Scripture only?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 5, 2012
885
5
0
#81
ok then. you could say we are BORN a child of adam then would you not? that it was not because of anything we did. but because of our parents in which we are born in adam. And it is because of one act of our human father Adam

Then would not being in Christ be the same way. Not an act of ourself. but one act of adoption by God into his family (new birth) by or through the one act of his son Christ?
Not quite understanding the question here, as you seem to write similar words to what I answered. Can you be more specific please!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#82
Not quite understanding the question here, as you seem to write similar words to what I answered. Can you be more specific please!

the gospel tells us how we are born into the family of God.

I am asking if you think the birth into Gods family should be any different than birth into adams family?
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#83
How can the gospel be a tradition? this makes no sense.. There is but one gospel. According to paul. any change in it would make it a different gospel. thus no gospel at all.
There are many writings called 'gospels'. Paul talks about fake apostles with other gospels, as you say. We use these four because we believe they are inspired. Believing that these four are the ones we should use, is a tradition for all Christians.

It's all in how you use the word. You use "Gospel" to mean the true good news of Jesus Christ. Some people use it to mean any book called a gospel. What we were trying to do is realize there are different ways to use the word. Geometar has some traditions he believes are of God; other people think he is wrong. I'm trying to find a way we can agree on how to tell what is right or wrong tradition, so we can all find out if Geometar is right.

It's not exactly true that "any" change would make is a different Gospel. What if I just took the Gospel of Luke, for instance, and left out the list of Jesus' ancestors? That would be a change, but it would hardly make the rest of Luke wrong. Mark and John don't list any ancestors, and Matthew has different ones. See, the problem is how far can you change something before it becomes a "different gospel".
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#84
There are many writings called 'gospels'. Paul talks about fake apostles with other gospels, as you say. We use these four because we believe they are inspired. Believing that these four are the ones we should use, is a tradition for all Christians.

It's all in how you use the word. You use "Gospel" to mean the true good news of Jesus Christ. Some people use it to mean any book called a gospel. What we were trying to do is realize there are different ways to use the word. Geometar has some traditions he believes are of God; other people think he is wrong. I'm trying to find a way we can agree on how to tell what is right or wrong tradition, so we can all find out if Geometar is right.

It's not exactly true that "any" change would make is a different Gospel. What if I just took the Gospel of Luke, for instance, and left out the list of Jesus' ancestors? That would be a change, but it would hardly make the rest of Luke wrong. Mark and John don't list any ancestors, and Matthew has different ones. See, the problem is how far can you change something before it becomes a "different gospel".
I see where the difference is.

When paul said there is no other gospel. and if anyone teach a gospel which is different let him be accursed. he was not speaking of the four gospels. he was speaking of the gospel I am speaking off. the means to salvation.

I think the 4 books mentioned are gospel in name only because they give us an eyewitness acount of why the gospel (means to eternal life) are valid and how it was paid for.
 
Nov 22, 2012
626
2
0
#85
There are many writings called 'gospels'. Paul talks about fake apostles with other gospels, as you say. We use these four because we believe they are inspired. Believing that these four are the ones we should use, is a tradition for all Christians.

It's all in how you use the word. You use "Gospel" to mean the true good news of Jesus Christ. Some people use it to mean any book called a gospel. What we were trying to do is realize there are different ways to use the word. Geometar has some traditions he believes are of God; other people think he is wrong. I'm trying to find a way we can agree on how to tell what is right or wrong tradition, so we can all find out if Geometar is right.
I dont understand why some "Christians" have fear from word "Tradition"?It really looks like a primal fear.Tradition will provide u to use the same service or same interpretations of Bible as our ancestors done that before 500-1000 or 2000years.How we could be the same Church if we all would use our own different interpretations of Bible or Church service.
Orthodox interpretations of Bible are pastiric ones,written before 1500years or older.In fact,everything that is in use at Orthodox Church is from the 1st 8centuries of Church.Cannons of the Church are same and unchanged from that time.Those cannons were written to establish win over heresy and to gather all people under 1 Church.
Now,if someone scare's of them,who is he then?I understand that peoples have no idea what happened at Early Church and at 2000years of her history.Many just know history old 500years.
 
Dec 5, 2012
885
5
0
#86
Men traditions (are they wrong? I do not think they are wrong I just want to point out traditions.)

Lords Prayer Doxology is not in the original scriptures
"For the kingdom, the power, and the glory are yours, now and for ever"

The Sinner's prayer not in scripture is it.

