Pastor John Hagee is an antichrist

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#61
There is no shortage of words that can be expressed by the tongue from a deceitful and desperately wicked heart that is embraced against others. The tongue is full of deadly poison set on fire of hell. It speaks well of some while cursing others and should this be? Bitter and sweet coming from the same fount. That's worse than being an unstable double minded soul.
"Bitter and sweet?" "[W]orse than being an unstable double minded soul?"

Ok ... that's one more reason that no one should follow John Hagee.

1 John 2:9 He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now.

The same video, again, sigh...

[video=youtube;hDh1Vr7qajA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDh1Vr7qajA[/video]
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#62
Do you think that the throne of David was tainted by David's sin that included both adultery and murder? Yet, the Lord will be given that throne and shall reigning over the house of Jacob forever (Luke 1:32,33)? If you were around during the time of king David and had learned of his sin when he was commander and chief, I am sure you would have taken measures to expose him (out him as you have done here) so that others would no longer trust his leadership or anything he had to say including teaching transgressors God's ways (Psalm 51:13).
We know what the scripture say about Saul's anointing. Why wouldn't I treat David in the same way he treated Saul?

1 Sam 10:1
Then Samuel took a vial of oil, and poured [it] upon his head, and kissed him, and said, [Is it] not because the LORD hath anointed thee [to be] captain over his inheritance?

1 Sam 24:8 David also arose afterward, and went out of the cave, and cried after Saul, saying, My lord the king. And when Saul looked behind him, David stooped with his face to the earth, and bowed himself.

I don't know what to call the kind of person that would do such a thing.

A loss for words?
 
B

BradC

Guest
#63
You must seriously have your hand seriously caught in the cookie jar if you're comparing David with John Hagee. :eek:

1 Sam 16:13
Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brethren: and the Spirit of the LORD came upon David from that day forward. So Samuel rose up, and went to Ramah.


His sins are between John Hagee and God.

He committed adultery during his ministry, he's unrepentant, there is no good reason for any clearheaded Christian to follow him. Do you not want him
exposed for some reason?



If they want to deliberately and unrepentantly live in sin, that's between them and God and the evil spirit that's whispering into their itching ears, that's not my issue at all.

This is spiritual warfare--it's not even about John Hagee--it's about
exposing the spirit (step by excruciating step) that is whispering into his ear. It's going to show up in Hagee's writing and speaking style and in the fruits of his work so that's what we're going to look at.

I think that's called basic discernment.
You are not discerning anything, you are exposing or seeking to expose the sin of another to discredit them personally, their ministry that God gave to them and those who have been called and responded to the message that he preaches. Whatever sin there may be, it has been away and to say that he has not repented, who are you to make that claim when his sin is between him and God. Have you not learned anything from the scriptures? He's been ministering the gospel for 50 years and that speaks nothing to you. He does not deny Christ, the work of the cross or the grace and mercy of God. I don't care what Zone has to say, she is not thinking right on this stuff and does not know some very simple doctrine that we are to practice as believers. I could give you at least (6) different doctrines that she violates all the time and she will accuse me of being too much grace oriented. She can live with her legalistic tendencies about being critical of others but she is not fooling those who know and have sound doctrine. It is not good to be puffed up with knowledge because there will never be any good fruit to come out of it and you can mark that down.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#64
There is no Plan B for the Jews. If this man preaches it, he is condemning Jews to hell for not believing, by telling them they do not need to believe in Jesus. That alone means the man has to be exposed!
the jaw-dropping irony is the foundation of the Israel-Firsters' theology.

i wonder if this tree is a good tree planted by Our Father?

"...[Dispensationalist] Darby who first insisted that: 'The Jewish nation is never to enter the Church'."

this is where they injected their rapture of the gentiles - gentiles go to heaven...jews live on earth - ETERNALLY.
i mean...can you believe this??

???????
but they say Covenant Theology, which says Jew & Gentile - no difference - is 'antisemitic':rolleyes:

.....

"Dispensationalism is one of the most influential theological systems within the universal church today. Largely unrecognised and subliminal, it has increasingly shaped the presuppositions of fundamentalist, evangelical, Pentecostal and charismatic thinking concerning Israel and Palestine over the past one hundred and fifty years.

John Nelson Darby is regarded as the father of dispensationalism and its prodigy, Christian Zionism. It was Cyrus. I. Scofield and D. L. Moody, however, who brought Darby’s sectarian theology into mainstream evangelical circles. R. C. Sproul concedes that dispensationalism is now ‘...a theological system that in all probability is the majority report among current American evangelicals.’[[1]]

Most of the early popular American radio preachers such as Donald Grey Barnhouse, Charles E. Fuller, and M. R. DeHaan were dispensationalists. Today, virtually all the 'televangelists' such as Jerry Falwell, Jim Bakker, Paul Crouch, Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggart and Billy Graham are also dispensationalists.

