Oneness Petecostalism

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#21
I went and search for the meaning of "modalism" and found it to be this: Modalism is a non-Trinitarian heresy claiming that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are simply different modes of God and not distinct persons within the Godhead.

If I gave you the impression that there are not three in the Godhead, then I did not express my thoughts correctly, although I did mention God the Father and God the Word in my post. There is three in the Godhead. 1) God the Father, 2) God the Word, 3) God the Holy Spirit. To me, when I only say "God", I am speaking of the Godhead, perhaps that is where you misunderstand me?
Then, by definition, that is not Oneness as you believe there is more than one person in the Godhead. If you believe in the Trinity but just expressed it in terms that are unfamiliar to me then apologies, but if you claim oneness I don't think you can honestly say you are a Oneness believer.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#22
Then, by definition, that is not Oneness as you believe there is more than one person in the Godhead. If you believe in the Trinity but just expressed it in terms that are unfamiliar to me then apologies, but if you claim oneness I don't think you can honestly say you are a Oneness believer.
This is what I proclaim:

There is but one God, and no other besides Him.
the LORD (Jehovah) is my Redeemer.
There is but One Lord.
Jesus Christ is the Lord.
If Jesus Christ means "Jehovah is salvation, the Messiah", then, indeed, Jesus Christ is my Lord, my Redeemer, my God.

But, He is not God the Father, seeing that if He was, then when He died, all things would have ceased to exist.
But, Jesus was the very essense of God the Father in bodily form.
But, it is certain that He is the second person of God (of the Godhead), as the Word is God (of the Godhead).

To be certain, there are three manifestations of the Godhead 1) God the Father, 2) God the Word, 3) God the Holy Spirit, but there is only one God.

I hope I have made myself clear as to what I proclaim?
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#23
But, He is not God the Father, seeing that if He was, then when He died, all things would have ceased to exist.
Seeing as you can't destroy spirit that wouldn't be true. But It doesn't matter since Christ is not the Father.
But, Jesus was the very essense of God the Father in bodily form.
Now this is where you start to not make sense. Because if Christ is the very essence of the Father, then that essentially makes Christ the Father. Basically you're combining two of the persons, since in your model Christ doesn't seem to be eternally co-existent with the Father.
But, it is certain that He is the second person of God (of the Godhead), as the Word is God (of the Godhead).
Ties into above.

To be certain, there are three manifestations of the Godhead 1) God the Father, 2) God the Word, 3) God the Holy Spirit, but there is only one God.
So The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are manifestations of the Godhead? Once again this leads us back to a slightly tweaked version of Modalism.
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#24
im sure scripture says the Godhead is a mystery and the epistles spent little time on it for that simple fact. Man on the other hand, makes a doctrinal issue which brings dis unity, division and at times the worst out in people whenever theology is viewed as greater than who all the theology speaks about, God the Father, His Son, Holy Spirit - "Godhead" - mystery

abc christianity - non salvation issues whether one thinks His one or three, its a mystery as they said lol
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#25
Now this is where you start to not make sense. Because if Christ is the very essence of the Father, then that essentially makes Christ the Father. Basically you're combining two of the persons, since in your model Christ doesn't seem to be eternally co-existent with the Father.
Please read Heb 1:3. In short it states: "... the express image of His person...". It makes Christ the representation of the Father to us. Did not Jesus say something along this line, "He who has seen me has seen the Father..."? So basically, they are two separate persons known as the Father and the Word, but they are of one nature.
It was God the Word who became flesh, and from such, the Christ was introdused into the world. There was no Messiah until the birth of the Son, but the Word has always existed and does co-exist with the Father. They of the OT always looked forward to the day that their Messiah would be born.

But, I understand that this is not your point when you said, "your...Christ doesn't seem to be eternally co-existent with the Father." But, if I say that Jesus was God the Word incarnated, then does that not imply that the Word is eteranlly co-existent with the Father and the Spirit?

Do not get me wrong, but I think there is confusion about the titles belonging to each of the three individuals of the Godhead. You say that Christ is eternal and co-exist with the Father. I say that the Word is eternal and co-exist with the Father, but that the Word also took upon Himself the titles Christ, Son, Mediatator, Priest, ...etc, when He became flesh and fulfilled God the Father's salvational plan. So, we are talking about the same Person, but with different titles.