Infant dedications (in leu of infant baptism)

Tithing should not be given under compulsion or coercion

Not praying the Lords prayer (this where the same words Jesus used to teach us to pray)

Bow heads and close eyes to pray

Refusing to kneel (At the name of Jesus every knee shall bow)
 
Dec 5, 2012
885
5
0
#87
I also forgot

Rapture is not in the bible, it is a man made word to explain some scriptures
 

Jon4TheCross

Senior Member
Oct 19, 2012
1,864
7
38
#88
Dearest Lord Father Almighty please bring peace to this forum and let us reason together as we discus Your Word. Help us get closer together as we talk to one another about the Good News of Your love. For this I pray, Amen.

Please do not copy/paste a whole website, if that is what you would like post a link.


Hello all, I do not understand how we are to believe in scripture only if the bible never says that. The bible says clearly to listen to the Word of God. Some people have explained to me that the bible is inspired by God thus making it his word.

This reasoning opened me more questions than answers. God never said behold I will send you a book. God sent His Son, and Jesus never wrote a book. Christians began to divide by multitudes once the bible made it to the printing press. And if that was not all, every person that reads the bible has a different take on the scripture. I am sure God wants us to love one another not fight one another.

Other questions raised are how did people get saved in the past if the bible was not around until close to the 400AC, and it was not mass produced until recent in history. That would make for a great multitude of people who did not read the bible, and still today many people can not read. How are they to be saved?
I agree that the Bible is simply a small portion of The Word of God.
Rev 19:11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
Rev 19:12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.
Rev 19:13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.

I believe the Bible is like a mustard seeds worth of the Word of God, and many simply do not want to hear or understand what it says. It's about hearing the voice of God. Thanks for the post.

Joh_10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.
Joh_10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:

If a person knows that something is The Word of God, then it's known, and it is. If a person believes that something is The Word of God, then they may be wrong, but if they truly believe it is and live according to it, then God will help them if they're truly wanting to die.

Col_2:20 Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,
Col_3:3 For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
#89
So that just makes me reword my question. How do we know which traditions are God's? More specifically to the point of this specific thread, how do the people who claim the traditions of Geometar's church are not God's traditions, know that to be correct?
Do you reject post #49???

It seems I have already answered you.

We know God's tradition doesn't go against His own Word. His Tradition and His Word are One...
 
Dec 5, 2012
885
5
0
#90
Do you reject post #49???

It seems I have already answered you.

We know God's tradition doesn't go against His own Word. His Tradition and His Word are One...
I agree with this to some extent. Some people refuse to see how a tradition may not be spelled out for their understanding so they refuse to accept them. We must discern this traditions, but we can not discern all the traditions in one day or week. This does not allow the person to receive the power of God over men, and sometimes blinds them in a way that they never see the truth.

I do not claim I have the truth, I am always searching and discerning. Thats why we are here aren't we?
 
Nov 22, 2012
626
2
0
#91
Do you reject post #49???

It seems I have already answered you.

We know God's tradition doesn't go against His own Word. His Tradition and His Word are One...
Like an answer i must ask a question.
If Protestants use this,why that "Spirit" do not speak to all of u the same things,but contradict?Why there r thousands different Churches and preachers and some prophets?

On the other side,u have 1(ONE) Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church,same and unchanged 2000years.There were millions of Monks for that time who read Bible,do their prayers and seek for wisdom.No one of them didnt made his own moverment(Church) and if he try that,that was start of heresy.No one wasnt killed for that,but called to repent.Because of some that were called Ecumenical Councils and holy fathers from all over the world came to take their participación in them.All Church rulles were established on them,at 1st 8centuries of the Church.

Orthodox Church still use the same rulles,same service,same prayers and same tradition as were used at that time.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#92
Do you reject post #49???

It seems I have already answered you.

We know God's tradition doesn't go against His own Word. His Tradition and His Word are One...
Here is the answer from post #49:
Reading the bible and praying to the Lord. Asking for Wisdom, Knowledge and Discernment...

I do not reject it, but it is a circular argument for those who agree with the new definition, as these are traditions proper to only some parts of Christianity. In some parts of Christianity, the statements of the Bible, and the definitions and results of wisdom and discernment are instead left to certain early writers. That is not the same tradition of how to answer these questions. As it stands now, we have a standoff. Some of us are advocating post 49, as you. Others are advocating the tradition of learning from these early writers. Each says they get affirmation for what they believe when they pray. I am hoping we can go further back, and determine how much truth there is to either position.

In regard to the statement in this post, both groups of Christianity feel that their respective tradition is in agreement with the Word of God, as they read it differently, having been taught to do so by different writers.
 
