Once saved always saved (OSAS) debunked

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
14,523
5,268
113
62
I asked a question. Rather than answer it, you ask me questions. So you heard my question but didn't know what it meant. Now you want me to answer so your understanding will be opened.
So it is possible to hear and not understand and to see and not perceive.
Even if I explain the answer, you still may not understand it. Understanding is not in the seeing but in the opening.
It's called revelation.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
14,523
5,268
113
62
That's ok. I just wanted to make sure that was being led to be coming closer to the full assurance, as is my hope, rather than to any conclusion that might bring said assurance into question.
I believe in eternal security.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
7,581
3,166
113
Salvation was brought to fruition by Christ's faith, not ours. Our faith comes as a result of His faith. It is not something that
can be "accepted" in order to invoke - true faith transforms itself into our reality in spite of us.
I know, that's your story and you're stickin' to it.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
14,523
5,268
113
62
Far be it from me to waste anyone's time.:sneaky:
I apologize for the way it has come across. I see this as a very fruitful conversation. And I'm glad always to give an answer for the hope that lies within me. I was merely trying to make the first point before I moved on.
And personally, I have found our discussions to date thought provoking and helpful.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
7,581
3,166
113
Of all the gifts of the Spirit, why is faith the only one that's a "work" if exercised? What about "tongues?" If speaking in "tongues" is a work, we've got a whole lot of people working for salvation.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,150
437
83
I know, that's your story and you're stickin' to it.
Yup

[Gal 2:16 KJV] 16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
14,523
5,268
113
62
Of all the gifts of the Spirit, why is faith the only one that's a "work" if exercised? What about "tongues?" If speaking in "tongues" is a work, we've got a whole lot of people working for salvation.
I think the distinction he is making is that our faith is a work because we produce it and the faith provided by the Spirit is provided by God on our behalf.
 
Dec 21, 2020
1,825
474
83
Of all the gifts of the Spirit, why is faith the only one that's a "work" if exercised? What about "tongues?" If speaking in "tongues" is a work, we've got a whole lot of people working for salvation.
Tongues is not a work, it is one of the manifestations of the gift of the Holy Spirit. When people decide to believe the gospel, they receive the gift of the Holy Spirit, making them saved, and THEN they can use the manifestations of the gift. Speaking in tongues is not "working for salvation." A person cannot speak in tongues UNTIL he is saved.

I know... different topic for a different thread...
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
7,581
3,166
113
Yup

[Gal 2:16 KJV] 16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
That's why you should jettison your KJV.
 
Feb 5, 2023
698
230
43
One good thing coming out of this whole thing is those who insist Jesus saved everyone and Universalism is the gospel can not insist OSAS is false.

:)
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,678
113
Hi BillG,

I don't know if this is your website or not, but I noticed an error on the one quoted above where the author stated the below:

"unmerited love and favor of God which is the spring and source of all benefits men receive from Him, including especially His assistance given man for his regeneration or sanctification. (Grace is) a virtue from God influencing man, renewing his heart and restraining him from sin. (Compare this more "modern Webster" with Noah Webster's original definition of grace) "

According to the author, grace is unmerited love and favor, but for something to be unmerited, it would require absolutely nothing from us, not even faith, and it wouldn't matter if we sinned in the first place, and the entire point of Christ's sacrifice would be defeated and was wholly unnecessary since we have unmerited love and favor.

So if you make grace = unmerited love and favor, it basically creates a Universalist's doctrine where nothing is required to stay in God's grace, not even a sacrificial lamb, or faith, or anything at all and it's a license to sin as well. Requiring my faith is putting a merit on that grace and contradicts the idea of "unmerited favor."

So my bottom line is, grace doesn't mean favor without merit. That isn't what the definition is in any lexicon or dictionary.
 

BillG

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2017
8,879
4,334
113
Hi BillG,

I don't know if this is your website or not, but I noticed an error on the one quoted above where the author stated the below:

"unmerited love and favor of God which is the spring and source of all benefits men receive from Him, including especially His assistance given man for his regeneration or sanctification. (Grace is) a virtue from God influencing man, renewing his heart and restraining him from sin. (Compare this more "modern Webster" with Noah Webster's original definition of grace) "

According to the author, grace is unmerited love and favor, but for something to be unmerited, it would require absolutely nothing from us, not even faith, and it wouldn't matter if we sinned in the first place, and the entire point of Christ's sacrifice would be defeated and was wholly unnecessary since we have unmerited love and favor.

So if you make grace = unmerited love and favor, it basically creates a Universalist's doctrine where nothing is required to stay in God's grace, not even a sacrificial lamb, or faith, or anything at all and it's a license to sin as well. Requiring my faith is putting a merit on that grace and contradicts the idea of "unmerited favor."

So my bottom line is, grace doesn't mean favor without merit. That isn't what the definition is in any lexicon or dictionary.
Hi Runningman.

Sorry maybe I should have clarified the links.

No it's not my website.

Please post the definition from the lexicon or dictionary or the links you use so we can all have a look.

I disagree with your fourth paragraph.

Grace does not promote universalism.

Anyone who believes that grace is a license to sin should read Romans 5-6.
If they still believe that then shake the rise of your feet.

I am happy with my understanding of grace and I can tell you that I am not a universalist.
Further it's the grace of God that teaches us to be like Jesus.

Titus 2:11-12

Trained by Saving Grace
11 For the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men, 12 teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly in the present age,

Titus 3:4-7
4 But when the kindness and the love of God our Savior toward man appeared, 5 not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit, 6 whom He poured out on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Savior, 7 that having been justified by His grace we should become heirs according to the hope of eternal life.
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,678
113
Please post the definition from the lexicon or dictionary or the links you use so we can all have a look.
The word for grace in Ephesians 2:8 means this:

G5485 charis
Strong's Concordance
charis: grace, kindness
Original Word: χάρις, ιτος, ἡ
Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
Transliteration: charis
Phonetic Spelling: (khar'-ece)
Definition: grace, kindness
Usage: (a) grace, as a gift or blessing brought to man by Jesus Christ, (b) favor, (c) gratitude, thanks, (d) a favor, kindness.

So there's nothing about grace being unmerited there. It doesn't exist in the context and the fact that one can fall from grace is further proof that grace isn't unmerited.

Galatians 5
4You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.

So just using Galatians 5:4 as an example, there is a condition attached to grace, meaning there is something you and I can do to actually not be in God's grace. That's merited grace.

There's more examples, but that's one.

English dictionaries also define grace as favor, kindness, or goodwill with the leeway to make mistakes, keep the grace, with the expectation continual effort is being applied to stay in said grace.

In Christian theology, grace can mean "unmerited favor" but that's actually a denominational teaching rather than a Biblical teaching as I just showed you with Galatians 5:4.

So Christian theology isn't necessarily something explicitly Biblical. "Unmerited grace" is no exception.
 
Last edited:

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
3,850
1,530
113
You argue Universalism. Jesus didn't die and save all.

What I am trying to understand..... is why those schooled in this school of thought/dogma always, and I mean always come back

with the same ole tired, devoid of thought response.

Some thing must happen to the mind of people who adopt or are raised in this dogma.

It is truly disturbing and scary this "group mind think."