Let me begin to answer your question with Acts 2.
In Acts 2, about 3000 people were baptized.
How ?
v41 gives us the answer:
Acts 2:41Then they that gladly received his word were baptized : and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.
baptising does not only mean water, we will never get past this if you keep thinking of water.
there are 5 ways of baptism in the bible.
Water baptism is John's baptism...lol
38Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
This means that they BELIEVED.
Now it is nowhere written that they repented. However, in v37 they were cut to the heart (or pricked in their heart), meaning that they were convicted by the message. So it is obvious that they repented.
baptised in the name means immersed in the name, it is not water
the process of baptism is through repenting!
What does Acts 3:19 says!?
when you believe, you believe the Gospel and you pray and repent. That is how to be baptised spiritually.
They were obviously baptized (baptizo), as they had received the message of Peter with gladness.
How was it possible to baptize so many people?
The Bible never reveals this.
We can only safely ASSUME (yes, you heard it right).
yes but baptizo is not water immersion.
how is it possible? by praying and repenting, that is how one is baptised.
Case I: There were 120 believers in the upper room. If each of the 120 disciples baptized just 25 disciples, that would make 3000 baptisms. (120x25=3000).
Case II: Nowhere in the Bible is there any qualification for the baptizer. Therefore a baptized believer can become the baptizer and baptize another person who has just come to believe in Jesus and has repented.
once again baptised isn't water immersion. You need to stop thinking about water when baptised is mention
So, Who can baptize ?
The person who teaches can baptize (Acts 8: 35-39)
A baptized believer can baptize. Jesus and Paul did not lay any emphasis on who baptized. Jesus' disciples were the ones who baptized. Paul did the teaching, but did not baptize. He did not even mention who baptized.
you mean Paul or peter?
if it's Paul, yes he baptised INTO name Acts 19 and 1 Corins 1
If you meant Peter, Peter and John were the ones baptising half the time through out Acts.
The Bible does not tell us everything. However, it tells us what is important i.e. belief+repentance+water baptism
water baptism is of John. Bible says we are to be baptised with Jesus baptism
Mat 28: 18-20 tells us to:
1) Make disciples (=believers=followers)
2) Baptize them
3) Teach them
A believer is a follower of Christ but not a student/disciple/Christian. You make disciples on unbelievers.
you do know that baptising is the same as teaching them right? you wash people through the word not water.
Keeping with the pattern of Acts, they must have been baptized.
The scriptures do not tell us everything.
If at all they were baptized, they were baptized as believers.
So they knew about Jesus and his commands.
They had also shown great faith despite their preachers being arrested.
Therefore in my opinion they were eligible for baptism.
how did you get this?
Acts 4:4 says only MEN grew in numbers to 5k as believers
About Jesus baptizing us with the Holy Spirit, I welcome it, but that's up to Jesus.
So I must do my part and let Jesus do his.
Bible says there is only 1 baptism. 1 spirit, 1 father, 1 church, 1 body.
so this should mean you either baptise them or Jesus baptise them.
But didn't the bible say we should baptise people? this is why we pass on the gift to people through baptism.
Simon wanted the apostolic ability to pass on the Holy Spirit by laying of hands. True, that his motives were wrong; but Peter did not have to power to give this ability to anyone. Peter received this ability at Pentecost as a result of the promise of Jesus. This ability can be bestowed only by Jesus.
i don't get what you mean
Peter could pass on the gifts of the Holy Spirit. Paul could also pass on the gifts of the Holy Spirit (Acts 19:6-7, 2 Tim 1:6)
No one could pass on the ability-to-pass-on-the-Holy-Spirit (or the ability to pass on the gifts of the Holy Spirit) that Jesus gave the the apostles. Simon the sorcerer wanted this ability, but this ability has to be given from on high.
why can't we pass on the gift of the holy spirit?
didn't Jesus personally gave the keys to Peter so how did Paul also have the keys? Paul was Saul who killed Christians. If Paul could do it we can.
And Peter can give the HS to anyone he wishes even to Simon but he had money motive.
The keys to the kingdom of heaven (Mt 16:19) are something different.
These keys open up the doors of heaven for anyone.
Heaven is equated with Salvation
So the Keys to the kingdom of heaven=keys to salvation(to be saved)
The keys to salvation are revealed by none other than Peter in Acts 2:38.
The keys are belief+repentance+baptism
i will look at this another time and at another discussion
CORRECTION: If each of the 120 disciples baptized just 25 WILLING BELIEVERS, that would make 3000 baptisms.
once again assumption. Bible says it was the Disciples that were baptising NOT believers.
Even John the Baptise had his own disciples that were baptising.
you need to be a disciple to baptise, people were just believers.
Disciples are also called Christians.