Nov 22, 2012
626
2
0
#93
Let we try this.
Post here in which questions Bible and Sacred Traditions are different?
 
K

Kefa52

Guest
#94
WHAT!!....[GOD does not need the bible to reveal truth to us ! But when He does it ccmfirmed in the bible ! Listen salvation is by faith and what JESUS did for Us !]


God reviels himself to us three ways:


Through his order in creation.
His Truth/Word...the bible
Through the holy Spirit.


We are to test the word with the Spirit, and text the Spirit with the word.


Even Satan can quote scripture, and he is better at it than we are.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#95
I also forgot

Rapture is not in the bible, it is a man made word to explain some scriptures
being an orthodox and I am sure knowing latin. i am suprised you would say this.

Rapture comes from the latin word meaning to be caught up,
to Carry away, or to sieze,



1 Thessalonians 4:17
Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up (rapture) together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord.

whether you believe it happens pre-trib, mid trib, post trib, or post millennial, you have to believe in a rapture. because God said he will come back for his people and rapture, or catch them up in the sky, to be with him forever.

you people also use a man made word. ever heard the word trinity? it has less proof that rapture does, because it is actually in the bible.. yet we both believe its doctrine is true.

Guess those inspirations for the men of your church are not perfect after all are they??
 
Nov 22, 2012
626
2
0
#96
being an orthodox and I am sure knowing latin. i am suprised you would say this.

Rapture comes from the latin word meaning to be caught up,[/B][/COLOR] to Carry away, or to sieze,



1 Thessalonians 4:17
Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up (rapture) together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord.

whether you believe it happens pre-trib, mid trib, post trib, or post millennial, you have to believe in a rapture. because God said he will come back for his people and rapture, or catch them up in the sky, to be with him forever.

you people also use a man made word. ever heard the word trinity? it has less proof that rapture does, because it is actually in the bible.. yet we both believe its doctrine is true.

Guess those inspirations for the men of your church are not perfect after all are they??
What u mean with Orthodox.I do not understand your post.
 
Feb 17, 2010
3,620
27
0
#97
Rock022, My wife always asks me why is it all read the same Bible but all do not agree! There are more than 2020 variations of churches. Dinominations they call it. And what did God say.... There should be ONENESS.
In the CHURCH OF CHRIST there is not even two minds, or two spirits, or two interpretations.... In the Church of Christ God gives us the guarentee that there is ONE ONE ONE ONE.. Eph 4:4 There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; Eph 4:5 One Lord, one faith, one baptism, Eph 4:6 One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
I have found right here on CC that there is not even ONE HOPE OF OUR CALLING here! SAD, but fortunately God warned us about this..... MANY WILL FOLLOW FALSE TEACHERS.... Not the elect, for they shall KNOW THE TRUTH, and the TRUTH SHALL MAKE THEM FREE.

My friend I always advize people to KNOW the WORD OF GOD well, it is HIS TRUTH (John 17:17) and the Truth shall make you free from all these false teachings and doctrines of devils! Do you know how many people called seducing evil spirits the Holy Spirit? PLENTY! and that is how succesful those seducing spirits are with false doctrins (teachings). Good luck discerning which is which. The Truth of God shows them out clearly!

Twisting and turning God's Word to suit there sinful ways. Saying things so against scripture that they do not realize how they will pay for that one day. I pity those that does not get the Word REVEALED, but have to interpret it.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#98
What u mean with Orthodox.I do not understand your post.
do not orthodox and catholic people slant heavily in latin? or is orthodox different than catholics on this?

Most catholics I know know alot of latin.. And even many of the orthodox people I have spoken to know latin at least a little.

do you have any response to the rest of the post?
 
Nov 22, 2012
626
2
0
#99
do not orthodox and catholic people slant heavily in latin? or is orthodox different than catholics on this?

Most catholics I know know alot of latin.. And even many of the orthodox people I have spoken to know latin at least a little.

do you have any response to the rest of the post?
I have no idea of latin language.Aslo latin language isn't in use at Orthodox Church.All Churches use their own language at service.For sure Orthodox do quotes from latin Church fathers of the early Church,but just titles not whole sentences of the document.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I have no idea of latin language.Aslo latin language isn't in use at Orthodox Church.All Churches use their own language at service.For sure Orthodox do quotes from latin Church fathers of the early Church,but just titles not whole sentences of the document.
ok that is different. forgive me for assuming something.

again, do you have a response to the rest of what I said. which was the IMPORTANT part of my post?