Other leading dispensationalist writers include Charles Ryrie, Dwight Pentecost, John Walvoord, Eric Sauer, Charles Dyer, Tim LaHaye, Grant Jeffrey and Hal Lindsey. Notable political proponents include Jimmie Carter and Ronald Reagan. Probably the most significant Christian organisations to espouse dispensationalism have been the Moody Bible Institute, Dallas Theological Seminary and the International Christian Embassy, Jerusalem...."

Christian Zionism: Dispensationalism And The Roots Of Sectarian Theology
A History of Dispensational Approaches
By Rev. Steven Sizer
 
M

Married_Richenbrachen

Guest
#65
You are not discerning anything,
Yes, we are. False gospel = false teacher. Search the scriptures and see.
Acts 17: 10 - 11And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming thither went into the synagogue of the Jews. These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

you are exposing or seeking to expose the sin of another to discredit them personally,
It's called obedience. Who do you propose we listen to - you, or God?
1 Tim 5: 19 - 20 Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses. Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.

their ministry that God gave to them and those who have been called and responded to the message that he preaches.
Which god?
Gal 1: 7 - 9Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#66
You are not discerning anything, you are exposing or seeking to expose the sin of another to discredit them personally, their ministry that God gave to them and those who have been called and responded to the message that he preaches.
His ministry is a gift from God?

Whatever sin there may be, it has been away and to say that he has not repented, who are you to make that claim when his sin is between him and God.
Whatever sin there may or may not be at the moment, he's still an antichrist and the one of fruits of that is unrepentant adultery. If he stops teaching then his sin isn't an issue.

Have you not learned anything from the scriptures? He's been ministering the gospel for 50 years and that speaks nothing to you.
I've already answered that.

What exactly has he been doing? -> Critics say John Hagee's compensation is too high

Matt 6:24No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

Luke 16:13No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
He does not deny Christ, the work of the cross or the grace and mercy of God.
Denying the work of the cross is exactly what John Hagee does! I've already answered that as well.

... Hagee believes that orthodox Jews can be saved without Jesus."
she will accuse me of being too much grace oriented.
That's Zone, because "grace oriented" is not the expression I would use--I see something darker BradC.

If you are really one of the righteous or one of the upright, then why have you sided with adulterous teachers twice in one week?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#67
Psalm 64:1-10 Hear my voice, O God, in my prayer: preserve my life from fear of the enemy.2 Hide me from the secret counsel of the wicked; from the insurrection of the workers of iniquity:
3 Who whet their tongue like a sword, and bend their bows to shoot their arrows, even bitter words:
4 That they may shoot in secret at the perfect: suddenly do they shoot at him, and fear not.
5 They encourage themselves in an evil matter: they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?
6 They search out iniquities; they accomplish a diligent search: both the inward thought of every one of them, and the heart, is deep.
7 But God shall shoot at them with an arrow; suddenly shall they be wounded.
8 So they shall make their own tongue to fall upon themselves: all that see them shall flee away.
9 And all men shall fear, and shall declare the work of God; for they shall wisely consider of his doing.
10 The righteous shall be glad in the Lord, and shall trust in him; and all the upright in heart shall glory.

David was an adulterer and a murderer but God put away his sin, do you read and listen to what he wrote? Shall not our sin be put away when we confess it before the Father? Didn't Jesus make that possible for all of us who have sinned? Perhaps you like searching out other people's sins and iniquities!

i don't need to look at Hagee's sins of the flesh.

it's his false doctrine and idolatry that apparently need to be continually brought to the light of day.
he's in error (and worse) in everything he teaches. a thoroughly false system that has nothing to do with what the bible says. leading millions into apostasy and inciting them to call for the murder of millions.

how is it you don't even mention this as SIN?
you brush right by it...or no, you actually call it good fruit!


1 Timothy 4
For the time will come when they will not tolerate sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, will multiply teachers for themselves because they have an itch to hear something new. - Holman

....

"There is no known writing existing, or referred to by other writers, of the pre-trib rapture teaching prior to 1830. None of the early Church fathers or anyone else throughout Church history wrote about the saints being raptured before the end-time Great Tribulation. This does not conclusively mean that the theory is false, only that it is a historical fact that this teaching did not exist among the early Christians or the Church fathers or any Christians throughout history until 1830.