So The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are manifestations of the Godhead? Once again this leads us back to a slightly tweaked version of Modalism.
Is there not but one God? Is there not but one Lord? Are they not all three One?
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#26
im sure scripture says the Godhead is a mystery and the epistles spent little time on it for that simple fact. Man on the other hand, makes a doctrinal issue which brings dis unity, division and at times the worst out in people whenever theology is viewed as greater than who all the theology speaks about, God the Father, His Son, Holy Spirit - "Godhead" - mystery

abc christianity - non salvation issues whether one thinks His one or three, its a mystery as they said lol

I am truly not trying to doctrinally argue, but as each is given from the Spirit, so it is that I find interest in DEBATING, never arguing, about this mystery. I agree with you that it does bring out the worse in people, and I hope this debate will continue in love and not in strive. And since it is not an issue of salvation, then there shall be no harm in a simple conversing about our God.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#27
im sure scripture says the Godhead is a mystery and the epistles spent little time on it for that simple fact. Man on the other hand, makes a doctrinal issue which brings dis unity, division and at times the worst out in people whenever theology is viewed as greater than who all the theology speaks about, God the Father, His Son, Holy Spirit - "Godhead" - mystery

abc christianity - non salvation issues whether one thinks His one or three, its a mystery as they said lol
I would definitly say the Trinity is one of the abc's of Christianity so to speak.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#28
Is there not but one God? Is there not but one Lord? Are they not all three One?
This is the part I want to zero in on. Basically you seem to have taken the Trinity and flipped it on it's head. Instead of a Godhead made up of three distinct eternally co-existent persons you have a Godhead which manifested itself in three divine persons.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#29
This is the part I want to zero in on. Basically you seem to have taken the Trinity and flipped it on it's head. Instead of a Godhead made up of three distinct eternally co-existent persons you have a Godhead which manifested itself in three divine persons.
Would you mind going to What is the Godhead?
This is exactely what I am trying to say. I know my words are hard to understand, and I am sorry for any misunderstandings.
 
S

Shwagga

Guest
#30
Absolutely, it was the Word who became flesh. And who was the Word if not "The Word of the LORD" of the OT? Is He not then the "God said" of the OT? He, the Word, was there before creation and through whom God the Father made the ages. So, indeed, it is the eternal Word which speaks these words before returning to His former state of having the same glory as the Father has, seeing that the Word is God. The Word never ceased to be God when He took upon Himself flesh, but took upon Himself the title Son, as God the Father did take upon Himself the title Father, but yet never ceased to be God.
Are you saying that God shared His glory with His speech? Are you making a distinction between God and His words? When you speak and words come out of your mouth, is that still you or an entirely different person?

The text is quite obvious, it's a conversation between two eternal Persons, which you can determine by all the personal pronouns being used, the adverb "together" and prepositions such as "with" in the context of "with You", clearly making a distinction between the one speaking and the one being spoken to.

So if you could just clarify your position here, do you believe that "the Word" is somehow separate from God and that God shared His glory with ...His words?

Thanks.
 
I

IMINJC

Guest
#31
prophecyman


I am what you would refer to as a Trinitarian, I believe that there is ONE GOD and He is clearly revealed in scripture as three personages, Father, Son and Holy Spirit and these three personages are the one God. No you can't find the word Trinity in the Bible, but the word was correctly created to describe how the Lord Himself revealed His own existance to us. How simple it would have been for a God who existed only in one person as "Oneness" says, to reveal Himself in that way. Why would He risk the confusion of His very existence by allowing for example; "The Father to speak out of heaven".."The Holy Spirit to descend from Heaven "in the form of a dove" and "The Son to be in the water." When you consider all other scriptures that clearly show the separate distinction of the three personages, this is a clear picture of why the word Trinity was created. What I'm trying to say is that the word Trinity wasn't created to forge something that wasn't clearly revealed in scripture.
The true diety of the God Head is really a simple matter that has been staring us in the face the entire time. I know God is three persons but yet ONE for one reason. God made man not only in His image but He made him in His likeness ...So..that means that when we look at the image of man, we see the image of God. It also means that man is made like Him, meaning whatever His essence is so is man's, whatever His make up is, thats what our make up is...So if God is really three persons but yet one God...man has to be three persons but yet one man. This is exactly what man is...1.Body 2.Soul 3.Spirit...all three of these personages are addressed in scripture. Man is Body, Soul, and Spirit and they all three have their own will seperate from the other. The reason God is so pwerful is because He is in total agreement with Himself..there is no division in Him.. This is the prayer that Jesus prayed for us...to be ONE as He and the Father are ONE....

