesus shoot? Or tell His disciples to shoot?"-Lesjude


You are right about the Marine Corp as I know all to well personally....Having said that, I will not stand by and watch my wife be raped or my kid killed and will plead the mercy and blood of Christ when I stand before God, because I will apply extreme lethal prejudice to protect my family from a bloody and deceitful rapist/killer and anyone else who tries to molest my family in any way shape and or form!
 
3

3Scoreand10

Guest
#13
You are right about the Marine Corp as I know all to well personally....Having said that, I will not stand by and watch my wife be raped or my kid killed and will plead the mercy and blood of Christ when I stand before God, because I will apply extreme lethal prejudice to protect my family from a bloody and deceitful rapist/killer and anyone else who tries to molest my family in any way shape and or form!
I will do the same brother!
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#15
Jesus said "turn the other cheek" but after that He left no instruction. The first time Jesus sent out the disciples, He said take no money nor sword" to show them that God had their back. The next time, He told them to take sword. Self defense is a God given right.
 
A

ABMF

Guest
#16
Jesus said "turn the other cheek" but after that He left no instruction. The first time Jesus sent out the disciples, He said take no money nor sword" to show them that God had their back. The next time, He told them to take sword. Self defense is a God given right.
They knew what He meant after He arose. The weapons of our warfare are not carnal. Matthew 5 6 and 7 are true. Jesus would not double speak. He isn't a politician. When peter pulled the sword to defend, Jesus rebuked him then healed the guy he wounded.