Reportedly the origin of the pre-trib rapture teaching was with a fifteen-year-old girl named Margaret MacDonald in the town of Port Glasgow, Scotland. Supposedly in 1830 she had a dream or vision that Christians were raptured just prior to the Great Tribulation. In 1831 or 1832 a Presbyterian pastor in London, England named Edward Irving heard about this dream or vision that Miss MacDonald had and started teaching it to his congregation. These are well-known reports among scholars of eschatology.

These reports concerning the origin of the pre-trib rapture theory may or may not be true. What is well-documented is the fact that John Nelson Darby, the founder of a group known as the Plymouth Brethren, after visiting Miss MacDonald began teaching this new theory.

Later, by 1917, C. I. Scofield had published his improved edition of the Scofield Reference Bible which contained the dispensational pre-tribulation teachings of Darby and others. Soon many Bible Colleges such as Moody Bible Institute and seminaries such as Dallas Theological Seminary became staunch promoters of dispensational theology that included the doctrine of a pre-tribulation rapture.

In 1970 Hal Lindsey, who attended Dallas Theological Seminary, popularized this teaching with his book titled The Late Great Planet Earth. Several million copies have been sold and a movie by the same title was made.

The widespread acceptance of a doctrine does not make it true. What really matters is not whether some Bible colleges and seminaries teach the pre-tribulation rapture theory, or whether many pastors teach it, or whether many Christians accept it as true; what really matters is what does the Word of God say?"

- bethelministries
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#68
You are not discerning anything, you are exposing or seeking to expose the sin of another to discredit them personally, their ministry that God gave to them and those who have been called and responded to the message that he preaches.
responded to the message HE PREACHES?

this is a good thing WHY?

God doesn't ordain false teachers. but He will use them.

Whatever sin there may be, it has been away and to say that he has not repented, who are you to make that claim when his sin is between him and God.
"above reproach, the husband of one wife"

Have you not learned anything from the scriptures?
Titus 1
5This is why I left you in Crete, so that you might put what remained into order, and appoint elders in every town as I directed you— 6if anyone is above reproach, the husband of one wife,c and his children are believers and not open to the charge of debauchery or insubordination. 7For an overseer,d as God’s steward, must be above reproach. He must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or a drunkard or violent or greedy for gain, 8but hospitable, a lover of good, self-controlled, upright, holy, and disciplined. 9He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sounde doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it.

10For there are many who are insubordinate, empty talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision party. 11They must be silenced, since they are upsetting whole families by teaching for shameful gain what they ought not to teach. 12One of the Cretans,f a prophet of their own, said, “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.”g 13This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith, 14not devoting themselves to Jewish myths and the commands of people who turn away from the truth.

....

"The Kingdom, Jewish Fables, and Chiliasm

Titus 1:14
Not giving heed to JEWISH FABLES, and COMMANDMENTS of MEN, that turn from the TRUTH.

Jewish fables (literally, myths) are no new thing. Paul has plainly warned the household of faith not to give heed thereto. He has not given us a list of those grievous heresies; but it is well known that the one that was most fondly cherished, and that constituted the gravest menace to the truth of the gospel, was the notion that the leading purpose of the mission of the coming Messiah would be the reconstitution of the Jewish nation and its elevation to the highest pinnacle of earthly dominion and glory; for that fatuous doctrine was the cornerstone of orthodox Judaism in Paul’s day; and because of his sturdy opposition to it he was persecuted, his enemies plotted to take his life, and he was sent a prisoner to Rome. No wonder that, during the term of his imprisonment there, he wrote to Titus his plain-spoken warning against “Jewish fables.” (Philip Mauro)

Many Christians are not aware of the JEWISH MYTHS, FABLES, and DOCTRINES brought out of BABYLON and taught as DOCTRINE during CHRIST’S and the APOSTLES’ ministry. They both had to contend with these fables and the commandments of men. This is also true concerning JEWISH ESCHATOLOGY and their CONCEPT of the KINGDOM.

Titus would encounter Jewish teachings. Titus is replete with warnings concerning false doctrines which were Jewish in origin and nature. Paul explained, “for there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, especially they of the circumcision” (1: 10). The keeping of genealogies was unimportant because it mattered not if one was of Jewish descent (3: 1; cf. Gal. 3: 25-29). Justification is “by His grace” Paul emphasized to Titus (3: 7). “Jewish fables” were Jewish myths and teachings. The “commandments of men” were teachings which found their origin in men as opposed to God (see Matt. 15:9) .