John 17:22
And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be ONE, EVEN AS WE ARE ONE:

I submit to you that Jesus is not talking about you and me becoming one, or the Church becoming one together..He is talking about we as individuals becoming one with ourselves, coming into agreement with oursleves as He the Father and the Holy Spirit are. Thats by receiving a new spirit upon our confession of faith in His death ,burrial, and resurrection, and renewing our soul, which is our mind, will and emotions by the Word of God and crucifying our flesh/body to bring it under the control of the Word.
 
The reason I say this is because I don't believe that Jesus would pray a prayer that was impossible for God to answer without violating rules that He has already established. If this was a prayer for us to be one with one another as the Father is One with the Son, according to "Oneness" theology, this is impossible. How can you and I be One on that level. We would have to no longer exist as seperate persons and find a way to fuse our minds together to literally become one mind or one person. God made us seperate individuals from one other and thats what we will always be. We can be in unity, but we will always have seperate expression and existence. There is no way we could be ONE as Jesus and the Father are as described by the "Oneness" doctrine.

Although, when you look at the Trinity concept of the God Head that is presented in scripture..The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit all functioning for one purpose, one cause, and one voice to the degree that they are one single entity. Now you can see how man being body, soul and spirit, pressing in this Christian walk to unify all three parts of himself, having his spirit transformed by Christ upon his confession of faith, then renewing his mind with the Word of God and beating his flesh to also fall under subjection to God's Word..now thats a prayer that if answered we could all benifit from.


 

 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#32
Are you saying that God shared His glory with His speech? Are you making a distinction between God and His words? When you speak and words come out of your mouth, is that still you or an entirely different person?

The text is quite obvious, it's a conversation between two eternal Persons, which you can determine by all the personal pronouns being used, the adverb "together" and prepositions such as "with" in the context of "with You", clearly making a distinction between the one speaking and the one being spoken to.

So if you could just clarify your position here, do you believe that "the Word" is somehow separate from God and that God shared His glory with ...His words?

Thanks.
?????
May I ask how you got the assumption that I was stating that God's speech is Diety? If you would go to where I inserted Biblical references to the exact paragraph, and having looked up the references yourself, you would understand that the Word was with the God in the beginning, and it was through him by which all things were created (John 1:1-3). It was the Word of the LORD who became flesh and is a name for Christ in Rev 19:13.

There are at least 2 in the trinity. Spedifically, God the Father and God the Word. This is in total agreement with "together", "with", and "with You". And when God the Father said, "Let there be...", then God the Word spoke it and it was. This is how Jesus can say that He created all things, because He was and is God the Word. He never ceased being God, but did humble Himself for the sake of God the Father's salvational plan.

God the Father is separate from God the Word, inasmuch as He is separate from God the Holy Spirit, with each having their role in the Godhead. But they are all one God, seeing that there is but one God.