CHILIASM is the belief in an EARTHLY 1000 year reign (I emphasize EARTHLY, because the phrase “1000 years” is found in the book of REVELATION, in which some interpret as symbolic of perfection and eternity) . Many christians are not aware that his teaching (CHILIASM) has been condemned as HERESY by many in the history of the church. Although we must not base our doctrine on whether it was condemned, but on the WORD OF GOD, We must remember that Jesus spoke of a KINGDOM WITHOUT OBSERVATION (LUKE 17:20)

Chiliasm is not unique with the Christian religion. Its roots can be found in most religions throughout the world. A key element which exists in most religions is that there will be a time when evil will be destroyed by the powers of good followed by a long period of peace. Historically, then, the word Chiliasm has taken on the added meaning of a time of universal peace.

According to Schaff, the belief of a period of a thousand years of peace from evil powers had its origin with the religion of Zoroastrianism. This religion began prior to the Babylonian captivity and was in vogue during the time of the captivity. Zoroastrians believe that they were the ones who first taught the concept of one all powerful god, and the coming of a redeemer to save the world from the evil powers that pervade upon the earth....

...Whether the Jews borrowed their materialistic conception in regard to the future kingdom from ancient Babylonian eschatology as is maintained by Dr. Bavinck, Hoekstra, and others, or whether Dr. Vos is correct in ascribing this Jewish view to their own carnal interpretation of Old Testament prophecy, is a question of minor importance for our present purpose. We believe with Dr. Vos that the charge of Babylonianism need not be laid against Chiliasm. It is not difficult for us to understand that Judaism with its external legalism and carnal expectation would come to such a materialistic conception of the Messianic reign. We do not believe that the Jews borrowed their views from heathen eschatology.

The later Jewish eschatology which was written during the time of the apostles and the early church is far more sensualistic than that which precedes. Baruch is especially typical of this sensualistic coloring. He speaks of the destruction of the enemies at Christ’s coming. After the evil forces are subdued there will follow a period of prosperity and great joy. It is said that a vine will then have a thousand branches, every branch a thousand clusters and every cluster a thousand grapes, etc. We also read, “In those days reapers will not have to exert themselves, and those that build will not have to toil, for of themselves all work will have progress together with those who labor thereon.”

The Jewish Talmud, which is of later origin, tells us that the promised Messiah will destroy the fourth world kingdom which is predicted by Daniel. Israel will be redeemed from the bondage and be gathered from the dispersion to their own land. The Messiah will raise the dead. Jerusalem and the temple will be rebuilt, law and ceremony restored and the kingdom of glory established. During this time the Gentiles shall live in servitude to Israel and the kings of the world will honor the Messiah with costly gifts and sacrifices. (William Masselink)" - John Eckhardt

He's been ministering the gospel for 50 years and that speaks nothing to you. He does not deny Christ, the work of the cross or the grace and mercy of God.
how many ways do you have to see this?

...

"....here is where Hagee walks off the cliff.

"That means very simply that there are Jewish people right now who have favor with God by the election of grace."

His definition of the favorable grace of God is far different that what Paul is describing. If you don’t believe me just look at what he says next.

"What is going to happen when Jesus comes back? Every Christian believes that Jesus Christ is the messiah. The Jewish people do not believe that. In that regard we have to agree to disagree. I say to my rabbi friends: "You don't believe it; I do believe it. When we're standing in Jerusalem, and the messiah is coming down the street, one of us is going to have a very major theological adjustment to make. But until that time, let's walk together in support of Israel and in defense of the Jewish people, because Israel needs our help."

This is a truly astounding statement from someone claiming to be an evangelical. To say that I believe in Jesus and you don’t so we’ll just agree to disagree is an absolute abrogation of Jesus command to go into all the world and preach the gospel unto every creature. Hagee is proposing that the election of grace spoken of by Paul is separate from the covenant of grace established by the death, burial, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. This, my friends is blatant heresy."

Hagee dual covenant < click


I don't care what Zone has to say, she is not thinking right on this stuff and does not know some very simple doctrine that we are to practice as believers. I could give you at least (6) different doctrines that she violates all the time and she will accuse me of being too much grace oriented. She can live with her legalistic tendencies about being critical of others but she is not fooling those who know and have sound doctrine. It is not good to be puffed up with knowledge because there will never be any good fruit to come out of it and you can mark that down.
sound doctrine?
 

jandian

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2011
772
11
18
#69
WE are living in times when many shall fall into apostasy (I Tim 4:1). Discernment is a must. We should be always alert and ready to jump off any bandwagon that doesn't represent God's word as intended.
There seems to be a problem with Hagee's message and subsequent justification because ... Whether they had a good excuse not to receive Jesus or not is irrelevant, there end will be the same if they don't. Jesus is revealed by the Spirit not by common sense (Matt 16:17); where words and misunderstandings fail the Spirit establishes.