We can say that there is 7 manifestations (note the singular "is") of the Spirit and there is no disbute. But when we say that there is 3 manifestations of God, then confusion occurs. And that is simply because we know there is but one God. And if there is but one God, then we must be content that God the Father is God, God the Word is God, and God the Holy Spirit is God. In so saying, we much agree that God the Word took upon Himself flesh and took the name Jesus upon Himself. Does the taking on of flesh make God the Word not God?
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
#33
May I ask how you got to the assumption
 
A

AtonedFor

Guest
#36
To continue on with post #17 ... re: Jesus being equal to Father God:

John 1:1-2 ----- “In the beginning was the Word (Jesus), and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with (Father) God.”
Heb. 1:8-13 --- “But to the Son He (Father God) says:
‘Your throne, O God, is forever and ever …And:
‘You, LORD, in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of Your hands. They will perish, but You remain
… But to which of the angels has He ever said: ’Sit at My right hand …?’ ”
John 14:11 --- “Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father in Me”
John 20:28 --- “And Thomas answered and said to Him, ‘My Lord and my God!’ ”
Acts 2:36 ------ “Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God
has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
Acts 7:59 ------ “And they stoned Stephen as he was calling upon God and saying,
‘Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.’ ”
Romans 9:5 -- “Christ came, who is over all, the eternally blessed God. Amen.”
Philippians 2:10-11 “at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
of those in heaven, and of those of earth, and of those under the earth,
and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord”
Titus 2:13 ------ “our great God and Savior Jesus Christ”
1 John 5:20 --- “… and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ.
This is the true God and eternal life.”
Jude 4 --- “the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ.”
 
A

AtonedFor

Guest
#37
To be certain, there are three manifestations of the Godhead
1) God the Father, 2) God the Word, 3) God the Holy Spirit, but there is only one God.
Yes, "Manifestations" is the correct terminology (instead of "Persons")
... because isn't everything (everyone) in the spirit world sexless?
However, God desiring to have a personal relationship with us,
thought it necessary to present Itself as masculine.
Could we comfortably have a personal relationship with an "It"?

Also, to clarify, the man called "Jesus" was a combination of:
OUTSIDE: a human
INSIDE: the Logos (Word), the Second Manifestation of the Triune Godhead
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A

AtonedFor

Guest
#38
There can only be one Savior, one first and last, one God who is before all, and in all that are born of the water and the Spirit,
baptized in the Holy Spirit by Yeshua himself.

We have Missionarys in 192 countries, and Churches all over the world. BTW, I don't like the term Church... its so Catholic,
but I rather call the elect "The Assembly of the Lord".
Approximately what percentage of your assemblies would you say speak in tongues?
.
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#39
I am truly not trying to doctrinally argue, but as each is given from the Spirit, so it is that I find interest in DEBATING, never arguing, about this mystery. I agree with you that it does bring out the worse in people, and I hope this debate will continue in love and not in strive. And since it is not an issue of salvation, then there shall be no harm in a simple conversing about our God.

i like you bro

yes absolutely right bro, reasonng about things is so different to debating though, debating is entering a conversation from a fixed viewpoint(hence argue) - leaves no room to be taught by God then if we think we know it all and everyone else wrong.
the only fixed position we need to stand on is the finished work of the cross - Jesus - lamb of God, reconciling us to Him.
 
S

Shwagga

Guest
#40
?????
May I ask how you got the assumption that I was stating that God's speech is Diety? If you would go to where I inserted Biblical references to the exact paragraph, and having looked up the references yourself, you would understand that the Word was with the God in the beginning, and it was through him by which all things were created (John 1:1-3). It was the Word of the LORD who became flesh and is a name for Christ in Rev 19:13.

There are at least 2 in the trinity. Spedifically, God the Father and God the Word. This is in total agreement with "together", "with", and "with You". And when God the Father said, "Let there be...", then God the Word spoke it and it was. This is how Jesus can say that He created all things, because He was and is God the Word. He never ceased being God, but did humble Himself for the sake of God the Father's salvational plan.

God the Father is separate from God the Word, inasmuch as He is separate from God the Holy Spirit, with each having their role in the Godhead. But they are all one God, seeing that there is but one God.

We can say that there is 7 manifestations (note the singular "is") of the Spirit and there is no disbute. But when we say that there is 3 manifestations of God, then confusion occurs. And that is simply because we know there is but one God. And if there is but one God, then we must be content that God the Father is God, God the Word is God, and God the Holy Spirit is God. In so saying, we much agree that God the Word took upon Himself flesh and took the name Jesus upon Himself. Does the taking on of flesh make God the Word not God?
I have no idea why you even responded to my first post. It was a question for those who hold to oneness theology, which you obviously do not hold to.